The Flat Earth, Limited Hangout Psyop - Cui Bono?

Last year a trusted and respected blog I follow started to write about a subject that was so wild they wouldn't address it directly but just started to introduce topics and ask strange questions.

When I realised it was a Flat Earth claim I couldn't believe that somebody so smart could be making such an outlandish claim.

However by nature I am addicted to truth and that means reading a lot of lies, mountains of bullshit and cesspit's of disinformation, so I commenced studying the subject.

After 30 hours or so of learning, I concluded that there was indeed something there on many of the topics raised but the central premise did not stand up for me (naturally I could be wrong).

What made me decide to terminate my research was that I could see there were obvious psyop personalities in the movement, clear use of professional video production and lot's of budget and time invested. 

I concluded it was in the favour of outfits like NASA or GCHQ to have people running around prozelytizing a geocentric universe as it would discredit many other subjects in the eyes of the spoon fed masses.

Most of all, I found the zealous extremism of 'believers' distasteful and their inability to tackle subjects that cost human lives every day a great moral failure.

Nobody has died from living on a tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron or spherical planet Earth. Anybody who has invested time studying the holographic universe would find the subject somewhat comedic given the illusory nature of much that is called solid reality.

However I dipped back into the subject this morning and I see the proponents have begun to realise my early assessment is in fact a reality though they still cling to the central tenet and that's alright by me. However I was impressed by a couple of the people in this Google hangout, and will make an effort to keep up with their work as I like their intelligence and level of sophistication on this complex subject which has now outstripped my early study by the six months I have ignored the subject.

I have much work to do on Terra Firma matters I feel can be resolved so that's where my focus is but I keep an open ear and a receptive mind to new information no matter how challenging.

One thing I am no longer wedded to is the heliocentric model though I'm surprised so few have applied the helical model to the subject.

In the mean time it's back to the grindstone of pragmatic activism and the really hard truth telling that scares the hell out of power such as The Number Six.

NASA Cover Up | Life on Mars

A totally heavyweight NASA scientist explains what many of us already know. Never A Straight Answer NASA are destroying evidence of life on Mars.

Jay Weidner on Kubrick Apollo Alchemy Aliens & Toroids

Not Jay Weidner's greatest interview, but I post it because I keep tabs on how the narrative is or has evolved. 

If I was interviewing Jay, I'd be asking him from time to time, 'how do you know that' or 'why did you come to that conclusion'. I'd do the same to a lot of people who make many claims but don't seem to have reconciled their own 2012 interpretations with the present.

Or at least it's not discussed even with hindsight.

I really think there's a hard talk style of interview needed in the esoteric circles. Not for the sake of confrontation but because it's OK to have unprovable claims but it's interesting to see the thinking or experiences behind them.

Otherwise it's just I've got a toroid in my pocket and it's pleased to see you before it folds back in on itself.

Breakaway Civilisation Analysis - Most UFO's Are Ours, Not Theirs

It's been a long time since I originally covered the breakaway civilisation topic but recent interviews have reignited my belief that post war technology was taken by a breakaway group and is many decades ahead of the traditional military technology we see discussed.

It may also explain why Obama shelved some NASA budgets on Mickey Mouse projects to pursue the ongoing myth that we can go back to the moon.

There's a lot of excellent information in this interview with Joseph Farrell who is usually a lot more guarded about the content of his books. This is an interview to take notes if you like to research things later.

Gravity

The extended trailer for the forthcoming movie Gravity is worth a look. It's like 2001 Space Odyssey with exploding Hollywood popcorn. There's something deeply mysterious about space. Well to me there is.

The Helical Model - Our Galaxy is a Vortex

Academia Openly Lecturing On Apollo Moon Landing/Stanley Kubrick's Use Of Front Screen Projection

The crucial point here is to understand that NASA did go to the moon but they sure as hell didn't show us the real films (which are now conveniently lost) and instead used Kubrick to do "backup film" of the landing from a studio in London. 

It is here that Kubrick developed and perfect the art of front screen projection.

Once you watch the explanatory video which is a film class on front screen projection (all three parts) you'll never look at Apollo footage and miss the tell tale line where a screen is used to project the background. 

You have a choice in life. You can either believe your tell-lie-vision programming or spend a few hours researching it and have your own mind made up by your own mind. 

Some people aren't used to it.

Did NASA Just Admit The Van Allen Belts Are Lethal?

Mr Van Allen discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts declared they were deadly. However since the Apollo missions that line has been retracted and NASA say it's safe for humans. I'm not too bothered either way, as my beef with the Apollo missions is the photography which uses a Hollywood technique of front screen projection. You might not be able to see the line between the stage and the backdrop below but once you do, you can't ignore them in any Apollo mission photography so here's a classic one for you. Once the brain groks the line you can't miss them ever again.

More importantly here is NASA describing the Van Allen belts as deadly. The original post is from here.

They were the subject of perhaps the first scientific discovery of the Space Age, and yet we still don't know much about them. The radiation belts that surround Earth are home to killer electrons, plasma waves, and intense electrical currents that can disrupt and destroy the electronics on satellites. But the behavior of the Van Allen Belts—named for James Van Allen, who led the team that discovered them in 1958—is wildly unpredictable.

This artist's conception shows the radiation belts (green), which are two doughnut-shaped (torus) regions full of high-energy particles that fill the near-space around Earth. The blue and red lines between and around the belts depict the north and south polarity of the planet’s magnetic field. The inner belt, a blend of protons and electrons, can reach down as low as 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) in altitude. The outer belt, comprised mainly of energetic electrons, can swell to as much as 60,000 kilometers (37,000 miles) above Earth’s surface. Both rings extend to roughly 65 degrees north and south latitude.

The radiation belts were discovered during the flight of the very first American satellite. Van Allen and colleagues had installed a Geiger-Müller tube on Explorer 1 to detect cosmic rays, and as the satellite made its eccentric orbit around the Earth, the readings periodically went off the top of the counter’s scale. It happened again during the flight of Explorer 3 several months later. Several followup missions proved that the space around Earth was not empty, but instead enriched with electrons, protons, and energy created by interactions between Earth's magnetic field (or magnetosphere), the solar wind, and (occasionally) cosmic rays arriving from beyond the solar system.

Fifty-four years later, NASA has embarked on a missions designed specifically to understand the space weather in the dynamic and erratic Van Allen Belts. At 4:05 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August 30, 2012, the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) were launched into orbit on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket that lifted off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. (Watch video of the launch here.) The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) built and will operate the twin RBSP spacecraft for NASA’s Living With a Star program.

The identical twin spacecraft will fly in separate orbits across the inner and outer Van Allen radiation belts. The mission is starting near the height of the Sun’s 11-year cycle, or solar maximum. Activity on the sun influences the behavior of the radiation belts, though scientists are puzzled by that behavior. Sometimes a solar storm can swell the belts with particles and energy, creating havoc for Earth-orbiting satellites by accelerating electrons (aka, “killer electrons”) and creating electrical currents. Other times, the radiation belts grow very calm and depleted during Sun storms. Occasionally, no change is detected at all.

The RBSP satellites are designed to observe how and when killer electrons are energized, to sample the electrical and magnetic fields in Earth’s space, to count particles, and detect plasma waves of different frequencies. The ultimate goal is to improve the prediction of space weather; that is, how solar activity can cause geomagnetic storms that upset telecommunications and electronics.

1. Further Reading

2. Carlowicz, M., and Lopez, R. (2002) Storms from the Sun: The Emerging Science of Space Weather. The Joseph Henry Press. Accessed August 30, 2012.
3. Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (n.d.) Radiation Belt Storm Probes Accessed August 30, 2012.
4. NASA (2012, July 18) The Electric Atmosphere: Plasma Is Next NASA Science Target. Accessed August 30, 2012.
5. NASA (n.d.) RBSP News. Accessed August 30, 2012.
6. Science@NASA (2012) ScienceCasts: The Radiation Belt Storm Probes. Accessed August 30, 2012.

Image by T. Benesch and J. Carns for the NASA Science Mission Directorate. Caption by Mike Carlowicz.

Update: I've since come across the radiation level science and I'm open to further investigation.

Stanley Kubrick & NASA's Excellent Adventure

Well worth watching to see a string of scientific luminaries talk about how close Kubrick's work looked in comparison to the actual moon landings. 

Really Copernicus?

NASA Caught Manipulating Apollo Images By Forensic Image Software

Forty years ago when NASA instructed their visual department to use double sided sticky tape, cropped masking and paint brushes to conceal the good stuff on the moon they don't want us to see but need us to pay for they didn't know some Dutch guy would be using state of the art forensic image software to show how blatant they censor reality. What is on the moon that is so mind blowing we can't be shown? Ancient architecture? Ancient Aliens? Who knows but it doesn't get more damning than this.

Nazis, NASA, Operation Paperclip & The CIA

By all accounts Werner Von Braun was an excellent boss to work for at NASA where he designed Saturn rockets after building the V2 rockets that bombed London. However as you will learn from this documentary he must have known they hung five people a day at the entrance to his work to prevent prisoners sabotaging the development of rockets.

That Wired Article About Obama On Mars? (CHANGE Vs Chang'e 2)

The architectural, parapolitical and mythological evidence that Mars once supported ancient civilizations, is not an issue I reject as either nonsensical or absurd. Logically capitalism says that the most powerful get the best technology and so the number of people who insist that there's a base on Mars, is to my mind worth keeping a sceptical but open mind on. The latest interview by a researcher I trust, didn't work for me as it was too difficult to sift through the discontinuities that come with 'Intelligence' administered MKULTRA or mind control.

When NASA warned everyone off the moon recently with a no fly zone, I thought that added fuel to the fire a real story is being concealed, and so even though I enjoyed the recent video by the Chinese satellite Chang'e 2, I enjoyed the potential irony of Obama's hollow election platform of CHANGE versus the Chinese Space lunar probe, Chang'e 2 manifesting itself through space-photography-leaks, if the video (see above) hasn't been faked.

However, I bashed out a comment on the subject in  a Wired article, that I want to paste here because Lloyd's post is triggering my synchronicity antenna. I think it has a few details that people should consider before rejecting the Wired article just because it seems fantastic. I've no idea if the Obama angle is true but my first sentence from this post still stands. 

Here's the comment.

Basiago may or may not be telling the truth. What is notable from a traditional, dumbed down journalism perspective (i.e journalism that doesn't pick up the phone and talk to the man like this Wired article) is that Basiago is a Washington State lawyer with five degrees including a Masters in Philosophy from Cambridge. His concrete links to an intelligence background through his father, along with his claims, are not the actions of a white-bread legal career in the United States. 

Couple this with his inability to say anything of interest philosophically and the question to be asked 'Is Basiago COINTELPRO?' His association with Laura Eisenhower granddaughter of 'Military Industrial Complex - Four Star General/President' Eisenhower is a thread also worth doing some active journalism on, instead of cut and paste hackery.

We should also bear in mind that the US government has gone out of it's way over nearly a decade now to extradite Gary McKinnon who unveiled that Project Genesis is a Mars Project, with non-terrestrial officers, collaborating on the project through bases on Mars. 

If he's just a conspiracy theory nut, why is the Pentagon so insistent it wants to prosecute a theory?

My guess is that Basiago (Who admits to memory gaps and is thus likely an MKULTRA victim) has a story with typical intelligence qualities. Thus, some of his story might be the truth and the disinformation is also seeded there too. Don't expect this story to go away either. Clif High's semantic search Webbots have indicated for some time that Basiago will be integral to a time travel story this year - That isn't proof it's supporting circumstantial evidence and worth factoring in.

None of this is science but then science doesn't like to stand up and take the hit for the body counts it produces in Afghanistan through its unconscionable joystick/drone warfare. 

Science can't have it both ways on on integrity.

Basiago also had a memorable spat with Major Ed Dames recently on a nationwide radio talk show call-in. Ed Dames provided remote viewing services to the US military - that's non local quantum methodology for the armchair debunkers out there. To me, this spat adumbrated the well discussed falling out on the fringes of the net between the CIA and the Pentagon. Look at Petraeus' move to Langley for support of this claim. One that some may see as wild but has subsequently manifested more concretely.

Keep an eye on Basiago. 

The challenge is what is the truth? 

That takes journalism not pseudo sceptic blabber.

Pope's Homosexuality, Nazi Past & Protection of Paedophile Priests Not Always Appreciated

I've no idea if the Pope is still denying the Nazi Holocaust despite his spell with the Nazi youth. I do believe the timing of his call to the Space Shuttle at 11.11 is worth making a note of. I also believe the gossip in high society Rome that he has a homosexual lover but not because Andrew Sullivan says so. I believe it because Italian Prince and former high level freemason Leo Zagami loves to spill dirt like that to curry favour with the groups that his kind have been fleecing, raping and killing for centuries. Time will tell if all goes according to plan.

I care not if the Pope is homosexual. Keeping an eye on the ball is what matters here. The Vatican and Buckingham Palace are richer than Croesus. They are nothing more than incorporated businesses deceiving the sheep under the guise of shepherding the tender young flock. 

Ratzinger's hand in suppressing the information of peadophile priests as a cardinal is unconscionable but then most of my peers are still waving flags at Royal weddings despite the video testimony of ritual child satanic sex abuse at Balmoral, and a plea from Princess Diana that the family 'are not human' before dying in a car crash that she foretold was being planned for her.

There was one moment in the space video where I saw the possibility of an astronaut possibly using gestured language to Ratzinger that gave me heart, but the evidence is slim so it's too early to tell. Instead, like DABOO7 yesterday, I'm keeping an eye on NASA's X37B secret mission craft as it flys through space across a suspicious series of earthquakes in real time. We've had specific and  authoritive warnings at the highest levels, over and over and over again, about the weaponisation of space. It's the equivalent of gunpowder being invented and the sheeples are distracted as to what the stakes are.

There's a fairy tale nightmare going on and it will be all over before shearing time unveils the full extent extent of deception. It's one extreme to the other with humans. From either mindless flag waving to overdue uprisings, or pathetic Indifference to vengeful indignation. By the time the outrage arrives this time it will be too too late again, and so the counter-intuitive task in hand will be to step in as voices of reason against the perpetrators. Two wrongs don't make a right, and as Einstein taught us - a problem can't be solved at the level of conciousness that created it.

Dark Side of the Moon

I wont go into the connections between Saturn and the Moon here though I'm pleased that David Icke has, in this interview above, begun to draw attention to the frequency matrix triangulated between all three celestial bodies (including Earth). Since I've been researching the occult (hidden issues) I've come to the conclusion that some of the most talented people in the artistic world have intuitively tapped into moon themse. I think Pink Floyd  suspected the moon isn't a naturally orbiting body, and I also suspect that David Bowie knows full well that Phobos is artificial and that Mars seemingly has ancient ruins on it just like our Moon.

Unlike most of the research I have done lately, I can say with a clear conscience that the moons artificiality or rather it's intelligent positioning and size is mostly a gut instinct thing because I've been staring at it for decades with a curious feeling of wonder and mystery inside. That mysterious feeling condensed into an important question when I learned its anomalies that are too hard to ignore.

The moon is a perfect sphere. You can see it for yourself. No other celestial body is as geometrically perfectly formed. Our planet, like all planets, bulges at the middle but there's a Swiss watch precision to the geometry of the moon that is both beautiful and slightly menacing. But that's my gut reaction. Here's why you might want to let go of old information in pursuit of truth. The moons size is unprecedented. It's actually too big to explain but do your own research and try and fine anything in the universe like it. You wont. Some scientists prefer to call it a twin planetary system.

Harvard Astrophysicist Irwin Shapiro had an interesting quote. He said that trying to explain the moon's presence is harder than explaining it's absence. Or rather "the best explanation was observational error — the Moon does not exist". That's the sort of scientific thinking I applaud. The one that says we don't know instead of some stupid 'whack' theory where the moon is meant to be a chip off the old block. Well I know a lot of you like your Hollywood served up preprogrammed so here you go.

Like two peas in a pod. The resemblance is uncanny, what with them being both spherical.

For some reason NASA is fixated on bombing the moon since it mysteriously gave up landing on it, and the results are it rings out like a gong. 


As if it is hollow. 


That hollowness would explain why it can orbit the earth without it's gravitational effect creating the kind of tidal waves that would be a bit deeper than a few feet. You can use your common sense when thinking about that using the picture above.

NASA scientist Gordon MacDonald believes the only explanation for the moon's density is that it must be hollow. The moons positioning is extraordinarily precise in so much that it's solar eclipse effect is perfectly positioned to within an inch (or two) to give us a perfect match against the sun yet not too much to block out a coronal effect.

Carl Sagan says that a natural satellite cannot be hollow. Furthermore Alan Butler author of Who Built The Moon interviewed Ken Johnston Manager of NASA data and photography was informed of anomalies about the moon that just don't make sense.

You might find Sergeant Karl Wolf of Langley Virgina's Airforce Base (CIA) testimony about structures, bases, towers and domes on the moon interesting too.

The airbrush team at NASA are very busy when it comes to the moon and so we're left wondering why so much is concealed from us. David Icke says that the moon has masking vibrational frequencies that would enable us to see more of the world and with respect to that kind of thinking, which isn't scientifically impossible; maybe his ideas on John Lash's Archons is worth revisiting. 


Good luck with that, it's a road littered with weeping uncontrollables who just want their old reality back. I'm still looking for one that makes sense with the current input data. 


Then I can relax. 


Till then nothing is counted out unless proven otherwise. You may also want to read up on Richard Hoagland's work on the subject of structures on the Moon and Mars. His output is too robust for the professional debunkers to tackle. That's when you know you're getting close. I only get one or two try it on with me, but then I'm late to the game.

One In The Eye For NASA - Changes Cold Fusion Name To *Insert Acronym Combo Of Choice*

Like everywhere there are good and bad people so I know NASA has got lots of good guys who believe in humanity. But the bottom line is once the public finds out how much discovery they've been sitting on for years to please their masters the name NASA will forever stand for Never A Straight Answer. E-CAT is cold fusion is zero point is vacuum energy is whatever you like but don't expect me to use NASA's new acronym to cover their asses and anyway I have it on good authority that the public likes the name 'new electrics' as they kinda get it straight away.

Nick Redfern - Magic Ritual, Rocket Mavericks & UFO's

Even if the NASA, UFO connection was limited to Jack Parsons of Jet Propulsion fame that would be enough WTF to write a few books. However if we factor in the Maury Island UFO Incident (and its nested connections to the Kennedy coup d'etat), that tips the subject over into super woo territory. Nick Redfern cranks that up to new super-woo high-strangeness altitudes with his book Final Events about the officially funded (but private think tank UFO investigation) The Collins Elite.

I don't buy Jack Parson's story for sharing rocket propulsion documentation with Israel and furthermore I don't understand what his incentive is given Israel's nascent status. But then we're dealing with an occult dabbler here and maybe he saw the ascent of Israel long before anyone else.

Nick Redfern - Corruption At NASA

Most of the people at NASA have no idea so it's a little unfair to portray the space agency (that is under military control) as corrupt across the board. Nevertheless the abdication of scientific inquiry and submission to hierarchy is ubiquitous by both highly qualified NASA pseudo scientists and the pseudo for profit news media.

Nick Redfern, Britain's plucky and persistent investigative writer and journalist highlights some of the more jarring evidence of corruption at NASA. I say corruption because taking money from taxpayers and not holding to the NASA mission faithfully is an abuse of trust and manipulation of public understanding.

However, if I'm being charitable to the rapidly plummeting credibility of NASA, they are the gatekeepers to information that would transform human conciousness across the globe over night. There would be winners and losers but the sheer scale of change has cornered the agency into a position of terrified incoherence when confronted by requests from the public to show us detailed and granular photography on Mars and the Moon in specific locations.

Off the top of my head evidence of the past civilisations on Mars would shred religion, history, free energy, academia and swell up a raging tsunami of more questions over the deception of our true history which we really have a very threadbare official narrative for.

Gabrielle Giffords, NASA & Synchromysticism

I don't follow the main stream media and so I often only get to know the details of a story when it spills over into synchromysticism or conspiracy and so the Gabrielle Giffords case has broken waters twice from two separate directions and so I'm going to paste the last in text and post the video of the first with Freeman elaborating on the Gabrielle Giffords case. I have a unique explanation for much of the high weirdness around cases like this but as it's even weirder than the original weirdness I'll keep it to myself. That doesn't mean it's wrong.

Below are the relevant Giffords' parts from a wonderful synchromysticism post on The Secret Sun (originally on Hidden Experience). It's a wonderful intro to Freeman's video work above work which he doesn't do so much these days preferring to emphasize the positive.

Now here is where things get really weird.

When Jared Lee Loughner shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, one of the first Doctors arrive on the scene was DR. DAVE BOWMAN. He attended a wounded 9-year old girl who just happened to be born on September 11th, 2001. She died that day, and her name was Christina-TAYLOR Greene.

Charlton Heston was an astronaut named TAYLOR in PLANET OF THE APES, and Keir Dullea portrays astronaut DR. DAVE BOWMAN, who returns to earth at the end of 2001 as the fetus like star child. To make things even stranger, Gabrielle Giffords is married to an astronaut. 

~ It is the Archangel Gabriel that appears to Mary. He tells her: “And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb...” (Luke 1:31) This immaculate conception story sounds curiously similar to some of the accounts shared by women who claim alien abduction experiences; these accounts are full of mysterious pregnancies. Often when the woman is NOT sexually active. This certainly parrallels the virgin Mary.

~ The name Gabriel certainly parallels Gabrielle. Also, some New Age exponents portray Archangel Gabriel as female.

~ There was another Gabriel involved in the shooting in Tucson. Gabriel "Gabe" Zimmerman, age 30, was a member of Congresswoman Giffords' staff and was killed that afternoon.

~ The name Gabrielle Giffords resonates Gwyllm Griffiths. Gwyllm is the evolutionarily transformed bald being in THE SIXTH FINGER.

~ Gabrielle Giffords miraculously survives being shot in the head, and ends up bald, like her astronaut husband.~ Giffords' astronaut husband (Mark Kelly) has an identical twin brother (Scott Kelly), who is also an astronaut! Scott Kelly was a pilot for space shuttle Discovery, and that's the name of Dr. Dave Bowman's spaceship. Scott Kelly was in space during the shooting, and offered a moment of silence on 1-11-11. (more from Loren Coleman)

This is just a sliver of the stuff and it sits more coherently in its full context at the post where I discovered it.

Update: Mike Clelland from Hidden Experience contributes to the Gabrielle Giffords synchronicity through a podcast interview with Alan Abbadessa Green (post below). Also Steve Beckow chips in on the subject over here.

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Jay Weidner - Diamonds Are Forever. But Hollywood Aint.

Jay Weidner is probably one of the more interesting people of his generation. Friends with the likes ofTerence McKenna and John Lash to name a couple of interesting choices, he's got just enough Hollywood connections to have an inside point of view without being tainted by the money and celebrity. 

Conversely he also has a track record of taking a serious interest in the metaphysical issues of the day from life after death to being a well regarded autodidact alchemy scholar. There's a lot more to him than just that but in this interview he and Jeff Rense are borderline cracking up with laughter at the absurdity of NASA back pedalling and graveyard-silence on a fistful of moon landing issues including NASA's hiring of Jim Olson to write a book defending the charges of faking simulating the moon landing. 

We learn here that Jim's requests for NASA Apollo archive material were too sensitive after about six weeks and so the brakes/reverse rocket boosters were put on the project and a severance fee of twenty thousand dollars was paid to bin the book.

Jay and Jeff also talk briefly about the recent no fly zone NASA put around the moon to prevent the Indians and  Chinese taking high resolution photography of the Apollo landings as their own space programmes advance logarithmically. It takes an unusually blunted mind not to question the official story why NASA have never been back. "It's boring" isn't quite cutting it.

Moving on from the moon, Jay also agrees with my pet theory of True Blood as allegory for the Anunnaki/Archons coming out of the closet as I blogged about back here in July. It's very reassuring to know that my wild speculations are also being reached on the other side of the planet and while not proof of claim are at least evidence of similar thinking. There's no question also that it was Jay who taught me to look at what television and Hollywood pump out with a critical eye for agenda and pre-programming/psychic priming.

Like Jay I also think Ron Paul will get a bullet if he ever came close to winning the presidency. It's extraordinary watching the corporate for profit media siding with psychopaths like Perry, Gingrich et al.