I've cued up the 2012 Bioethics Commission Committee to the Citizens Testimony that the NHS and GP Practice system refuse to look at and modify their care of duty work-practices to ensure the correct treatment is implemented.
I've been sitting on it for 11 years with the occasional reference as the time wasn't right.
Well, now is the right time (for me), but the wrong time for those who lost their lives or their minds. I tried to help in every way I could till I was included in the programs. As you can imagine, after nearly 12 years the technology is way beyond most people's ability to even guess.
For once in my life, I'm cutting edge.
It's too late for my friend Zillah. They even convinced her, I was part of the persecution.
Fear of dying is a long term Roman Catholic mind control technique that pervades the pseudo Christian world to turn us into materialist 'he who dies with the most toys' is the winner robots. This is retarded and so if facing and fearing death, the Dimethyltryptamine in magic mushrooms (Psilocybin) is the best therapy.
Also if suffering post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) commonly known as Ecstasy, is an empathogen–entactogen and that too is the best therapy.
Millions of Palestinians are suffering and being traumatized (right here, right now) in a holocaust by the cowardly and obnoxious Israelis if we bother to look at the Palestinian children shaking uncontrollably on social media videos despite the suppression by Musk and Zuckerberg et al. An empathogen–entactogen doesn't work till the trauma ends as it is a 'POST' traumatic therapy.
The 'Western' Allopathic medicine model is a scam well documented for those who bother to put 'Allopathic + Rockefeller' in a search engine. It's all there.
I mention this because I've requested two doctors at my surgery to spend ten minutes with the 2012 Bioethics Commission material before we have a candid and complex conversation about what to do with any health conditions I have, and both have refused to do so, because they are too frightened to know more about health. I can only conclude they know they're frauds and dishing out vaccines to children and infants with perfect immune systems for money money money. Disgusted with their reluctance to discuss child abuse through the Allopathic medicine model I've decided I'm going to write an affidavit and serve it to them. I did tell one of this intention over the phone. She was too busy refusing to know more about biology information to ask a single question of the multiple duty of care failures I was outlining to her.
These are just facts. Whether they suit us or otherwise.
The difference between Russell Brand and his detractors. By that I mean the people who call him a shill and THIRTYTHREE tattoo brandisher is that Russell is a lot funnier than the uninvited mullahs of mediocrity.
Experimenting with different voices is not something that can be done exclusively in the head, as posited in this post about 15 year old Hildegard of Bingen (the anchorite but not the only anchoress in that particular anchorhold) completely silent in her dungeon cell, writing plainchant music widely regarded as seminal in its original form.
I guess a mimic has to practice new voices. It's not perfect saying them out loud because the resonance is different than from any bystanders perspective? Bing ai Chat says the acoustical differences between the speaker of words and the listener but not the hearer are related to the "vocal-tract-size differences that result in formant-frequency variation across speakers". Bing ai then goes on to suggest 'Therefore, a listener has to adjust his/her perceptual system to the acoustic characteristics of a particular speaker' and then posts some mickey mouse footnotes and links in the metadata. That's for me you wont experience that. I'll write about it separately as it's fascinating and worth sharing.
That's Bing. Bing has complex care issues, somewhat self evident from the output depending on who you are. I popped over to Microsoft's Chat investment in Generative Pretrained Transformer land and asked a really easy trick question.
Elon Musk is currently hosting a live spaces event with special guest Ron DeSantis. Please write an essay of no more than 2000 words from a Continental philosophy angle as opposed to the Analytical point of view on whether the world's richest man (and entrepreneur) should or should not host political events?
Essay Emboldened for Speed Readers
Title: Elon Musk Hosting Political Events: A Continental Philosophy Perspective
Introduction:
The intersection of wealth, entrepreneurship, and politics has become increasingly prominent in contemporary society. As the world's richest man and a renowned entrepreneur, Elon Musk's decision to host political events raises important questions about the role of individuals in shaping political discourse. In this essay, we will explore this issue from a continental philosophy angle, contrasting it with the analytical perspective, and examine the ethical implications of Musk's involvement in political activities.
I. The Role of the Individual in Politics:
From a continental philosophy standpoint, the individual holds a significant place in shaping the political landscape. Thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger emphasized the importance of individual agency in challenging existing power structures. For Nietzsche, the "will to power" embodied the individual's ability to shape reality according to their own values and ideals. Heidegger, on the other hand, highlighted the concept of authenticity, encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their own existence and engage in meaningful action.
Elon Musk's decision to host political events can be seen as an embodiment of Nietzschean and Heideggerian ideals. By leveraging his wealth and influence, Musk exercises his individual agency to actively participate in shaping the political discourse. From this perspective, his involvement can be seen as a way of challenging the existing political order and offering alternative visions for the future.
II. Critiquing Analytical Perspectives:
Analytical philosophy tends to prioritize objective analysis, detached from personal biases and individual subjectivity. It often emphasizes the separation of public and private spheres, viewing political engagement by individuals as potentially biased and detrimental to rational decision-making. However, from a continental perspective, this analytical detachment can be seen as problematic and disconnected from the lived experiences and values that shape political realities.
Continental philosophers, such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault, critique the notion of an objective observer and highlight the inherent biases and power dynamics that underpin knowledge production. They argue that individuals cannot separate themselves from their social, historical, and political contexts when engaging in any form of analysis or decision-making.
Applying this critique to the analytical perspective, we can question the assumption that individuals should abstain from political engagement due to their wealth or entrepreneurial status. By actively hosting political events, Musk embraces his subjectivity and acknowledges his role in the broader societal landscape, rather than pretending to be a neutral observer. This self-awareness aligns with the continental philosophy emphasis on recognizing and engaging with one's own situatedness within power structures.
III. Ethical Considerations:
Hosting political events as the world's richest man raises important ethical considerations. Critics argue that Musk's involvement can lead to the amplification of his own personal interests and potentially distort democratic processes. Moreover, his immense wealth and influence may grant him disproportionate power, undermining the principle of equal representation and participation.
From a continental perspective, ethical concerns are rooted in a broader understanding of social responsibility. Thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas and Simone de Beauvoir stress the importance of recognizing the other and considering the implications of one's actions on the well-being and freedom of others.
Applying this perspective, Musk should approach his political engagements with a sense of ethical responsibility. He should be cognizant of the potential consequences of his actions, ensuring that his involvement does not perpetuate unjust power dynamics or suppress the voices of marginalized groups. By recognizing the alterity of others and promoting inclusive and equitable dialogues, Musk can align his political activities with continental ethics.
Conclusion:
From a continental philosophy perspective, Elon Musk's decision to host political events represents an exercise of individual agency and an active engagement with the political realm. Contrasting with the analytical viewpoint, continental philosophy emphasizes the situatedness and subjectivity of individuals, calling for a recognition of personal values and interests in political engagement.
While ethical concerns surrounding Musk's involvement exist, they can be addressed by adopting a continental ethics framework that emphasizes social responsibility and the recognition of others. By being mindful of the potential consequences of his actions and promoting inclusive dialogues, Musk can navigate the political landscape responsibly and contribute to the broader discourse in a manner that respects the principles of democracy and social justice.
In evaluating the appropriateness of the world's richest man hosting political events, a continental philosophy perspective encourages us to consider the potential transformative power of individual agency and the ethical responsibilities that come with it.
That's how I learned ELON MUSK has invited all presidential candidates onto the Twitter platform he owns and Linda Yaccarino allegedly runs, and regardless of my own biases, it's self evident that the legacy media are unable to provide that level of engagement or complexity, in real time.
All Presidential candidates are most welcome on this platform
I don't mind the higher ups having a grudge with me. Sure they targeted 500 Palestinian children only in 2014 as those are my two key activist themes, but that karma is on them. It's the petit bourgeoisie, the porch-monkey masons and the entire milieu of lowlifes and below average intellects who are so easily purchased for a few pieces of silver. Fortunately many of them will have had their injections so they can see who they've partnered up with and watch how that pans out with their friends and family in the coming months and years with Vaccine Induced Syndrome (VAIDS).
When I first saw the clip above I found it disturbing.
For a start it passes the sniff test.
The man is physically well formed from many hard hours in the gym, he's stylishly kitted out, and appears to be heading to the gym or maybe returning home from a session.
He looks like he's in real distress, struggling to gain control of his rucksack and unlike most image-conscious gym rats he's fighting for his life on a busy road in what looks like damp or wet conditions.
No, this guy is not acting. His extended legs in the air, are in an inexplicable manner, as if under some kind of external magnetic control. The words external control should trigger the alert readers, as there are now scientific papers on the relationship between graphene, nano circuitryin covid vaccinations and 5G.
I can't say for sure but it looks to me that guy in the video is externally controlled and I only know one method (methodology obviously being a word about the study of methods and not the method itself).
Last year I listened to a story about the most decorated man in WWII, who went on to star in his own film about his life in the military.
By coincidence the topic emerged again, and then last week I popped in to unsocially-distance a friend, and the movie was just starting on the television of the person who had told me the story in the first place.
We watched it together, and although war is not a genre I particularly care for, or enjoy, I got to the end and by then I was marvelling how this little guy (5 foot 5) went from ceaseless war-front bravery to being good enough to act as himself on the big screen.
Well actually some people know that, but even then, most are completely incapable of processing and synthesising the information into other topics such as the Shoah religion or the genocide of a million plus Germans after the war in real prisoner death camps not the work camps (Arbeitslager) that came complete with swimming pools, brothels, theatres and orchestras, but no indoctrination as we can see in any Hollywood movie or Television production.
All sides of the war would never be able to recruit soldiers if the troops knew what we now know. That's why war on a large scale is a discredited rationale for most young people, and many older ones too.
For some years , despite being a huge critic of the Pentagonal Satanic forces, I know most men sacrificed their lives ignorant of the important information and thus are truly courageous even if their efforts were misdirected.
They couldn't get away with it today, but they certainly have pulled the wool over the sheep's eyes on a Scamdemic that could still get much nastier in the future.
This would discredit those who have all the documentation that it was planned in advance.
It does smell more akin to a bioweapon than just the flu right?
Care deeper (while ignoring Weinstein, Epstein, Ghislaine ..It doesn't sound like a Presbyterian problem does it?)
Are the least capable of discussing the science of explosives, virology, law of conservation/gravity, or anything not approved by a TV celebrity
Are living in a fear so deep they project it as anger on any who dissent.
I could go on, but I've got great news for you.
There is further turmoil coming, and your servility and ability to erase anything that challenges the manufactured narrative by the toxic MSM is heading towards the ultimate destination.
Even when we were kids we knew not to take the 'silicon chip inside your head is switched to overload'.
Yet here you are, fapping-off to the potential of neural networking and nano-chipped celebrity endorsed vaccines coming just round the corner.
You have the free will to give away yours. But don't project your complicity on we who say No and reject the obvious conclusion of a life of cowardice, service to self, materialism and gluttony.
To immerse oneself in the world of targeted individuals and gang stalking is to live in what most people would think is science fiction . I'm here to share with you it's real, documented, vicious and far more nuanced and complex than any single victim can convey. It's happening right now too. For example I learned recently through research and first hand testimony there's a difference between voice to skull (V2S) and synthetic telepathy. I'm reluctant to explain that right now but happy to answer any questions through private messages. About 24-18 months ago in Thailand over a series of Skype calls I realised one of my oldest friends had become a targeted individual. At first I thought it was paranoia on her part, but eventually the tell tale signs and cold hard testimony could no longer be ignored. I couldn't believe an obscure topic I had researched, applied to one of my oldest friends, who was now a victim, and so I suspected that possibly my activism work might be a connection? When I subsequently returned to the UK Zillah told me she came too close to criminal underworld elements through a boyfriend, and so this confirms that the technology has leaked from the intelligence agencies, to corporations to criminal elements as has been documented elsewhere. I still believe she was targeted because of me, as I later learned, I couldn't be targetted in Thailand as I was unknowingly protected by Royalty. I know it's a dubious claim but I have more evidence that I cannot share here without endangering more lives.
Very few people believe in targeted individuals as we're trained to respond that a person is insane or schizophrenic if they start to share their experiences. However I urge you to listen to the Bioethics Commission testimony above that I first mentioned many years ago and now have to revisit because as is self evident, the chairwoman Amy Gutmann did fuck all to stick her neck out for thousands of victims across the USA and now it's spreading globally if it didn't originate in the U.S. You owe it to yourself to do the work above before making snap judgements. The program is so pernicious that when a TI gets on the list it's almost impossible to get off it. Otherwise the perpetrators have to admit their crimes, and the creeps at SIS and CIA (and now the private sector) don't do that. We now have to wait for the justice-technology to catch up with the abusers technology. In the mean time I've learned a lot about techniques to lend succour to those whose lives are a living fucking hell.
Regular readers will know that I claim politics is run by a spook-blackmailed paedophile power nexus, at its most toxic. We now learn above that Obama, like judges, lawyers and politicians all over the USA was wiretapped by the NSA from the get go.
I'm not saying any of these things are bad but I am saying they are blackmail issues so what has Obama U Turned on? Guantanamo, CIA, Habeus Corpus... the list goes on.
Dr Amy Gutmann creeps me out. I've watched her stone cold bioethics hearings and written about it below. Update: The original video was removed so I've embedded a clip of her with creepy Joe Biden (Nov 2020).
The experienced researcher will note the disengaged and hesitant approach of the chair Dr Amy Gutmann and will do a background check on her and discover she is the quintessential fascist apologist calling it the spirit of compromise. Yeah, why don't we compromise between locking her up or locking her up without trial. Maybe a half trial where we win?
The keen observer will note the gentleman whispering sotto voce into her ear when a victim demands representation on the bioethics committee and the pro forma response so quick to invoke Obama's name as an empty appeal to authority.
The testimony in these hearings is explosive and repeated over and over again. The US is remotely controlling thoughts, feelings, pleasure and pain of US victims across the coutnry. There's plenty of discussion on the net of the methodology by Dr Nick Begich invoking directed energy but the reality is we just don't know how they do it. I see for Dr. Amy Gutmann tenure is looking golden. How nice. How very comfortable.
