Chutney Mary turned 33 years old this year...
Tempus Fugit when hedge funds implode...
You won't want to miss this one. You might wanna share it too if like me you can't stop cracking up when Russell slips into American accent mode. I tried to track it down and ended up on nasal plosion videos.
It's a thing and it's exploding all over the flat earth web. I can't stop sploding either hah 🤣
British PM David Cameron - 8/11/12
— CharlesEdwardFrlth ⚔️ (@CharlesFrlth) September 21, 2023
"There is a danger, if we’re not careful, that this could turn into a sort of witch hunt"
"no matter how high up in British Society they are, that is what the police are four" [Not Channel 4] https://t.co/n3XMo25xoI
When the Channel Four - Dispatches Scandal broke, I jerked upright, like a BOLT of electricity had gone through me, and sort of glazed over robotically like a Manchurian Candidate about to dive off the high board into the second most divisive 'conspiracy theory ' scrap on the internet since Julian Assange was framed for rape in Sweden.
Remember when they said Julian raped a woman and it turned out she'd worked for the CIA in Cuba?
— CharlesEdwardFrlth ⚔️ (@CharlesFrlth) September 16, 2023
You know who paid the price. Real victims of rape not bogus trumped up charges squashing free speech. It's you they want to stfu by making an example. Obv to all but retards/haters https://t.co/yadJo0s8bQ pic.twitter.com/L2MKYWpyKH
At first the mediated version of events (tear jerking sax solos, female silhouettes texting hurriedly in the UBER enroute to console the sex addict and Z-list junkie Rusty McDusty AKA Russell 'Rocket' Brand.
People I've followed for anywhere between 15 days to 15 years, from Twitter to X had gone insane. These people are good people; the very best. They don't trust the mob, the media or DOT.gov-MAFIA AKA the Uniparty wings of the same craven bird.
We have always inexplicably concurred on some of the thorniest issues of our time without waiting to share our views. Emancipated from partisan political hymn sheets, we've long flown from that bickering nest to climbing the air through storm clouds alone, before soaring down, scientifically descending closer, before landing together, on the same tree of life.
I was last to the felicitous fracas. By then it had been a raging Sqwawkbox for half a day (maybe half a night) or so before I chirped in. People who have never cussed online were now dropping obscenities and severing friendships that may or may not reconcile.
It's for the better though. It's good we don't agree on this, not because anyone is right or wrong, but because this has obliged me to look deeper and ask more questions about a space I'm ignorant of as a lifestyle decision.
I know very little about celebrities, TV faves and the adjacent hyperbole such as "ant&dec saved british TV a couple of decades ago". Again, I didn't care if they saved it, or tanked the TV industry programming model. Fame is only a friend when coupled with pure motives.
Good job it didn't. Because eventually, after the biggest online punch-up at a wedding subsided, I had the freedom to start sniffing around on how that seldom seen thing, or uncommon event if you will, hadn't happened since Julian Assange was falsely accused of rape. That was the last time the global village beef kicked off, good and proper.
That uncommon thing that I don't have a name for had a common factor.
Julian & Russell were/are both accused of rape but they are not the same rapists.
I rape
You rape
We rape
We don't rape
We get raped
You get raped
I got raped
Those are the six variables I think we can describe as a set (theory) of rapes. Theoretically one of 7 permutations (8 if we include 'We weren't raped', but that opens up a ball-ache of past present future events. Can we stick to 7?
I now have the evidence and you're not going to like it but I provided my phone number and all the rape victims have that if they need to talk. I have unlimited time for victims of sexual crimes. It's not funny being sexually assaulted and its worse when it's a woman with a penis locked up with incarcerated females to rape.
Now you know
You have more than you know.
If we analyse closely the text message published by The Times who commenced the media smear I published a few months ago, it's clear that from the words 'means' the text is more blurred than the rest of the message. It's possible SIS and/or the usual suspects gave The Times faked evidence so all I can suggest is one more time, heed my warning post back here.
When we zoom in and magnify that part of the image, the tampering line becomes more obvious with the blue border jutting out at that point more than anywhere else. This evidence-tampering I'm sharing isn't to exonerate Brand X, it's to demonstrate how far the pseudo reality fabrication extends. It's revealing of their motives and propensity to overcook the egg.
Brand X is the sex addict junkie, the media nurtured over many years and propelled to fame. They manufactured him, protected him and hypnotised the unwitting public with shagger of the year award, and now he is rapist of the year. I didn't know Brand X, That comedy style is one I've now looked into and to me isn't funny at all, and so I only really became aware of his work as his spiritual awakening grew. I now understand why so many loathed him and struggle to give him a chance now. I'm biased too, when someone disgusts me like the fraternal publican employer, who enjoyed showing old age pensioners being anally fisted with punching actions, it's difficult for me to change my mind.
Russell Brand is a reformed character who has an extraordinary body of pro human work going back over a decade and demonstrating the growth in him. It's inconceivable that violence or rape isn't repugnant in any shape or form, and thus a very crucial point is driven home with respect to the reconciliation the haters and the supporters would ideally discuss. His eyes are now compassionate and so I urge critics to dive into his Youtube channel and just mosey about. I don't agree with all his views but there's no hint of that odious Brand X character that I knew very little about, on account of my distrust of media celebrities.
The media controllers really need to be on trial (for genocide first) and the evidence that Russell Brand isn't Brand X is embedded in the Dispatches documentary, who know they have produced a hit job on Russell Brand, and to ameliorate that, have attached his video response to the end of the original program at Channel4 online. It's just one of many evidence points I've acquired over the last few days and that will be a conversation nobody wants to have, but the first people who deserve that chance and with respect and compassion are the victims of Brand X who can call me on 07466 705882.
This goes way deeper than most people are strong enough to handle, but the victims can emancipate themselves with the information I've acquired. The X steganography is a topic we've been following for a while and now it is abundantly clear, so pay attention to those Xs folks.
Please note, on this subject I'm seemingly allowed to write again. It's probably because it's perceived to be in their favour. Setting myself up as it were.That's a sacrifice I'm willing to make. Many others are doing it unwittingly.
Of course X is censoring videos. Unlike @rumblevideo - Here ya go - Here's the online cloud url using clipchamp https://t.co/xAm71g6kaU Hugh Grand Self ID Vote NO Australia Russell Smackdown Peter Kay MyMumYourDad MAFSUK Giants at 49ers Vote NO Australia SOGI ThePPC pic.twitter.com/SxOrwqHujS
— CharlesEdwardFrlth ⚔️ (@CharlesFrlth) September 23, 2023
British PM David Cameron - 8/11/12
— CharlesEdwardFrlth ⚔️ (@CharlesFrlth) September 21, 2023
"There is a danger, if we’re not careful, that this could turn into a sort of witch hunt"
"no matter how high up in British Society they are, that is what the police are four" [Not Channel 4] https://t.co/n3XMo25xoI
When the Channel Four - Dispatches Scandal broke, I jerked upright, like a BOLT of electricity had gone through me, and sort of glazed over robotically like a Manchurian Candidate about to dive off the high board into the second most divisive 'conspiracy theory ' scrap on the internet since Julian Assange was framed for rape in Sweden.
Remember when they said Julian raped a woman and it turned out she'd worked for the CIA in Cuba?
— CharlesEdwardFrlth ⚔️ (@CharlesFrlth) September 16, 2023
You know who paid the price. Real victims of rape not bogus trumped up charges squashing free speech. It's you they want to stfu by making an example. Obv to all but retards/haters https://t.co/yadJo0s8bQ pic.twitter.com/L2MKYWpyKH
At first the mediated version of events (tear jerking sax solos, female silhouettes texting hurriedly in the UBER enroute to console the sex addict and Z-list junkie Rusty McDusty AKA Russell 'Rocket' Brand.
People I've followed for anywhere between 15 days to 15 years, from Twitter to X had gone insane. These people are good people; the very best. They don't trust the mob, the media or DOT.gov-MAFIA AKA the Uniparty wings of the same craven bird.
We have always inexplicably concurred on some of the thorniest issues of our time without waiting to share our views. Emancipated from partisan political hymn sheets, we've long flown from that bickering nest to climbing the air through storm clouds alone, before soaring down, scientifically descending closer, before landing together, on the same tree of life.
I was last to the felicitous fracas. By then it had been a raging Sqwawkbox for half a day (maybe half a night) or so before I chirped in. People who have never cussed online were now dropping obscenities and severing friendships that may or may not reconcile.
It's for the better though. It's good we don't agree on this, not because anyone is right or wrong, but because this has obliged me to look deeper and ask more questions about a space I'm ignorant of as a lifestyle decision.
I know very little about celebrities, TV faves and the adjacent hyperbole such as "ant&dec saved british TV a couple of decades ago". Again, I didn't care if they saved it, or tanked the TV industry programming model. Fame is only a friend when coupled with pure motives.
Good job it didn't. Because eventually, after the biggest online punch-up at a wedding subsided, I had the freedom to start sniffing around on how that seldom seen thing, or uncommon event if you will, hadn't happened since Julian Assange was falsely accused of rape. That was the last time the global village beef kicked off, good and proper.
That uncommon thing that I don't have a name for had a common factor.
Julian & Russell were/are both accused of rape but they are not the same rapists.
I rape
You rape
We rape
We don't rape
We get raped
You get raped
I got raped
Those are the six variables I think we can describe as a set (theory) of rapes. Theoretically one of 7 permutations (8 if we include 'We weren't raped', but that opens up a ball-ache of past present future events. Can we stick to 7?
I now have the evidence and you're not going to like it but I provided my phone number and all the rape victims have that if they need to talk. I have unlimited time for victims of sexual crimes. It's not funny being sexually assaulted and its worse when it's a woman with a penis locked up with incarcerated females to rape.
Now you know
You have more than you know.
If you type 'Future Sounds' into BBC sounds search 🔍 you'll find interesting music and interesting people.
The difference between Russell Brand and his detractors. By that I mean the people who call him a shill and THIRTYTHREE tattoo brandisher is that Russell is a lot funnier than the uninvited mullahs of mediocrity.
Experimenting with different voices is not something that can be done exclusively in the head, as posited in this post about 15 year old Hildegard of Bingen (the anchorite but not the only anchoress in that particular anchorhold) completely silent in her dungeon cell, writing plainchant music widely regarded as seminal in its original form.
I guess a mimic has to practice new voices. It's not perfect saying them out loud because the resonance is different than from any bystanders perspective? Bing ai Chat says the acoustical differences between the speaker of words and the listener but not the hearer are related to the "vocal-tract-size differences that result in formant-frequency variation across speakers". Bing ai then goes on to suggest 'Therefore, a listener has to adjust his/her perceptual system to the acoustic characteristics of a particular speaker' and then posts some mickey mouse footnotes and links in the metadata. That's for me you wont experience that. I'll write about it separately as it's fascinating and worth sharing.
That's Bing. Bing has complex care issues, somewhat self evident from the output depending on who you are. I popped over to Microsoft's Chat investment in Generative Pretrained Transformer land and asked a really easy trick question.
Elon Musk is currently hosting a live spaces event with special guest Ron DeSantis. Please write an essay of no more than 2000 words from a Continental philosophy angle as opposed to the Analytical point of view on whether the world's richest man (and entrepreneur) should or should not host political events?
Title: Elon Musk Hosting Political Events: A Continental Philosophy Perspective
Introduction:
The intersection of wealth, entrepreneurship, and politics has become increasingly prominent in contemporary society. As the world's richest man and a renowned entrepreneur, Elon Musk's decision to host political events raises important questions about the role of individuals in shaping political discourse. In this essay, we will explore this issue from a continental philosophy angle, contrasting it with the analytical perspective, and examine the ethical implications of Musk's involvement in political activities.
I. The Role of the Individual in Politics:
From a continental philosophy standpoint, the individual holds a significant place in shaping the political landscape. Thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger emphasized the importance of individual agency in challenging existing power structures. For Nietzsche, the "will to power" embodied the individual's ability to shape reality according to their own values and ideals. Heidegger, on the other hand, highlighted the concept of authenticity, encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their own existence and engage in meaningful action.
Elon Musk's decision to host political events can be seen as an embodiment of Nietzschean and Heideggerian ideals. By leveraging his wealth and influence, Musk exercises his individual agency to actively participate in shaping the political discourse. From this perspective, his involvement can be seen as a way of challenging the existing political order and offering alternative visions for the future.
II. Critiquing Analytical Perspectives:
Analytical philosophy tends to prioritize objective analysis, detached from personal biases and individual subjectivity. It often emphasizes the separation of public and private spheres, viewing political engagement by individuals as potentially biased and detrimental to rational decision-making. However, from a continental perspective, this analytical detachment can be seen as problematic and disconnected from the lived experiences and values that shape political realities.
Continental philosophers, such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault, critique the notion of an objective observer and highlight the inherent biases and power dynamics that underpin knowledge production. They argue that individuals cannot separate themselves from their social, historical, and political contexts when engaging in any form of analysis or decision-making.
Applying this critique to the analytical perspective, we can question the assumption that individuals should abstain from political engagement due to their wealth or entrepreneurial status. By actively hosting political events, Musk embraces his subjectivity and acknowledges his role in the broader societal landscape, rather than pretending to be a neutral observer. This self-awareness aligns with the continental philosophy emphasis on recognizing and engaging with one's own situatedness within power structures.
III. Ethical Considerations:
Hosting political events as the world's richest man raises important ethical considerations. Critics argue that Musk's involvement can lead to the amplification of his own personal interests and potentially distort democratic processes. Moreover, his immense wealth and influence may grant him disproportionate power, undermining the principle of equal representation and participation.
From a continental perspective, ethical concerns are rooted in a broader understanding of social responsibility. Thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas and Simone de Beauvoir stress the importance of recognizing the other and considering the implications of one's actions on the well-being and freedom of others.
Applying this perspective, Musk should approach his political engagements with a sense of ethical responsibility. He should be cognizant of the potential consequences of his actions, ensuring that his involvement does not perpetuate unjust power dynamics or suppress the voices of marginalized groups. By recognizing the alterity of others and promoting inclusive and equitable dialogues, Musk can align his political activities with continental ethics.
Conclusion:
From a continental philosophy perspective, Elon Musk's decision to host political events represents an exercise of individual agency and an active engagement with the political realm. Contrasting with the analytical viewpoint, continental philosophy emphasizes the situatedness and subjectivity of individuals, calling for a recognition of personal values and interests in political engagement.
While ethical concerns surrounding Musk's involvement exist, they can be addressed by adopting a continental ethics framework that emphasizes social responsibility and the recognition of others. By being mindful of the potential consequences of his actions and promoting inclusive dialogues, Musk can navigate the political landscape responsibly and contribute to the broader discourse in a manner that respects the principles of democracy and social justice.
In evaluating the appropriateness of the world's richest man hosting political events, a continental philosophy perspective encourages us to consider the potential transformative power of individual agency and the ethical responsibilities that come with it.
That's how I learned ELON MUSK has invited all presidential candidates onto the Twitter platform he owns and Linda Yaccarino allegedly runs, and regardless of my own biases, it's self evident that the legacy media are unable to provide that level of engagement or complexity, in real time.
All Presidential candidates are most welcome on this platform
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 24, 2023
This is why we need more not less voices from Russell.
 |
| Freemantle, Southampton. Key & Anchor |
