The Simpsons Predict Elon's Departure - Rishi Interviews Musk

My conversation with @elonmusk 👇 pic.twitter.com/rn21pB6rlT

— Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) November 2, 2023

Rishi opens up the discourse with a deadly throat punch. And Elon never quite recovers.

How long have you been beating your wife?

Or more accurately the PM opens with 'The Billionaire philanthropist and close confidant to Jeffrey  Epstein on up to 40 (documented) meetings with Bill Gates, says.

'There's no one in our time, to do more to push the bounds of science and innovation, than you' says Rishi gesturing to Elon.

BOOM

Musk and I agree on quite a few things but just listen to how banal his contribution is to AI. Not one single creative suggestion. He tries to baffle our PM with bullshit and it's insulting. Every profession has its own language. Smart people make it simple to understand, not harder. He even runs dry on the use of jargon and changes the subject to Twitter's Community Notes and how we should sympathise with his son's learning difficulties. We are here to talk about AI not Twitter, Musk.

When I realised how vacuous Musk is on the implications of possibly the last technology to be invented by man I came up with a creative starter for managing AI.

AI is the toothpaste out of the tube. The only way to control it is to have better AI, managing commercially available AI, such as an AI council that ensures it always has the latest and best thinking. World Council AI could then manage any external AI threats. It's an opportunity for humanity to collaborate, not a threat.

How is that council to be kept neutral and protected while subject to transparency? That's a job for the politicians, and Rishi Sunak was right to invite the Chinese to the UK.

Rishi Sunak is qualified to know about Musk's Epstein links from intelligence briefings. Do I know the reasons behind Theleme, mRNA and other such angst ridden questions? No.

But I have a theory and it's a conspiracy that is for the good. 

Is This Why Russell Brand Needs To Be Destroyed?

You have more than you know.

Tick Tock - Tick Tock - Shit Is Getting Real

I haven't had a television since 2006 and the last time I did watch live news, NATO were bombing Libya and within seconds I felt hyper nauseous. I was in a hotel room, meeting up with a friend in Bangkok and while he got ready, I don't know what had changed but that screen with overwhelming colour-radiation news graphics, wasn't the same beast I'd given up on five years earlier. Something malignant and technologically malicious had taken its place. Maybe it's just me but by then I'd realised how toxic television news propaganda is. Years of unlearning duff information and skewed opinions followed.

I can't pinpoint the timing, but in the last few months BBC Radio 4/World Service have started reporting Zionist war crimes on the defenceless Palestinians with an unprecedentedly even hand.

I don't know why that could be, I can't even come up with an hypothesis, but I know most media apertures in some depth, and deeply appreciate the BBC's change in tone on this topic. It's tedious when the occupied are genocided by the worlds most far-right wing (lebensraum) occupiers with military grade decimation against olive growers and shepherds trying to stop the land thieves running over their flocks of sheep and torching their livelihoods and groves. And before anyone pulls out a hand shandy, pearl clutching minute of hate on democratically elected Hamas; the Israelis created Hamas. That's WaPo for the ignorant, and these are the sheep for the heartless.

I'm particularly grateful on behalf of all the murdered children who have no voice as even David Cameron courageously noted that Gaza is an open air prison camp. Unlike the West Bank, Gaza is one of the most densely populated places on the planet. It's a point of concentration if we're paying attention to reality not sycophancy and oily career climbing. 

The BBC is doing something I didn't expect to see in my lifetime, so please allow me to return the favour and impress upon their news media employees that the future is going to be ugly and it's about the censorship of what one Israeli Cardiologist described as the "biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust". Cue the usual vultures and careerists using Judaism to feather their own nests.

There's no consolation having four friends and family who took the experimental injections, and three injured (so far) despite my greatest efforts, but there might still be time to make the most important decisions of your life if your health is OK so far, and work in the mainstream legacy news media. 

Consider the rising tensions filmed in the video clip at the top. Those are protestors with vaccine injuries and suffering, plastering flyers on BBC premises with protestation at the lies, disinformation, misinformation, science suppression, misdirection and money money money that even the BBC guzzles on, from private psychopath Billionaire 'philanthropists'. Even broadsheet newspaper readers are still fellating Billy Goat Gates in the comments. Good lord if Darwinism was real (it's largely intellectual cack) this problem is now cleaning itself up.

The BBC is probably my greatest source of endless learning and pleasure, but the news departments, like every corporation are cancerous brain tumours (Glioblastoma Grade 4) under shaved children's skulls. 

My strategic recommendation is sell the BBC news division (whore of Babylon) to Rupert Murdoch and stick to informative, educational, cultural and modest entertainment content. Otherwise it's all toast soldiers and Humpty Dumpty broken eggs. You can scoff but I did inform everyone when and where the great awakening commenced.

On Bill Gates own platform, and look where we are now.

Universe is slow to anger and has a very ironic sense of humour, so do yourself a favour and watch this last clip. Ask yourself if it's best to bite the bullet earlier or later? The choice to know is yours and the choice to act is most certainly your responsibility too.

Consider wisely. 

Poor choices will boomerang quicker than you think.

Impending Food Shortages

As a former marketing and advertising kind of guy, I take a close interest in retail layouts, products and promotions.

My first question during the lockdown was how Poundland remained open as it must have been the biggest revenue boon ever for them, making money while other retailers were closed for the scamdemic.

For the open minded the documentation was published before the plandemic. Event 201 is just one search term  along with patents and orders for COVID supplies made long before the phenomenon itself. People who are invested in the mainstream media deception appear psychologically incapable of researching the abundant material available. I feel disappointed when given fake news but I'm never triggered.

However, I can trigger the fuck out of any Vaxxed/Save Ukraine womble. 

Don't believe me? Send me a message and I'll arrange the zoom so we can see who is unstable.

I've repeatedly referred to the revelation of the method on this blog. The controlling pseudo elites must show the flock what they're going to do in order to have their free will to then be subjugated or just plain murdered as the Midazolam and Morphine crowd discovered when Granny was taken-out under the auspices of healthcare.

I know a multimillionaire who went to hospital for insomnia and was knocked out, intubated and for months begged for help knowing he was being killed and then when they didn't die (physically a very strong man), he was shipped to the loved-up ward and the good cop, bad cop psychology worked a treat. He delivered them flowers afterwards, that's how powerful trauma based mind control is. Remember trauma based mind control? I've over ten years writing on the subject on this blog.

But back to Poundland. They dismantled their floor plan and where products were packed to the rafters, they've widened the aisles and have halved their inventory at least. The halving is because they can't get the products from China but also there's that deliberate commercial shipping backlog which is just as synthetic as the fires at foodplants.

If you think this is a batshit conspiracy theory, then stand by your principals and don't panic shop. They took the piss with the toilet rolls a couple of years ago but this next stage is for keeps. [We both know the normies will panic shop when the inevitable panic-chapter kicks in again].

All of the above is a pretext for a hybrid depopulation plan coupled with biometric tracking of those left behind to serve the cattle owning class. The trick is to do it slow enough so the herd don't stampede.

It's so obvious.

Update:  The arson continues.

The Intimidation of Former Merck Vaccine Saleswoman Brandy Vaughan

It's a terrible crime to murder a woman 

This same business, abort/supply human DNA.

Disclaimer - I once did some consultancy work for Merck.

If Only There Was A Vaccine - There's Never Been A Vaccine Like This

The dye used in the vaccine is called Luciferase (it's just marketing or revelation of the method if one is informed).

I embed these videos because they are scrubbed from Youtube as quick as they are uploaded. Everyone should be concerned about the information in this short clip.

Notice: Bill Gates (son of a eugenicist) is wearing a suit with Christmas Trees as the pattern. 

Let's see how Chrimbo works out for you this year (I don't celebrate authorised events).

Just a hunch.

Are The EU & Bill Gates A Malignant Tumour?

Is the EU and then World Health Organisation, a malignant tumour? 

On the surface it's a happy clappy work-in-progress, but aside from being run by unelected bureaucrats... it is militarily aligned with NATO which is responsible for some of the worst human atrocities of the last few decades. Those who think an EU super army will do differently probably need to do some research on the child abuse victims in Brussels where senior EU and NATO officials reside and practice their occult beliefs.

However for me the obvious blindness of EU fans is the crushing austerity imposed on Greece, Spain and Portugal. Neoliberal economics is a cancer and those who are invested in trivial pursuits such as gender fluidity identity issues are so hopelessly lost among the bombs abroad and the hungry families at home they fail to see the grotesque nature of the ideology they side with.

Last and most telling about the remain crowd is their fervent support for EU human rights.

Only thing is, the EU ignored those same human rights when it came to smashing the faces in of the Catalans. Show me one pro EU person who objected to the violence imposed on these people. 

Just one. 

Do I have one pro EU person in my nearly 5000 connections and whatever number of followers who can stand up and say they are consistent in their value set?

The comments are open.

The Banality of Evil - Vaccine Czar Testimony

Just testimony. Tony Benn has pedigree.

Boguskysoft

 Lots of people that I have a healthy respect for in the advertising world have criticized the new work by Crispin Porter for Microsoft and I can't agree with them. I'm with Grant and Adrian on this one because from what I've seen so far the work achieves two important goals.

 Firstly I like it. Not in a rapturous Gorilla or Monkey kind of way but it's likable and that's not an easy thing to achieve. I've rarely watched Seinfeld even though it's likable and funny content, I'm not a cheerleader for Bill Gates (I think luck was an important factor in his success) and generally I don't find using stars to be a credible route for marketing communications. BBDO starfuckers I think George calls this genre.

 However it's not important what I feel. It's amusing and that is a matter of subjectivity. I'm sure you can make you're own mind up on that.

 More importantly there are a lot of strategic communication problems that are in my eyes being solved by the work I've seen so far. I also think it's kind of interesting that it's quintessentially American advertising and yet there's a Windows Video Channel on Youtube it is universally distributed. A potent communications model for some American centric global brands if you stop to think about it (McDonalds? Nike?). Something along the lines of act local, think global (A word play on an oxymoron I've long disliked). But anyway, Microsoft using a Google owned distribution channel and not their own? Even Soapbox points towards the Youtube content. That says a lot to me after a chat with Geert in LA a couple of months ago where it was pointed out to me that use of non MS software is/was often frowned upon.

 I think it's only the commercially naive who could believe that communications can solve the Microsoft problem. The job of advertising here is to ameliorate the rising dissatisfaction with the brand and possibly communicate that Microsoft is determined to get closer to its customers through more down to earth and likable dialogue; for surely even monologue commercials such as this provoke a discourse that was seldom seen in the fifities when advertising took hold. Look, even I'm doing it. It's the internet you see!

 Back to the problem. What is Microsofts problem? Why is one of the most succesful companies on the planet in trouble. Simply put the operating system is unwieldy. If you pay a army of coders to improve stuff, they will invariably make additional stuff that isn't needed. It's called feature creep and is a recurring problem with technology associated designers. Reliability is also an issue when it comes to discussions of unwieldiness. The bigger the system the more opportunities there are for the system to break down and that is often the case with Microsoft. That's their core problem but the immediate emotional problem is they are increasingly unliked.

 I've recently made the transition from Microsoft to Apple and I couldn't be more delighted with the results but it doesn't mean that I'm blind to the advantages of the de facto operating system of the world. Without Microsoft I'm not even sure Apple would be as good as they are. Who knows? Nobody can prove stuff like that anyway. It's all theoretical. But in any case maybe you can take a look at the first piece of content I saw, liked and decided to write about. It's not revolutionary, but then neither is Microsoft anymore.

 Just off the top of my head I think shopping in the budget shoe store is strategically right for Microsoft. The future for the brand is one of lower entry and upgrade cost for the average user. Apple is still one of the most profitable brands on the planet because it charges a lot more. A sitcom genre is just right for mainstream America as primary customer segment (with Mexican family making a first sensible guest appearance - California is majority Latino in 10 or so years) but also for the wider world. A sitcom is quintessentially American. It's likeable, funny, comforting and about as far removed from excessive oil, corporate greed, dirty politics and war as one could wish to hope for. In short it's the best of America, and I don't even watch them so this is not a fanboy's perspective.

Seinfeld is an excellent pick.


 Microsoft is simply never ever going to be hip and so this is a mainstream ad - Any hint of hipness and the same critics calling for Crispin's blood would be accusing the brand of unreal aspirations or tonality fumbles . Think General Motors over Toyota Prius and a profile of the customer is conjured up pretty quickly. This is a comfortable way to get to know Bill Gates, a man rarely associated with humour and love him or loathe him, he comes across as likeable, keen to be liked and not without a sense of humour. I'll leave you with the lastest segment that I've only seen while writing this article and frankly I think it's close to brilliant in that way that American sitcom writers are the best in the world at. I've laughed out loud while eating in an upscale restaurant in Beijing with my fellow late afternoon diners enjoying my mirth and while I'm not prepared to go back to Windows (Indeed my next move is likely to be Linux) I'm more inclined to cut Bill Gates some slack the next time I'm sat in front of a Microsoft product running on a computer (highly likely). And maybe that's the point, maybe it's about stopping the hate and giving one of the most remarkable people (faults and all) in the history of commerce and technology some room to manouevre. I know I will. What do you think? Do you really still hate Microsoft more after watching this?

Jobs vs Gates

When asked what was the greatest misunderstanding about their relationship in yesterdays interview at The Wall Street Journal's D Conference. Jobs replied 'we've kept our marriage secret for over a decade now'. (8th minute)