🇵🇸🇮🇱 “There is no more future. My future is over now. I have no future at all.” says 13-year-old Layan al-Bas after an Israeli bomb blew her legs off.
This is an extraordinary interview by Mehdi Hasan. Neither of course talk about the Israeli involvement in 9/11 so we can't claim that either side is being candid, but what we can identify is a level of Beltway/Washington Consensus programming and mendacity on Michael T Flynn's side that is self evident to any rational human being.
The man is a bonehead, an unoriginal thinker, a danger to world peace. Update: Here he is with Liz Crokin who has done sterling work on Pizzagate but is literally an bimbo airhead who has never picked up a history book. Tell her that, I'll debate her and Bonehead Shekelgruber Flynn TOGETHER. Two on one and I'll wipe the floor with them.
If anybody can point me to independent holocaust counterarguments I'm keen to review all the available information. Until people respond in the comments below, the evidence is the six million figure is both hugely inflated and regularly pulled out to justify Zionism. This is unacceptable; however even one Jewish, Muslim, Christian or any death is appalling, but if false figures are being used to justify attempts in order to stop people asking questions, and exercising freedom of debate (either wrong or right) then a great deception is taking place. Update: Here are the Red Cross figures. Clearly the Zionists are exaggerating. These kind of lies are pernicious and so what else is being lied about. I invite you to research all claims.
Update. The International Red Cross revised their figures from 373 000 above to 6000000 once again as in the video of the pre war newspapers I've posted. This is too much of a coincidence for the rational person so I assume it's somewhere in between half a million to a million. A lot of people were killed in WWII including 20 million or so in the USSR. All of it needless manipulation.
Growing up in British Armed Forces Germany I could never understand the love of 'Auntie' as the BBC is called by the children in my schooling days when my family returned to the UK. Now I realise that they were programmed to love the British Broadcasting Corporation or the Beeb as some referred to it.
It may take some time but until the BBC accepts it has no business pimping government propaganda, particularly for their immoral wars it runs the risk of losing it's entire portfolio of entertainment and information. Some of this content is world class.
As is their mind control propaganda. The best of the best. Look at the witless British during the Jubilee celebrations for concrete evidence of that.
The Council on Foreign Relations set the establishment line. By reading their reports and articles a person can be ahead of the mainstream media and politics by a few days or weeks. They do allow the occasional dissenting voice but when they are behind their next invasion or preparing for war there's no ambiguity about the propaganda they are selling. Many mainstream journalists never question the Council On Foreign Relations even though their manipulation of political power, embedded corporatism and totally asymmetric representation of the Jewish Georgetown Professor in favour of bombing Iran stereotype is self evident. Their influential publication Foreign Affairs is far more militant than PRAVDA in its day and it's writers are indiscernible from psychopath savages found at lynchings if one removed their suits and visible signs of prosperity and vulgar over-education.
Why is the corporate media talking up war? Could it be they make money out of the military industrial complex commercial ties to media and war profiteering? Even the United States of America head of Department of Defence Leon Panetta has said that Iranhas no nukes. I would feel much happier if Iran had some nuclear capability to stabilise the region. I'm on Iran's side if the US create war again.
Events over the last several days reveal that the United States and Israel plan to conduct a false flag terror event to be blamed on Iran. The event will likely occur within the next six months and will result in an attack on Iran prior to the November election.
Obama’s intelligence chief, James Clapper (center), warned of Iranian terror attacks inside the United States.
Intelligence in U.S. and Israel Warn of Domestic Terror Attack
Officialdom in the United States and Israel have issued a warning about an Iranian “threat stream” against Israeli “soft targets” in America.
The warning arrives several days after Obama’s intelligence boss James Clapper said Iran may strike inside the United States,
“We predict that the threat on our sites around the world will increase… on both our guarded sites and ‘soft’ sites,” states a letter sent out by the head of security for the Israeli Consul General for the Mid-Atlantic States.
Guarded sites are Israeli government facilities like embassies while soft sites are Jewish synagogues, schools, and community centers.
Yoram Cohen, the head of Israel’s security service Shin Bet, said recently that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will attack Israeli and Jewish targets abroad in response to the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists.
In January it was reported Mossad was behind the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan.
“The thwarted assassination plot of a Saudi official in Washington, D.C., a couple of months ago was an important data point,” a nameless official told ABC News, “in that it showed at least parts of the Iranian establishment were aware of the intended event and were not concerned about inevitable collateral damage to U.S. citizens had they carried out an assassination plot on American soil.”
Cohen linked the alleged threat to the discredited plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in October.
A court document in the case revealed that the FBI and the DEA concocted the plot as a sting operation and used failed used car salesman and alcoholic Mansour Arbabsiar as a patsy. Arbabsiar, who is from Iran, thought he was participating in a drug deal.
Despite the fallacious nature of the plot, intelligence officials used it to hype the specter of Iranian terrorism that will likely result in a false flag operation used as a pretext to invade Iran.
“In the past few weeks, there has been an escalation in threats against Israeli and Jewish targets around the world,” an intelligence document cited by ABC News states. It warns that demonstrations against Israel “could potentially turn violent at local synagogues, restaurants, the Israeli Embassy and other Israeli sites.”
The Israeli bulletin also provides an excuse for the TSA to step-up intrusive pat-downs and demand travelers be subjected to dangerous naked body scanners at airports across the United States.
“According to our evaluation there is a possibility that the forged passports will be used in order to pass as Israeli citizens at the security checks in Israel and around the world.
Israeli security authorities may consider an Israeli citizenship as a [criterion] to proceed with a more lenient security check in secure sites such as airports, etc.,” the bulletin explains.
The latest warning arrives two weeks after the Turkish newspaper Zaman reported that a cell of the Quds Unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard planned to attack U.S. embassy in Ankara and other targets across Turkey.
Fast Moving Timeline for War
The latest development follows a number of events over the past few weeks that point toward a concerted attack by Israel and then the United States on Iran:
• DEBKAfile reported earlier in the week that the United States will have 100,000 troops in the region by March. “Pentagon has been quietly massing troops and armaments on two islands located just south of the Strait of Hormuz, and within easy striking distance of Iran,” Mac Slavo wrote on January 31.
• On Friday, the establishment media reported that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said “there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June,” according to the Washington Post. The timeline is predicated on Iran entering an Israeli contrived “zone of immunity” in its unsubstantiated effort to build a nuclear bomb.
Iran has issued a number of threats in response to punitive oil and economic sanctions devised by the United States and Europe. On Friday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a nationally televised speech that his country will retaliate if Western nations impose crippling oil sanctions. In January, in response to European Union foreign ministers deciding to impose an oil embargo on the country, Iran vowed to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
• Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Martin Dempsey admitted on January 9 that Iran has the ability to close off the strategic shipping lane linking the Gulf of Oman with the Persian Gulf. He said doing so would constitute a “red line.”
• In December, in response to Sec. Def. Panetta’s not ruling out an attack, Iranannounced it would hold a military exercise in the Persian Gulf. The 10 day exercise, dubbed “Velayat-e 90,” demonstrated that Iran has the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. further exacerbated the situation by sending the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis through the Strait of Hormuz while Iran was conducting its war game.
• Russia and China have indicated that an attack on Iran would constitute an attack on their national security. “Iran is our close neighbor, just south of the Caucasus.Should anything happen to Iran, should Iran get drawn into any political or military hardships, this will be a direct threat to our national security,” said Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s deputy prime minister and former envoy to NATO, in mid-January.
War President: Re-electing Obama
In November, DEBKAfile said Obama will use war as a re-election tool. “President Barack Obama went on line to America’s senior allies, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Israel and Saudi Arabia, with notice of his plan to attack Iran no later than September-October 2012 – unless Tehran halted its nuclear weaponization programs,” the neocon-connected subscriber-only publication predicted.
“Obama’s announcement was not perceived as a general directive to US allies, but a guideline to blow the dust off the contingency plans for a strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities which stayed locked in bottom drawers for three years,” states the report, adding that “Obama’s announcement spurred Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Israel into girding their navies, air forces, ballistic units and anti-missile defense systems for the challenges ahead.”
Britain’s foreign secretary William Hague said in January his country has not ruled out military action against Iran. Britain had dispatched its “most formidable warship HMS Daring” to the Persian Gulf region prior to Hague’s remarks.
In 2010, as Obama’s job rating began its descent into the abyss, former Clintonite and Democrat operative Mark Penn said Obama needs a domestic terror attack to regain his popularity. In July of that year, another former Clintonite, Robert Shapiro, said the only thing can preserve the Obama presidency is war.
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, writing for the Financial Times. “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
The late Washington Post columnist David Broder was more succinct. “With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran’s ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs.
This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve,” he wrote in late 2010.
Tensions will undoubtedly rise if there is a terror attack inside the United States, either against an Israeli target or American one.
It would provide an airtight excuse to unleash the awesome power of the U.S. military against Iran and cast Obama in the adulatory light all “war presidents” receive as the masses fall in line and wave their flags and cheer on “our boys” as they decimate another country and engage in yet another bloody massacre of innocents.
Once again the spineless Pentagon (and cowardly Ministry of Defence) are unable to stand up for the difference between right and wrong. They are a charade of the public relations talk for military which is always blah blah honour blah courage blah blah troops when the reality is they stand for nothing. Small boy psychopaths in fetish uniforms with guns taking it out on innocents in countries they shouldn't be in for countries that want to steal oil and resources.
When the powerful group Council On Foreign Relations (Reptile HQ) wrote an article that Silvio Berlusconi was on his way out I knew it was a done deal. Amazingly when I reminded people after, they all replied that it was inevitable even even though it wasn't. He's the longest serving and most resilient post war Italian Prime Minister with more scandal on his crime sheet than any other E.U. leader. Berlusconi was the cockroach EU survivor but suddenly people exercised false memory syndrome with pseudo political knowledge. It's weird living in a parallel universe that filters the shit out of mainstream media. I worry who you are sometimes repeating TV and newspaper revisionism. Have you no critical faculties of how these false realities are constructed?
Now the Council On Foreign Relations is calling for war. Like Iraq they are telling lies about the reason. They are playing the non existent fear threat. They are despicable and we should hang them when the books are balanced. They are our intra-species predator.
That's the power of mainstream media. People are told afterwards 'it was inevitable' by the boob tube and that's the last they remember of the matter even though a Bilderberg Banker is now in charge of Italy. Who is this Matthew Kroenig character egging on war? What's his stake? How much money does he make out of this? How much fighting has he seen? Why is the TV friendly weasel able to say such outrageous statements when Iran have never attacked anyone and the Anglo American alliance is like a rabid dog out of control on crystal methampehtamine?
So when the Council For Foreign Relations (and lizards like @Rothkopf) say it's time for war with Iran you should know that China and Russia aren't going to sit by and watch the Anglo American Empire put another flag in the last Middle East oil field worth having.
Please be aware of the psycho groups that pull the strings of power whichever party is in government.
I realise it should be a NATO's flag dripping in oil above but the Pentagon is the boss, and this video interview is still remarkable for its candid nature. There's no mention of the Libyan wish to be paid in cash instead of worthless dollars that led to the West attacking Libya but Gaddafi makes his point very well. Libya is a very sweet piece of cake he says, and so let's be just as candid. The West has a very sweet tooth, and as can be seen in this interview, we're prepared to work with Islamic extremists to avoid going cold turkey.
Excellent Christmas cheer video round up on the flashpoints that the corporate media are not reporting accurately by Global Research TV. I don't agree with all their assessments, all of the time, but the service they provide means I'm covered on what's important around the world without a corporation's vested interested in the military industrial complex's skewering the truth like a freshly skinned deer over an Appalachian mountain barbecue fire.
I'm not into war porn but the photo above is easy to overlook that there's a tank rolling out of the smaller helicopter if you take a closer look. The defence Archons have fleeced us in order to keep themselves in toys that ultimately don't mean anything when tactical nuclear warheads start to take out key strategic points. The Straits of Hormuz is the one that matters most to the West and frankly I'll be raising a glass if Iran sever that arterial corridor of the Western banking/war model for beggar thy neighbour.
Taking a metaphysical look at the satellite map the decline of the masculine archetype and the emergence of the feminine bodes well in terms of geographic gender symbolism. See for yourself. It's only a fifth of the world's oil supply that flows through the couple of kilometres below that is deep enough for an oil tanker to crawl through.
Couple of nuclear tipped suicide speedboats would take care of that.
Growing up as an army brat and later working alongside the US military I've had a little more experience of the the war machine than most.
These days I've no patience for the way the military and war is unfailingly portrayed as a noble thing. It's not. The RAF pilot that blew this Libyan kids chin off deserves a good hiding instead of being lionized as compassionate because his cocker spaniel missed him while he was bombing the shit out of brown people.
I know the men in the line of duty are not the war creators but that's why it's so important to speak up.
Recently during Memorial Weekend in the States I was listening to my favourite radio host repeating the ' we honour our fallen soldiers' line and I got really annoyed. It''s pure conditioning and plays into the hands of uneducated kids by portraying that joining the military is honourable. So I tweeted this.
The West is cranking up the war machine for the second time this year and using the same 'humanitarian' reasoning it did for Libya. Yet again the hypocrisy of the perpetual war machine brain washes the masses into forgetting the body count for NATO war crimes is the largest this century by millions.
Please take a chance to look at what our cowardly Royal Airforce bombs did in Tripoli and Sirte before you go back to your corporate sponsored diet of X Factor and Footy.
It's easy to dismiss the Nobel peace prize awarded to Tawakul Karman (and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee) as unconnected to the X Factor and TV dinner lives of the West but this year is a great example of an activist in a part of the world, that along with Bahrain and Syria is buried under a daily dishing of brutality that exists in large part to pipe the oil into the West's vehicles.
Everything is connected. Listen to her. There's no daylight between her and say the words of John Lennon or any of the other greats that invariably the system seems to find a way to place a bullet in.
I think Wired do an enthusiastic yet unaspirational job of technology reporting. Unexpectedly, the last four weeks in a row , I've been blown away by The New Scientist's front cover stories telling a different narrative that is more faithful to the true scientist which is one of humility. How much we don't know, what science can't tell us, what we are unlikely to ever discover and this weeks story on the multiverse which I think is one of the few times we can use the word profound without risk of hyperbole.
Many people are overwhelmed by ideas of an infinite number of universes, and prefer not to think about science's claim of, for example, the existence of another universe where one is a double hand amputee victim, and thus unable to search the internet using a traditional mouse as you are now invariably doing.
The idea of this specific timeline uncoiling among an infinite number of potential and actual timelines is only cosmically coherent if the notion of free will and decision making is the precursor to a timeline branching off into another electromagnetic or holographic universe.
Put another way you're living in Grand Theft Auto Gaza-Strip and the video effects are very realistic.
You can thank the creator for that or if that's a problem, thank yourself by learning a little about Pandeism whereby we are co-creating reality in a momentarily disappearing collision of the past and the future, that we call the present.
I find it revolting to see Science's inability to pause and reflect, and do a little balancing of the books. A quick tally of the numbers of hungry, sick and impoverished people on the planet over the course of the scientific century tells me the Higgs boson will be understood more quickly than how to feed people.
That's a shit stain on 20th century materialist science's pretension of progress, and no better dramatised by people who think discussing their latest oblong of I ME MINE Appleness is any more interesting to me than being collared by a watch lover and given a lecture as to it's features and benefits. I just don't care about your tech. It's an illusion that will only hit home when the penny drops that technology can't be eaten but rice can. Taking an interest in where suffering can be alleviated is human. Not gazing into a screen of distraction.
Recently I've started taking offence to the war-porn blogs that are populated by psychopathy. These writers and commenters are jerking off to killing machines yet as soon as I point out that those assault vehicles/drones helicopters/iphone geotrackers would do a terrific job of picking off the residents of Boca Ratone or Key West the hypocritical rage and offence is extraordinary. I got banned yesterday from commenting on one war porn blog by Raymond Pritchett of Information Dissemination. He wrote
@charlesfrith not funny. Joking about killing Americans is not acceptable behavior. You have been banned.
He deleted that tweet later, but I want to make it clear to him. I only use obvious satire about killing Americans, but the killing business you pimp off is larger than the next 17 countries in the world. It is paid for by impoverished but frugal Asian savers through loans that are extorted with obvious military threats of retaliation and lastly but most importantly the U.S. weapons you stroke in your mind, kill real and innocent people day in and day out.
I ask you Raymond Pratchett
Is it really my satire that is unacceptable or is it the charade of goodness you call the American Way? The reality you are really jerking off to every time your priapism for war porn takes over you, and your readers, was in the Huffington Post yesterday (picture below), and I left a much more sober comment there because unlike you, I honour the soldiers by thinking about ways to keep them out of war. Not fetishising their killing.
I don't have a television but the last time I was drenched by HDTV Libya war reporting just as it was kicking off it made me feel sick to my stomach. Seeing how they hoodwinked you one more time into a war over oil. Will you ever learn? By coincidence SaLuSa warns us of this and even if you don't buy into who is doing the speaking, the 'what' is being said, specifically on the media and war is not up for debate. Thinking people should see how corrosive Television has been on our species. Via Vigilant Citizen
Victor Suvorov is a former spy who now lives in the UK. Here is the fourth part of a presentation to the U.S. Naval academy. It's an amazing smoke filmed rooms portrayal of Stalin's mind but right at the end (and that's why I start on the last part) he lays it square to the U.S.
He doesn't say it directly but like I've been saying to the West for years now indirect communication is an art form and this is an unambiguous message to the alert.
