We Are Through The Looking Glass

We've seen a few different Trumps over the years but not so much lately. I'm seeing more of them now.

5GW

Disinformation is Necessary

This pertains to the previous post, apropos or not? 😎

What is the reverse of 'saving last'?

https://charlesfrith.blogspot.com/2022/01/saving-six-for-last-plausible.html

Saving SIX For Last [Plausible Deniability]

Plausible Deniability?

The Waif Fare (Wayfair) Scandal

The Wayfair Scandal is predicated on impossibly expensive cabinets ($10000 plus) being sold online by Wayfair, with names that directly correlate to missing children. There are also cushions and pillows being sold but that's another story thread. Let's focus on the cabinets first.

I first saw this being gently peddled as 'weirdly expensive' cabinets by Amazing Polly, who to my mind is a little too well scripted and produced for a researcher.

She strikes me as possibly Mil Intel but as ever I could always be wrong.

I could go on forever with endless examples of Wayfair back-peddling on the reason.

"Industrial Strength Cabinets"

"Glitch in the website code"

...and so on and so forth, but nobody has explained the missing children's names for the cabinets which are often highly unique. This is one of many videos demonstrating the facts that are now being scrubbed off the net, at the speed of light. Watch this video below.

Tori Dunning

Andrea Jung



Samara Duplessis

In my experience of researching these topics, I urge people to proceed with caution. If anything can be mandela affected (sic), so can this.

No justice, no peace.

Update: Owen Crushing Benjamin says it's more likely a money laundering market.

MI6 "Whistleblower" Dr John Coleman Completely Discredited

Fortunately not many people take MI6 whistleblower and Author of Committee of 300 Dr. John Coleman seriously. However, it's important to call out the MI6 shills who print conspiracy theories to keep consumers busy with misleading information and distract from real powers like Zionism, Corporation City of London and Neoconservatism.

I've just been reminded that Mark Devlin still quotes the preposterous rumour that Theodor Adorno wrote The Beatles lyrics.

Is The NSA Trolling Ed Snowjob? (Is the CIA Trolling Julian?)

This morning I thought I'd write an explanation of why I think Julian Assange is both real and not what he says. I wanted to suggest that he might have started out on one trajectory and then changed course to another. I've tried to approach his mother to do interviews but that line of contact has now ceased and so while I believe Julian Assange's intentions are good I don't think he's in charge of the full game and any message carrier/whistleblower  who doesn't speak up about the 9/11 fairy tale can't be on the level because the evidence is so overwhelming.

I also think Edward Snowden may not be all he says he is. Both China and Russia have said no thanks to the most valuable information available and one they both offer large incentives for. If Ed Snowjob's information isn't good enough for Russia or China it isn't good enough for me. I've learned nothing I didn't know about before. I know more potential scenarios about hidden technology than most, and I also know more bullshit stories than most so take that caveat with my claim too. 

Edward Snowden is also on record as being the kind of sly fascist who would kill someone who leaks information. He said this only three years ago. 

That's not very cool is it?

The hypothesis I'm offering doesn't address the question of why would this pseudo-leaking or post modern limited hangout be made in the first place? One idea could be we're looking at internal tensions being played out between the CIA and the NSA both of whom Ed Snowjob worked for.

I think the answer is it's a PR trap to make Russia and China look bad. Syria is worsening and the only thing that is stopping the American's doing an Iraq/Afghanistan/Libya on Syria is the Western people's support for China and Russia. We don't trust our own governments any more and realise the old enemy is keeping the ship on an even keel

This is just an hypothesis and my thanks to Darren for articulating what I've been wanting to say about Julian and Edward for some considerable time with the Star Trek clip above. It demonstrates how complex the situation both Wikileaks and Snowden are in. I'm always open and positive towards all new information and ready to change my mind, but until Julian or Snowden talk about the fake 9/11 attacks it's no more real than the stuff we already know. Both may be naive but it's an intelligence test failure to be on the wrong side of history with respect to 9/11.

This is information warfare and truth is your only weapon. 

The above stands as mine.

Dark Side Of The Moon - A Mockumentary Disinformation Classic

UPDATE: My popular Youtube account with hundreds of hours of uploads was closed down earlier because of the above documentary. It is now embedded from Google Videos where I originally secured it. Many other users have uploaded it to Youtube, yet I was singled out immediately after writing my post below this notice.

This blog was also closed down.

I've since managed to rescue this blog by repeating an authorization action by SMS that by coincidence I only did last week to prevent unauthorized access on my Gmail account from Honduras. Google Kindly provide information like that when accounts are being compromised on different continents.

It's fair to assume that my post below has annoyed the living heck out of someone. I have my suspicions, but more importantly while we figure out why my post is a threat I'm going to appeal to Google as to why I'm being penalised for transferring a video from one Google platform to another. 

I don't hold Google accountable as there is no business that is not subject to outside pressure.

Update II: I've now used a Youtube upload. It isn't mine but its the same film I lost my account over. Such is life.

Dark Side of the Moon is a French documentary by director William Karel that originally aired on ARTE in 2002 with the title Opération Lune. The basic premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo 11 Moon landing was faked and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help from director Stanley Kubrick. 

It features some surprising guest appearances unless one factors in that it's a CIA  sponsored "mockumentary" disinformation classic that muddies the waters beyond recognition and in a way that is very hard to explain. The give away is heavyweights brought in on a nudge and wink to cloak the story in the "ridicule curtain" most notably, chief lizard Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry (Heinz) Kissinger, Alexander Haig and two decent humans Buzz Aldrin and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane Kubrick. The former is obliged to and the latter is likely unaware that heart attacks can be arranged.

The tone of the documentary is heavy "ridicule curtain" most effectively lowered around the UFO question in the fifties when the CIA purchased The National Enquirer to successfully drive the subject out of polite company and into low income/education demographics. The doc/mockumentary begins with low key revelations of NASA working closely with Hollywood at the time of the Moon landings and is meant to be tonally ironic. However these have now been subsequently proven by Jay Weidner in his first class and excellently researched technical film documentary Kubrick's Odyssey.

Over the course of the tale, Karel facilitates the credibility of the ridicule curtain through by and large telling the truth with a preposterous honesty that the serious mind cannot entertain. He even postulates that not only did Kubrick help NASA fake the moon landings but that he was eventually killed by the CIA to cover up the truth (not accurate he was taken out for his film Eyes Wide Shut before it was finally released.)

The appearance of Rumsfeld and Dr. Kissinger who definitely know all the dirty laundry affairs of State are a touch of genius in terms of strategic communications planning. 

It's genius plausible deniability.

Every time the elite tiers need to kill a meme they wheel out the big guns. This one worked well though they never counted on Jay Weidners stubborn, persistent and scholarly approach to the subject that leaves the serious researcher in no doubt.

Angels With Dirty Faces

I left a comment over at John Smallman's blog of channelled information from the being known as Saul. The current meta narrative in channelled information is extraordinarily interesting but it takes about twenty minutes to explain why so to date I've never told anyone. 

 I keep an eye on John Smallman and a couple of others including the manipulative one(s) that peddle some very corrosive ideas.  However uncharacteristically for Saul the last post was a lecture on the collective conciousness of the 2012 Olympics and I thought to myself. "No fucking way Saul. You might be an Angel (or whatever) but I'm not taking instruction from anyone"

The irritation also gave me a chance to articulate why much channelled information proselytizes a flat, transparent and non hierarchical and mutually participatory world, and yet channelling is tainted by its very use of the monologue and repetition. It's advertising and the jury is still out on who is the client.

Here's my comment to Saul.

The Military Expo Olympics are sponsored by DOW Chemical who produced Agent Orange and which has two million grotesquely malformed victims

- [Ngo Vinh Long, in “Vietnamese Perspectives,” in Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War, editorial by Stanley Kutler (New York: Scribner’s, 1996]

Google images will bring you up to date very quickly on how fresh this matter still is. http://bit.ly/MXDpAM

DOW Chemical deny responsibility because they’re guilty and thus liable for billions in compensation to care for victims. DOW Chemical also deny responsibility for the Bhopal disaster in India. Once again they owe billions in compensation they will never provide. The poorest and weakest suffer directly from Olympic Sponsor DOW Chemical’s greed and corporate psychopathy.

However it’s easy to see that DOW Chemical are deeply humiliated and embarrassed by their history of killing, poisoning and mutating innocent people. We know this because DOW Chemical hired the most vindictive corporate espionage outfit called Stratfor to spy on Bhopal activists looking for information to smear anyone but themselves.

There are many examples of the Olympic detachment from humanity including GovCorp themes of corporatization and militarization, but I wont repeat them all and risk appearing sour. That’s not the case. People are entitled to enjoy their free time any way they choose and the human moments transcend the worst excesses of the Olympic franchise.

However to try and claim that the Olympics are a beacon for awakening is a painfully incomplete narrative..Saul’s propensity for the monologue frames a point of view that nobody can contribute to or shape.

In this respect Saul is reliant on a manner of communication that has more in common with the Patriarchy such as the Church or Dictators than an open conversation.

This is the paradox of the channelled message. It heralds a new age while relying on the quintessential model of hierarchical communications. The rhetorical speech, the soliloquy and the monologue.

If humanity needs instruction on what to think about the Olympics then I put it to Saul that we’ve learned nothing at all.

Clif High - The Six Yogas Of Naropa & A Kick In The Toroidal Nuts

One of the great things about the CIA/NSA controlled bulletin boards Above Top Secret and Godlike Productions is that they are populated by trash-mouth sceptics and astro-turf poison tongues too obtuse to understand the subtlety of Clif' High's work and the broad thrust of timelines versus the ever-present-now methodology of managing the future. (It's complex).

That's just the way we want them. Shooting their mouths off and doing the job they were destined to fulfil as the collective serpent that turned on its own propaganda tail. 

If I was a shit raker in the CIA and the NSA with a 'ticket' to an underground base in the event it all goes (extinction level event) pear shaped, I'd shut em down right now, but as they are fulfilling a task nobody ever anticipated, including me, it suits my agenda to thank the men in black for epic failing big-time on our behalf. 

It's a cork popping WIN.... Depending on whose side you're on of course.

Here's the post that gamed the future (and the ever-present-now)

Zecharia Sitichin's Anunnaki Disinformation

Without Zecharia Sitchin I would never have immersed myself in the Sumerian Cuneiform tablets. However by my own reasoning I concluded that they are disinformation and thus worthy of attention but scrutinised closely for agenda. 

I also knew that Zecharia Sitchin had CIA connections and right from the beginning I have questioned his New York lifestyle and his abrupt manner at dealing with people as well as his elusive history which changed over time according to my research. 

His Freemasonry is not the final nail in the coffin but merely the start of a new analysis of the Anunnaki legacy. It's about psychological emancipation from the 'Slave Species' meme that was, in the final analysis, the purpose of Sitchin's well funded work.

Sitchin's didn't sell millions of copies of his books and yet lived a Manhattan life of affluence. Furthermore they aren't that good. I have electronic copies for anyone interested and the journey for unmasking the Sitchin's fabrication starts at the website Sitchin's Was Wrong.

There Were Giants In The Earth In Those Days - Genesis 6:4

I've blogged before about the Smithsonian truth embargo on our history but this discovery by Michael Tellinger on the South African border is extraordinary and has barely been just uploaded. It takes an understanding of the Expando Earth model to understand the essential gravity science behind this, but the really hard work is figuring out why our institutions lie to us. That's a little more application than nuts and bolts science.

Please note. The Bible is a tool of manipulation but like all good disinformation and misinformation its greatest utility is in figuring out the nature and agenda of our manipulators. We learn more and more every day in these wonderful days of the apocalypse (the unveiling) and revelation.

Update: Michael Writes:

I would like to share with you what could be one of the best pieces of evidence that there were once giants on Earth a long, long time ago. Geologists have marvelled at this giant foot print in rough granite, about 4 feet long. This is a deeply sacred, mystical and spiritual place among African knowledge keepers and so it should remain. It is affectionately known as the Footprint of God. At about 4 feet in length, the person who would have left it behind must have been about  24 feet OR 7.5 metres tall. This site presents us with a real dilemma and a deep mystery that needs to be resolved.

I start many of my presentations by saying, that the history of our planet is a lot stranger than most of us could possibly imagine. All you need to do is look at the brilliant research of Klaus Dona, to see the evidence of 7,5m-tall giants in prehistory on our planet.

Some claim that the footprint is a natural erosion pattern.  Personally I find that suggestion highly improbable for various reasons that I will not go into here. But to support my thoughts on this, Prof. Pieter Wagener from the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University in Port Elizabeth SA, and a PhD in applied maths, suggests that "there is a higher probability of little green men arriving from space and licking it out with their tongues, than it being created by natural erosion".

The footprint is located in South Africa, near the town of Mpaluzi, close to the Swaziland border. It is estimated to be between 200 million and 3 billion years old because of our current understanding of the formation of granites in Earth's history. This dating immediately causes heated debate and argument - so I urge you to keep your mind open and focused on the evidence.

This amazing footprint in granite was discovered in 1912 by a farmer called Stoffel Coetzee, while hunting. At that time this was a deeply remote part of South Africa known as the Eastern Transvaal, teeming with wild life, including antelope, wildebeest and lions. The footprint remains in the same condition as it was when first discovered. The possibility that this was a carved hoax is extremely low because of its remote location. The erosion pattern inside the foot is very similar to the natural erosion around the footprint. It is unimaginable that a few thousand years ago, someone decided to carve a giant footprint into the rock at this remote particular spot. Even today, it is difficult to find.

The real mystery is how this amazing phenomenon occurred – I have no real proof but I have several theories and ideas, but these are just speculation, allowing for an extremely unusual set of circumstances.  BUT – the footprint remains and we cannot wish it away.

YES - It is granite - it is a well recognised geological part of South Africa and recorded on all geological maps - that is why this footprint is such an incredible mystery. It can be described as a "phenocrystic" granite, OR coarse porphyritic granite, that underwent several different stages of cooling. The result being an interesting mixture of large and small granules. This is why granite companies are keen to mine this area for granite because it will look really "pretty" when polished. In the official Geology Of South Africa, this outcrop is called Mpuluzi Batholith (Granite) and the official dating of this rock produced dates of around 3,1 billion years.

Let me remind you that we know less about our human history than is allowed by the laws of physics. So if you fall into the category of individuals who immediately dismiss this as a hoax or natural erosion, I ask you to check your ego and arrogance and open your mind to infinite possibility in a multiverse of infinite possibility.

This is a real mystery that needs close scientific examination and I will be embarking on this in the near future.

The Men In Black Movie (How Hollywood Paints The Bad Guys As Good)

I wrote this comment on Adam Curtis's blog dealing with Chuck Norris movies that brainwashed the U.S. to fight immoral wars. I'd just watched Men In Black at the time and so it seemed only right to explain how the disinformation and brainwashing game still goes on.

With respect to the notion that "you begin to wonder whether the whole of the subsequent economic and foreign policy of Britain and the United States wasn't created by the rubbish movies of the 1980s" the reality is closer than is palatable.

Violence in films paints a reality that is most effective by programming populations to be prejudiced against the artificial enemy of the day and most damaging is the mind control it exerts on young uneducated males, and their propensity to join the military and kill foreigners obediently. The CIA and Pentagon among others permit Hollywood to use their war hardware in return for script editorial veto and inclusion. If a war movie isn't appropriate, the alphabet soup agencies and war psychos have the money and influence to make movies that frame issues to their liking. 

A lovely example from the 90's found that security males fond of dark glasses, coiled wire to an ear, and complete obedience to their pensions over and above their personal relationships and any morality were beginning to be seen as a sinister accessories tainted by black budget projects being openly discussed on the internet. 

The solution was for a cool movie portraying the males in dark civilian attire and glasses as behind-the-scenes dudes with sexy kit, and off planet responsibilities. It was so successful the lay person now thinks "Men In Black" references special security guys even though the original Men In Black phenomena is super-high weirdness that troubles the Feds as much as it does the witnesses who receive a visit.

The geniuses in disinformation fixed it as neat as one could wish. They steered a movie that positioned their Feds as the 'Official' Men In Black even though civilians came up with the term to describe a UFO related phenomena.

Hollywood made the MIB's cool and real life supernatural cache made them bad ass cool. A complete win for synthetic reality.

The following interview with Nick Redfern by Mike Clelland is a first class introduction to the subject or even a reference for the researcher.

Podcast Powered By Podbean

Genius Plausible Deniability

Very funny, even if it is the most corrosive secret in human history. Very well scripted by the Frasier writers at a time when there was a lot of chatter starting to leak out. That's John Glenn in the photo above.

Ancient Technology As Disinformation?

I'd be fibbing if I didn't admit to a fondness for tinfoil-hat grade conspiracy theory indulgence in the niche subject of Disinformation/COINTELPRO/Disinfo or information warfare. Nobody else thinks its interesting beyond spotting obvious examples and outing them but the stories created to blur or muddy the truth reveal an important picture of the thinking behind the disnfo agent in terms of what problem does it solve for them and how that informs us of broader psychological pictures such as their agendas and neurosis.


Take this 'camcorder found in ancient artefact'. A closer look reveals it to be riddled with disinformation tell tale signs. My impression is that it's the sort of video that acts well against the increasingly popular Ancient Aliens series. On the one hand it attracts the fan to defend the possibility of the discovery of ancient technology leaving them most exposed to ridicule when subsequently revealed as a hoax. That's my interpretation of why anybody would go to the effort of creating a video like this....anonymously.

AJ Ensor - Disinformation

90% of intelligence agency work is disinformation and furthermore 90% of disinformation is the truth with one or two lies, so the agenda can be either confused, steered or controlled. When I spot what looks like disinformation I pay it close attention and try to deconstruct the agenda because people have gone to some effort to confuse me, and that is always very revealing of their aims.


The last time I had occasion to observe information closely that elites meddlers feared enough to pollute was Whitley Strieber's book, The Master of the Key  because of the meaning distortions put into it without anyone noticing for a decade or so. Whitley was given some incredible information about the human race and somebody went to the effort of making small but vital changes to, I think, the proof read copy. Those changes went unnoticed till just recently when a reader noticed the discrepancies. Even the author had missed those until alerted.

Listen to internet radio with Ohio Exopolitics on Blog Talk Radio

In the interview above, my alarm bells were alerted by an ex forces UFO book author called AJ Ensor (he claims). In my experience ex forces are to be viewed with suspicion because they are often on a pension and are obligated to do as they are told. His claims to be a journalist, but writes very shoddily, he makes fantastic claims for a man who is now dead, liberally sprinkles his intelligence community links at any opportunity as a calling card but most obvious to the alert minded, speaks awkwardly and deceptively with damaging admissions.

AJ Ensor admits he didn't check facts like what Majestic 12 means (UFO 101) for the uninitiated), he goes into a long meaningless ramble about the bell curve and statistical deviation, his first book is a children's fantasy and so is his second if you want my opinion. Time and again in the interview AJ Ensor isn't interested in the facts that a real journalist would pursue, instead he prefers to spin tales that any reasonably UFOlogist would identify as grounded in varying grades of truth depending on one's personal weltanschauung of the topic. It was only at the end when his story dissembled into meaningless bullshit that I actually gave it some credit as disinformation that is so bad we are meant to do the opposite of his final recommendation when in fact his final conclusions align with my own understanding of how to handle off planet intervention. I am posting it so that fellow dabblers can see how difficult it is to pursue an understanding of a very difficult subject.

However each time I see the efforts that organisations will go to in order to infect UFO information I'm energised that my instincts are right. They are hiding something and there's an agenda being played out here. I do recommend Ohio Exopolitics who frequently serve up (to use a food and drug dealing metaphor) interesting guests to be interviewed.


Update: Whitley Strieber disagrees with me and despite it being his book, I maintain my position.

Dutchsinse

Good guy sharing good information.

Government In Social Media

Anunnaki - Dont Watch This Film

It's my belief that the Anunnaki left disinformation in the shape of those cuneiform clay tablets in Sumeria which means that Zecharia Sitchin's analysis is flawed. However there's still good information to be picked out of all this by the seasoned researcher who is sensitive to the hand of disinformation.