Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Monday, 13 April 2026

Neo-Catholicism Rising: Observations from a Theology Outsider









Over the past few years, I have watched a Christian revival start to take shape. It has hardened into something specific: Neo-Catholicism, or what I am also calling New Wave Christianity. It is antizionist. It is anti-Scofield Bible. And it is, on its own terms, the most uncompromising version of the faith that Jews and Muslims may not have run into lately.


The central claim is straightforward. Do not kill. Above all, do not kill for group justice or collective payback. Christians are the only Abrahamic tradition that holds every human being has an immortal soul. That single point rules out a lot of the exceptions the other faiths sometimes allow. They are right about the soul. I am not here to mislead anyone on that.


I am an amateur theology student. I have put in the hours on the Abrahamic faiths and a few others. Christianity is the one I know historically the best. Catholic upbringing, no re-conversion. I am not a Christian. I simply stand next to this group as we chime, and because they strike me as solid, committed people.


My own studies keep shifting. Roman Christianity. Origins of the biblical texts. Christological arguments and early heresies. The conversion of European peoples to the faith. Overlaps with the Nag Hammadi library. The Flavian theory on Gospel creation. Yeshua versus the later “Jesus” framing. Right now, I am wrestling with the Ethiopian Bible and what it says about Christian epistemology and knowledge integration. I mine a topic until I get what I came for, then move on.


The podcasters and commentators I pay attention to; Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, Coach Colin, and maybe a Carrie Prejean Boller? Sit in the top five percent for theological robustness and lived conviction. They are hardcore. They are decent company. We do not waste four or five hours a day on heretic knife fights. That would be pointless. Instead, we talk transnational criminal research, pattern recognition, and the events legacy media ignores.


What stands out is their quiet internal fire. It feels more exploratory, more empathetic, and more righteous than the alternatives I have studied. Tucker calling out Trump for refusing to place his hand on the Bible during the oath. Baron Coleman pressing Andrew Kolvet hard on the timeline and Utah airport details around the Erika Kirk meeting. Candace Owens delivering daily. Carrie Prejean Boller, fresh Catholic convert, getting herself removed from Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission for refusing to treat Zionism as biblical prophecy. These are not poses. They cost something.


I have been anti-Catholic for years because of institutional corruption. What I missed is that Catholicism has always kept a clearer doctrinal line on the Holy Lands and Jerusalem than most Protestant strains—especially the Scofield-influenced evangelical ones. That fact has warmed my view of the Vatican a notch. I still speak to the same God everyone else does without needing the wrapper, but the intellectual consistency is there.


If I ever joined a congregation, it would probably start with a RC church, though I would not limit it. My background does not drive the observation. A Hindu watching the same revival would see the same thing: a current of belief that actually works in practice. I like to duck into a mosque or temple from time to time too.


Arguments for and against Christianity are endless—historical, textual, philosophical. Fine. The power of the lived conviction is harder to wave away. This revival is not nostalgia. It is present-tense, adaptive, and pulling in serious minds who have had enough of the diluted versions.


That is the record. No gloss. Just what I see.



Thursday, 26 March 2026

Midnight Multiplex Morgan Hislop





The destruction of the zionist project was sealed under the Trump presidency.


What a legend.


NCSWIC

Thursday, 13 February 2025

Napoleon - 2023




I don't trust any historical accounts these days. Our timelines have been tampered with and so it's impossible to tell what's been made up, exaggerated or most importantly left out.

I do enjoy some historical topics while I wait for the full truth to be discovered or revealed and so Napoleon is a subject I've researched to some extent. I don't believe the logistical explanation for supplying 6 to 7 hundred thousand troops (Grande Armée) a thousand miles into Russia. I also don't believe that Napoleon was exiled to the island of Elba and then the island of St Helena for the reasons provided by the British. Why would you win a war and then give the vanquished their own island, a navy ship and a staff?

It doesn't make sense that Napoleon 'escaped' back to the French mainland and marched all the way to Paris with a rag tag army and even the logistics involved in that exercise as he had no official authority or state mechanisms to leverage.

This latest movie falls short of conveying Napoleon's full life as it would require a 10-20 part TV miniseries to do it justice but as I have an interest I thought I'd watch this cinematic effort and it jumps about like all earlier attempts. 

The editors keep in a few small movie set accidents. Things falling over, that sort of thing. It doesn't work and it's compounded by factual errors like stating Napoleon was born in 1768 (it was 1769) and that he bombed the largest pyramid in Egypt with cannon fire.

We need a big name actor to put on Napoleon's clothes and Joaquin Phoenix does a good job  with arguably Vanessa Kirby's Josephine Bonaparte as the stand out acting. It's a reasonable movie but I'd forgotten I don't like war scenes in films so I fast forwarded through those but the special effects were novel.

Below is an explanation of the credulity of the wartime logistics. He makes the mistake of undermining the claims but then conflates this with the existence of Napoleon at all which is silly but it's still worth watching.



Wednesday, 12 February 2025

Birmingham Royal Ballet - Cinderellla





I went to see this at Southampton Mayflower Theatre last Saturday. It was exactly what I hoped for, anticipated and expected.


Over the years I've seen ballet productions by Matthew Bourne, English National Ballet, Birmingham Royal Ballet and Opéra de Paris in Beijing.


It was a better seat ticket than usual and the proximity exposed me to mistakes. Did I see those mistakes before? No. Was it still one of the best ballet productions I ever seen? Absolutely.


The opening scenery was sophisticated as I've come to expect yet subsequent scenes were absolutely minimal and cosmic themed at the end. The music for Cinderella is Prokofiev, it's the best score I've yet listened to. The dance ensembles were dazzling as were those very costumes. The lead female (Cinderella), Miki Mizutani is the essence of the role, in such a manner that I marvel how a Japanese girl can live on the other side of the world and play a very European part with such perfection - for me at least.

Special shout out to the pantomime ballet of the wicked stepsisters played by Eilis Small and Reina Fuchigami. Ms Small was very attractive from the get go despite playing a difficult lanky role of clumsy yet complimentary to the overall ensemble. I felt a connection with her that lasted longer than usual. Ms Reina Fuchigami played the plump sister and was in the top three dancers in the production. Again, clumsy but poetic is a difficult act to pull off yet both sisters do exactly that.


What have I missed. Serendipity. The seat to my left was occupied by the best conversationalist I've encountered in years. She was about 70 to 80ish and I would have spent the next 24 hours with her if not longer.




Monday, 16 December 2024

Candace Owens & Explosive Truths



Candace Owens has been dropping Napalm on Israel, Zionism and Jews who support Israel and Zionism all this year. It's been quite a phenomenon to observe as she takes her Catholicism seriously and researches her subjects well before giving them massively wider publicity than the secrecy and censorship they've long been protected by.


I was going to publish her findings about the Sabbatean Frankists (Jewish Satanists) a few months ago, but held off and I'm glad I did. Her recent expose of the Israeli attempt to sink the USS Liberty has garnered over 4 million views on Youtube and many more on X.


That information has long been published on this blog since 2013, but it's Candace who has cracked the silence on this disgusting and heart wrenching attack on innocent US sailors leading to 34 deaths and a 171 injured.


I'll drop some more Candace video clips below to provide a fuller picture of what she has been exposing this year like no other has done in history on this deeply protected subject.












The Jewish holocaust is the most historically riddled with embellishments, lies, inflation and maudling obnoxiously ridiculous narratives. That doesn't mean Jews didn't die in WWII but the cartoon served up as official narrative is in it's twilight months, and the truth is more complex, more manipulated and more leveraged than the reality which is disgusting enough as are any wars often driven by Zionism.


The people who sided up with Zionism and doctrinaire Israeli history are weak. They may appear powerful but those days are evaporating and a lot of weak sycophantic people including A list media personalities and Academia and so forth are going to be judged on their support for the most reprehensible synthetic history ever.

Wednesday, 11 December 2024

Brandon Martinez Perspectives








I wonder; I just wonder if Brandon Martinez is acquainted with the Q material and specifically the Eleven references in 4500 drops (or so) to Adolf Hitler? 


Specifically Q Drop 928 Mar 2018 - 4.35.34 PM EST




We adapt to new and credible information when and if it presents itself.



Lamentably Mr Martinez resorts to ad homs and thus logical fallacies including argumentum ad lapidem or appeal to the stone. He name checks the yeti-believers and flerfers.



I have a much more nuanced working-theory than flatted earth. I call it the infinite plane hypothesis. Infinite past, infinite future and infinite space. Thus infinite plane.




Any information that refutes it through contention will require a better theory, though a new hypothesis is just as, if not more useful.