Discovered in Fuschel am See in Austria which is quite far from the nearest Mesopotamian 7 Eleven, leading us to conclude that globalization isn't as new as we like to think. But then you know by now I disagree with the Smithsonian fairy tale. Link here.
Without Zecharia Sitchin I would never have immersed myself in the Sumerian Cuneiform tablets. However by my own reasoning I concluded that they are disinformation and thus worthy of attention but scrutinised closely for agenda.
I also knew that Zecharia Sitchin had CIA connections and right from the beginning I have questioned his New York lifestyle and his abrupt manner at dealing with people as well as his elusive history which changed over time according to my research.
His Freemasonry is not the final nail in the coffin but merely the start of a new analysis of the Anunnaki legacy. It's about psychological emancipation from the 'Slave Species' meme that was, in the final analysis, the purpose of Sitchin's well funded work.
Mike Clelland interviews Christopher Knowles and riff on any number of subjects but the line that comes to mind is the question of why the Ancient Aliens hypothesis drives the high priests of opinion shaping nut?. This is interesting because the ancient alien evidence is in some ways more robust than say the dream-like, trans-dimensional, culturally influenced, conspiratorial phenomena of today. We don't have the cuneiform tablets for the 20th century, we don't have the Nag Hammadi texts or the cultural purity of UFO cave and alien paintings where the pseudo cynic can't point to the influence of popular-culture media influence or the constantly twitter trending psychological-hash-tag-theory-of-the-moment.
I find these audio interviews essential value for piecing together the mystery which spreads into every single thread of inquiry presented by the ubiquitous alien and UFO theme. It it a new archetype that is larger than the Trickster? Maybe it's a composite. A 21st century recombinant-culture archetype mashup working it's way through and threading together every culture and every facet of every culture, from the mass media of the military industrial govcorp complex to the oral tradition of the Dogon tribe of Africa or the Australian Aboriginals.
Fascinating & Infuriating. I am however most comfortable with alien abduction information. I find time and again that the tone of voice and extensive description of the enigma most real through this lens and so paradoxically I need the least evidence to convince myself. Tone of voice and conviction over time is where I find intuition more concrete than the flakes of empirical evidence we have.
I've yet to find a better rationale of the alien presence than the writings of the Nag Hammadi texts. I think it's worthwhile referring to these in the event of unexpected visitors or rather a more material manifestation of their presence. Technically we can go back further in history to the Sumerian Cuneiform tablets but unlike the Gnostic texts the tablets are the word of the 'Gods who from heaven to earth came'. That's Gods/Elohim plural (check that in Genesis for yourself) and is a big difference from mystic humans who warned us of mind parasites and inorganic beings from space manipulating our planet unseen. It's clear they've done nothing for us since Mesopotamia. I'd rather be hunter gatherer than have anything to do with them. Far more honourable and in harmony with nature. John Lash explains why we should be serious about these Gnostic Samizdat texts the Vatican Church did its best to destroy.
David Hatcher Childress draws our attention to ancient Sumerian/Akkadian cuneiform writings turning up in Tiahuanaco in Bolivia (close to Lake Titicaca Peruvian border) on ancient artefacts of The Pokotia Monolith and The Magna Fuente Bowl.
It's like an ancient chip shop turning up in an archaeological dig at Angkor Wat.You can listen to an interview with him on the subject by Coast over here or play the Youtube embed below. It's first class audio and further evidence of the concerted effort to conceal our true historical record.
One great point David Hatcher-Childress makes that hadn't occurred to me, is that the Smithsonian may well be unaware of the deception it perpetrates. Most of the key evidence was spirited away around the 18th and 19th century in America and so the narrative is already in place. Once the story is bedded down i.e. the pyramids in Egypt have nothing to do with the Pyramids in Mesoamerica, it matters very little who is in charge from now on as they will certainly be innocent of revisionism and have a pension to protect. They will be unwilling to interrogate a time line that has been in place for quite some time. It's more about a nudge than a push if anything emerges to challenge the story like this incredible evidence that our ancestors had intercontinental trade not unlike the early 20th century at the very least. Possibly flying if we factor in those Indian Vimanas.
The end of the interview refers to the end of Indiana Jones where secret treasures are locked up under heavy government lock and key and as Jordan Maxwell claims 'Stephen Spielberg doesn't make movies to entertain. He makes them to comment on the world'. I think Jordan is right and if you listen to this interview you can make your own mind up. Here's a previous Smithsonian post.
Nobody took the implications of the Sumerian Cuneiform tabletsmore seriously than I, but as time went on I started to question why would I take the word of the Anunnaki seriously? Particularly with their longer-term perspective of time it would make perfect sense to throw a few tablets of disinformation into the mix.
John Lash also came to this conclusion (though long before I started to think about these things) as he outlines in this splendid interview. I'm more or less finished with the Anunnaki mythology for now, and increasingly focused on the Nag Hammadi codices, though obviously it's interesting, as all disinformation is, to analyse and look for motives and behavioural clues. If there's one talk about the Anunnaki that I urge everyone to listen to it's this one.
John also reminds us that most of the cuneiform tablets are transactions like the one above for sheep and goat tallies. They were the Goldman Sachs of their day. Which is one of those coincidences that makes a lot of sense if we think it through?
I don't mind admitting I'm wrong as long as I can learn and can move on to the next level, so I'm going to share this latest interview with James Horak who states clearly that the Anunnaki are fictitious. He makes no elaboration on that apart from the a point I too have questioned, which is how would complex life evolve on Planet Nibiru with so little essential exposure to our sun?
I imagine there's a more nuanced solution to the puzzle than the materially substantial ancient cuneiform clay tablets he classifies as fictitious but as this interview is stuffed full of explosive information on the big cosmic picture I'm happy to share it and concede I may well be mistaken though I don't believe I'm totally misled. The last two days of catching up on material has been extraordinary and a much more complex control paradigm is emerging. I can't imagine anyone who is new to this information could handle more than a few minutes of it.
I think it was William Henry who moaned about the 'cult of Sitchin' the other day and so in the interest of presenting some different evidence I am posting another SumerianCuneiform tablet translator Edmund Marriage. Which would be OK if it was just to offer an opposing point of view (though Marriage and Sitchin agree on much) but Edmund has an additional interpretive historical story about Jesus in England which I really don't have time to integrate into my Annunaki studies but proves that there's a lot of ways to interpret history. Or more accurately a lot of study.
However the cylinder seal above is different. It's one of the hardest minerals on the planet and we have no idea how the Sumerian culture engraved it so as when rolled across tiny strips of wet clay it reveals pictorial stories.
That is unless one entertains the ancient alien intervention story which makes perfect sense to me. But then so does the genetic manipulation of DNA outlined in those cuneiform tablets by Zecharia Sitchin between homo erectus and homo sapien.
Meanwhile in back scratching quackademically controlled history of humans land, the official story is of no civilisation before 5 000 years ago, despite those Bosnian Pyramids et al.
Great little clip from Michael about the Sumerian cuneiform tablets that are (even if Anunnaki disinformation) an important piece of the puzzle to understanding why we remember so little of our history.
Learn about them and prevent the great reset that cyclically happens to our species from occurring again.
Dr. Jack Pruett's book The Grandest Deception and this Coast to Coast interview above is even more hardcore than the previous two discoveries I made this week.There is so much evidence piling up on the internet at the moment with respect to the Annunaki/Nephilim Zecharia Sitchin, David Icke, Michael Tellinger, William Bramley subject that I suspect the story is gathering early momentum to hit a wider audience. A few weeks ago I was scratching around trying to get good research material but was losing sources to disinformation instead of gaining. Now like a miracle I get hit with three new sources in a week and I think there's more to come. I need to go for a run so I'll add the links to this post later.
Interesting piece of history. On the left is Zecharia Sitchin, man of many hats. Sitchin says the Sumerian tablets are unequivocal. A very long time ago, an alien species called the Annunaki (or the Elohim in the bible) came to our planet to mine the monoatomic gold in order to purify their own planet Nibiru's atmosphere.
They may have stretched the story a bit to give themselves the leadership mystique.
"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness".
Monotheism is a big deal and yet God isn't plural here. He's not chilling with other Gods, so that is more likely Anunnaki speak for 'we're the big kahunas round here'.
The Annunaki couldn't keep their hands off our women. Sleeping downstairs I think the Victorians termed it. But it's also recorded in the Bible and on the Sumerian tablet.
Genesis 6:2 That the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
That's where the bloodline thing started. The half breeds of the hybrids and Annunaki are a bit spesh. Like that royal wedding hysteria you all wet your knickers over yesterday. Those blue bloods are, as Princess Diana used to say before they murdered her 'not human'.
Zecharia Sitchin had CIA links back in the day, and it's fair to say he guided the cultural narrative of the Annunaki with their assistance.
My assumption is he cut a deal where he did favours from time to time. Even with good book sales, Sitchin's Upper West Side lifestyle was incommensurate with independent research.
Here he is being interviewed by Jordan Maxwell (note the Masonic handshake). Jordan is not an intellectual, and insists he's no scholar and is always humbly stating that he's just an ordinary man pursuing extraordinary knowledge. That's true but Jordan has particular pattern recognition skills that enable him to spot important symbolism most of us are not able to.
Ancient bloodlines, secret societies, paternal orders, symbolism, etymology, astro-theology and all these topics align with the texts on those Sumerian cuneiform tablets. I guess Jordan pursued Sitchin and not vice versa, but it is telling that the maverick scholar gives both the time and honour to the amateur sleuth both publicly and I hear privately. Like an Inspector Morse sharing the cryptic crossword with Detective Colombo out of respect. My only question is did he do this to keep his enemies close?
Again pure speculation, but if you read Sitchin's Wikipedia entry and the one he gave to the New York Times it's all over the map. Israel to Shiite Iraq, Azeri American to University of London educated Russian. It's the mark of someone hiding his past and living a life of deception. One that paid handsomely for Zecharia Sitchin.
There are only two supercrooks in Egypt for me. Mubarak is just a thief of the highest order but Zahi Hawass is the Egyptian handwriting arm of American revisionist history. During the Jasmine revolution Hawass was fired, then rehired and now under two weeks later he's been busted for a year in jail.
This is big news because money is one thing but crimes against history are crimes against the people of the world. Watch this story unfold and let's see why those ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets stolen from the Baghdad museum "guarded" by the US military were in some people's eye's one of the reasons why Merka invaded Babylon in the first place. If you like your history Indiana Jones style. This is where the action is at.
Oh and BTW you trolls on Wired.com aren't up to standard. You need to raise your game if you're going get me limbering up good 'n proper. Pluck my sums.
