Showing posts with label universal laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label universal laws. Show all posts

Saturday 16 December 2023

Zerb - Mwaki (feat. Sofiya Nzau) [Official Audio]
















The music is a remix of MIANA 'WIMBO' I shared over here


The ongoing case to secure my X holdings Corporation data is documented back here. As I've repeatedly stated, I need it for unrelated to X Holding Corporation judiciary processes. Presently that is a cost free process but that will not always be the case, given my extensive testimony to X Holding Corporations was read by a human not a machine.


An alpha would give me the data they're obliged to by law. A gamma would hold it back out of spite.


Written without prejudice. All rights reserved.


Friday 14 July 2023

Back To The Future - Future Proves Past

Sunday 4 June 2023

Gore Vidal vs Roy Cohn




Gore Vidal never disguised his aristocratic background. Roy Cohn did. Also, Gore Vidal dropped more intel about his social class than anyone else to my knowledge. Gore Vidal taught me the importance of knowing where a Young American was schooled. It's a big deal here, if not bigger across the pond of idyllic thinking.


Goalhanger Films have great historians in their employ, both of whom would have fascinating opinions on the conversation above. Particularly Dominic who is a US political history scholar. Trigger warning : If you continue to read, there's a spoiler.


My conversation starters are: Did you notice they're all (including the presenter with blond curls - a fetish for Roy), homosexual in this Television Production. 

Where's Harvey Milk when we need him?

Is Salisbury Cathedral made by man? 


What sort of man?

Monday 22 May 2023

Conspiracy Realist





The Telegraph's Meredith Walker, wrote an article yestereday corroborating the key points I made in my previous post. They are that when .GOV has an inconvenient human rights obstacle to remove, it cannot manufacture easily ignored mandates such as the lockdown rules broken by Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Dominic Cummings, Sir Keir Starmer, Neil Ferguson (subsequently rewarded with an OBE), SNP MP Margaret Ferrier and Sir Gavin Williamson (Knighted for his efforts) among other Members of Parliament.


“The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” ― Henry Kissinger


Here's the article.

During my two decades in tech I’ve seen governments manufacture public outrage to serve their desire for control more times than I can count. There’s a predictable pattern that starts with a complex social problem receiving widespread attention. Everyone acknowledges the gravity of the issue. There is a rush to “do something”. 


But “something” too often involves magical thinking and specious “solutions”. Frequently, technology is painted as both cause and solution. Problems are presented as existing “online” and thus their solution is framed as technological. This almost always involves some combination of expanding surveillance and curbing the fundamental human right to privacy and free expression. 


The Online Safety Bill is a perfect example. Under the pretext of protecting children, its provisions could lead to the implementation of government-mandated mass surveillance applications on every UK smartphone. These would scan every message you send. 


The opaque databases and error-prone AI technology that would power this surveillance regime could lead to the mass deplatforming of millions of people based on unreliable algorithmic systems. Such a system would also introduce vulnerabilities and flaws that would inevitably be exploited by hostile states and hackers. 


While politicians have denied for months that the Bill will break encryption, the Home Office has been quite clear that it believes end-to-end encryption is enabling child abuse on the internet. 


The cynicism of this argument is made clear when we recognise that the Government has reduced support for measures protecting children that seem more likely to work. Early intervention services spending was slashed by 50 per cent from 2011 to 2021; referrals to children’s social care rose 9 per cent in 2021-22 alone. 


There’s no way to square this with the idea that protecting children is the first priority, rather than a pretext for government-mandated mass surveillance.


As written, experts agree the Bill would nullify end-to-end encryption, which Signal and other apps use to ensure that only you and the people you’re talking to read your messages. 


This encryption is what stands between citizens and the criminals, scammers and (sometimes) regimes that would dearly love to have access to their innermost thoughts.


This would make Britain a global role model for repressive regimes. If the UK declares that it’s fine to surveil all communications, it will set a precedent others will follow. 


It will have written the playbook by which authoritarians around the world could justify similar systems, where phones could automatically report citizens to the government if they write “Hong Kong Democracy”, “Ukraine Invasion”, “LGBTQ resources” or whatever else a government decides to ban. Being the first country to mandate such systems would be a stain on Britain’s legacy. 


Whatever happens, Signal is committed to ensuring people everywhere have the ability to communicate privately. When the Iranian government blocked Signal, we recognized that the activists, journalists and citizens in Iran who needed privacy were not represented by the authoritarian state. We worked to set up proxies and other means to help them access Signal. 


If the Online Safety Bill is passed, we promise that we will do everything in our power to ensure that the British people have access to safe and private communications. But we will not undermine or compromise the commitments we have made to you, no matter what the Government says.


However bleak the prospect, I remain optimistic that it will not come to this. The cynical and unworkable reality of the Bill is becoming clearer, and well informed politicians are moving to remedy its most troubling provisions. 


The Online Safety Bill is part of a pattern. But it’s a pattern we can stop here. There are real measures that the Government can take to protect children and I sincerely hope that Parliament will look to address them, rather than stripping away privacy and other fundamental rights.


Meredith Whittaker is president of the Signal Foundation

Sunday 15 May 2022

Roe vs Wade




The abortions-are-magnificent crowd (including The Lancet), demonstrating how captured the most prestigious (i.e. all) institutions are,  will ordinarily be unfamiliar that the story was fabricated with whopping lies.

Thing is though, I've noticed that they're also incapable of changing their minds which were formed (in the main) not by themselves independently. It's futile hoping for any sentiment of intention to think about things when presented with new information.

It occurred to me lately that this lockstep solidarity to political correctness must by reason be dogmatic. Where does that dogma come from? Who says what is correct? How is PC zealotry telegraphed to the avowedly 'politically correct' in these fast evolving times?

The answers are perhaps obvious though less obvious is that the stance of the antidote to PC is Political Incorrectness. Not Mao's Little Red Book or Das Kapital or Teen Vogue... incorrectness is what the individual decides must be a stand against the latest BS which is so offensive it manifests an unavoidable and visceral resistance to the go-along-to-get-along path of conformity and groupthink.

Abortion is a tragedy, but it's also food for a small controlling group.

Norma "Roe" McCorvey bitterly regretted how she had been manipulated, and spent the rest of her life advocating for birth over murder. I too regret, all these decades later, that the fait accompli I was presented with back in time, could have been averted if I'd been more mature and clear sighted.

It's too late.

Monday 19 July 2021

Just The Facts Please - Not Suitable For Corporate Fluffers, Cowards & Intellectually Arrogant People




This is a deep dive into the patents surrounding the current global health panic. It's technical, attention demanding, in-depth, granular and devastating to Big Pharma and the unfortunates who have trusted the system to have the general public's interests at heart.

A little bit of a back story on this information. It was sent to me by a guy I met in a bar in Jomtien, Thailand. My girlfriend (if a 60 plus woman qualifies as a girl) nudged me and said, go talk to that guy over there.

"Why" I asked?

"Because he's on his own" she replied, so I walked over and introduced myself, we hit it off on esoteric subjects, and we've been friends ever since. It was only subsequently I found out he worked for the best law firm in his country, and was probably the best lawyer who was a foreigner (English in this instance).

It was he who sent me this information and it's mind blowing stuff in terms of legal decimation of the official COVID-19 narrative.

Now if you're a pussy and/or a bit intellectually challenged, this isn't for you, but if you like to be in the arena, the credit goes to the man who is in this domain and not outside of it.

The choice to know will be yours.

Thursday 15 October 2020

Death of a Supreme Court Occult Priestess - Ruth Bader Ginsberg & QAnon









Many years ago, when my journey was commencing into researching how power really works, it was Project Talent surviver, (Supersoldier) Duncan O'Finionan who explained to me, that the up and coming battle we are now immersed in would be a spiritual one, and that survival would be dependant just as much on what a person doesn't accept as much as what fights they are prepared to take on. 

He made it clear that incentives, and tricks wrapped as gifts would be the battleground and that selling out to the dark side, could easily be more about what lifestyle a person wished to maintain in order to remain comfortable, well fed and watered.

It wasn't until I was immersed in the Q information that I began to understand the nature of the long term plans that are being implemented right now, to the horror of people who believe Trump to be the Anti Christ.

We were tutored by Q that more important than winning the mid-term elections in Congress, was the Senate, and more importantly the Supreme Court were vital to secure, for the long term future of a free world.

Prior to this information I had always railed as to why Jewish judges dominated the SC, when statistically only 2% of the US population are, but as I took a closer look at Ruth Bader Ginbsberg, I saw something far more wicked (purposely evil) than a pro Israel supreme court judge.

Not only does she bear more than a passing resemblance to the quintessential witch from the Wizard of Oz but it is indisputable that her agenda on the SC has been diabolical over the years since Bill Clinton nominated her for the position.

If you haven't seen it yet, I urge you to watch the video embedded above, of Donald Trump's public appearance at the WH when her death was announced.

It's the sound of a thousand harpies wailing and gnashing their teeth at yet another loss to the dark side, and yes there will be more winning, winning winning.

Tuesday 6 October 2020

The Mask Is For The Ignorant & Obedient


In the UK, I've not worn a mask since the Corona scam kicked. Masks are for bed wetters, retards and virtue-signalling spunk junkets.


There's no need to consult a doctor, and if anyone asks what your medical condition is, that's illegal to ask and is private and confidential information.

If you're wearing your mask (along with your pink vagina hat, black lives matter T-shirt and Extinction Rebellion flag) you're either a pussy and/or ignorant.

Thursday 29 August 2019

Finders Keepers - A Documentary





Finders keepers is a terrific little documentary, set in the southern parts of the United States. It's the kind of film that Hollywood would ordinarily cast Billy Bob Thornton in, and which he excels at.

Instead of Hollywood, it's a grounded documentary about the influence of the media on very normal people. Well, I say ordinary people but these characters are the kind of people who are simple but also very complex.

It would be easy to critique these homely people and the effect that a concentrated media presence had upon them. However, it was the appearance on a TV show that lead to one of the protagonists finally seeking help for his alcohol and drug addictions.

It's also a documentary about ownership and possession, and how in some respects we don't own things, because its things that end up owning us. In the end everything works out for the better, though not without many tears, pain and heartbreak. 

The greatest learning from this documentary is that sometimes ill intentioned people can be a catalyst for our own growth and this is a learning and mindset we should carry with us each day.

There is a loser in this movie, but only because he doesn't recognise the lesson delivered to him for what it is.

Sunday 14 April 2013

English Common & Admiralty Law - Duck & Dive The Legal Game




This is fascinating just to see John Harris Freeman explain what he has learned. I've watched a few of these videos and they come under the genre of Freeman advice. It's worth knowing this information before you sign a piece of paper or agree that you "understand" in court because that means you agree you stand under the authority. Not always the best answer if you disagree with any accusations.

Friday 17 August 2012

LAPD Mike Ruppert & CIA Drugs Trafficking



Detective Mike Ruppert and his seminal video testimony on CIA drug trafficking. No ordinary detective but an extraordinarily honourable representative of the Law Mike Ruppert blew open the gates on this subject and it cost him a lot. We owe him a lot.

Thursday 9 February 2012

Immanuel Velikovsky's Interdisciplinary Scientific Smart Bomb



Velikosvky is old school classical scholar with a number of feathers to his hat including ancient languages, astronomy, physics and medicine. While at Princeton and a year and half before Einstein's death they discussed/argued over the nature of an Einsteinian gravitic universe and Velikovsky's electromagnetic universe. Finally Velikovsky forecast that if he was right the surface temperature of Venus would be much hotter and that Jupiter would emit radio waves. Einstein died before he could respond to these subsequent proof discoveries but what is interesting is the sheer inability of science to deal with his thinking in a rational way. 

This superb documentary doesn't really dig into the implications of Velikovsky's work but is an excellent introduction to his studies.

Velikovsky states at the end that he never anticipated the 'violence' with which his ideas were opposed. Like much conspiracy theory calumny from the establishment I ask a simple question? 

"If it's only a theory, why the outrage?".

Wednesday 11 January 2012

James Gilliland - How Cosmic & Multidimensional Is Your God?



I wouldn't want people to think that just because I know the Abrahamic faiths are rigged to keep us fighting each other for thousands of years that I don't have a conceptual and spiritual position on the ability to be self aware which is to me as divine a spark of infinity as the beginning and end of time or the edge of space and existence. That's a long way round of avoiding the God word which is so loaded by the rigged games we've had foisted on us.

James Gilliland gets it. He has experiences I'm not familiar with but like me his God has nothing to do with the Islamic, Christian and Jewish Gods of salvation. They're fake. Wired by off and on planet forces to keep us below a level of conciousness that we're very capable of exceeding. God willing.

Wednesday 28 September 2011

Something And Nothing


When Lawrence Krauss made this presentation for the non existence of a designer (God) his assumptions are based on information that doesn't travel faster than light but that's changed in the last week so I don't need to make my case for semantic confirmation bias that I say he uses here and which is philosophical (not mathematical) and no stronger or weaker than his case. However Lawrence is still brilliant and one of the best arguments I've come across for a Godless Universe. It is essential to the debate.