The United States Of Holocaust Deniers

Holocaust in Korea:

3 million(including 2 million civilians) killed denying Koreans repatriation of THEIR country.

2,854,000 (Britannica)
2,889,000 (Eckhardt)
3,000,000 (D. Smith)
3,062,000 (Rummel)
3,500,000 (Lewy, incl. 2-3M civilians)

********************************

The US Holocaust in Vietnam:

3.5 million slaughtered upholding Pro-Western dictator in Vietnam, under the pretext of Ho Chi Minh being an 'agent of Moscow'.

Estimates of CIVILLIAN casualties Vietnam War alone:

2,058,000 (Eckhardt)
2,163,000 (Britannica)
2,500,000 (Grenville)
3,000,000 (Chomsky)
3,100,000 (Tucker)

South Vietnam military:

224,000 (Kutler, Olson)
250,000 (Clodfelter, Grenville)
650,000 (Small & Singer)

N.Vietnamese Military (including NFL):

900,000 (Britannica; Grenville)
1,000,000 (Clodfelter)
1,100,000 (Tucker)

********************************

The US Holocaust in Cambodia:

1 million slaughtered during US bombing of Cambodia & Laos (prior to Pol Pot's bloody revenge on the Capitalist-Sympathisers).

Cambodia:

500,000 (Independent Finnish Study; Kapuchea: A decade of Genocide),
600,000+(Chomsky).

http://www.yale.edu/cgp/Walrus_CambodiaBombing_OCT06.pdf

Laos:

70,000 (Rummel),
200,000 (Martin Stuart-Fox A History of Laos),
250,000 (Wallechinsky),

********************************

The Indonesian Holocaust:

1 million slaughtered opening Indonesia to Western business by US client dictator Suharto.

500,000(Eckhardt)
500,000 (D.Smith)
509,000 (Rummel)
600,000 (Chomsky)
3-600,000 (Hartman)
750,000 (CDI)
300,000-1 Million (Encarta)

"In terms of the numbers killed, the murders rank as one of the worst in 20th Century history" - CIA Intelligence report: Indonesia 1965.

For sources evidencing CIA & MI6 complicity in Suharto's slaughter:

In an article entitled; "Ex-agents say CIA compiled death lists for Indonesians" which appeared in the San Francisco Examiner on May 20, 1990, 1990, and the Boston Globe on May 23, 1990 Journalist Kathy Kadane explained (following a series of interviews with former US officials);

"They systematically compiled comprehensive lists of communist operatives. As many as 5,000 names were furnished to the Indonesian Army and the Americans later checked off the names of those who had been killed of captured.'

She quoted US diplomat Robert J Martens who said during an interview; "It was a big help to the army. They probably killed a lot of people & I probably have a lot of blood on my hands."

Deputy CIA station chief in Indonesia Joseph Lazarsky told her: "We were getting a good account in Jakarta of who was being picked up...the army had a shooting list of about 4,000 or 5,000 people...We knew what they were doing."

The same article appeared in the Washington Post on May 21 1990 titled: "U.S. Officials' Lists Aided Indonesian Bloodbath in '60s".

An admission of - albeit it only indirect - complicity from the CIA's website in a partially declassified document called "The Lessons of the September 30 Affair":

"...our decision to commit American troops in that country...stiffened the backbones of the Indonesian officer corps...for them to crush their own Communist threat in a "massacre" which took the lives of some 350,000 or more party members at no cost to the United States."

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/doc...

********************************

Suharto's US backed invasion of East Timor:

150,000 (Rummel)
150,000 (CDI)
250,000 (FAS 2000)

********************************

Holocaust in Latin America:

2-300,000 in US suppression of democracy in Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chile etc.

********************************

Holocaust in Iraq:

100,000 plus Kurds killed supporting Saddam's gassings with US chemical precursor exports, agri-credits for crop loss, initial cover up of Halabja.

(See my previous video for links to sources of US/UK complicity in Saddam's gassings).

1.3 million killed in US led Iraqi sanctions (including deaths of 500,000 children).

1 million killed in current invasion & installation of pro-Western puppet government in Iraq, incorporating media denial of resistance fighters & the fueling of sectarian violence in a blatant divide & conquer strategy.

Current Iraq Invasion: 

654,965 (John Hopkins, Lancet) 6/2006. 
1,033,000 (ORB) as of 8/2007. 

********************************

The Native America Holocaust:

30 million Native Americans slaughtered in the original 'discovery' (invasion) of the Americas.

13,778,000 (Rummel)
30,000,000 (Aletheia)
30-90,000,000 (Chomsky)
100,000,000 (Stannard

On Feb 7 1955, The Supreme Court entered it's opinion in the case of Tee-Hit-Ton v. US asserting that the US holds title to American Indian territory by 'right of conquest'.

Update: The original Youtube video was censored and removed. I found an alternative on a Korean video site.

Holocaust Indoctrination

@charlesfrith My kid just endured 2mths holocaust/Judaism 'understanding' in RE. Other religions are lucky if they get 2 lessons.

— minnie Moo (@missjemmima) March 10, 2016

I've always said the detention of Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals and more is an obnoxious episode in any country's history. However obligatory Holocaust Studies is now pure indoctrination to shame and guilt the young (including Israelis) into never researching the facts. 

The holocaust happened per se, but it was not the tourist attraction that is now the official record. The holocaust is much more complex than just did it happen or not. It takes a lot of study to understand the nuance into why the Soviets built the 'holocaust' gas chambers at Auschwitz to have something to blame on a defeated Germany. The US was no better and did the same at Dachau and Nuremberg. Typhus was the key cause for the the half a million plus deaths that occurred. This was aggravated by allied bombing of supply lines to concentration camps though allied business interests such as General Motors were given a pass.

One element of this part of history that is most offensive and mentioned by neither Jews or Holocaust historians is that the Germans were experimenting on Jews in the camps for mind control purposes. The US imported the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity to work later for the CIA's MKULTRA mind control programs. Nobody wants to talk about this yet it's the most obscene part of the whole story.

Jean Paul Sartre - Another Zionist Puppet With Nothing Significant To Say

As is self evident from his photo, Sartre has no connection to the Middle East other than the Khazarian Ashkenazi desire to steal Palestinian land and genocide the Palestinian people.

What is it about the nature of Zionism, its racism, and its colonial policies that continues to escape the understanding of many European intellectuals on the left? Why have the Palestinians received so little sympathy from prominent leftist intellectuals such as Jean- Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault or only contingent sympathy from others like Jacques Derrida, Pierre Bourdieu, Etienne Balibar, and Slavoj Zizek? Edward Said wrote once about his encounters with Sartre and Foucault (who were anti-Palestinian) and with Gilles Deleuze (who was anti-Zionist) in this regard. The intellectual and political commitments inaugurated by a pro-Zionist Sartre and observed by Said, however, remain emblematic of many of the attitudes of leftist and liberal European intellectuals today.

While most of these intellectuals have taken public stances against racism and white supremacy, have opposed Nazism and apartheid South Africa, seem to oppose colonialism, old and new, most of them partake of a Sartrian legacy which refuses to see a change in the status of European Jews, who are still represented only as holocaust survivors in Europe. The status of the European Jew as a coloniser who has used racist colonial violence for the last century against the Palestinian people is a status they refuse to recognise and continue to resist vehemently. Although some of these intellectuals have clearly recognised Israeli Jewish violence in, and occupation of, the West Bank and Gaza, they continue to hold on to a pristine image of a Jewish State founded by holocaust survivors rather than by armed colonial settlers.

In an interview with the Revue d’etudes palestiniennes in 2000, the late Pierre Bourdieu said: “I have always hesitated to take public positions…because I did not feel sufficiently competent to offer real clarifications about, what is undoubtedly, the most difficult and most tragic question of our times (how to choose between the victims of racist violence par excellence and the victims of these victims?).

If by this, Bourdieu was referring to the holocaust, then he was a victim of Zionist propaganda. No matter how much Zionism continues to resurrect it and claim it as the excuse for its racist violence against the Palestinians, the holocaust does not justify Israel’s racist nature. If Bourdieu accepted this, then his dilemma of choosing between Israel and its victims would have been readily resolved.

Take Jacques Derrida as another example, who when lecturing in occupied Jerusalem in 1986 stated his position as follows: “I wish to state right away my solidarity with all those, in this land, who advocate an end to violence, condemn the crimes of terrorism and of the military and police repression, and advocate the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the occupied territories as well as the recognition of the Palestinians’ right to choose their own representatives to negotiations, now more indispensable than ever.” Derrida, however, felt it necessary to assert in his speech that the Israeli State’s “existence, it goes without saying, must henceforth be recognised by all”.

Despite Derrida’s opposition to White supremacist South Africa in the mid-1980s, he believes that Israel, a racist Jewish state, should be recognised by all. Derrida’s refusal and resistance to see that Israeli colonialism and racism operate with the same force, albeit with different means, inside the Jewish state as they do in the territories Israel occupies is a manifestation of an emotional attachment to this Israel, which Derrida declares openly as the motive for his statement: “As is evident by my presence right here, this declaration is inspired not only by my concern for justice and by my friendship toward both the Palestinians and the Israelis. It is meant as an expression of respect for a certain image of Israel and as an expression of hope for its future.”

Clearly, Derrida is attached to a certain image of Israel that is defiled by some of its actions, like the occupation. In that, he hardly differs from Zionist liberals who never minded the massacres and oppression of Palestinians under successive Labour governments but were only scandalised when the Likud governments followed a similar path during Israel’s invasions of Lebanon.

In a later interview which Derrida gave to the newspaper Al- Hayat in March 2000 while visiting Egypt to deliver a series of lectures, he asserted his continued opposition to Israeli occupation and his support for Palestinian resistance against it. He did add one caveat, however, namely that “I am also not on the side of anti-Jewish tendencies.” Derrida never explains the links he sees connecting Palestinian resistance against Jewish racist violence to “anti-Jewish tendencies”.

Derrida’s stance on Israel, like Bourdieu’s, is not unique at all. Leftist French intellectual Etienne Balibar has recently sent a large number of colleagues a statement justifying his recent visit to Israel to lecture there. Balibar, who is debating the merits and demerits of the academic boycott of Israel that some French academics and institutions are undertaking, falls on the anti-boycott side without ever saying so. Although he claims to support the boycott, his visit and lectures in Israel belie that claim. In his justification, Balibar claims his position not as a “contradiction” but rather as a “difficulty”. On the one hand, he does not want to isolate those Israeli academics who oppose their government’s occupation, which, he claims, justifies his visit to Israel, while on the other, he asserts that there are precious few such Israelis anyway.

Balibar does not explain how lecturing in Israel has helped these few Israelis break their isolation, and whether his visit simply increased the legitimacy of Israel, visited as it is by prominent world intellectuals who are even able to criticise it while there (thus confirming Israel’s propagandistic image as “the only democracy in the Middle East”). Nowhere in his justification does Balibar note the fact that Israel is a racist Jewish State; his opposition is only to its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. Balibar seems to believe that by meeting and/or including Palestinian academic institutions and academics as part of his audience, his visit would be justified.

Balibar is obviously not ignorant of the nature of Israel and its racist policies. He does liken it to South African apartheid, for example. Would he however have visited apartheid South Africa in the mid-1980s and called for the withdrawal of South African troops from Angola and Namibia and asked that he meet with Namibian academics while remaining silent the whole time about South African racism? What kind of ethics is being enacted in such a justification? One wonders if Balibar would see this as a “contradiction” or as a “difficulty.”

In his recent book, Welcome to the Desert of the Real, famed Slovenian socialist intellectual Slavoj Zizek tackles the Palestinian question in a most unoriginal manner. What concerns him most is not the foundational racism of Zionism and its concrete offspring, a racist Jewish state, nor the racist curricula of Israeli Jewish schools, the racist Israeli Jewish media representations of Palestinians, the racist declarations of Israeli Jewish leaders on the right and on the left, or the Jewish supremacist rights and privileges guiding Zionism and Israeli state laws and policies - all of which seem of little concern to him - but rather Arab “anti-Semitism” which should not be “tolerated”.

Zizek makes Zionist-inspired propagandistic claims that have no bearing on reality, namely that “Hitler is still considered a hero” in “most” Arab countries, and that The Elders of the Protocols of Zion and other anti-Semitic myths are found in Arab primary school textbooks. While he seems to note Israeli discriminatory policies against Palestinian citizens of Israel and Israeli daily terror visited upon the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, the conflict, for Zizek, seems like one of competing nationalisms and can be solved by possible NATO intervention. It is not Zionist Jewish colonialism and its commitment to European white supremacy in Jewish guise that the Arabs are reacting to and resisting; rather, it is Islam’s rejection of “modernity” triggered by a Jewish “cosmopolitanism” that characterises this conflict. “Israel’s stand for the principle of Western liberal tolerance” is attenuated in his essay by noting its neocolonial role, but this clearly does not prevent Zizek from visiting the racist Jewish state where he was a week ago delivering four lectures in which, according to Ha’aretzhe never mentioned the Palestinians or Israeli racism and terror once. Such is the legacy of Jean-Paul Sartre on many European leftist intellectuals.

If Sartre failed to see how European Jews who left Europe as holocaust refugees arrived in Palestine as armed colonisers, Zizek’s approach is more insidious. While he insists that the holocaust is not connected to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, he proceeds in viewing the Jewish colonists as still remaining holocaust refugees and possible victims of some alleged Arab anti-Semitism. Herein lies his obsession with opposing the alleged anti-Semitism to which these Jews are subjected by those who resist their racist violence. Zizek’s own anti-Semitism which manifests in reducing Judaism to the anti-Semitic notion of a “Judeo-Christian” tradition, and which identifies Jews anti-Semitically as “cosmopolitan”, is never clear to Zizek who projects it onto the Palestinians.

While suspending the status of European Jews as holocaust survivors, these European intellectuals fail to see that much of Zionist colonialism began half a century before the holocaust and that Jewish colonists were part of the British colonial death squads that murdered Palestinian revolutionaries between 1936 and 1939 while Hitler unleashed kristallnacht against German Jews. Zionism’s anti-Semitic project of destroying Jewish cultures and languages in the diaspora in the interest of an invented Hebrew that none of them spoke, and in the interest of evicting them from Europe and transporting them to an Asian land to which they had never been, is never examined by these intellectuals. Nor do they ever examine the ideological and practical collusion between Zionism and anti-Semitism since the inception of the movement.

Zizek seems observant enough, in another essay, to note that Zionist Jews are employing anti-Semitic notions to describe the Palestinians. His conclusion is not, however, that Zionism has always been predicated on anti-Semitism and on an alliance between Zionists and anti-Semitic imperialists, rather he perceives the alliance that today’s Zionists have with anti-Semitism might as the “ultimate price of the establishment of a Jewish State”.

When these European intellectuals worry about anti-Semitism harming the Israeli settler’s colony, they are being blind to the ultimate achievement of Israel: the transformation of the Jew into the anti-Semite, and the Palestinian into the Jew. Unless their stance is one that opposes the racist basis of the Jewish State, their support for Palestinian resistance will always ring hollow. As the late Gilles Deleuze once put it, the cry of the Zionists to justify their racist violence has always been “we are not a people like any other,” while the Palestinian cry of resistance has always been “we are a people like all others.” European intellectuals must choose which cry to heed when addressing the question of Palestine.

The writer is lecturer of political science at Columbia University, USA.

This article first appeared in Al-Ahram Weekly. It is reproduced by EI with permission of the author.

Hollywood Movie 'Denial' & Holocaust Porn

Even Jewish Holocaust Denier David Cole Stein concedes that Homosexuals, Gypsies and Jews were slaughtered en masse by mobile Einsatzgruppen units in the months following the invasion of Russia. He also accepts the liquidation of Jews in the Ostland (Eastern territory) ghettos, and that the “Reinhard” camps (Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor) were probably extermination centers, though the evidence for Treblinka is missing 900,000 remains, despite a BBC TV programme that dug out a few bones from a nearby cemetery and declared this as the evidence. Treblinka itself wont allow any proper archaeology or ground radar analysis to determine volume and scale.

The Gas Chambers and obscenely inflated Auschwitz figures have since been scientifically and historically discredited as part of a post-war psyops by characters from British, Soviet and U.S. military intelligence such as child abuser Lord Greville Janner (Belsen) and C.D. Jackson (Buchenwald).

Why did the Soviets, British and U.S need to fan the flames of 'post-war justification' against the Nazis and furnish with lies? Well as servants of the banking elites, who funded all sides in the conflict, the intelligence agencies and their respective nation states, needed to have another reason for going to war other than the invasion of Poland which both the Soviets and the Nazis took part in. In short it wasn't worth it with hindsight.

The victorious populations needed to know they had sacrificed millions of their loved ones for reasons other than losing the British Empire or the Establishment of toxic Zionism in the Middle East. It had to be more 'righteous', and as anyone who has studied the world wars knows, they were both completely synthetic.

World respected historian David Irving discovered the information described above from first hand interviews and German language archives, as he had taught himself the German language. As a dedicated writer he refused his publisher when instructed to put in his books that the Shoah took place, as defined in movies and television series of the early 70's.

Prior to that the word holocaust was mostly used by the British to describe events such as the fire bombing of Dresden or Tokyo.

The Hollywood movie Denial bears no more resemblance to reality than the characters they used to portray David Irving (a good looking man in his day) and Deborah Lipstadt who is displayed above as she looked during the kangaroo court trial of David Irving. She is portrayed instead by the beautiful jewish actress Rachel Weisz. Once again it is holocaust porn. It is holocaust inflation. It says that more dead Jewish bodies is better than less dead Jewish bodies. That isn't right.

In the words of Professor Norman Finkelstein it is for Holocaust Mongers.

Easily The Best Interview I've Listened to this Year - Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist - David Cole

Even if you're not interested in the subject matter this interview is the best human inquiry I've listened to so far this year.

Tiny minds will claim this is holocaust denial but of course Jews did die in prison camps. 

Just no where near as many and not in the same way that is used to justify the Palestinian holocaust.

Therefore this topic is called Holocaust Revisionism as a field of study and it's illegal in countries that have to prop up the propaganda version. Personally I don't like the name as it was the British, Americans and Russians who were first to revise history in order to set up Israel after WWII.

David Cole is a really interesting person to listen to, and has a story that is more essential than the constructed holocaust narrative. In some ways it's also bigger because it includes all the death and destruction of WWII but also makes some sense out of it.

It will be decades before many people will have the courage to review this information. But that's OK because most people now see through the Israeli viciousness in Palestine.

David Stein on the Holocaust Religion

David Stein on the holocaust from Ryantineocon on Vimeo.

It's illegal to say what Jewish researcher David Stein says above about the holocaust religion in some countries, and that's why it's very important for me to put this information up.

Much of contemporary media reality framing can be understood by studying closely the holocaust religion.

The death of one single person is a tragedy and so as many millions of all nationalities died in World War II, it's important to understand why all around the world, questioning the claims of this particular religion are illegal in certain places.

It's up to us what kind of world we want to live in, but if you think our education and media and laws are protecting a story for the good of humanity you've probably not been paying attention.

Please note:

Many prison camps existed in Germany as per the Transfer Agreement (worth studying)

Allied bombers destroyed the supply lines to those camps

Starvation and diseases broke out leaving emaciated bodies on liberation

Allied bombers often didn't destroy their business interests in Germany

Million(s) of German prisoners of war died in Eisenhower's prison camps

No serious historian believes the six million figure

Great suffering was endured by innocent Jews, Homosexuals, Gypsies and Germans during the second world war. Anyone who thinks I'm anti-Semitic better have enough money to pay for the blood test that proves my blood is more Semitic than there's.

I dare you.

MI6 and CIA Fomented The Syrian Uprising 2 Years Before It Happened

Israel is smashing up all its neighbours as part of the Oded Yinon plan.

You will not see this information in the news and so if you watch the news more than this video, the fake corporate news media becomes your reality.

GLOBAL RESEARCH - Gearóid Ó Colmáin

In an interview with the French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas said:

‘’ I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.

This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.

Naturally, I refused, I said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.’’

Dumas went on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of people.

‘’This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.

Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we’ll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed.

It’s a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.’’

Dumas is a retired French foreign minister who is obliged to use discretion when revealing secrets which could affect French foreign policy. That is why he made the statement ‘I am French, that doesn’t interest me’.  He could not reveal France’s role in the British plan as he would be exposing himself to prosecution for revealing state secrets.

There have been many disinformation agents in the British and French press, many of them well known ‘leftist’ war correspondents and commentators, who have tried to pretend that Israel secretly supports Assad.  Those who make such arguments are either stupid, ignorant or deliberate disinformation agents of NATO and Israel.

Israel’s support for Al Qaeda militants in Syria has even been admitted by the mainstream press. For example, Germany’s Die Welt newspaper published a report on June 12th on Israel’s medical treatment of the Al Qaeda fighters.

Israel planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with the Yinon Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that pose a threat to Israel. The Zionist entity is using Britain and France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending more American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel Aviv.

Of all the aggressor states against Syria, Israel has been the quietest from the start. That is because Laurent Fabius, Francois Holland, William Hague and David Cameron are doing their bidding by attempting to drag Israel’s American Leviathan into another ruinous war so that Israel can get control of the Middle East’s energy reserves, eventually replacing the United States as the ruling state in the world. It has also been necessary for Tel Aviv to remain silent so as not to expose their role in the ‘revolutions’, given the fact that the Jihadist fanatics don’t realize they are fighting for Israel.

This is the ideology of Zionism which cares no more for Jews than it does for its perceived enemies.   The Jewish colony is determined to become a ruling state in the Middle East in the insane delusion that this will enable it to replace the United States as a global hegemon, once the US collapses fighting Israel’s wars.

Israeli Prime Minister once told American talk show host Bill Maher that the reason why Israel always wins short conflicts, while the United States gets bogged down in endless wars. ‘’ The secret is that we have America’’, he said.

But Israel is itself slowly collapsing. If one excludes the enslaved Palestinian population, the Jewish state still has the highest level of poverty in the developed world with more and more Jews choosing to leave the ‘promised’ land, a garrison state led by mad men, an anti-Semitic entity threatening to engulf the world in war and destruction. Israel cares no more about its own working class Jews than any other ethnic community.

In fact, if the Likudnik crooks running the Israeli colony get their way, working class Israelis will be among the first to pay as they are conscripted to fight terrorists created by their own government. With orthodox Jews protesting in the streets of New York against Israel and Haredi Jewish minority opposing Israel’s rampant militarism, Zionism is coming under increased attack from Jewish religious authorities and non-Zionist Jews both inside and outside of the occupied territories.

This is not the first time that Roland Dumas has spoken out against wars of aggression waged by successive French regimes. In 2011 he revealed that he had been asked by the United States when he was foreign minister in the Mitterrand administration to organize the bombing of Libya. On that occasion the French refused to cooperate.  Dumas, a lawyer by profession, offered to defend Colonel Gaddafi, at the International Criminal Court in the event of his arrest by Nato.

Dumas was also vocal in condemning France’s brutal neo-colonial bombing of the Ivory Coast earlier in 2011, were death squads and terrorists similar to those later deployed in Libya and Syria were unleashed upon the Ivoirian population in order to install a IMF puppet dictator Alassane Quattara in power. Gbagbo was described as one of the greatest African leaders of the past 20 years by Jean Ziegler, sociologist and former member of the Advisory Committee of the UN Human Rights Council.

Gbagbo had plans to nationalize banks and wrest control of the country’s currency from the colonial finance institutions in Paris. He also wanted to roll back many of the worst effects of IMF restructuring by nationalizing industries and creating a functioning, universal free health service. All of this threatened the interests of French corporations in the former French colony. So, the Parisian oligarchy went to work to find a suitable replacement as caretaker of their Ivoirian colony.

They sent in armed terrorist gangs, or ‘rebel’s in the doublespeak of imperialism, who murdered all before them while the French media blamed president Gbagbo for the violence that ensued. Gbagbo and Gaddafi had opposed Africom, the Pentagon’s plan to recolonize Africa. That was another reason for the  2011 bombing of their two African countries.

The formula is always the same. Imperialism backs ‘rebels’, whenever its interests are threatened by regimes that love their country more than foreign corporations.  One should not forgot that during the Spanish Civil War of 1936, General Franco and his cronies were also ‘rebels’ and they, like their counterparts in Libya in 2011, were bombed to power by foreign powers, replacing a progressive, republican administration with fascism.

There are pro-Israeli fanatics in France who have used the analogy of the Spanish Civil War as justification for intervention in Libya and Syria. The pseudo-philosopher Henry Bernard Levy is one of them.  Of course, the ignoramus Levy doesn’t realize that the reason France, England and the USA did not officially intervene in the Spanish Civil War is because they were covertly helping the ‘rebels’ from the start. They enabled arms shipments to the Francoist ‘rebels’ while preventing arms deliveries to the Spanish government, who, like Syria today, were helped by Moscow. Anyone who has studied the Spanish Civil War knows that all the imperialist countries wanted Franco as a bulwark against communism.

There is nothing imperialism loves more than a rebel without a cause. What imperialism hates, however, are revolutionaries. That is why the ‘rebels’ which imperialism sends into other countries to colonize them on behalf of foreign banks and corporations, have to be marketed as ‘revolutionaries’ in order to assure the support of the Monty Python brigade of petty-bourgeois, ‘ leftist’ dupes such as Democracy Now! and their ilk.

Dumas is not the only top French official to denounce the New World Order.  Former French ambassador to Syria Michel Raimbaud wrote a book in 2012  entitled ‘Le Soudan dans tous les états’, where he revealed how Israel planned and instigated a civil war in South Sudan in order to balkanize a country led by a pro-Palestinian government. He also exposed the pro-Israeli media groups and ‘human rights’ NGOS who created the ‘humanitarian’ narrative calling for military intervention by the United States in the conflict.

The subject was covered extensively by African investigative journalist Charles Onana in his 2009 book, Al-Bashir & Darfour LA CONTRE ENQUÊTE.

There are many more retired French officials who are speaking out about the ruinous policies of this French government, including the former head of French domestic intelligence Yves Bonnet. There have also been reports of dissent in the French armed forces and intelligence apparatus.

After the assassination of Colonel Gaddafi in October 2011, the former French ambassador to Libya Christian Graeff told French radio station France Culture that it was responsible for the diffusion of lies and war propaganda on behalf of Nato throughout the war.  Graeff also warned the broadcasters that such disinformation could only work on the minds of serfs but not in a country of free minds.

The power of the Israeli lobby in France is a subject rarely discussed in polite circles. In France there is a law against questioning or denial of the holocaust. However, denial of the Korean holocaust, Guatemalan holocaust, Palestinian holocaust, Indonesian holocaust and the dozens of other US/Israeli supported genocides is not only perfectly legal but is the respectable norm.

The same lobby which introduced the Loi Gayssot in 1990, effectively ending freedom of expression in France, would also like to ban any independent investigations of genocides whose narratives they have written, such as the Rwanda genocide, where Israel played a key role in supporting the ‘rebels’ led by Paul Kagame, who invaded Rwanda from Uganda from 1991 to 1994, leading to the genocide of both Tutus and Tutsis. Many serious scholars have written about the Rwandan genocide, which the Israel lobby repeatedly uses as a case study to justify ‘humanitarian’ intervention by Western powers.  The Zionist thought police would like to see such authors prosecuted for ‘negating’ imperialism’s disgusting lies on African conflicts.

Now, the Israeli Lobby is forcing the (their) French government to prosecute twitter messages which the lobby deems ‘anti-Semitic’. This is one further step towards the creation of a totalitarian state where any criticism of imperialism, foreign wars, racism, oppression, perhaps eventually capitalism itself could fall under the rubric of ‘anti-Semitism’.

These people are sick, and those who cow down to them are sicker. Perhaps the etymology of sickness, a word cognate with the German Sicherheit (security) according to dictionary.com, is not a coincidence. For what is particularly sick about our society is the cult of security,  endless surveillance, ubiquitous cameras, the cult of the all seeing eye, the prurient gaze as part of the incessant discourse on terrorism by those who specialize in the training of the very terrorists they claim to be protecting us from.  Whether or not the words security and sickness are linguistically related, they are certainly cognate in a philosophical sense.

Roland Dumas and others like him should be highly commended for having to guts to say what so many others are too morally corrupt, too weak and cowardly to admit.

As the French government and its media agencies drum up hysteria for war on Syria, Roland Dumas, now in the twilight of his years, is warning people of the consequences of not understanding where Israel is leading  the world. Will enough people heed the warning?

Bradley R. Smith - Historian

If you want to have an easy life the last thing you should do is challenge the central taboo of our time which is holocaust inflation. This is the obscene satisfaction that the demonstrably false 6 million corpses is far superior and preferable to the more accurate  and human loving 500,000 figure. 

Naturally nobody dies to deserve in prison camps doing hard labour but to exploit a story and use it as defense for crushing free intellectual inquiry is a double obscenity that no right thinking person can defend.

Bradley R Smith's entire body shook the first time he was handed a leaflet on the subject and was close to throwing it in the bin he was so outraged. However, he put it in his pocket and the rest is history.

In this interview he calmly explains the link between the holocaust being used to commit genocide on the Palestinians. That deception has now been broken forever as even the Ziomedia narrative is no longer trusted, and in time the full deception will be internalized by all who have a high regard for the dangerous and unspeakable truth.

Bradley R Smith recently died and unlike holocaust bottom feeders and opportunistic narrative parasites such as Danny Finkelstein and Marko Attila Hoare, his words ring with the unmistakable cadence and respect for veracity.

Never Forget - The Holocaust Religion

This is the full Ry Dawson interview of David Cole, on how the holocaust religion underpins much of the thought crime tyranny that is taking place. Currently it is illegal to ask questions about the holocaust in quite a few countries, and it seems asking questions about 9/11 and JFK are becoming that way too.

There are very good reasons for asphyxiating free inquiry. The closer we look at the official narratives the more we start to question others.

Bringing the Hammer Down on the Holocaust

No more picking at scabs, it's time for healing and time for closure. Every Jew will be able in the near future to find out who executed their family, who signed the orders and all the details that come with primary source documents about to explode on the web.

Why is this such big news? Because both the Zionists and the Nazis collaborated to hide this information and the whistleblower who was persecuted and smeared is Jewish.

This will expose Holocaust bottom feeders justifying the genocide in Palestine like Marko Hoare and Danny Finkelstein. Playing the eternal victim complex to cover Zionist expansion in the Middle East will in future be a computer search away to refute. 

The 6M figure will be finally crushed and maybe we can start to learn why both Jews and Germans are the victims of the world's most powerful taboo. Questioning Basic Holocaust facts.

Operation Genocidal Edge - The Israeli Holocaust in Palestine

The Israeli genocide in Palestine that lasted a month was not an easy thing to endure. My own experience though is of course minuscule compared to the trauma and ongoing persecution of the survivors. 

They are holocaust survivors.

David Cole Stein: "Republican Party Animal"

David and I disagree on pretty much everything. He's a right wing, Jewish Zionist pal of mine on Facebook. 

However we agree on Alcoholic Conviviality and Holocaust Research of which he is an expert and scholar on.

He is doing his first presentation since 1995 when Jewish Terrorist Group, The Jewish Defence League (JDL) put a 20,000 Dollar Bounty on his head after violently assaulting him a few times.

If you're in LA, it's an historic moment as reality starts to trickle, run and gush on this subject which underpins the troubles of humanity. IE Which holocaust do you deny and why is it illegal to talk, research or present the science that unveils the 6M lie.

Superb Documentary - The Act Of Killing

 

Joshua Oppenheimer's post-modern documentary The Act of Killing is among one of the most insightful way's of communicating information I thought I had a better grip on.

I live in Asia, I speak Thai, I've travelled all over Asia and specifically in Indonesia on business and pleasure. I understand in great detail, the 1965 CIA instigated coup in Indonesia where Sukarno was replaced by the US backed Suharto (a topic Oppenheimer refuses to acknowledge, thus erasing history like not mentioning the Nazis at the Holocaust). 

A million dead? No big deal. Hardly anything compared to Stalin's Yagoda (who also had a funny toothbrush moustache, took out 10 million and barely still gets a mention on Youtube or the History books. Jewish Bolshevism doesn't sit too well with the Holocaust industry. it's bad for business.

Anyway, I'm familiar with gangs and countergangs warfare, CIA covert operations in dozens and dozens of countries around the world. I could probably do it myself with a half million Sterling and a few good connections in Birmingham and Sheffield.

I know how the game of divide and rule works. 

It's so much easier to smash the wedding cake up than to make the wedding cake.

This documentary though is something else. It mergers life with fiction and then a sort of metafiction and arguably a new genre of sub metafiction where the protagonists no longer know if they're in real life play-acting or play-acting in real life.

It's beautifully shot when not lapsing into bathos for the home-made execution shots. It's not without a serious message and is an important documentary that got me asking questions to issues I thought I knew the answer to. That's a good thing.

Watch it. You wont be disappointed.