How To Hide An Empire

Humorous memes aside, I learned more interesting info in and from this discussion than anything I can recall in a while. 

His moon landing thesis is hysterical. For every floorboard of Empire, he misses the croaking of it.

Question Addressed To NASA

Just because it's tagged. Doesn't mean it hasn't been tampered with.

Chris Knowles | The Trump Coup & Lucifer’s Tech

It's been a long time since I blogged a Christopher Knowles talk. I think I'm right in saying that the ISIS OSIRIS scholar fell largely silent as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service (ISIS) pretty much flaunted who runs all the terror groups in the world (either for, under or with their scummy mates in the CIA and MI6 (DGSE, RAW, BND).

That said, this talk is a wonderful syncretic approach to everything from aliens to technology, mystery schools and the 'Gods'. 

James Bond Ridicules NASA's Fake Moon Landings

Hilarious. I thought this was a double cheeseburger James Bond Apollo moon landing pantomime moment when I watched the movie originally as a lad, but now it all makes chutzpah piss taking sense. 

I've got a good documentary on the subject  loaded up in drafts and scheduled for later tonight. It starts off slow but gets a lot better in the second half. Or you can just get stuck in over here.

NASA Caught Manipulating Apollo Images By Forensic Image Software

Forty years ago when NASA instructed their visual department to use double sided sticky tape, cropped masking and paint brushes to conceal the good stuff on the moon they don't want us to see but need us to pay for they didn't know some Dutch guy would be using state of the art forensic image software to show how blatant they censor reality. What is on the moon that is so mind blowing we can't be shown? Ancient architecture? Ancient Aliens? Who knows but it doesn't get more damning than this.

Apollo 12 - Redux (For Hardcore Lunar Hoax Geeks Only)

Bravo. The most detailed, professional, granular and comprehensive take down of NASA I've seen and heard yet. 

However I think the real genius of this work is how it takes the viewer into space and lets them live out what a space lunar mission is all about. It's a postmodern irony that to do this so extraordinarily well it had to dramatise the lies, falsification and mendacity. I will be posting this on my blog. It deserves a wide audience.

Still Confused How Kubrick Shot Front Screen Projection For Apollo Moon Landings?

The footprint snapshot above is of both a spacesuit boot and a stagehand footprint from the Apollo 15 mission though it's difficult to ascertain if it's NIKE or Clarks footwear. The newly released clip underneath it is from Jay Weidner's terrific documentary on how Kubrick shot the Apollo moon landings.

It's a nuanced subject though so please pay attention to the words we use. 

Just because Kubrick shot the backup footage (while shooting 2001 A Space Odyssey) doesn't mean that the astronauts didn't go. 

It's likely they or later missions did, but they had to to sanitize/simulacra the footage and photography for reasons we can only guess.

It's a fascinating insight into the extraordinary lengths the system can go to if it wants to keep a secret from the sheeple back on Terra.

Some say Governments can't keep a big project secret but if you haven't considered how Project Manhatten was kept so super secret that even President Truman didn't know about the A Bomb when Roosevelt died then that's probably an important one to factor into your own analysis and conclusions.

Lots more of the background on this in the moon landing tags below.

Dark Side Of The Moon - A Mockumentary Disinformation Classic

UPDATE: My popular Youtube account with hundreds of hours of uploads was closed down earlier because of the above documentary. It is now embedded from Google Videos where I originally secured it. Many other users have uploaded it to Youtube, yet I was singled out immediately after writing my post below this notice.

This blog was also closed down.

I've since managed to rescue this blog by repeating an authorization action by SMS that by coincidence I only did last week to prevent unauthorized access on my Gmail account from Honduras. Google Kindly provide information like that when accounts are being compromised on different continents.

It's fair to assume that my post below has annoyed the living heck out of someone. I have my suspicions, but more importantly while we figure out why my post is a threat I'm going to appeal to Google as to why I'm being penalised for transferring a video from one Google platform to another. 

I don't hold Google accountable as there is no business that is not subject to outside pressure.

Update II: I've now used a Youtube upload. It isn't mine but its the same film I lost my account over. Such is life.

Dark Side of the Moon is a French documentary by director William Karel that originally aired on ARTE in 2002 with the title Opération Lune. The basic premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo 11 Moon landing was faked and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help from director Stanley Kubrick. 

It features some surprising guest appearances unless one factors in that it's a CIA  sponsored "mockumentary" disinformation classic that muddies the waters beyond recognition and in a way that is very hard to explain. The give away is heavyweights brought in on a nudge and wink to cloak the story in the "ridicule curtain" most notably, chief lizard Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry (Heinz) Kissinger, Alexander Haig and two decent humans Buzz Aldrin and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane Kubrick. The former is obliged to and the latter is likely unaware that heart attacks can be arranged.

The tone of the documentary is heavy "ridicule curtain" most effectively lowered around the UFO question in the fifties when the CIA purchased The National Enquirer to successfully drive the subject out of polite company and into low income/education demographics. The doc/mockumentary begins with low key revelations of NASA working closely with Hollywood at the time of the Moon landings and is meant to be tonally ironic. However these have now been subsequently proven by Jay Weidner in his first class and excellently researched technical film documentary Kubrick's Odyssey.

Over the course of the tale, Karel facilitates the credibility of the ridicule curtain through by and large telling the truth with a preposterous honesty that the serious mind cannot entertain. He even postulates that not only did Kubrick help NASA fake the moon landings but that he was eventually killed by the CIA to cover up the truth (not accurate he was taken out for his film Eyes Wide Shut before it was finally released.)

The appearance of Rumsfeld and Dr. Kissinger who definitely know all the dirty laundry affairs of State are a touch of genius in terms of strategic communications planning. 

It's genius plausible deniability.

Every time the elite tiers need to kill a meme they wheel out the big guns. This one worked well though they never counted on Jay Weidners stubborn, persistent and scholarly approach to the subject that leaves the serious researcher in no doubt.

Dark Side of the Moon

I wont go into the connections between Saturn and the Moon here though I'm pleased that David Icke has, in this interview above, begun to draw attention to the frequency matrix triangulated between all three celestial bodies (including Earth). Since I've been researching the occult (hidden issues) I've come to the conclusion that some of the most talented people in the artistic world have intuitively tapped into moon themse. I think Pink Floyd  suspected the moon isn't a naturally orbiting body, and I also suspect that David Bowie knows full well that Phobos is artificial and that Mars seemingly has ancient ruins on it just like our Moon.

Unlike most of the research I have done lately, I can say with a clear conscience that the moons artificiality or rather it's intelligent positioning and size is mostly a gut instinct thing because I've been staring at it for decades with a curious feeling of wonder and mystery inside. That mysterious feeling condensed into an important question when I learned its anomalies that are too hard to ignore.

The moon is a perfect sphere. You can see it for yourself. No other celestial body is as geometrically perfectly formed. Our planet, like all planets, bulges at the middle but there's a Swiss watch precision to the geometry of the moon that is both beautiful and slightly menacing. But that's my gut reaction. Here's why you might want to let go of old information in pursuit of truth. The moons size is unprecedented. It's actually too big to explain but do your own research and try and fine anything in the universe like it. You wont. Some scientists prefer to call it a twin planetary system.

Harvard Astrophysicist Irwin Shapiro had an interesting quote. He said that trying to explain the moon's presence is harder than explaining it's absence. Or rather "the best explanation was observational error — the Moon does not exist". That's the sort of scientific thinking I applaud. The one that says we don't know instead of some stupid 'whack' theory where the moon is meant to be a chip off the old block. Well I know a lot of you like your Hollywood served up preprogrammed so here you go.

Like two peas in a pod. The resemblance is uncanny, what with them being both spherical.

For some reason NASA is fixated on bombing the moon since it mysteriously gave up landing on it, and the results are it rings out like a gong. 


As if it is hollow. 


That hollowness would explain why it can orbit the earth without it's gravitational effect creating the kind of tidal waves that would be a bit deeper than a few feet. You can use your common sense when thinking about that using the picture above.

NASA scientist Gordon MacDonald believes the only explanation for the moon's density is that it must be hollow. The moons positioning is extraordinarily precise in so much that it's solar eclipse effect is perfectly positioned to within an inch (or two) to give us a perfect match against the sun yet not too much to block out a coronal effect.

Carl Sagan says that a natural satellite cannot be hollow. Furthermore Alan Butler author of Who Built The Moon interviewed Ken Johnston Manager of NASA data and photography was informed of anomalies about the moon that just don't make sense.

You might find Sergeant Karl Wolf of Langley Virgina's Airforce Base (CIA) testimony about structures, bases, towers and domes on the moon interesting too.

The airbrush team at NASA are very busy when it comes to the moon and so we're left wondering why so much is concealed from us. David Icke says that the moon has masking vibrational frequencies that would enable us to see more of the world and with respect to that kind of thinking, which isn't scientifically impossible; maybe his ideas on John Lash's Archons is worth revisiting. 


Good luck with that, it's a road littered with weeping uncontrollables who just want their old reality back. I'm still looking for one that makes sense with the current input data. 


Then I can relax. 


Till then nothing is counted out unless proven otherwise. You may also want to read up on Richard Hoagland's work on the subject of structures on the Moon and Mars. His output is too robust for the professional debunkers to tackle. That's when you know you're getting close. I only get one or two try it on with me, but then I'm late to the game.

Nick Redfern - Corruption At NASA

Most of the people at NASA have no idea so it's a little unfair to portray the space agency (that is under military control) as corrupt across the board. Nevertheless the abdication of scientific inquiry and submission to hierarchy is ubiquitous by both highly qualified NASA pseudo scientists and the pseudo for profit news media.

Nick Redfern, Britain's plucky and persistent investigative writer and journalist highlights some of the more jarring evidence of corruption at NASA. I say corruption because taking money from taxpayers and not holding to the NASA mission faithfully is an abuse of trust and manipulation of public understanding.

However, if I'm being charitable to the rapidly plummeting credibility of NASA, they are the gatekeepers to information that would transform human conciousness across the globe over night. There would be winners and losers but the sheer scale of change has cornered the agency into a position of terrified incoherence when confronted by requests from the public to show us detailed and granular photography on Mars and the Moon in specific locations.

Off the top of my head evidence of the past civilisations on Mars would shred religion, history, free energy, academia and swell up a raging tsunami of more questions over the deception of our true history which we really have a very threadbare official narrative for.

Gary McKinnon's Mistake? "Unearthing" Project Genesis On Mars

Gary Mckinnon hacked into the military industrial complex computers and has said consistently in numerous interviews that the US has advanced Space Fleets that are capable of star travel. He has never backed down from his claims. George Kavassilas says the  venture is called project Genesis on Mars and is populated by a lot of carefully selected people to preserve our species and that women will be the target of fertility recruiting when the spin on the story comes out.  It's worth recalling that the moon was never revisited and that some say NASA were warned off by the management who use it to keep an 'eye' on us.

This might explain why the moon is the only satellite in the cosmos with its unusual anomalies orbiting our planet a bit like (dramatic licence) a Death Star Robocop CCTV, keeping a fixed eye on us. It's a shame that like Bradley Manning and Julian Assange, the elites are locking up people who have most to say on these subject. How can we ever grow up if we're treated like children?

Update: Dr Joseph P Farrell comments on latest developments in 2013

Sunset & Landscape On Mars

I'm enjoying these Rover shots on Mars even if they drip feed them out despite the taxpayers paying for them. The sunset is particularly interesting as it gives a sense of scale because the sun is larger to us on Earth because of our proximity. One way of understanding why our sun/moon relationship has intelligence in its positioning is to ask yourself what size Mars' moons Demos and Phobos have as they orbit the planet and what the odds are that they would perfectly eclipse the sun as our moon does? 

Or put another way, Phobos doesn't even look round as the picture below shows. It also whips around Mars almost four times faster than Mars rotates if I'm not mistaken giving it a somewhat artificial satellite status.

Buzz Aldrin says there's a monolith on Phobos too but we haven't heard much about that since though fair play for at least trying. The Mars landscape I've posted above really needs to be examined closely. To me it looks more like magnificent desolation. Which is coincidentally the name of Buzz Aldrin's curiously titled book. Something must be in good order first before it can be desolated no?

NASA Wants To Break The Ice On Europa (Good Luck With That)

Insider joke for those in the know. More info on the official story here, and the back stage drama (audio interview) here or the overall picture in Richard Dolan's excellent video above. Good pun if intended and excellent channelling if not. Punk Planning salutes you.

All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landing there. - Quote from 2010 Space Odyssey

Did The Moon Ever Impact Earth?

I'm liking Henry Kroll's thinking on a Lunar impact of Earth. I'm unsure of the impact size which seems a little on the small side but other than it's quite compelling.

Here's the blurb:

There are no cave paintingsof the Moon prior to 11,712 years ago. The oldest painting of the moon we can find is only 9,000 years old in China. Moon rocks date to 6-billion years--older than the Earth. One was dated 20-billion years which is billions of years older than the Big Bang theory.

If you still think the moon has been up there billions of years where are the Moon meteorites? Mainstream science has only found 13.2 pounds of lunar meteorites--about the same as Mars meteorites. Mars is a lot further from Earth, it has more gravity than the Moon and it has an atmosphere so where are the Moon meteorites. Given the fact that the Moon is covered with craters, we should be able to walk out on the desert and pick up tons of them--even build houses out of them but there aren't any. If it has been up there billions of years we sould be tripping over Moon meteorites.

There is only one object up there in the sky with enough mass to tilt Earth 23.5 degrees and that is the Moon. It bounced off the Earth exterminated all the tribes, camels, horses and mastodons in North America 11,712 years ago. I used Arizona edu/impact effect computer. I put in the mass of the moon, 7.35 E 33 kilograms, the mass of the Earth 5.98 E 24 kilograms and angel of 11 degrees and a speed of 2.5 kilometers per second. The resulting impact depressed the Earth's crust 5 kilometers. The Arctic Ocean is 5 kilometers deep north of Alaska. It took 7oo terramegatons to tilt the rotational pole of Earth 23.5 degrees. 

Tilting Earth 23.5 degrees doubled arable land and doubled the productivity of the oceans because now we have more pronouced summers and winters as sunlight hits the Earth 1,800 miles further north and south thawing out the ice caps. It also doubled the productivity of the oceans releasing more free oxygen. The impact raised sea levels 300 feet. It was an engineered project designed to make Earth more productive for larger human and animal populations. It was terraforming!


Henry blogs over here.

Jay Weidner On NASA Deception & Dark Sides Of The Moon

An old interview with Jay from 2009, freshly uploaded to Youtube. I'd never heard the Wiesbaden bomb thing before or even Joseph P. Farrell ever mention it. My first question on that would be 'didn't the German Nazis hate the so called "Jew physics"'? I've no time to interrogate it any further than that but comments always welcome.

Update: Original video censored.

Did NASA Reshoot The Moon Landing?

At this stage I can't imagine these Youtube clips would be turning up without the consent of quite powerful individuals. Make your mind up for yourself and dig into the moon tags for a fuller examination of the available evidence.

Lunar Shadows

Responding to comments on the counter-intuitive nature of shadow directions in the Moon Castles & Pyramid post the video creator secureteam10 has provided an explanation which in his defence (I assume it's a he) is also NASA'S explanation for photographic shadow discrepancies  from the Apollo missions. 

I have too many questions now to argue either for or against the veracity of the shadows but this post I wrote is worth reading for a fuller picture.

Moon Castles & Pyramids

A lot of marriages have folded with researchers getting obsessed with lunar architecture. There's a ton of this stuff on the net and I don't question it given the supporting evidence I've learned elsewhere. However I never post this kind of stuf because photographic evidence should be secondary (to me). But this clip that was just uploaded is fresh and in my book superior to anything else I've seen.

So if intelligent life is on the moon, is that why Apollo never finished the mission and we can barely get a decent photograph of the lunar surface yet download new galaxies forming light millennia away? Is this why NASA just made the moon a no go zone even though it belongs just as much to us as it does to them?

We'll see.

David Hatcher Childress - Moon Anomalies

I've playfully mocked David Hatcher Childress for his brilliant cartoon voice. If given the chance I'd write a character into Family Guy for him tomorrow. However he's one of the most accomplished researchers in my book and if you watch him regularly on the Ancient Aliens season he always manages to bring something to the table in the short bursts they give their experts unlike some of the more telegenic presenters who could be scripted or have swotted up ten minutes before hand (well that's the impression I get).

So this video caught my eye as it was done some time ago and I've never associated David with lunar anomalies but not only is his presentation seemingly ahead of the game to other researchers I've relied on to date but he nails the critical points that have led me to somewhat awkwardly conclude (not assert, conclude) that the Moon was consciously put into place at a very specific point of orbit around the planet Earth. I along with many many other people are a whole lot more sceptical than the gullible scientific materialists who accept blindly without question that the moon and the sun occupy the same proportionally sized real estate in the sky by coincidence. Furthermore nobody from the established science corner will take me on in a debate. Which is odd because all I know can be learned in half an hour.

Without even going into the numbers which drill down into the subject, or the unique motion for a moon which doesn't rotate but faces the planet from the same side like a giant CCTV camera keeping a perma-eye on things, I don't buy NASA or Wired Magazine's explanation that it's a coincidence. 

P.W. Bridgeman describes a coincidence as what you have left over from a bad theory.

Most people get a little confused about the moon landing debate so allow me to briefly complexify that discussion in order to clear it up. The landings both happened and were filmed separately for reasons I can only guess at. But film it separately they did. More posts on that over here.

NASA's Holy Grail Is An Apology From Me

Sorry about slagging you off a lot but I just watched the GRAIL DELTA rocket launch that will position two satellites around the moon. It was online and live with NASA techs feeding information and answering questions during the action. It was brilliant. Thanks for that.

I wont use this occasion to hammer home those Lunar anomalies that cannot be ignored so well done NASA and specifically NASAJPL2 online. That was a real experience for me. I can't wait to reverse CCTV (MoonKAM) the moon from those cameras you're putting up there. 

One last question. 

Half a Billion bucks for two washing machine sized satellites? Just kidding. it'll be worth every cent. I just know it.