The crucial point here is to understand that NASA did go to the moon but they sure as hell didn't show us the real films (which are now convenientlylost) and instead used Kubrick to do "backup film" of the landing from a studio in London. It is here that Kubrick developed and perfect the art of front screen projection.
Once you watch the explanatory video which is a film class on front screen projection (all three parts) you'll never look at Apollo footage and miss the tell tale line where a screen is used to project the background. You have a choice in life. You can either believe your tell-lie-vision programming or spend a few hours researching it and have your own mind made up by your own mind. Some people aren't used to it.
Mr Van Allen discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts declared they were deadly. However since the Apollo missions that line has been retracted and NASA say it's safe for humans. I'm not too bothered either way, as my beef with the Apollo missions is the photography which uses a Hollywood technique of front screen projection. You might not be able to see the line between the stage and the backdrop below but once you do, you can't ignore them in any Apollo mission photography so here's a classic one for you. Once the brain groks the line you can't miss them ever again.
More importantly here is NASA describing the Van Allen belts as deadly. The original post is from here.
They were the subject of perhaps the first scientific discovery of the Space Age, and yet we still don't know much about them. The radiation belts that surround Earth are home to killer electrons, plasma waves, and intense electrical currents that can disrupt and destroy the electronics on satellites. But the behavior of the Van Allen Belts—named for James Van Allen, who led the team that discovered them in 1958—is wildly unpredictable.
This artist's conception shows the radiation belts (green), which are two doughnut-shaped (torus) regions full of high-energy particles that fill the near-space around Earth. The blue and red lines between and around the belts depict the north and south polarity of the planet’s magnetic field. The inner belt, a blend of protons and electrons, can reach down as low as 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) in altitude. The outer belt, comprised mainly of energetic electrons, can swell to as much as 60,000 kilometers (37,000 miles) above Earth’s surface. Both rings extend to roughly 65 degrees north and south latitude.
The radiation belts were discovered during the flight of the very first American satellite. Van Allen and colleagues had installed a Geiger-Müller tube on Explorer 1 to detect cosmic rays, and as the satellite made its eccentric orbit around the Earth, the readings periodically went off the top of the counter’s scale. It happened again during the flight of Explorer 3 several months later. Several followup missions proved that the space around Earth was not empty, but instead enriched with electrons, protons, and energy created by interactions between Earth's magnetic field (or magnetosphere), the solar wind, and (occasionally) cosmic rays arriving from beyond the solar system.
Fifty-four years later, NASA has embarked on a missions designed specifically to understand the space weather in the dynamic and erratic Van Allen Belts. At 4:05 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August 30, 2012, the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) were launched into orbit on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket that lifted off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. (Watch video of the launch here.) The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) built and will operate the twin RBSP spacecraft for NASA’s Living With a Star program.
The identical twin spacecraft will fly in separate orbits across the inner and outer Van Allen radiation belts. The mission is starting near the height of the Sun’s 11-year cycle, or solar maximum. Activity on the sun influences the behavior of the radiation belts, though scientists are puzzled by that behavior. Sometimes a solar storm can swell the belts with particles and energy, creating havoc for Earth-orbiting satellites by accelerating electrons (aka, “killer electrons”) and creating electrical currents. Other times, the radiation belts grow very calm and depleted during Sun storms. Occasionally, no change is detected at all.
The RBSP satellites are designed to observe how and when killer electrons are energized, to sample the electrical and magnetic fields in Earth’s space, to count particles, and detect plasma waves of different frequencies. The ultimate goal is to improve the prediction of space weather; that is, how solar activity can cause geomagnetic storms that upset telecommunications and electronics.
Forty years ago when NASA instructed their visual department to use double sided sticky tape, cropped masking and paint brushes to conceal the good stuff on the moon they don't want us to see but need us to pay for they didn't know some Dutch guy would be using state of the art forensic image software to show how blatant they censor reality. What is on the moon that is so mind blowing we can't be shown? Ancient architecture? Ancient Aliens? Who knows but it doesn't get more damning than this.
UPDATE: My popular Youtube account with hundreds of hours of uploads was closed down earlier because of the above documentary. It is now embedded from Google Videos where I originally secured it. Many other users have uploaded it to Youtube, yet I was singled out immediately after writing my post below this notice. This blog was also closed down.
I've since managed to rescue this blog by repeating an authorization action by SMS that by coincidence I only did last week to prevent unauthorized access on my Gmail account from Honduras. Google Kindly provide information like that when accounts are being compromised on different continents.
It's fair to assume that my post below has annoyed the living heck out of someone. I have my suspicions, but more importantly while we figure out why my post is a threat I'm going to appeal to Google as to why I'm being penalised for transferring a video from one Google platform to another. I don't hold Google accountable as there is no business that is not subject to outside pressure. Update II: I've now used a Youtube upload. It isn't mine but its the same film I lost my account over. Such is life.
It features some surprising guest appearances unless one factors in that it's a CIA sponsored "mockumentary" disinformation classic that muddies the waters beyond recognition and in a way that is very hard to explain. The give away is heavyweights brought in on a nudge and wink to cloak the story in the "ridicule curtain" most notably, chief lizard Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry (Heinz) Kissinger, Alexander Haig and two decent humansBuzz Aldrin and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane Kubrick. The former is obliged to and the latter is likely unaware that heart attacks can be arranged.
The tone of the documentary is heavy "ridicule curtain" most effectively lowered around the UFO question in the fifties when the CIA purchased The National Enquirer to successfully drive the subject out of polite company and into low income/education demographics. The doc/mockumentary begins with low key revelations of NASA working closely with Hollywood at the time of the Moon landings and is meant to be tonally ironic. However these have now been subsequently proven by Jay Weidner in his first class and excellently researched technical film documentary Kubrick's Odyssey.
Over the course of the tale, Karel facilitates the credibility of the ridicule curtain through by and large telling the truth with a preposterous honesty that the serious mind cannot entertain. He even postulates that not only did Kubrick help NASA fake the moon landings but that he was eventually killed by the CIA to cover up the truth (not accurate he was taken out for his film Eyes Wide Shut before it was finally released.)
The appearance of Rumsfeld and Dr. Kissinger who definitely know all the dirty laundry affairs of State are a touch of genius in terms of strategic communications planning.
Every time the elite tiers need to kill a meme they wheel out the big guns. This one worked well though they never counted on Jay Weidners stubborn, persistent and scholarly approach to the subject that leaves the serious researcher in no doubt.
As if Universe knows I just got shafted on my Youtube account some random (not me) has uploaded Jay Weidner's recently released secret-spilling documentary "Kubrick's Odyssey" to Youtube. It was only released this year and reveals a film-makers eye on Kubricks exposure to the secrets of the 20th century. This film will probably get pulled so try to watch it before it goes.
The documentary is twenty times more explosive than the mockumentary CIA number which is confusing. Jay lays it all out for you here. Just hold judgement for a hour (or more) before you make your mind up.
Personal note to Jay: I've plugged your documentary a hundred times with links to your site where people can buy the movie but in light of my recent news I hope you'll be OK with this post.
This digs a little more into the mind control issues required for the astronauts and the 2001 Space Odyssey military industrial complex connections to the faked moon landing. Humanity can never grow up till we begin to question the Santa Claus lie.
If there's one reason for watching Jay Weidner's documentary above it's for the explanation of front screen projection used in the Apollo missions staged photography. You can also see it clearly in the photo above along with a typical studio light stand from the period, being used on a set that it's very likely Stanley Kubrick directed. The basis for this claim is also explained in the documentary.
To this day NASA refuse to take colour photographs of the moon or point a telescope at the Apollo landing positions and show us sceptics the evidence of the landings such as moon buggy and so forth. It's been over 40 years and nobody has ever gone back either. A good thing to do if you don't want people asking awkward questions.
Before I left Hong Kong for Siam, I passed by another Omega watch in Causeway Bay (Hong Kong is crazy about watches so the density of high end watch shops is quite striking. I took the opportunity to try the Omega Speedmaster on for the first time - It felt spesh. This specific watch is pretty much one of the few 'as is' terrestrial brands that was integral to the Apollo Mission moon landings including the first one in 1969. So I tried it on.
I really enjoyed explaining why 1969 was such a special year to the staff, and they appreciated listening to more reasons to talk about the watch for potential customers. I waffled on that there were five momentous and historical events in 1969. The most important was probably the launch by the US military's special projects mafia called DARPA, of DARPANET. This led to the internet which apparently is quite popular in many parts of the world regardless of cultural inclination, or notions of cultural superiority. It pretty much works for everyone.
Then there was of course the first Apollo mission Moon landing which is the reason for the limited edition release of the watch this 40th anniversary. The NASA space missions were largely responsible for propelling the United States now unsurpassed technology culture into perpetual orbit.
Then there was Woodstock which is where it got interesting because the manager of the Omega shop joined us at that point as he was old enough to remember that ideas like make love, not war became mainstream, as well as say a better understanding that marijuana wasn't an evil drug and so what if people took their clothes off and danced to the Grateful Dead or the irreplacable Janis Joplin. I really enjoyed having someone there who was even more qualified to talk about it than I. He was smartly turned out, respectably dressed with wire frame glasses and yet he seemed to authenticate what may have looked like counter culture in its day but is largely just mainstream culture today.
Then of course the Stonewall riots took place which I wrote about just recently over here. Clearly homosexuality isn't the most effective lifestyle for birth propagation (if that's a good thing given each human's carbon footprint) but it did mark the point when a person's sexuality was of less consequence than the things they believed and did. I think also there's a deeper philosphical question about sex that is answered in the issue of homosexuality acceptance, but I've possibly waded through a theoretical and auto didact 'degree' of understanding in gender dysphoria studies that I picked up in my early 20's while breaking personal land speed records. I've yet to knock that episode into a decently shaped post that I anticipate entails some weaving in (and out) of Baudrillardian simulacra. I began to think about it late last year while occasionally chowing down with the formidable Tim Footman who counts a contributed chapter on Baudrillardian philosophy in one of his books, writes a great blog and has effectively snookered me for life, on any racial observations with an idiosyncratic style of logic, an example of which he uses here on Kurt Vonnegut of all people. It leaves me with an infantile respost, both insipid and arrogant; along the lines of 'but I believe I'm still right'. Here's the Stonewall Riots.
Lastly to amuse the people at the Omega shop, I threw myself into the topic of great events that happened in 1969. Of course there were too many things that made the year an absolute corker including The Beatles playing their last gig on the roof of Apple Records, Golda Meir became the first female Prime Minister of Israel and arguably was an inspiration for Margaret Thatcher while continuing to validate Israels right to statehood as indeed Gaza and the West Bank have.
What else? Well, the maiden flight of the Boeing 747.
John and Yoko.
It feels important to share from the authoritative books I've read on the matter, that the British people were both primitive and unfair in their treatment towards Yoko Ono. Once again they further eroded their dwindling reputation for characteristic fairness by being a bully towards her in the media. They considered John Lennon to be only theirs.
Sharing isn't the greatest British quality, or so it appears when it comes to national treasures. Nevertheless, it's important to know that had it not been for that unfair treatment from the Great British Public. Well who knows, maybe they wouldn't have felt the need to flee to the United States despite enduring the toughest of immigration battles and maybe John Lennon wouldn't have been shot. Another episode of British reliance on tabloid opinion that killer the golden goose as with Princess Diana.
A compressed twenty five minutes explaining how Jay Weidner figured out that the moon landings used front screen projection as a film technique (an allegation supported by Hollywood film technicians) and how he put two and two together to conclude that Stanley Kubrick with the help of top NASA scientists like Fred Ordway created the most realistic space scenes though not without leaving clues as to its veracity or otherwise.
Well anyway I'm biased and so it seems are Kappa. I couldn't resist this just in case the last few posts were a bit too serious, and even though Lauren doesn't like my Puff Charlie look. But the way I see it 1969 is so close to the 70's which is just a mere extension of and adjacent to the 80's. Doddsy knows all about all of them anyway. He was there man.
