Ex Navy Seal Blows The Lid Off False Flag Terror & Area 51 Secrets

Bill Woods story is extraordinary. His looking glass testimony backs up Dan Burisch and as an Ex Navy Seal from Seal Team 9 we owe him a debt of honour for coming out on the side of humanity instead of the the inhuman side that keeps us oppressed and divided through wars and politics, toxic media as well as poisoning our food and our environment.

The Pentagon, the CIA and all the oppressive paternalistic hierarchical, secret obsessed and  immoral science fanatics are going to be flushed down the toilet once this is all over. They are insane and can't see it. The only people who can diagnose it are people like us and as they aren't listening it's a fait accompli.

Here's the blurb: 

An interview with an ex-Navy Seal who during the years 1992-2000 was sent on top secret bombing missions in the Middle East, predominantly in Iraq. Years after the first Gulf War when we were supposedly not at war with Iraq yet he and Seal Team 9 were targeting Tomahawk Missiles on a monthly basis taking out targets that were increasingly "soft"... involving deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians. Find out how this highly trained young man and his team were coerced by the military into purposely destroying villages and creating future terrorists as part of a plan that would ultimately serve their dark purpose, the war on terror and 911.

Withdraw From Iraq - Penetrate Iran: Council On Foreign Relations Masturbates Furiously

When the powerful group Council On Foreign Relations (Reptile HQ) wrote an article that Silvio Berlusconi was on his way out I knew it was a done deal. Amazingly when I reminded people after, they all replied that it was inevitable even even though it wasn't. He's the longest serving and most resilient post war Italian Prime Minister with more scandal on his crime sheet than any other E.U. leader. Berlusconi was the cockroach EU survivor but suddenly people exercised false memory syndrome with pseudo political knowledge. It's weird living in a parallel universe that filters the shit out of mainstream media. I worry who you are sometimes repeating TV and newspaper revisionism. Have you no critical faculties of how these false realities are constructed?

Now the Council On Foreign Relations is calling for war. Like Iraq they are telling lies about the reason. They are playing the non existent fear threat. They are despicable and we should hang them when the books are balanced. They are our intra-species predator.

That's the power of mainstream media. People are told afterwards 'it was inevitable' by the boob tube and that's the last they remember of the matter even though a Bilderberg Banker is now in charge of Italy. Who is this Matthew Kroenig character egging on war? What's his stake? How much money does he make out of this?  How much fighting has he seen? Why is the TV friendly weasel able to say such outrageous statements when Iran have never attacked anyone and the Anglo American alliance is like a rabid dog out of control on crystal methampehtamine?

So when the Council For Foreign Relations (and lizards like @Rothkopf) say it's time for war with Iran you should know that China and Russia aren't going to sit by and watch the Anglo American Empire put another flag in the last Middle East oil field worth having.

Please be aware of the psycho groups that pull the strings of power whichever party is in government.


Update: Matthew Kroenig is dispensed with in Salon.

Why Is The United States Funding & Training MEK Terrorists To Destabilize Iran?

This is a rip roaring heated discussion between three people about the MEK or Mujahedin-e Khalq. Glen Greenwald and the former State Dept guy make the guy from the Washington Institute look like the terror revisionist he is but in the end I say the easiest way to know if they're good or not is to see who supports MEK: Tom Ridge, Rudy Giuliani and John Bolton. These are the most venal money grubbing political snakes in the United States. It's not hard.

Since its creation in 1997 the US list of terrorist organisations has included the Iranian group, Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK).

"It is a criminal offence, a felony to have any transactions with this group, let alone to provide material support… if you coordinate advocacy on behalf of that group. There are lots of Muslims sitting in prison…for doing far less..." - Glenn Greenwald, a journalist and former civil rights lawyer

The group's supporters say they are Iran's democratic opposition, working for a nuclear-free Iran. But critics argue they have a violent history that dates back to the overthrow of Shah Reza Pahlavi.

Most members of the group now live in an Iraqi refugee camp.

Unlike other designated terrorist organisations, the MEK enjoys the support of many high-profile US officials, including Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor; John Bolton, the former US envoy to the UN; James Woolsey, the former CIA director; and Tom Ridge, the former secretary of Homeland Security.

They have travelled around the US and the world, giving speeches advocating the MEK's removal from the US terrorist list.

Below are excerpts from some of the speeches:

Tom Ridge: "They do not belong on the list. They're not a terrorist organisation. Take them off the list".

John Bolton: "I don't think that organisations should be put on that list for political purposes as the MEK was in 1997. I don't think organisations should be kept on that list as the MEK was in 2008 for political purposes. I think the facts should be allowed to fall where they may."

Rudy Giuliani: "We will stand up for them, we are with them as if we are in that camp with them today. Whatever they do to them, they do to us."

"The treasury should get to the bottom of finding out where the money is coming from. If this is being done in coordination with the MEK, a crime has been committed then somebody ought to be convicted...but I don't know if that's the case [here]." - Patrick Clawson, Iran analyst at the Washington Institute

Now the US Treasury Department has launched an inquiry into whether these officials are being paid by the MEK to speak, which would be a violation of US laws.

So why are so many high-ranking US politicians and former officials openly backing the MEK despite their designation as a terrorist group?

Is it even legal? And why has it taken so long for the US government to ask the same question?

Joining Inside Story Americas with Lisa Fletcher to discuss this are: Glenn Greenwald, a journalist and former civil rights lawyer; Reza Marashi, the research director at the National Iranian American Council; and Patrick Clawson, the research director and Iran analyst at the Washington Institute.

"When the MEK was put on the terrorist list in 1997 by Martin Indyk he said in his book 'we decided to put the MEK as a designated terrorist organisation not because they were pro- or anti-American but because they were [one] without a shadow of a doubt...'" Reza Marashi, research director at the National Iranian American Council

Who is MEK?

• Founded in 1965 by Islamic-Marxist students, the group helped to overthrow the Iranian government in 1979, prompting a clampdown following the revolution.
• Many members are refugees in both Iraq and France.
• Saddam Hussein, the former Iraqi leader, used them for attacks against Iran and the Kurds.
• The US disarmed them following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which the MEK agreed to in exchange for protection.
• The US turned over MEK refugees to the Iraqi government in 2011.
• The group's leaders continue to live and operate in France.

Fox Me Harder

 

One of the upsides of the current financial turmoil is my new found love for Fox News. I'm no CNN fan boy though, as they feel hopelessly incapable of appearing either robustly partisan or assiduously impartial. CNN strikes me as trying too hard to be a friend and having no solid position apart from the pursuit of ratings.

Fox has succeeded in invoking nauseous feelings with me, ever since our paths first crossed. The 'fair and balanced' tagline is Orwellian, and it perturbs me when reasonably educated people sing it's praises as the lone voice of truth against the liberal bias in the media (while forgetting about right-wing radio, the WSJ editorial and a slew of right-wing blogs).  Bias is evident in the media but it generally balances out. However the ferocity of the Fox presenters against the Democratic party members is distasteful, and symptomatic of everything  that is divisive about modern day politics in the United States.

Watching Fox presenters at work is like seeing a co-ordinated and telegenic gang of thugs at work. Like A Clockwork Orange with impeccable presenter hair do's, lickable teeth that blaze sparking enamel, and blusher that smoothes out aging and skin-colour differences under the intense bright lights. It is for me ugly, unhealthy and has reduced the U.S. media landscape to a default position of defining plurality of opinion as un-American activity, which is quite the reverse of what largely made the U.S. great in the first place. The makeup may be flawless and the colour graphics capable of rekindling the glare on the dimmest of aged TV screens, but it's the hate that fuels a grotesque spectacle of 'Newspeak' on offer 24/7 by Fox.

Despite avoiding Fox (or even TV as a general rule in recent years) I know their key political pundits reasonably well through Al Franken's book which did a pretty good job of demolishing the individuals who drive the ratings on this channel, including the token 'Liberal' Holmes, who hasn't quite figured out that Hannity on occasions is evidentally  a borderline sociopath (I believe if I heard correctly that the man admitted he'd never danced with his wife the other day, thus revealing as any double left-footer knows, a cauterized personality that is in need of therapeutic liberation.

It's not how well you dance it's about the joining in and participation Hannity. What next? No foreplay in case it distracts from and contributes to the time saving serious business of getting down to business? What next?  Supreme court appeals against fellatio and cunnilingus as incontrovertible evidence that Roe Versus Wade exclude all else that has no direct contribution to conception? What a tool.

Recently though I've started to enjoy the dysphoria that Fox News is experiencing through observing everything they have stood for, in the last eight years and more, disintegrate in daily live broadcasting of their televisual dingo pack life. All that they have despised, smeared and belittled is now becoming the bipartisan and consensually agreed way forward for their beloved government to avoid sparking off financial paralysis. The U.S. among other measures is nationalizing  financial institutions, and has done so to the worlds 20th largest company, throwing taxpayers money into anything that can be rescued if it keeps Wall Street propped up - whether that is strapped to the lamp post in a vein attempt to bluff sobriety matters not.

The rationalization for this remarkable about-face on the government's role in business and their increasing intervention  by the Fox news presenter line-up is more perverse than say the genre of fisting pornography popular with smooth talking Japanese admen. But all that Bill O'Reilly, Hannity et al can say in these astonishing times, is that these Trotskyite measures are not as painful as the alternatives of an instantaneous meltdown. What are we talking about here? Hot-dripping-wax meltdown on crying Japanese schoolgirls or just economic collapse? I must remember to write the Japanese humiliation sex post one day. It will be a corker. You can count on it.

If however that's what happens when a country avoids short sharp shocks and opts for long drawn out economic decline as medicine, drip fed over a decade or more, as the US is seemingly inclined to do, then I question the efficacy.

Break it up now and rebuild quickly no? Didn't Jung say the best thing to subvert human growth is the delay of legitimate pain?

Isn't this perverse denial by the Fox line-up called ideological bankruptcy?  Shouldn't this require some measure of contrition if not a full mea culpa? The Fox/Republican ideology that the markets are unfailingly wise has been unmasked as a laser focused and greed-driven wealth-acquisition spree with no concern for the people who are now being asked to pick up the bill or more accurately left with bills they will struggle to pay should their salaries be the next victim of liquidity problems.

Now that my former prejudice against Fox is dropping quicker than the dollar is about to in markets that have figured out how deep and long the US congress is going to embrace economic decline, I've discovered the upside of the Channel such as unexpected broadcasts  of the people I've seen as reluctant to be interviewed by serious media in the manner that proper journalists do. It's a complete revelation to see Donald Trump predicting that oil prices will drop like a rock (they will because of demand) and that this will be a silver lining (a slim one, the system is broken - not the cost of energy you cretinous syrup)

Here we have a phenomenally successful property tycoon incapable of providing anything close to the inspiration that these critical times are crying out for, and all the while  ingnoring impending complete loss of systemic confidence. I was however chuffed to see Bill O'Reilly lambast Karl Rove for the first time ever on home turf. I suspect that this was fueled by the realisation Bill's pension fund is looking like toast. Typically many Republicans feel outraged when it's their own financial well being at risk or when their prescriptive morality is challenged on say abortion or gay marriage. I could go on about Karl Rove and his constant appearances on Fox of late, although I doubt he's going to demand his own arrest any time soon now that the fake yellow cake from Niger for WMD's in Iraq has been discredited at the expense of outing a CIA operative so the case for war was perceived as robust. Karl Rove; yet another chicken hawk who sent the young sons of the United States to a war that will line the pockets of people in oil, defense and private security such as Karl Rove and his jackal consorts.

I  doubt a better time to enjoy Fox in their current predicament will occur again quite so soon. Here we have a bunch of people with a clear ideology that is articulated often and openly with more than an whiff of superiority, about where tax is taken and spent, the importance of business over society, war over peace, tolerance over intolerance, self sufficiency over charity, prison as a lucrative business necessity, war on drugs, war on terror, war on anti-war, and war on anything that galvanizes people to respond to the knee-jerk corrosive nationalism that fear invokes. Fox have supported the government on every major decision taken by the GOP; from the Iraq War to their negligent response over Hurricane Katrina. There is not an envelope to squeeze between them and the GOP, and so the impending displacement of U.S financial supremacy surely has their fervent endorsement held fully responsible? Some people say that if you're not on the left when young you've no heart and if you're not on the right when older you've no head. I say if you're not capable of conceding disastrous errors of judgement or acting with contrition towards society as a whole then the word sociopathic springs too mind again.

I don't wish this post to give the impression that I'm some fully paid up evangelist for the entire Liberal sentiment or that the Democratic party are the solution to the unprecedented challenges we are all about to face. I'm heavily disappointed with the lack of Democratic backbone in recent years, and their inability to voice the unpopular when a few years in the wilderness would have earned their stripes as people of principle and conviction. They've overseen a colossal failure of duty, and hardly deserve to inherit the cyclical momentum that appears increasingly likely to go there way. I'm on record as saying that Ron Paul was my preferred candidate for the presidency because of his sheer courage and frankness in policy proposal. So please no blind partisan loyalty from this neck of the woods. Binary views on life are unhelpful and probably anachronistic given the complexity and volume of  the information age we live in.

But for the time being Fox is making great TV as their reality disintegrates around them. Thanks for the show guys.

The Wizard of Ozrael - Wag The Dog

A three minute neoconservative Israeli primer on the forthcoming breakup of Iraq and Syria. You tell me if  it's not reality. For a longer more punishing look at the subject this new post at Voltaire by Laurent Guyenot is exceptional.

Pussy Riot Fever As Bradley & Julian Are Incarcerated? - @ioerror Twitter Speech On Julian

1. One of the most inspiring things about Julian is that he knew the risks & took action for the benefit of all *humanity* #wikileaks
3. Julian's actions are not based in egoism or megalomania - they are based on principles of universal justice brought through truth telling.
5. Julian's willingness to take a stand in public is dismissed as "not required" by people who have yet to show anonymity alone could work.
7. Daniel Ellsberg is not an egotistical guy either - he could have leaked the Pentagon Papers anonymously & wanted to take a stand for change
9. Every person inspired by JA/DE's courage in public leads others to be inspired to at least take action anonymously, if not publicly.
11. We must not create idols for worship but we must not denigrate those who make or take risks merely because we know their name or story.
13. Nor should we discredit the positive actions of people, merely because they, like all people, are imperfect, flawed or sometimes wrong.
15. Nelson Mandela is a great example of a guy who, while imperfect, brought about great change worthy of praise, while having a healthy ego/id.
17. So many great people, working for justice are imperfect and so easily people forget the smears & attacks they faced in their struggle.
19. Pick someone working for social justice, against unjust wars, against oppressive forces of almost any kind - they are attacked mercilessly.
21. These attacks, even if there is a shred of truth to them, must not be used to discredit the positive goals & results of such struggles.
23. Point out that some founding fathers of the US were racists and that they were right to fight against British tyranny - we must carry it on
25. Nelson Mandela used tactics that we can improve on, as did the US revolutionary forces against the UK - #wikileaks has never used violence
27. The fact that #wikileaks has managed to make such an impact by building on the lessons of past struggles is precisely why so many attack it.
29. Without a single bullet, #wikileaks has turned elections, exposed murders, shown massive corruptions - it has uncovered and enabled action.
31. #wikileaks would have never have mattered without Julian Assange and everyone involved, taking these risks knowingly for a better world.
33. Even if you personally dislike Julian, we must not let him hang. Humanity benefits from #wikileaks work. He hasn't hung you, he has helped.
35. Some say #wikileaks doesn't need him and that he's a risk to #wikileaks but that is exactly the wrong lesson. We cannot disregard his needs.
37. When I spoke at HOPE in Julian's place, I quoted Solzhenitsyn "And mankind's sole salvation lies in everyone making everything his business"
39. Solzhenitsyn (continued): "in the people of the East being vitally concerned with what is thought in the West,"
41. Solzhenitsyn (continued): "the people of the West vitally concerned with what goes on in the East."
43. This is what #wikileaks and Julian Assange have done - they have made it possible for us to do exactly as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn hoped.
45. We now know almost exactly how many people the State has killed by their own hands - when it refuses to be accountable for war and lies.
47. We now know the tactics of corruption from Kenya to Iraq. from Libya and Tunisia - from the West, the East, & the Global South.
49. Julian's action with #wikileaks was not to end up dead or exiled or famous - his actions create opportunity for all of us to take action.
51. When Howard Zinn talked about Democracy, he showed that it is more than simple voting, it is knowledge, culture, discussions, accountability
53. When Julian talks about Democracy, he takes action to enable knowledge, culture, to foster discussions, to create avenues for accountability
55. We must not forget that Julian has taken steps to fight against the creeping authoritarianism that come from any exploitable govt structure.
57. In the "West" we speak of dissidents and activists, such as those in Bahrain without issue - the State department even speaks out for them.
59. We must not forget that the people oppressed in Bahrain deserve freedom not because they're in Bahrain but because they are alive & feeling
61. All across the world, Julian and many others have enabled and connected struggles to evidence for what they often knew but could not prove.
63. What is created next must come from the all of us not wasting our generation. No martyrs and no losing ourselves to be crushed by the State.
65. We must remember that the State will lie to us - each state involved in hunting Julian has lied to its people. This is a structural issue.
67. The structure of modern governments takes otherwise good people and puts them into impossible situations. A feedback loop we can reset.
69. The structure of these governments was an improvement on what came before but we must improve the structure to improve the outcomes.
71. Many of the modern governments, partially as a result of scale, have lost people's faith in doing the right thing, in representing us.
73. We must remind everyone one of those people in those structures that justice does not merely appear for people in Julian's place.
75. How will we do this? How will communicate these goals? How will we communicate our shared points of unity and our goals of justice?
77. We will do this with actions. Individual actions and actions taken together as a whole, in the pursuit of those points of unity, those goals
79. We must start by letting everyone in a position of power know: what happens to Julian, we believe it will happen to *all* of us eventually.
81. What we must also impress on their minds is that if it happens to Julian as suspected, it will happen to them before it happens to all of us
83. We must find the names and ranks of all of responsible and refuse to let them off the hook. File lawsuits, block doors, print leaflets.
85. We must find those who know, who knew and are silent - from drone assassination to hunting Julian Assange - they must be held to account.
87. I have been held by the US Army/ICE/DHS on US soil - denied a lawyer, my property taken, my life threatened - is this the world we want?
89. These things do not represent progress towards justice, when police are legally protected about lying - when the military has no limits.
91. These issues are concrete examples of tyranny, of injustice, of systems that are structurally flawed.
93. These very systems that #wikileaks has sought to inform us about; we must not waste this chance and we must not let the world waste Julian!
95. Every single person impacted by the US Grand Jury should speak out about their experiences - we cannot let people say it isn't happening.
97. Every single person who can take a stand against the NDAA section 1021 - no indefinite detention without a trial anywhere, ever.
99. We must speak out, we must speak loudly, we must write in when we see lies printed by the New York Times or the Washington Post.
101. We must not be crushed by fear or of fear of reprisal - we must refuse to be silenced and expose those who pressure and try to harm us.
103. When people say that Julian is unreasonably paranoid - we must show them that the US is breaking its own rules, our rules, to pursuit him.
105. In the next few years, if we do not fix our structural problems, we will have the technology for total totalitarianism - just waiting for us
107. Silence will not protect us - only standing strong and standing together, despite our own misgivings - against injustice, any injustice.
109. File an amicus brief in Jewel vs NSA to fight against the tyranny of general warrants. File an amicus brief in the case against sect 1021.
111. File a FOIA for anything and everything - create trouble with the truth - hold the bastards accountable for misusing our power against us.
113. If you're in London, now is the time for you to occupy the embassy of Ecuador - be eyes for the world, against the tyranny of the UK.
115. For every person like Julian or Bradly Manning, there are dozens whose names we do not know - we must support all of them in their struggle.
117. Do not despair that we can't win every struggle, we must not be discouraged. The moral action is right even absent a chance of winning.
119. Do not despair that some are cowards; show them they are welcome to change their minds and support them in the struggle when they're ready
121. This generation can overcome the apathy and the failures of the last few decades. We reject the notion that the State is perfect or honest.
123. Julian Assange's fate is in our hands; now is the time for action! Take it before it is too late for him and too late for the rest of us.

Fake News

I've been having a few pints of Fake News by Fallen Acorn Brewing at Clockwork in Shirley lately, and very tasty it is too, though nowhere near as awesome as Murmuration by Red Cat Brewing, which is like a pint of home brewed Quality Street, laced with treacle and 6% Alcohol.

Anyone who thinks the media prints, publishes or broadcasts anything remotely like reality is struggling right now with righteous indignation as the internet pretty much crushes the things that are said, as well as raising the things that are left out. 

Here's a classic piece of fake news for the memory wipes. 

Only a million genocided on this one.

No big deal then for a WMD conspiracy theory dreamt up by Neocon vermin who have the audacity to publish there plans in advance because the consumer classes are too naive to understand how powerful groups wield ancient and occult rules to secure their objectives.

Regrettably most people are too ill informed to understand the very basics of the Skripal story, like did he or didn't he die, which was misreported because it's designed to be a package of lies.

No doubt the fake left who partied hard during the Obama years while he bombed 7 Muslim countries had a good time till Trump got it. They left it to independent researchers and bloggers to utilize this once in lifetime opportunity to inform people of what was really going on via the Internet, in Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and later on Yemen.

To be fair I am leaning towards Electronic Entrainment to explain a lot of people's inability to identify the difference between right and wrong, because it also applies to weasel moves, (by for example Trump), giving Palestinian land to Israel for the American Embassy in East Jerusalem, or appointing a known "hands-on" CIA black site torturer (a woman no less) to lead the CIA.

The sinking of the Lusitania was probably one of the earliest Fake News specials but we should also including the sinking of the Maine in 1898. The media has been instrumental in selling all of the conflicts that arose from these and so the question remains, who owns and who populates the media? The math is inarguable when it comes to diversity analysis.

Alas it takes courage to point out why 2% of the population are responsible for 90% of Fake News currently shaping the average hairless monkey's opinion.

Here's a slightly out of date visual possibly explaining the BBC's toxic bias towards Fake News.

And a couple of BBC Fake News peddlers. 

BBC contributor Melanie Phillips is married to Joshua Rozenberg, former legal affairs editor for the BBC.

Russia's decision to stand by its long time ally Syria is key in the current sentiment towards the country. Maybe something to do with pipelines the NWO so wish to control across Syria and the energy reserves on Israeli occupied Syrian land that Genie Energy now control.