American Sniper

NATO, Neocons & Zionists |The Disease That Divided Ukraine

Victor Yanukovich was the President of the Ukraine who was toppled from power by the rabid hyenas who have done the same in Libya, Iraq, Iran, Chile and on and on and on. You would think his interview after six months silence would be worthy of analysis by his enemies but in fact the corporate media are silent and I've had to use Google translate so you can hear his side of the coup process.

It's just information. You decide what you think, but avoid thinking anything if you haven't heard all sides.

As we found out "AIF", a six-month silence was due to the need to analyze not only the words of Ukrainian politicians, as well as their actual actions and in particular the consequences of these actions.

Editor of the weekly "Arguments and Facts" Nicholas Zyatkov tried to clarify the position of the former president of Ukraine.

Nicholas Zyatkov, "AIF": Mr. Yanukovych, do you feel a personal responsibility to the people of Ukraine for what is happening in the country?

Viktor Yanukovych: I am fully responsible for the time when I was head of state and could influence decisions. I remind you that as of February 22, 2014, when it was committed by a coup in Ukraine there was no civil war, pensions and wages were paid on time and in full, the dollar was worth 8.8 hryvnia, Crimea was part of Ukraine, and in Donbas no people were killed.

The only thing that I feel responsible - that failed to prevent political adventurers with the help of external forces coup.

Euromaidan began last fall - the evening of 21 November at the Independence Square came about two thousand people. The protesters were angry refusal of the Government of Ukraine signed an agreement on association with the EU.

The very next day, the number of protesters has increased dramatically. Activists tried to break into the building of the Cabinet of Ministers, but the way they blocked the special forces soldiers "Berkut". Protesters threw several flash-bangs, security forces used batons and tear gas. It was the first clash of the parties.

November 30 security forces broke up Euromaidan. In response, the radicals from among the activists seized the building of Kiev Rada and the House of Trade Unions, and attempted to assault the Presidential Administration. Following these events, the focus has shifted to the demands of the protesters - especially if they require integration with the EU, it is now calling for the resignation of the government and holding early presidential elections.

By the end of December, the protesters lined up at the Independence Square and other parts of the city multiple barricades. Activists visited by representatives of the European Commission and the German Foreign Ministry. In January in Kiev Popular Assembly gathered from 100 to 500 thousand protesters.

Active armed clashes with law enforcement agencies of protests began on January 19-20. Ukrainian Interior Ministry reported hundreds injured employees. Two days later, on the street Grushevskogo firearms two people were killed. In regions start capturing district administrations.

The sharp escalation of the conflict occurred on February 18, when the streets of Kiev 25 people died, dozens more were injured and wounded. In collisions involved militants "Self Defense Maidan" and "right quadrant."

Three days later, Viktor Yanukovych, in the presence of the foreign ministers of Poland, Germany and France signed an agreement on uregulirovnii political crisis. The next night, the president had left Kiev.

At the same time, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada resigned, and later the deputies adopted a resolution on the appointment of early presidential elections on 25 May 2014. Power in the country went to the opposition, but activists are gone from the Maidan Nezalezhnosti.

After the change of government in Kiev, in some eastern regions of the country erupted protest - people do not recognize the government Yatsenyuk. Meanwhile, at the Independence Square continued to operate the tent city.

Over the past few months on Independence Square remained a campground, but in August, the utility will try to understand the barricades. Visit activists struck a new mayor of Kiev Vitali Klitschko. The mayor urged the protesters to disperse, but they booed him in response.

Attempt to disassemble the barricades rigid met resistance from activists. There have been several skirmishes. In some places, protesters set fire to tires.

At the end of clashes continued analysis of the barricades. Kiyani dismantle strengthening and dismantle camp.

The power of such a price I do not need

- As far as I remember, it was you were Ukraine to Europe from 2010 decision to suspend the signing of the Association Agreement took many by surprise. What still was caused by this decision?

- The decision was caused by the realization of the enormous economic losses that could incur Ukraine. Of course, I sign the agreement in Vilnius, surely still I held the presidential office and would govern the country. Western leaders would be happy to meet with me and praised for the "right decision". I even would have more chances to be elected for a second term. But it would be at the cost of bankruptcy half of Ukrainian industry and the inevitable significant drop in living standards. I did not need the power of such a price ...

- But for any sane person it is clear that the negative effects of the Association Agreement had to be known to you in advance. Why they were told only three weeks before the scheduled date of the signing of the agreement?

- We understand that the Ukrainian economy will face great difficulties after signing the agreement. We could sign it only if the compensation of our losses that could arise from problems in trade with Russia. Ukraine's transition to EU technical standards in engineering, a significant lifting of subsidies in agriculture to the level of the EU - these and many other questions were beyond the power of Ukraine. But EU policy, insisting on a speedy signing of the agreement, refused to provide any compensation and review the economic part of the agreement, taking into account the proposals of Ukraine. Including by considering the narrow issues in the format of Ukraine - EU - Russia.

- Let's talk about the Maidan. It all started with the acceleration of students on the night of November 30, 2013 It is said that behind it the head of your administration?

- To understand who was behind it, it is necessary to know who it was profitable. I was totally inefficient.

Of course, no order to disperse the demonstrators were not and could not be. In my opinion, it was a well-organized provocation, in order to convert a peaceful protest in a radical direction. I have no direct evidence that the provocation for November 30 worth Lyovochkin. However, such suspicions are without reasonable justification.

- Tell me honestly, why did not you punish those responsible for breaking up, because it could appease the protesters?

- As a consequence of the first were established facts and evidence about those events, I personally have been suspended from their posts, Deputy Secretary of the NSDC Sivkovych and chairman of the Kiev city administration Popov, and Interior Minister dismissed the head of the Kiev Zaharchenko the Interior Ministry Koryak. To establish the truth had to be an investigation, and that, as you know, not a quick process. However, no one waited for the results. People on Independence quickly imposed the idea that I was personally ordered to disperse the students.

And your question about who is guilty of breaking up, I address the current investigator, who after a year and have not given a clear answer.

The signing of the agreement with the EU was only postponed

- Then why do not you come out to the people on the Maidan, as was done in 2010 during the "tax Maidan"?

- I've never been afraid to communicate with people. But, if you remember, December 1, 2013, opposition leaders have led people to the building of the Presidential Administration. Although the vast majority of the demonstrators was set up peacefully, even then there was a group of aggressive radicals who are ready to overt violence. They were waiting for my arrival to provoke an attack on the president, in which the secret services would have to respond adequately.

You remember the mood of these thugs. Imagine what would happen if I came there.

- Why is initially peaceful protest over European perspective escalated into armed confrontation with the demand your resignation and a full reset of power? Would not you expect that events will follow the scenario for which went?

- I did not expect such a reaction. For the development of the events had no reason to. Our movement in the EU was not stopped. Signing of the agreement was only postponed. We, as a sovereign independent state, had every right to our position, defending our national interests. And I have repeatedly commented on it publicly.

However, the real directors of this action has already been approved his plan - to undermine the country and make it weak and compliant. To do this, first of all it was necessary to overthrow the president.

Riots in Kiev began around 17:00 Moscow time, when the People's Chamber in the center of the city turned into clashes with police - a group of youths began throwing firecrackers in the security forces cordon.

Police said the protesters with tear gas and stun grenades, after which the demonstrators opened the gates of the stadium "Dynamo", which set fire to a police bus and headed towards the Verkhovna Rada.

Later it was reported that in the ranks of activists began the search for agents provocateurs - the protesters were beaten those who they believe could be the instigator.

Around 18:20, there were reports that protesters near the Verkhovna Rada second bus was set on fire police, while security forces used water cannons against the activists.

Later it became known that the protesters set fire to another bus - this time near the Verkhovna Rada.

To get to the building of the Verkhovna Rada of demonstrators stormed the police cordon set forth on the street Grushevskogo.

About eight in the evening it became known that one of the opposition leaders Vitali Klitschko urged demonstrators to refrain from clashes with the police, but the unrest continued.

In fact the mass disorder was initiated criminal proceedings. As of 23:00 Moscow time, aware of the four detained rioters.

At the same time, the Ukrainian Interior Ministry announced that in clashes with protesters suffered more than 20 law enforcement officials. It was reported that one of the employees "Berkut" protesters dragged to the House of Trade Unions and beaten.

Three injured in clashes on Hrushevskoho taken to hospitals. It is reported that the injury was not serious Verkhovna Rada deputy of the opposition party "Native land" Les Orobets.

Riots and clashes culminated in Kiev only in the morning.Tanned bus fire extinguished with water from hydrants. As a result, law enforcement remains buses remained in place clashes ice skeletons. Three-meter barricades of icy police bus - the only barrier that separates the demonstrators and law enforcement officers on the street Grushevskogo in Kiev.

According to police, during the clashes affected more than 70 law enforcement officers, including 49 - were hospitalized.

According to doctors, all affected by the results of collisions on Hrushevskoho several hundred. The current situation in the city is relatively calm.

And this was done in the best traditions of the revolutions in the Middle East. Every time when energy runs low Maidan, came provocation that makes people angry with even greater force. Every time we stop the most aggressive and radical parties, which even the opposition leaders called provocateurs, it was used against us. These radicals are magically transformed into "political prisoners."

When both of these measures was not enough to increase the degree of hatred in society, in the Maidan were the first victims. Do you remember the two young men who were killed allegedly on the street Grushevskogo? According to preliminary investigation, there were substantial grounds to claim that they were killed elsewhere. Their lives were sacrificed technologies coup.

Directed Maidan was not needed Yanukovych and Ukraine

- Mr. Yanukovych, look what happened. One part of the Ukrainian people accuse you that you gave orders to storm the maidan, and then shoot the other part - undecided suppress dissent. From your actions have the impression that you did not dare to take one side or another.

- My duty was to preserve the integrity of Ukraine, lives and ensuring the operation of the law. As president of the whole country, I could not take someone's side. I've always been on the side of a peaceful resolution of the situation and avoid bloodshed.

- Nevertheless, blood was shed ... What do you think, who was behind the organization of the Maidan? Was it a spontaneous process or has been hidden from the eyes of the organizers and leaders?

- On the Independence had many patriots of their country, who sincerely believed in the success of the European choice for Ukraine.

But let us look again, who was favorable maidan. Tens of thousands of people who stood on the Maidan, received nothing. All the benefits went to irresponsible politicians and their sponsors. These false promises to convince people that all this is easy to achieve and the only barrier to "bright future" - this is Yanukovych. But the director of this scenario is not needed Yanukovych, they needed Ukraine.

World of Ukraine was so close ...

- Can a little more specific: What happened on February 18-21, Independence? Who gave the order to shoot?

- As you may remember, the 18th of the opposition led people to the Verkhovna Rada. They had a goal - to capture the parliament and presidential administration. At the time, members of the MUP was not in the hands of firearms, so there could be no order for his application.

In the evening on January 20 in Kiev continued clashes of protesters with the local police. By Hrushevskoho Street at which the confrontation were brought additional special forces.

Special forces troops were also sent to the stadium "Dynamo", which took place on the eve of a few skirmishes, and was set on fire one of the four police buses.

In response, several demonstrators climbed onto the stele near the stadium and it threw Molotov cocktails special forces.

This led to the fact that near the stadium, there were several fires to extinguish a fire which was caused by the calculations.

In addition, activists erected a wooden catapult with which law enforcement officers threw firebombs.

Special forces, in turn, be used against demonstrators stun grenades and tear gas.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych called on protesters to engage in dialogue and assured that he would do everything possible to ensure public order.

In the evening also met representatives of the government and the opposition, which called for negotiations Yanukovych. He agreed to the dialogue, but the meeting did not participate.

Meanwhile, the leader of the opposition party "BLOW" Vitali Klitschko said that the Kiev brought provocateurs whose aim is burning cars, looting and fighting. Klitschko said that the government aims to create chaos in Kiev and destabilization.

As of the morning of January 21, demonstrators continue to run in the law enforcement pyrotechnics.

Already during the day on February 18, protesters began smashing commercial and residential buildings on the street. Instytutska attacked the office of the Party of Regions and made an open murder of two ordinary office staff.

After this event, began to develop at an incredible rate. The opposition has completely passed the boundaries of the law and began openly to arm the rebels. Just for one day on February 18 from gunshot wounds killed more than ten police officers. Tell me if this could happen if the protesters had no weapons?

At the same time in the Western Ukraine a group of radical activists began en masse to seize state institutions. Including the departments of Internal Affairs, the Security Service and armories. In the hands of the militants were thousands of firearms.

We knew that if this weapon will be delivered in Kiev, large blood can not be avoided. It was therefore decided to stop illegal actions and release the streets adjacent to the Maidan, from the thugs, but without the use of firearms.

In Ukraine, everything would end peacefully and without bloodshed, if the agreement in February between Yanukovych, the Foreign Ministers of Germany, Poland, the representative of the French Foreign Ministry and the opposition have been fulfilled. 

Realizing that the continuation of operations could trigger a large number of victims, it was decided to stop the operation, in order to hold talks with the opposition. Once again, I declare that I have no intention to disperse the Maidan; If I wanted that, in the evening on February 19 police forces have carried him. But to me it was important to find a compromise and save the country.

All day on February 19 I spent in difficult negotiations with opposition leaders, the results of which was agreed a truce. However, radical groups in the Maidan immediately rejected any idea of a truce.

And the current government, I want to ask why it is still not finished investigating the deaths "Heavenly hundreds" dead and law enforcement officers? Probably afraid to reveal the whole truth about what happened?

Viktor Yanukovych

On the morning of February 20 the number of armed radicals increased dramatically. The presence of weapons at protesters, opposition leaders began to speak openly on the stage Maidan. At the same time began aimed fire on law enforcement officers, including by building a conservatory. Having no orders to shoot back, the security forces began to retreat.

Inspired by this "success" of the arrow Maidan continued aimed fire on the premises previously occupied by the hotel "Ukraine" and "Zhovtnevy Palace". And aiming at the security forces, and civilian participants Maidan. Everyone knows about the victims of the "Heavenly hundreds", but the media is almost no mention of casualties among police officers. As of February 20, killing 20 policemen, 130 more police officers were hospitalized with gunshot wounds. But they were under fire and Molotov cocktails not for Yanukovych, and for the law, for order, for peace, for Ukraine.

And the current government, I want to ask why it is still not finished investigating the deaths "Heavenly hundreds" dead and law enforcement officers? Probably afraid to reveal the whole truth about what happened?

Opposition leaders decided to kill me

- I and many of our readers would like to ask you: why in such a critical moment you decide to leave Kiev, and then Ukraine?

- As you know, February 21, 2013 an agreement was signed with the opposition. According to him the opposition should take its activists, and power - the siloviki from the center of Kiev. I went to the maximum concessions, agreeing to an early presidential election, cutting presidential powers, amnesty rioters. We have already reached certain agreements with the leaders of the opposition. Unfortunately, they could not or would not ensure their implementation. But this time the agreement was certified by the foreign ministers of Germany, Poland and the representative of the French Foreign Ministry. So I was confident that an agreement will be executed and the conflict is finally completed.

On this day, I planned a trip to Kharkiv and Donetsk, to meet with his political allies. But the road to Kharkov in my motorcade was committed armed attack.

The evening of 22 February, I was still on the territory of Ukraine, when Parliament decided about my removal from power. This decision was absolutely unconstitutional. Without the creation of a special temporary committee, any conclusions of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts. But the most obvious violation consisted in the fact that for the decision about my dismissal voted 328 deputies with the required minimum of 338 that should be ¾ of the total number of deputies. The adoption of this resolution coup organizers moved the last Grand - they made the overthrow of the constitutional order.

My motorcade was shot several times. One of the guards was injured. That's why I had to move to a place where security forces still remained faithful to the oath, Chief obeyed.

Viktor Yanukovych

They had one option - to find one of the four constitutional means removing me from power. Impeachment failed. I admit incapacitated when I was alive and well - unreal. There were still two ways: voluntary resignation or death. Opposition leaders called me and urged to resign. I flatly refused. After this, the specific actions that were threatening me and accompanied me to people. According to the information I have received, and, most importantly, on the assassination attempt, I clearly realized that I decided to kill.

- Do you really think that you decided to kill?

- Do not just decide - they are all for that matter. My motorcade was shot several times. One of the guards was injured. That's why I had to move to a place where security forces still remained faithful to the oath, Chief obeyed.

Even when I was in the Crimea, it is clear to me the question arose: what to do next? On voluntary surrender is not out of the question. Yanukovych conspirators living witness of their crimes was not needed. Had two options: either I use correct me strength and restore the constitutional order in Ukraine, or I will be forced to leave the country.

I am keenly aware that my attempt to restore constitutional order in the country would lead to civil war. Even according to official public opinion polls conducted in February 2014, 47% of the population supported the Maidan, and 46% opposed. In this case, the front line would extend approximately along the Dnieper. And the tragedy that is going through the Donbass, felt himself to be the whole of Ukraine.

I decided not to expose the country to the horrors of civil war.

I do not have accounts abroad

- The principal questions that were not given a clear answer: you do not think that the new maidan was caused by including corruption scandals around your family? Do you feel in this regard its responsibility and guilt?

- This is information technology, and I do not tire of repeating: neither I nor my sons were not involved in corruption. It is no coincidence that so far the new Ukrainian government could not prove it. After all, these facts do not exist.

The slogans of the rule of law, an independent judiciary, the high standard of living - it's good. But, unfortunately, for the past year on all these aspects of the state in Ukraine has deteriorated.

Viktor Yanukovych

- And what about the statement of the official Ukrainian structures that on your foreign accounts frozen billions of dollars?

- I do not have and never had any accounts abroad. My lawyers filed a request in more than 40 countries around the world with the requirement to confirm or refute the presence of my assets. Months passed, but no country has confirmed the existence of such accounts I have.

- Mr. Yanukovych as you think Euromaidan achieved rapprochement between Ukraine and Europe?

- The slogan of the rule of law, an independent judiciary, the high standard of living - it's good. But, unfortunately, for the past year on all these aspects of the state in Ukraine has deteriorated. Paying a heavy price in attempting such a "rapprochement" Ukraine has not received a response to anything but the collapse of the country, deaths, misery and impoverishment of the people.

- Answer briefly, how would you rate the new government?

- You ask this question every Ukrainian. Whether it was better to live under the new government?

- Why, in your opinion, Donbass become a hot spot on the map of Ukraine? Who is to blame in this conflict?

- Lawlessness and revolution in Kiev outraged residents of Donbass. The flames were fanned the first steps of people, seized power: the abolition of the law on languages, imposing their "heroes" and ideals. The new rulers had little maidan - they decided to humiliate Donbass.

The greatest responsibility lies with Turchinov, who, being illegitimate and. o. President, decided to use the army against its own people, literally push people armored personnel carriers.

During the most tragic events in the Maidan me being elected president, and with all the legal grounds for the use of force, it did not go.

This war is unfortunate policy

- Many people think that the war in the south east can not go outside without makeup. And in this regard, the Ukrainian authorities have repeatedly accused the financing DNR and LC ...

- This is a cynical lie. Such accusations are often heard from the lips of Ukrainian politicians, especially Nalivaychenko. As I understand it, the investigation into the financing of DNR and LC within its jurisdiction. Probably not being able to answer these questions, he chose the favorite method of the present Ukrainian law enforcement: if there is no answer to the question - blame Yanukovych. Neither Nalivaychenko nor his colleagues have not provided any evidence to support these allegations.

I would advise other Nalivaychenko and his colleagues think about the legality of their actions and the inevitable consequences for them - because their hands stained with blood.

- Well, then how do you feel about all these unrecognized republics? You see them independent or part of Ukraine?

- During his tenure as President of Ukraine, I guarantee the integrity of the state is doing everything possible to smooth out the internal contradictions and to preserve the unity of the country. The new so-called rulers decided to defend the interests of only one half of the country, completely ignoring the opinion of the other half.

In any case, ordinary Ukrainians from the west and east have nothing to share. This war is unfortunate policy, in order to consolidate their power and to divert people's attention from other problems.

So I'm sure that as soon as the current policy are gone, people will be able to negotiate and Ukraine will once again be united.

I believe in the wisdom of the Ukrainian people

- In the meantime, today in the Donbass people perish. Could you imagine like a year ago?

- I am very sorry to see that every day in the Donbass killed civilians, children and old people. Are not only killed by shells and bullets, but from hunger and cold. Is what many knew only from history, they are now forced to experience personally. 70 years after the Great Victory millions of people in the Donbass have felt that such a blockade. Hundreds of thousands were forced to leave their homes to escape from death. At the same time, "Ministry of Truth" in Kiev, the Ukrainian society is lying about the real extent of the tragedy in Donbass.

- Do you have specific suggestions on how to stop the bloodshed in the Donbass?

- Fast and easy solutions do not exist, but I will try to identify the priority of them.

Pseudo patriots must stop sponsoring "heroic" volunteer battalions that cause hatred among residents of Donbass. They need to immediately disarm. This will reduce the degree of radicalization of the conflict.

Also need urgent dialogue between all parties, regardless of their status. It is important that each party could influence the process. The dialogue should lead to the elimination of economic problems and the resumption of economic relations in Ukraine. It is very necessary for the people of Donbass, who suffer from hunger, as well as for the entire country, located on the edge of the economic abyss. These measures will require political will and patience on both sides.

You must then determine the status of these regions with the expansion of their powers. This will remove the accumulated contradictions. After a further escalation of the conflict in eastern Ukraine will inevitably lead to even greater split of the country.

It pains me to see how the country is sinking into chaos and into civil war. But I want to believe that the Ukrainian people have the wisdom to stop this scenario imposed on them and to achieve peace and harmony in the country.

A Legendary Post On British Power Paedophiles - Can You Guess Who Wrote It?

I've had this post in drafts since 2013 but now that the dust has settled and the dirt has risen I think it's time for people to read this excellently informed article on VIP paedophiles in the UK and have a guess who wrote it? Answers in the comments please.

*****

The evidence for a massive paedophile ring infesting the royal palaces, Downing Street and the Westminster Parliament is overwhelming and mounting by the week. The implications of the full truth being revealed can hardly be overstated - the devastating discrediting of the major political parties and the end of the monarchy.

It would bring about a total public re-evaluation of everything they have believed about the country they live in and the forces that dictate its laws, direction and methods of operation. The knock-on effect would be the same for much of the rest of the world because what I am about to describe is happening in every country to a larger or lesser extent - not least in the United States.

The revelations about record-breaking paedophile and child procurer Jimmy Savile have exposed the former BBC 'star entertainer' as a purveyor of sheer evil on a scale that would challenge any imagination. Here are the cold and shocking numbers according to the police - and these are not nearly the whole story:

450 people of both sexes have made complaints about Savile involving 28 police areas throughout the country and among them are 34 alleged rapes. They spanned a period of 54 years between 1955 and 2009 when Savile was 82. The abuses happened to 23 children and young people on BBC premises and at 14 hospitals and at least one hospice. More than 70 per cent of his victims were under 18 and one as young as eight. 

Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler said that Savile's crimes were 'vast, predatory and opportunistic' and he had effectively 'groomed the nation.' Sounds good, but personally, I would not trust the Met's investigation Operation Yewtree to pursue the full truth about Savile any more than I would have trusted him to produce the school nativity. 

Spindler added - ludicrously - that Savile used his celebrity to 'hide in plain sight'. Oh, no, no, no, mate. That will not do. Savile got away with it for 54 years because he was protected by the highest levels of the paedophile-Satanist-controlled British Establishment for whom he was procuring children. 

Lest we forget: Disc jockey Jimmy Savile was a close friend of the royal family including Lord Louis Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from the 1960s until he died aged 84 in 2011. Savile was also a close friend of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who ran one of the most paedophile-infiltrated administrations of modern times - yes and with all the competition, too.

Now a new front is emerging to expose the ring's sickening activities - the notorious Elm Guest House in Rocks Lane, Barnes, south-west London. I have been on the trail of Elite paedophilia and Satanism on both sides of the Atlantic for two decades but I still shake my head at the same recurring names year after year in location after location. 

Names emerging from sources seeking to expose what happened at Rocks Lane have included a Thatcher cabinet minister who has come up so often it is extraordinary testimony to the Establishment's ability to cover up that he is still at large and considered worthy of political influence.

Another 'Elm name' familiar to me is Anthony Blunt who is alleged to have used the name 'Anthony Goldstein' when visiting Rocks Lane. Blunt was one of the infamous 'Cambridge Five' British Intelligence insiders who spied for the Soviet Union. Four of them were Blunt, Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean and Kim Philby and the fifth, never named, was Lord Victor Rothschild, although there were actually more than five.

And Blunt leads us once again to the British royal family ...

Anthony Blunt (1907-1983) was born the third cousin of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon who became the wife of King George VI and is best known as the late Queen Mother - the woman that Princess Diana described as evil. This was a good description given that the lady they called 'The Nation's Grandmother' was one of highest satanic witches in Europe (see The Biggest Secret).

Blunt's mother was the second cousin of the black witch's father Claude Bowes-Lyon, the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne. Blunt and his brothers would go for afternoon tea with the Bowes-Lyons at their London home in Mayfair and he was in the royal, political and Intelligence loop almost from the start.

There is another highly significant aspect of the Blunt story according to the London Daily Mail. The paper reported that he told colleagues that he was actually the secret son of King George V, the brother of Bowes-Lyon's spouse, George VI. This would put what was to happen later in a much clearer context.

Blunt was educated at the elite Marlborough College where he was a member of the Honourable Fraternity of the Amici. This is a rarely-mentioned secret society based at Marlborough but also operating at other elite colleges including Eton, Radley and Wellington. 

Its rituals appear to be based on Freemasonry with a system of degrees and prominence for the symbol of the all-seeing eye. Amici initiates use their covert manipulation to secure major positions of influence among the students and this continues when they enter the worlds of business and politics. It is the usual worldwide story, in other words, as with the Skull and Bones Society at Yale, the Quill and Dagger at Cornell and the Sphinx Society at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.

Blunt also spent part of his childhood in Paris when his official father, the Reverend Stanley Vaughan Blunt, ran the chapel at the British embassy. So Blunt had many royal and Establishment connections throughout his formative years and things began to move quickly when he won a scholarship to Trinity College at Cambridge University.

It was at Cambridge that he became a member of a Russian spy ring which was passing British secrets to Moscow during World War II. Four members have since been officially named as Blunt, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Kim Philby (who married Jewish Soviet spy Litzi Friedman). But others got away with it including their leader, Lord Victor Rothschild. 

Highly significant to the ring was a university secret society called the Cambridge Apostles. Blunt was a member and so was Guy Burgess and other spies and alleged spies, John Cairncross, Guy Liddell and the most important of all, Victor Rothschild. Blunt acted as a talent spotter and recruiter for the ring and his value as a potential Soviet source increased when he was recruited by MI5. 

Maclean and Burgess fled to the Soviet Union in 1951to avoid prosecution and Philby followed in 1963 after more than a decade of denial which saw him continuing to work for newspapers and part-time for MI6. Blunt secretly admitted his involvement to MI5 in 1963 on condition that he had immunity from persecution and this was not made public until 1979 when Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was forced by the weight of evidence by then in the public domain to make a statement to this effect. 

The ring master behind all of this was Lord Victor Rothschild who at one time shared his London flat with the homosexual Burgess and Blunt. Homosexuality was a criminal offence at the time and a perfect vehicle for blackmail even without the paedophilia that also went on.

Official biographies say that Rothschild was recruited by MI5 during the war in the same way as Blunt, but in fact Rothschild ran British Intelligence and wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill, another reported paedophile. 'National hero' Winston Churchill was a despicable character who worked covertly for the global enemies of freedom and peace - the Rothschilds. They were a secret source of income. 

There is a very good chance that Churchill was a Rothschild bloodline and the Windsors have been since their origins in Germany from where the Rothschild global empire of finance and secret society manipulation emerged. 

Prince William is a Rothschild at least through his grandmother - Princess Diana's mother, Frances Shand Kydd who was born Frances Ruth Roche, a Rothschild offshoot. Royals often tend to have official parents that are, one or the other, not blood parents. It must be a heck of a job keeping up with it.

Victor Rothschild was known within British Intelligence as the 'Black Bag Man' because he controlled the secret 'stash' that covertly funded off-the-record projects that the official government had refused to sanction. He knew where the bodies were buried throughout the Establishment and who was doing what to whom among royalty, politicians, media and academia. This allowed him to manipulate and dictate through threat of exposure.

These are the techniques that continue to be used today by the Rothschild networks and this is another reason why they love to see paedophiles in positions of power making the decisions that change society in the desired Orwellian fashion. The same happens in North America - in fact everywhere the Rothschilds and their lackeys are at work which is, well, pretty much everywhere.

No, it should be the other way round, mate.

Victor Rothschild was Winston Churchill's minder and the director of his policy before and during World War II - a war in which the Rothschild Cabal controlled all the major players through their placemen Roosevelt (United States); Churchill (Britain), Stalin (Soviet Union) and Hitler (Germany). 

This is the point that historians and researchers of the Cambridge spy ring don't understand. Victor Rothschild was not a Soviet spy - he was the Rothschilds' man directing British war policy as others were directing that of North America, the Soviet Union and Germany. 

The spying was largely done for the Rothschilds, not the Soviet Union, but there is also the fact that if you want to stop something happening that doesn't suit your agenda, or take most advantage of something happening when it does, then tell another 'side' (another of your sides) what is going to happen well before it does. 

This is what the Cambridge spy ring was really all about, but only Rothschild among them would have known that. The rest were convenient stooges and who was the one that never got caught? Rothschild. Six retired KGB colonels confirmed after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1993 that Rothschild was involved in the Cambridge spy ring, but they wouldn't have known the wider background either. Compartmentalisation is the key.

King George VI with his missus Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, third from the left, and in the centre is the king's mother, Mary of Teck, a descendent of infamous Satanist and blood drinker Vlad Dracul of Transylvania who inspired the Dracula stories. 

Anthony Blunt was so trusted by the royal family and his cousin Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (after all, he claimed to be one of them) that he was sent on a mission to Germany at the end of the war to retrieve British royal correspondence to their German royal relatives showing support for the Nazis which is what the royals are. Prince Philip's Nazi background is well documented, for example, but he's not alone.

Prince Philip at a Nazi funeral and his own family were closely connected to Nazis never mind the Windsors into which he was married.

The House of Windsor were officially the German House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (Herzogtum Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) until they changed their name to Windsor during the First World War as an exercise purely in public relations with Britain at war with Kaiser Wilhelm and their other relatives in Germany. 

Wilhelm was the cousin of King George V, whom Blunt apparently said was his father, and George was also a cousin of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, but don't worry an elite doesn't run the world. 

The British wing of the Battenberg family anglicised their name to Mountbatten at the same time and later it was Lord Louis Mountbatten who maintained communications between the Windsors and their relatives in Nazi Germany even though he was Britain's Chief of Combined Operations and later Supreme Allied Commander in South-East Asia. 'Sides' don't matter to these people - the outcome is what counts. 

It was the paedophile Lord Mountbatten, the mentor to both Prince Philip and Prince Charles, who introduced his friend Jimmy Savile to the royal family in the 1960s.

Charles, Mountbatten and Philip.

Anthony Blunt's reward for services rendered in hiding the Nazi truth about the Windsor-Mountbattens was to be appointed Surveyor of the King's Pictures when he retired from MI5 after the war - even though he was still a member of the Rothschild spy ring and was seen with Burgess and Maclean just before they defected in 1951. 

Blunt continued in his royal role when George VI died in 1953 and his daughter Elizabeth became Queen although her mother Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon - Blunt's cousin - and her arranged-marriage husband Philip were the real power behind the throne. 

The Royals well knew about Blunt's treasonous background. Army officer Philip Hay went for an interview at Buckingham Palace in 1948 for the post of Private Secretary to the Dowager Duchess of Kent and he said that after they passed Blunt in a corridor, Sir Alan Lascelles, King George VI's private secretary, said: 'That's our Russian spy'. 

The Queen had been briefed about Blunt's secret confession (not that she needed to be) but he continued to work in all the royal palaces as the official advisor on her art collection and Victor Rothschild turned up to at least one dinner party with his friend Blunt years after his admission of spying. 

Meanwhile, other British spies such as John Vassall, a clerk at the British embassy in Moscow whose homosexuality was used to blackmail him, was jailed for 18 years when he was not in the same league of treachery as Blunt. 

What a joke it all it.

The Windsors would have also known that Blunt was a paedophile and it is no surprise to me whatsoever after hearing him named many times that he has turned up on the alleged lists of visitors to the Elm Guest House. The stories have long circulated about his procurement of young boys, mostly from 'care' homes, and his paedophile parties.

These include how Blunt would murder children through asphyxiation while they were being raped because of the apparent sexual 'high' these sickest of people get from this. One rapist would be a masked man said to be a royal or a Rothschild (same thing) who always wore socks even when otherwise naked. He became known as the 'Soxon Rothschild'. 

Blunt also ran a paedophile ring and was a friend of Stephen Ward who was at the centre of the Profumo Affair in early 1960s when the British Secretary of State for War John Profumo was exposed for having an affair with the model and dancer Christine Keeler , who was also having a relationship with Eugene Ivanov, a Russian military attaché.

Key events in the story happened at Cliveden, the Buckinghamshire mansion owned by the Astor family, and the usual suspects were involved, although of course not named, including Lord Mountbatten and Prince Philip. Stephen Ward was the fall-guy in the story and he 'committed suicide' to keep himself quiet. You know how it goes.

Blunt and his boyfriend, the former Irish Guards bandsman John Gaskin, lived in a flat at the Courtauld Institute of Art off London's Oxford Street where Blunt was director, and Gaskin would go out trawling public toilets for young men drunk or drugged enough to bring back for Blunt's pleasure.

When Gaskin began to blab about Blunt's activities, he 'fell' out of a window and landed on railings some distance below. Miraculously he survived, but later he is said to have thrown himself in front of a train five years after Blunt had died in 1983.

The royal family of course knew all about his paedophilia and child murder just as they knew about their close friend for decades, Jimmy Savile. Blunt once went for tea with his cousin the Queen Mother and took with him a 12 year old boy, according to a footman who said that he overheard her tell Blunt: 'You will keep my secrets and I will keep yours.'

And my god, they both had some.

The Queen Mother, a high Satanist, got away with it all her life thanks to a simple technique: smile when they're watching. Her daughter has yet to grasp that one. 

I understand why so many people find it impossible to comprehend that members of the royal family, political leaders and feted academics, entertainers and big banking and corporate names would be involved in paedophilia, murder and human sacrifice, but they are. 

I have been exposing the paedophile and child killing British Prime Minister Ted Heath since my book The Biggest Secret was first published in 1998 and this was backed up this week by barrister Michael Shrimpton, a former immigration judge and now an Intelligence and national security consultant. Shrimpton has an extensive intelligence background both sides of the Atlantic and he has written a book called Spyhunter which he hopes to publish this year.

Shrimpton said in an interview on community radio that Heath was a paedophile who murdered his young boy victims, or had others do it, often by throwing them into the sea after he had abused them on his series of yachts called Morning Cloud - one in particular that won the Sydney to Hobart race and then sank off Jersey in 1974 after Heath had sold it to a Jersey resident. 

Shrimpton said, as I have, that the record-breaking paedophile and BBC 'star' Jimmy Savile supplied boys for Heath - many of them from the Jersey children's home, Haut de la Garenne, with the support of those who ran the home.

Savile and Heath.

Shrimpton goes on:

There are people who are still alive who are involved in the paedophile scandal and obviously I am not going to name them on a radio programme but the most prominent paedophile associated with the Savile ring was a man called Edward Heath who you may recall was Prime Minister.

Heath was recruited by the Germans in 1937, I have said this in Spyhunter. Heath was into little boys and Savile was supplying them. A number of these boys were taken out the Haut de la Garenne in Jersey. Savile was taking children from a children's home with support of German assets in Jersey.

My own view is that the 'German' networks that Shrimpton talks about were controlled in the background, just like Britain, Russia, and the United States etc., by the Rothschilds and their lackeys. The same is true of the Nazi scientists, engineers, geneticists and mind controllers sent to the United States after the war under the code-named Operation Paperclip to set up NASA, the mind-control programme MKUltra, and much else. 

Germany has been a Rothschild fiefdom since the infamous occult family called Bauer changed their name to Rothschild in the 18th century and it is also used as a conduit for their activities by the Vatican wing of the conspiracy, the Jesuits, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar and Opus Dei. The Vatican was heavily involved in the 'rat runs' that transported those Nazis to the United States under Operation Paperclip.

Lenny Harper was the deputy head of Jersey police who had his career destroyed for the crime of genuinely investigating what happened to children at Haut de la Garenne. He searched for graves, but none were found because Michael Shrimpton said there weren't any: 

The boys were in fact being taken to a boat, it happened to be Edward Heath's boat or yacht and they were murdered and thrown overboard so there is no point sadly in looking for their grave ... they don't have any grave except the sea. 

That's why the BBC and the Cabinet Office have been so keen to protect Savile; that is why the cabinet office in the 1980s were willing to back Savile to the point of giving him a position of authority at Broadmoor [a high-security psychiatric hospital] ... you don't put a paedophile in charge of Broadmoor. It's like putting a lunatic in charge of the asylum or a drunk in charge of a brewery or David Cameron in charge of a government ...

Shrimpton rightly said that Lenny Harper was a very competent and very courageous police officer who 'was up against a Cabinet Office-backed paedophile ring and the investigation that he was conducting was at some professional risk ... 

... Indeed I suspect his life was also at risk at one point because he was getting close to some very uncomfortable truths about people in the Cabinet Office, GO2 [British Intelligence] in London and certain people in Jersey in the German network.

Shrimpton says that Heath's paedophilia and murder of children was covered up by his Cabinet Secretary John Hunt, Baron Hunt of Tanworth, who Shrimpton says was also a paedophile. There are interesting parallels between Hunt and Savile. 

Hunt was appointed by the Queen to be a Companion, Knight Commander and Knight Grand Cross of the British Order of chivalry known as The Most Honourable Order of the Bath of which the Queen is the head and Prince Charles the Grand Master. Hunt was also given a Papal Knighthood by Pope John Paul II - so was Jimmy Savile who was also knighted by the Queen.

Savile and Hunt were both given a Papal knighthood by the biggest child-abuse network on Planet Earth - the Roman Catholic Church (Church of Babylon relocated).

Michael Shrimpton highlights a fact that I have come across constantly over the years - that children abused by famous people, especially in the worlds of politics and royalty, are then killed to protect the identity of their abuser. He said: 

If the children are and I am afraid with paedophilia we sometimes have babies being abused but if you are not talking babies, you are talking toddlers who are able to recognise the people that are abusing them ... since you are talking about people who are on television, people who are high profile, you have to murder the children in order to protect your asset. 

So for the Germans [I would say Rothschilds] it was essential that the boys ... were being taken onto the yacht [for] a death ride. When Jimmy Savile was taking let's say a fourteen year old boy down to Morning Cloud, handing him over to Edward Heath or a member of the crew on the yacht, it was a death ride, that was that boy's last journey on earth because there was no way in the world with him recognising Edward Heath that he could be allowed back on shore and Savile must have known this ...

I named Edward Heath as a serial paedophile and child killer in my book, The Biggest Secret, first published in 1998 - seven years before he died. I also named him and his Chancellor of the Exchequer Anthony Barber as practicing Satanists, as I did the leading members of the royal family.

Anthony Barber.

Heath was read what I said by an excuse for a 'journalist' days after publication and he did nothing because to do so would have had the truth exposed in court - as it would be now if anyone from the Thatcher cesspit wants a go. Michael Shrimpton mentions Barber in his interview as being in league with Heath and Cabinet Secretary Hunt.

You can hear the whole interview with Michael Shrimpton at the end of this article and he also talks about what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what Shrimpton says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. 

Now let us assess what this tells us about the royal family and the Conservative Party administrations of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher between 1979 and 1990. Thatcher replaced Heath as party leader in 1975 and went on to be the next Conservative Prime Minister.

The implications for both the royal family and Thatcher are as follows:

Jimmy Savile was a close friend of Lord Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from the 1960s and this continued for decades AFTER the cover up of Heath's paedophilia and child murder in association with Savile. You mean they didn't KNOW? Is someone having a laugh? British Intelligence didn't know? Ditto. 

British Intelligence didn't know that a record-breaking paedophile had been interviewed by police but not charged on a number of occasions for sexual abuse against minors and didn't know about his legendary sexual abuses over 54 years? Of course they knew, but some at MI5 and MI6 would have been among his clients. 

A British newspaper quoted a 'Buckingham Palace insider' as saying that Prince Charles 'was furious that he was never informed about suspicions that Savile was a pervert who preyed on children.' The 'insider' said 'the Palace have been on to the security services to see why they were not informed' and the source continued:

The Queen, Philip, Charles and others want to know why no-one picked up a phone to tell them a child abuser was being allowed in royal homes and meeting with senior royals and their families ...

What a load of baloney. I'll tell you why they didn't pick up the phone -they were already well aware that the royals knew and had done so since paedophile Mountbatten brought Savile into the fold as a child procurer in the 1960s. 

This is the same royal family that employed at close range another infamous paedophile and child murderer, Anthony Blunt, and like so many paedophiles and killers they gave him a knighthood - as they did Savile. British Intelligence didn't know what Blunt was doing? He worked for them as well as moonlighting for the Rothschilds and the KGB.

Sir Maurice Oldfield

British Intelligence, while employing I am sure many genuine people, has been infested by Satanists and paedophiles including the former head of the Secret Intelligence Service, or MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield. He was a friend and associate of Victor Rothschild and one of his haunts was the Kincora Boys' Home in Belfast, Northern Ireland, along with Establishment paedophiles like Mountbatten and Heath. 

The Kincora abuse scandal broke in the 1980s but naturally the small fry were netted while the big fish swam away in the cesspool they inhabit. Oldfield was another paedophile given a knighthood by the royals and he was also made a member of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, another royal 'chivalry' order in their web of elite groupings and secret societies. 

So now to Margaret Thatcher: She and her husband Denis became such close friends with Jimmy Savile that he was invited to join them for New Year's Eve every year for more than a decade - and this was AFTER the Conservative Party cover up of Edward Heath's paedophile and child murders committed in concert with Savile.

Thatcher's government and circle of associates and aides was alive with paedophiles including Chester MP Peter Morrison, a close aide to Thatcher from 1975 to 1990. He was an open-secret paedophile, well known to colleagues, the media and the Chester police, and yet Thatcher and her Cabinet and inner circle did NOTHING while he was abusing boys in North Wales children's homes and elsewhere. Anyone in that Thatcher circle MUST have known. Thatcher minister Edwina Currie wrote in her published diaries:

One appointment in the recent reshuffle has attracted a lot of gossip and could be very dangerous: Peter Morrison has become the PM's PPS[Parliamentary Private Secretary]. Now he's what they call a 'noted pederast', with a liking for young boys; he admitted as much to [Conservative Party chairman] Norman Tebbit when he became deputy chairman of the party but added' 'However, I'm very discreet' - and he must be! She [Thatcher] either knows and is taking a chance, or doesn't; either way, it's a really dumb move[by then Morrison had been a close aide for 15 years - what does Currie mean Thatcher may not know?].

[Conservative MP] Teresa Gorman told me this evening (in a taxi coming back from a drinks party at the BBC) that she inherited Morrison's (woman) agent, who claimed to have been offered money to keep quiet about his activities. It scares me as all the press know, and as we get closer to the election someone is going to make trouble, very close to her indeed.

Note that Currie doesn't explain why she didn't go to the police or the media to demand that something be done about Morrison - it is only a case of how his activities could affect her party and the demand therefore that he better be discreet. 

It was Currie, as a health minister with responsibility for high security hospitals under Health Secretary Kenneth Clarke, who appointed Savile to run a taskforce at Broadmoor in the 1980s which he exploited to abuse patients.

Morrison and Thatcher. 'Hague' is William Hague, the current Foreign Secretary who was Welsh Secretary when the North Wales 'care' home scandal broke in which Morrison was involved.

The wider implications of paedophile politicians and royalty are far greater than even the sickening abuse of children. It means that paedophiles in power can be blackmailed to change society through legislation in ways that the blackmailers demand or else. 

The Rothschilds operating out of Britain, Germany, France and Rome have been the force behind the creation of what is now the European Union on their way to a global fascist dictatorship based on a world government, army, bank and currency,

Edward Heath was completely controlled by the Rothschilds (in my view, what Michael Shrimpton calls the Germans) because of his paedophilia and child murder. Rothschild asset Heath was the most constant and vocal advocate over decades of Britain's entry into the then European Economic Community (EEC) and it was Heath as prime minister who signed Britain's entry on January 1st 1973.

Heath's policies during his premiership between 1970 and 74 were largely dictated by a Think Tank called the Central Policy Review Staff which was headed by ... Lord Victor Rothschild. One of the policies was the industrialisation and chemicalisation of farming methods which Rothschild had championed as chairman of the Agricultural Research Council from 1948 to 1958. 

Rothschild was a frequent guest of Heath at the prime minister's country residence at Chequers, west of London, from where Heath and his Chancellor Anthony Barber would attend satanic rituals at Burnham Beeches, an area of woodland owned by 'The City' (London's financial centre) and so in truth owned by the secret societies that control The City (see The Biggest Secret).

Harold Wilson.

Victor Rothschild was also close to Heath's political opponent, the Labour Party Prime Minister and another paedophile, Harold Wilson. Either Wilson or Heath was in Downing Street from 1964 to 1975 and both were attached to strings held by Rothschild. 

It was during a Wilson premiership that Rothschild arranged for the covert export of plutonium to Israel to establish their now massive nuclear weapons programme (see ... And The Truth Shall Set You Free). 

Victor Rothschild was the force behind the expansion of nuclear power and worked in support of this by manipulating the miners' strikes of the Heath years which at one time led to Britain moving to a three-day working week to conserve energy. Several anti-nuclear protestors met unexplained or suspicious deaths.

Rothschild became senior security advisor to Margaret Thatcher at the same time that his Rothschild Zionist associate and royal knight Sir Colin Figures was head of MI6. Rothschild was also the instigator behind the sacking of BBC Director General Alasdair Milne in 1987 after Thatcher had appointed his friend Marmaduke Hussey as head of the BBC governors.

I was at the BBC at the time and met Milne. He was the last genuine defender of the BBC's independence and it's all been downhill ever since - exactly as planned. 

These are the wheels within wheels turning all the time under the cover of official versions of events which are repeated without question by the mainstream media. The cement that holds it all together is Satanism, paedophilia and secret societies. 

Police chiefs have announced this week that their initial inquiry into political paedophilia in Britain, known as Operation Fairbank, is going to be joined by a full-blown investigation into the historical abuse at the Elm Guest House called Operation Fernbridge while Fairbank will continue to follow up other leads.

Fairbank was established after Labour MP Tom Watson asked Prime Minister David Cameron in a parliamentary question about evidence he had of a widespread paedophile ring operating out of 10 Downing Street under a previous prime minister. 

Several politicians, including an ever-recurring Thatcher cabinet minister, a Thatcher promoter and a very famous singer are on a list of people said to have visited the Elm Guest House along with Anthony Blunt in the 1980s - the Thatcher years. 

Also on the list are a number of members of the Monday Club, a far-right faction within the Conservative Party which supported the apartheid regime in South Africa. 

Thatcher aide Derek Laud was the first black member of the Monday Club as he was the first black master of foxhounds in the country - both environments normally far from welcoming and conducive to black people. He was given the nickname 'Golly'.

This is the same Derek Laud, a long-time friend of Prime Minister David Cameron and his wife, Samantha, and a guest at their wedding, who was accused of paedophile activity by the now defunct Scallywag magazine in the 1990s along with Thatcher Treasurer Lord McAlpine who was in the news recently protesting his innocent after similar allegations surfaced. Neither chose to sue Scallywag all those years ago. 

The evidence for an enormous paedophile ring operating within the royal palaces, Downing Street and the Westminster Parliament is overwhelming and if the police do not make arrests of big political and royal names so they can be questioned under caution then police investigations will be shown to be a cover up given the evidence that is mounting all the time. 

The British Establishment with its worldwide reach and influence is indeed looking over the abyss.

Barrister and Intelligence Insider Michael Shrimpton talking about Jimmy Savile and Ted Heath

Michael Shrimpton also describes what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert Dr David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what he says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.

I can't confirm what he says about Madeleine or Cook but for sure I can with everything else with regard to Heath, Savile and the Conservative Party and government. Nor do I agree with all of his assumptions about who was behind it all, and certainly not that British Intelligence are the 'good guys'. But it is very interesting information very much worth hearing.