Area 51 Scientist Speaks Out - Human Alien Collaboration

Scientist David Adair talks about propulsion at the speed of light technology in the early 70's. This is a mind blowing interview that isn't about alien blowjobs. I used the visual to get your attention. It's not really about collaboration either as back engineered technology is seemingly secured by groups who don't answer to the people.

This is an interesting interview. I've been noting the topic of scientific divine inspiration for a couple of years now and David Adair confirms here, the technology ideas were coming to him in his dreams. 

So that's Descartes, Francis Bacon, Tesla and now Adair all taking other world inspiration including 'angelic' visits not to mention Francis Crick's inspiration from mystical LSD. Today's scientists are smoking crack pipes and clinging on to the illusion of empiricism and materialism if they refuse to recognise where the sizzle is coming from.

Michael Tellinger - Its The Cycle Stupid

I was listening to Jay Weidner talking about the indian Brahmin cycles earlier this morning and I liked simplicity of the cycle word. I've been posting Michael Tellinger's clips here for a while, because like Paris Tosen he has an an authenticity to him that is very effective (though they are completely different). 

Michael is the guy you'd want on Wogan telling the world's pensioners that things aint what they used to be without too many pulmonary heart attacks kicking off during the commercial break. People should be paying attention to the increase in coronal mass ejections that are occurring and the potential instantaneous worthlessness of iEverything if the electricity grid goes down.

Thankfully our elites will be safe and secure to lead us from those underground bases that Richard Sauder says they have been building forever and which explain those missing trillions that Rumsfeld was on about before 911 distracted the people from whatever ball game was on that evening.

Me? 

I'm staying on the surface. 

I'm not a lizard (Though the underground station is good for a few hours) ;)

Russell Brand Interviews Richard Dawkins

'There's a lot we don't understand' - Richard Dawkins to Russell Brand (Before negating the possibility of ancient aliens as explanation for the Elohim of Genesis)

Listen Without Prejudice

Paris Tosen shares his story. There's a unique texture to it including earnestness, innocence, guilt, over optimism and curiosity interspersed with bits of anger. It's also funny in parts and well worth hanging around for just those.

If you think that's easy to fake, sit in front of your webcam and invent something for 50 minutes. 

Can't do it? 

Then listen without prejudice.

Randy Maugans Interviews James Horak

The moon's artificiality isn't the focus of this interview by Randy Maugans but as soon as James Horak mentions it's artificial I started to take him a lot more seriously. It's one of the few verifiable logical propositions I have figured out isn't a theory. Well, unless you count throwing a bullseye dart from here to the moon which I don't. A coincidence is what you have left over when you apply a bad theory.

James Horak - Just Because It's Nuts Doesn't Mean It Isn't True

I haven't done enough research to figure out what or if there's a catch to James Horak, so I wont mislead you with full-on high-weirdness evangelism just yet. I first listened to an  interview of him yesterday, and I will upload that mp3 file to Youtube when I've converted it to a movie file. 

I began to take James a lot more seriously stated that the moon is not in orbit at a random distance from the planet - it was put there. That's a classic neo Galileo thinking. A person who isn't afraid to stand up to the Vatican, or Wired magazine (otherwise known as cut and paste science) or whatever body holds a persons reality together more than their own intellectual clout.

I mention that because walking home from a run yesterday I realised there's a much better way of explaining the artificiality of the moon than I have achieved so far. My attempt invariably has people scratching their heads and attempting to change the subject.

It's fairly important because the entire edifice of mickey mouse materialist science begins to crumble if normal people realise that the scientific establishment is  either too stupid to figure out a doozy of a question or even just lying to us at a very basic level.

That prompts even more dangerous questions. 

I want to do an "artificial moon" explanation to web cam instead of writing about it because it's not rocket science if you excuse the pun. Anyone can figure out that the moon was carefully put into place if they are curious enough. Arousing that curiosity is the challenge. It's about asking a better question, but for the time being I've only got a better answer. So that will have to do.

Occult Disney

There's more than just the inverted Pentagon and Satanic star in this clip, but I wont bore the uninitiated though I do ask the sceptical a question. If the Pentagon was going to choose a shape that said "eyes wide shut" because you're too stupid to get it anyway, what shape would it be, or what shape could it be? 

Oh I get it. 

You think the Pentagon is a force for good right? 

They wouldn't do it hidden in plain sight.

At ease Soldier.