The Moon Up Close DP 1020

These are rare because close scrutiny of the lunar surface just creates problems for NASA (Never a straight answer).

Behind The Scenes Of Kubrick's The Shining

The internet is truly awesome. Thirty-five minutes of the making of The Shining filmed by Stanley Kubrick's 17-year-old daughter Vivian Kubrick. For more insights into why the film steered away from Stephen Kings' book, read this post.

Via Open Culture

Apollo 18

Apollo 18 is not my usual fare but after watching Transformers 3 and the overlap with lunar chatter on the net I'm looking forward to seeing what Hollywood has to say about the Moon. 

Update: It's a shit movie but some of the 70's photography is superb.

57 Varieties Of Lunacy

Lovely coincidences happening here for me. David Willcock asserts that there are 57 varieties of humanoid based on Clifford Stone's testimony and I thought that's the same description as Heinz 57 varieties (trivia is my speciality) but just then Wired Journalist Dave Mosher  took umbrage to my constant criticism that science articles on Wired are often cut and paste journalism and tweeted a link to a science paper on the K/T event and then seconds later David Willcock started talking about it in this interview. I like coincidences so I'm obliged to do my homework on this now. It feels like I'm being nudged that way.

And Dave... Sorry about being so rude but seriously, the moon is artificial. That's the story Wired really needs to do. How about it?

Randy Maugans Interviews James Horak

The moon's artificiality isn't the focus of this interview by Randy Maugans but as soon as James Horak mentions it's artificial I started to take him a lot more seriously. It's one of the few verifiable logical propositions I have figured out isn't a theory. Well, unless you count throwing a bullseye dart from here to the moon which I don't. A coincidence is what you have left over when you apply a bad theory.

James Horak - Just Because It's Nuts Doesn't Mean It Isn't True

I haven't done enough research to figure out what or if there's a catch to James Horak, so I wont mislead you with full-on high-weirdness evangelism just yet. I first listened to an  interview of him yesterday, and I will upload that mp3 file to Youtube when I've converted it to a movie file. 

I began to take James a lot more seriously stated that the moon is not in orbit at a random distance from the planet - it was put there. That's a classic neo Galileo thinking. A person who isn't afraid to stand up to the Vatican, or Wired magazine (otherwise known as cut and paste science) or whatever body holds a persons reality together more than their own intellectual clout.

I mention that because walking home from a run yesterday I realised there's a much better way of explaining the artificiality of the moon than I have achieved so far. My attempt invariably has people scratching their heads and attempting to change the subject.

It's fairly important because the entire edifice of mickey mouse materialist science begins to crumble if normal people realise that the scientific establishment is  either too stupid to figure out a doozy of a question or even just lying to us at a very basic level.

That prompts even more dangerous questions. 

I want to do an "artificial moon" explanation to web cam instead of writing about it because it's not rocket science if you excuse the pun. Anyone can figure out that the moon was carefully put into place if they are curious enough. Arousing that curiosity is the challenge. It's about asking a better question, but for the time being I've only got a better answer. So that will have to do.

Fritz Lang, Werner Von Braun & The Moon Landings

I think this is even more interesting than the first part of the documentary I posted earlier. There's less of a focus on the questionable moon landing photography and more on manipulation of populations through media and film entertainment. It starts off with questions of the Van Allen belts being to dangerous for man to travel through without being irradiated to death but does move on to the whole Soviet and United States manipulation and deceit of space travel. I had no idea of the Von Braun/Fritz Lang connection or that the Soviets too were faking so much stuff.

I'm genuinely confused in a good way trying to fit in both sides motives because intercontinental complicity seems to be a theme I pick up now and again, and I may have to explore much deeper. 

The lie is different at every level isn't it?

British Questions About NASA Moon Landings

The first time I heard about the hoax moon landings I thought don't be ridiculous. I've only given it a day's research now, and had to walk away from it because both sides put forward a pretty good case for fake pictures or explanations for photographic anomalies in an inhospitable environment. Also it get's complicated as some of it may be true and some of it may be illusion for political reasons as those who believe Kubrick was hired by NASA to film the moon landings after his 2001 space oddysey success. I'm going to walk away from this discussion but if it get's you questioning the processed cheese reality of mainstream media that's a good thing but good luck with coming to a conclusion.

The real dark side of the moon is that all the evidence suggests it was put in place and is therefore some sort of artificial satellite. It's size, orbit, position, gravity and density are just too weird for anybody too explain.

Advanced Joseph P. Farrell

More interesting for people familiar with Dr Farrell's work but good free range thinking on a lot of subjects if you're like it erudite.

Richard Hoagland - (Sous-titres Français)

2 hours and 50 minutes of essential information on hidden lunar secrets with newly posted French subtitles. Well worth listening to the joint author of Dark Mission.

A fine rant by Occultscience101 who is one of the most comprehensive Saturnalia deconstructionists on Youtube and an unsurpassed etymologist capable of connecting more dots than most brains (including mine) have bandwidth to deal with. Fortunately his colloquial style is quite accessible, though some of his less obvious throwaway points can themselves be teased out into long sub codified treatises of the topic taking on a recursively fractal pattern endlessly looping back into itself until someone calls time. Which is ironic because Saturn is among other designations Chronos. The God of time.

Supermoon

Cosmic Capitalism

 

If survival of the species is a worthwhile game-plan then application of logic can't be harmful.

My thoughts are we have three options:

1. Laissez faire Corporatism/Capitalism/Scientific Materialism

There's enough history to argue that we are no more in control of our destiny, then there is evidence of why we exist in the vastness of the universe, apparently alone. Most of our discoveries are more a case of accidents then purpose-driven discovery, and so the solution is let it unfold without a plan. I have a deep conviction about transition of energy after death and don't fear dying, but it strikes me as odd that those who are least predisposed to this kind of thinking, are most unlikely to openly and vocally champion Capitalism's course of action. If one doesn't believe in life after death why hand over to those who are living?

2. Harmony

This option requires a more immediate and locally self-sufficient discussion on managed population decline. In 50 years with one-family-one-child policies, as China has already shown, we could be in a position to conclude what that harmony means. How the resources are intelligently shared, how much untouched nature is to be contiguous with humans and how to rewire corporations to wean them off addiction to profits.

3. Cosmic Capitalism

The picture of the Chanel logo on the moon was the first visualization that made sense to me.

It never occurred to me until recently that capitalism could be the solution to our problem. Not the mutant strain we are working. Currently capitalism is a shoe scraping cripple for unbiquitous wealth creation. It's the HIV of abundance, a malignant tumor on our collective hope for a better tomorrow. 

What explains the absence of truly awesome visionary branding, selling futures of cosmic   promises with travel or luxury brands (for example) vying with each other right now to brand the lunar surface as a terrestrially inspired vision. I'm talking about a celebration of firm conviction in cosmic capitalism, physically investing in the wealth needed to enable us to eject ourselves from the orbit of an uninhabitable Earth, and leaving behind a spent womb and bruised uterus ready for metamorphic change? A Goodbye-Earth lunar-branding experience, celebrating escape from orbit, and out of this solar system and onto the next.

With capitalism that has vision such as this I can roll with the costs of what is left behind. But the capitalism we have. It has no balls. It's a parasite. It has no future.

What say you?