That Wired Article About Obama On Mars? (CHANGE Vs Chang'e 2)

The architectural, parapolitical and mythological evidence that Mars once supported ancient civilizations, is not an issue I reject as either nonsensical or absurd. Logically capitalism says that the most powerful get the best technology and so the number of people who insist that there's a base on Mars, is to my mind worth keeping a sceptical but open mind on. The latest interview by a researcher I trust, didn't work for me as it was too difficult to sift through the discontinuities that come with 'Intelligence' administered MKULTRA or mind control.

When NASA warned everyone off the moon recently with a no fly zone, I thought that added fuel to the fire a real story is being concealed, and so even though I enjoyed the recent video by the Chinese satellite Chang'e 2, I enjoyed the potential irony of Obama's hollow election platform of CHANGE versus the Chinese Space lunar probe, Chang'e 2 manifesting itself through space-photography-leaks, if the video (see above) hasn't been faked.

However, I bashed out a comment on the subject in  a Wired article, that I want to paste here because Lloyd's post is triggering my synchronicity antenna. I think it has a few details that people should consider before rejecting the Wired article just because it seems fantastic. I've no idea if the Obama angle is true but my first sentence from this post still stands. 

Here's the comment.

Basiago may or may not be telling the truth. What is notable from a traditional, dumbed down journalism perspective (i.e journalism that doesn't pick up the phone and talk to the man like this Wired article) is that Basiago is a Washington State lawyer with five degrees including a Masters in Philosophy from Cambridge. His concrete links to an intelligence background through his father, along with his claims, are not the actions of a white-bread legal career in the United States. 

Couple this with his inability to say anything of interest philosophically and the question to be asked 'Is Basiago COINTELPRO?' His association with Laura Eisenhower granddaughter of 'Military Industrial Complex - Four Star General/President' Eisenhower is a thread also worth doing some active journalism on, instead of cut and paste hackery.

We should also bear in mind that the US government has gone out of it's way over nearly a decade now to extradite Gary McKinnon who unveiled that Project Genesis is a Mars Project, with non-terrestrial officers, collaborating on the project through bases on Mars. 

If he's just a conspiracy theory nut, why is the Pentagon so insistent it wants to prosecute a theory?

My guess is that Basiago (Who admits to memory gaps and is thus likely an MKULTRA victim) has a story with typical intelligence qualities. Thus, some of his story might be the truth and the disinformation is also seeded there too. Don't expect this story to go away either. Clif High's semantic search Webbots have indicated for some time that Basiago will be integral to a time travel story this year - That isn't proof it's supporting circumstantial evidence and worth factoring in.

None of this is science but then science doesn't like to stand up and take the hit for the body counts it produces in Afghanistan through its unconscionable joystick/drone warfare. 

Science can't have it both ways on on integrity.

Basiago also had a memorable spat with Major Ed Dames recently on a nationwide radio talk show call-in. Ed Dames provided remote viewing services to the US military - that's non local quantum methodology for the armchair debunkers out there. To me, this spat adumbrated the well discussed falling out on the fringes of the net between the CIA and the Pentagon. Look at Petraeus' move to Langley for support of this claim. One that some may see as wild but has subsequently manifested more concretely.

Keep an eye on Basiago. 

The challenge is what is the truth? 

That takes journalism not pseudo sceptic blabber.

Homeland Security Spokesperson Doesn't Know What The Rest Of The World Knows

A raft of callers into C-SPAN point out that the underwear bomber was led through immigration and ushered onto the plane by an unknown gentleman in a brown suit. A classic example of a so called expert looking foolish. It appears he's unable to do even the minimal amount of fact checking such as this crucial report by Intel Hub.

Nothing Matters

Following on my Lawrence Krauss lecture and post on nothing, (he's fun but overrated) this excellent video on nothing serves a couple of purposes. Firstly I think The New Scientist is one of the least arrogant scientific institutions and that is to be applauded. Their lead stories are invariably about how much we don't know rather than the pseudo-sceptical fascism of techno-bores who can't wait to impress with their scientific prowess of rapidly dissembling theories (thermodynamics is in for an overhaul).  It is possible they're also just warming you up for cold fusion or vacuum energy because that's on its way in.

I think there's a wonderful philosophical-dimensional point to be made that if there's no space between two objects, i.e. they are touching, then nothing exists through the presence of something and that's a contradictory point I've made in the past, that flips the physicality argument (of something exists through nothing) made in the video. It suggests objectivity is beginning to finally lose its intellectual coherence. 

This means there's no such thing as the 'other'. I am you and you are me, it's all one, and can you lend me a fiver please.

My last point is the resurrection of ether. This Victorian idea is now firmly back in science and while we haven't revived the use of leeches may I point out that materialist science is a joke. CERN, nuclear physics and all that smashing things up science is past its sell by date.

Materialist science is not our future.