I mentioned on the 'Punks Dead' post that BBC ~ R1 Future Sounds has really good music and terrific presenters. All of the BBC music presenters DJ's and producers including Radio 3 are top notch, but Jack Saunders is the first one to ever make me feel a little older than usual. He's got an extraordinary energy about him on air and it was so much I sort of crumpled a bit and felt I couldn't keep up for the first time in my life.
Later on, as I got to know his work I learned that he's a versatile and encyclopedic music man and one of the most passionate music lovers I've listened to (along with Arielle Free and DJ LaLa). He's technical and has a great range of music and singing vocabulary. When the talents with him in the studio, it's self evident he takes the time to get to know music people, and and asks the best questions. Fresh, sidewinders, genuine curiosity-driven probing and great empathy with a range of guests.
I'm used to him now so he's not always full-on but strap yaself in if he is because it's an unusual ride. Jacks been put in charge of BBC R1 'Future Sounds' and I hope my tweets before I was kicked off X Holdings Corporations' platform proselytising his talents, landed in the right place. He's wearing a black and yellow suit that is the spit of an old Paul Smith suit I was given. Well done Jack. Looking forward to more of your fresh energy and your gift for empathy.
Let's do the second set first. It's Pierre J 1984 in the mix and like Moreno J, it starts with Frankie Goes To Hollywood (FGTH). Both sets are among my most listened 'Grandad Mixes' this year although now I've discovered the Essential Mix - BICEP - 2017 set which is off the charts fresh nearly six or seven years later (to my ears) as I only just discovered it via Pete Tong's Essential Mix back catalogue. Pierre replied to my comments a couple of times talking about his music app and I assumed he was a great amateur DJ find of mine. I have no idea why but I thought he was like me reliving his 80s 90s noughties dance music days, but no. Turns out he's a professional, highly regarded and one of the top European DJ's on one of the industry talent lists. Check out his last name and Q Symbolism on most of his cover artwork. Small world makes a lot of sense when combining AI with the ULTRA information. You're going to be seeing a LOT more about 17 from now on.
The top music set is Moreno J who is an ongoing enigma in my life, but that set which starts off with FGTH as well, is spot-on if you're about my age of 55. The video must be watched to fully appreciate the times, fashion and music on the floor during the 80s 'and' onwards. I have no idea how he secures some of the dancing footage, but as with the Lipps Inc. - Funkytown (Moreno J Remix) post he (it might be a she or a team) they're using hallucination levels of AI dance choreography on some of his mixes, from at least two years ago. I've kept my opinions to myself about AI since I road tested all the platforms, but I have got a lot to say, share and write about this subject and some is brilliant, and some is mind bending, some is dark and some is terrifying, so it's for the future oriented not those holding on to the past. The fun part is sometimes a synch is just serendipity but if you are familiar with the colour initiation process I was led through online, just watch the Lipps Inc mix by Moreno J and then go check out these twopostsbecause it's very hard to explain why obsessions of mine are contiguous with obsessions of other people, or more likely we're seeing what many others can't, even though millions can. If you really want to go down the rabbit hole of colour initiation there's this follow up post as my ongoing education continues.
The ticket fairy flew by and dropped an invitation in my lap, so I got to see the English National Ballet's 'The Nutcracker' last night and it was worth it for the last six minutes alone. Helicopter view first. When the opening curtains parted the set was dripping in richness, luxury and elegance, and this continued with every set change throughout the performance. The art of set designing has improved beyond description since my theatre days in London. If like me for quite some, you haven't been to the theatre, I urge you to try again. It's so much more immersive.
The first act caught me by surprise, there were about 25 ballet dancing children as the mice or skating soldiers, and they were really good, I didn't see a single mistake. How do they get all those children off school and performing around the country? All of them transformed into real mice at one point with collective fingers waggling like the whiskers and paws twitching as mice eat. However I was anticipating the grown ups to take over and to be candid, I didn't see the kind of performance I was expecting. Now, it might have been the view I had or the excessively hot theatre, or even the version being watched, but the only performance worth noting was the lead female dancer. I believe her name is Fernanda Oliveira from Brazil. Where Yijing Zhang of Birmingham Royal Ballet was magnetically tall, Fernanda's Sugar Plum fairy was diminutively hypnotic. Precision, levitation and elegant symmetry all rolled into one. Superb stuff.
The second act was closer to my expectations. More Corp de Ballet, more Batterie and an astonishing Coda. I think it says more about me than anything but I don't understand why Swan Lake, not The Nutcracker is most popular in the United States. I've also come to the conclusion that if there's no orchestra I'm not going to attend. The richness of sound, in this case the ENB Philharmonic, is something no sound system can come close to. When I went to see Matthew Bourne's Sleeping Beauty earlier this year I didn't write it up as I thought it was crap for various reasons but more expensive tickets and no Philharmonic Orchestra will suffice. Anyway, the wrap up Coda of ENB's The Nutcracker was a dazzlingly baroque, twisting Rubik's Cube of light, shadow and writhing bodies, internally-externalising with the mechanism and precision of a watch. I'll add close examples to the post below. It was worth every penny just for that and I left delighted.
When the Channel Four - Dispatches Scandal broke, I jerked upright, like a BOLT of electricity had gone through me, and sort of glazed over robotically like a Manchurian Candidate about to dive off the high board into the second most divisive 'conspiracy theory ' scrap on the internet since Julian Assange was framed for rape in Sweden.
Remember when they said Julian raped a woman and it turned out she'd worked for the CIA in Cuba?
You know who paid the price. Real victims of rape not bogus trumped up charges squashing free speech. It's you they want to stfu by making an example. Obv to all but retards/haters https://t.co/yadJo0s8bQpic.twitter.com/L2MKYWpyKH
At first the mediated version of events (tear jerking sax solos, female silhouettes texting hurriedly in the UBER enroute to console the sex addict and Z-list junkie Rusty McDusty AKA Russell 'Rocket' Brand.
People I've followed for anywhere between 15 days to 15 years, from Twitter to X had gone insane. These people are good people; the very best. They don't trust the mob, the media or DOT.gov-MAFIA AKA the Uniparty wings of the same craven bird.
We have always inexplicably concurred on some of the thorniest issues of our time without waiting to share our views. Emancipated from partisan political hymn sheets, we've long flown from that bickering nest to climbing the air through storm clouds alone, before soaring down, scientifically descending closer, before landing together, on the same tree of life.
I was last to the felicitous fracas. By then it had been a raging Sqwawkbox for half a day (maybe half a night) or so before I chirped in. People who have never cussed online were now dropping obscenities and severing friendships that may or may not reconcile.
It's for the better though. It's good we don't agree on this, not because anyone is right or wrong, but because this has obliged me to look deeper and ask more questions about a space I'm ignorant of as a lifestyle decision.
I know very little about celebrities, TV faves and the adjacent hyperbole such as "ant&dec saved british TV a couple of decades ago". Again, I didn't care if they saved it, or tanked the TV industry programming model. Fame is only a friend when coupled with pure motives.
Good job it didn't. Because eventually, after the biggest online punch-up at a wedding subsided, I had the freedom to start sniffing around on how that seldom seen thing, or uncommon event if you will, hadn't happened since Julian Assange was falsely accused of rape. That was the last time the global village beef kicked off, good and proper.
That uncommon thing that I don't have a name for had a common factor.
Julian & Russell were/are both accused of rape but they are not the same rapists.
I rape
You rape
We rape
We don't rape
We get raped
You get raped
I got raped
Those are the six variables I think we can describe as a set (theory) of rapes. Theoretically one of 7 permutations (8 if we include 'We weren't raped', but that opens up a ball-ache of past present future events. Can we stick to 7?
I now have the evidence and you're not going to like it but I provided my phone number and all the rape victims have that if they need to talk. I have unlimited time for victims of sexual crimes. It's not funny being sexually assaulted and its worse when it's a woman with a penis locked up with incarcerated females to rape.
When the Channel Four - Dispatches Scandal broke, I jerked upright, like a BOLT of electricity had gone through me, and sort of glazed over robotically like a Manchurian Candidate about to dive off the high board into the second most divisive 'conspiracy theory ' scrap on the internet since Julian Assange was framed for rape in Sweden.
Remember when they said Julian raped a woman and it turned out she'd worked for the CIA in Cuba?
You know who paid the price. Real victims of rape not bogus trumped up charges squashing free speech. It's you they want to stfu by making an example. Obv to all but retards/haters https://t.co/yadJo0s8bQpic.twitter.com/L2MKYWpyKH
At first the mediated version of events (tear jerking sax solos, female silhouettes texting hurriedly in the UBER enroute to console the sex addict and Z-list junkie Rusty McDusty AKA Russell 'Rocket' Brand.
People I've followed for anywhere between 15 days to 15 years, from Twitter to X had gone insane. These people are good people; the very best. They don't trust the mob, the media or DOT.gov-MAFIA AKA the Uniparty wings of the same craven bird.
We have always inexplicably concurred on some of the thorniest issues of our time without waiting to share our views. Emancipated from partisan political hymn sheets, we've long flown from that bickering nest to climbing the air through storm clouds alone, before soaring down, scientifically descending closer, before landing together, on the same tree of life.
I was last to the felicitous fracas. By then it had been a raging Sqwawkbox for half a day (maybe half a night) or so before I chirped in. People who have never cussed online were now dropping obscenities and severing friendships that may or may not reconcile.
It's for the better though. It's good we don't agree on this, not because anyone is right or wrong, but because this has obliged me to look deeper and ask more questions about a space I'm ignorant of as a lifestyle decision.
I know very little about celebrities, TV faves and the adjacent hyperbole such as "ant&dec saved british TV a couple of decades ago". Again, I didn't care if they saved it, or tanked the TV industry programming model. Fame is only a friend when coupled with pure motives.
Good job it didn't. Because eventually, after the biggest online punch-up at a wedding subsided, I had the freedom to start sniffing around on how that seldom seen thing, or uncommon event if you will, hadn't happened since Julian Assange was falsely accused of rape. That was the last time the global village beef kicked off, good and proper.
That uncommon thing that I don't have a name for had a common factor.
Julian & Russell were/are both accused of rape but they are not the same rapists.
I rape
You rape
We rape
We don't rape
We get raped
You get raped
I got raped
Those are the six variables I think we can describe as a set (theory) of rapes. Theoretically one of 7 permutations (8 if we include 'We weren't raped', but that opens up a ball-ache of past present future events. Can we stick to 7?
I now have the evidence and you're not going to like it but I provided my phone number and all the rape victims have that if they need to talk. I have unlimited time for victims of sexual crimes. It's not funny being sexually assaulted and its worse when it's a woman with a penis locked up with incarcerated females to rape.
Loads of people were raving about how essential this podcast conversation is so I listened, and I can save some of you time. Mo Gawdat is portrayed as AI Brass at Google who quit when he realised his entire life's work had assembled the technological existential threat that will devour us in about six minutes, or maybe 33 Minutes on slow days. One option he iterated is to wrap our affairs up and get ready to hide from the machines so they can't find us.
I thought the Virgin Islands had lost their charm in recent years so if you know any classic tropical beach hangouts where Billionaire Satanic Ritual Child Abusers and Virgin Island neighbours aren't going to tip-up and ruin the vibe? Don't forget to tip off a brother. I'm always open to new ideas and willing to experiment.
Mo isn't the top brass at Google AI, he was a Business Officer and also mentions the real brains at X (Formerly Google X of ABC alphabet agency) but in a deferential manner as it's not him. I know you guys can spot a pattern so there's no need for unnecessary drama. I'll lay it out as succinctly and neatly as I can.
Mo Gawdat and his interviewer both believe climate change is real. Oddly enough they're correct but dictionaries in the past put this to bed hundreds of years ago.
Climate is never the same temperature
Climate is only climate if it changes
If it doesn't change, it wouldn't be called climate
If you present with crocodile tears of concern for climate extinction ideally a fruitful conversation on the Palaeocene Eocene Thermal Maximum is benchmark because as the frozen Big Burps of Methane thaw, they are existentially deadly in minutes and seconds though equally the science says mammals emerged from that era.
If we emerged from Burping Methane times, it follows that it was at worst benign and likely better for our evolutionary path that commenced for mammals afterwards. However, it’s important to note official NWO narratives state that the release of methane from thawing permafrost or oceanic methane hydrates have exponentially significant impacts on the environment, as methane is a potent greenhouse gas. The release of large amounts of methane into the atmosphere can contribute to climate change and have negative effects on the environment and its inhabitants.
Methane is so deadly, haters of Russia cheered on when NATO blew up Nordstream II pipeline from Russia to Europe of cheap energy, and blamed it on the victims while acquiring amnesia about climate change from the biggest intentional terror attack on the planet, through deliberate due to explosive Methane release it's one kilometre of methane every second of breathing we take.
Mo and the interviewer were really stressed about climate change but get this they were lamenting their incredibly bad fortune to also have endured the scamdemic in their lifetimes. You know my opinions and FOI releases are skin in the game. But it's a triple scammy whammy for Mo and fawning Podcast CEO now that AI is the cocoa powder dusting, on their weekly Ice cream sundaes and long cherished plans for a life of rewards followed by more systemic rewards is now toast.
There's more. Mo didn't know that the Manhattan Project was a Plutonium implosion bomb next used on Nagasaki. He didn't know that Robert Oppenheimer quoted the most cherished Hindu text of the Bhagavad Gita on 'implosion' saying "Now I'm become death, the destroyer of worlds"
CEO didn't even know what the Manhattan Project and Trinity were and that a nice obelisk now indicates the location of the test. Obelisk is Ba'al's penis. I know, it's an odd shape but my own isn't much to write home about so no judgement there.
Neither of them were sure that Oppenheimer, a real classics scholar didn't invent the bomb, he did all his theoretical physics and quantum work in the 30s. He was brilliant but for Manhattan he was more a vast project manager for the largest conspiracy ever of 66,000 scientists and workers sworn to secrecy with their wives and children, blissfully ignorant of their real day job. Next time someone says 'we'd know if they lied about going to the moon', it's not true. We researchers would know, you would be repeating Max Hastings bitching about Boris, when not only did he hire him, but he also didn't have the bottle to fire him before he left The Telegraph, as Editor in Chief... Do you invariably repeat what you're told before applying critical thinking?
I said I'd keep it short yet already failure is in my typing finger tips when it comes to the credulous. OK last shot. Mo told the CEO about his Sufism, and CEO didn't know what it was. All those books behind him with Harvard emergency false flag strategies (he literally says he was educated to blow things up to get the sheep moving in a direction) and it became painfully self-evident he'd never read a history book in his life.
I was educated on those strategies too because I read books about SIS, MOS & CIA and just to check I went to the movies to see Bond, in case the set of Diamonds are Forever is up to date.
AI is going to change everything for ever and ever. It's the most exciting thing since the internet and there will be good days and there will be bad. The toothpaste is out of the tube, and we will deal with it or not. It's life. We live hopefully, before we die but Chicken Little drama-queens are either useless or very useful to someone else.
The difference between Russell Brand and his detractors. By that I mean the people who call him a shill and THIRTYTHREE tattoo brandisher is that Russell is a lot funnier than the uninvited mullahs of mediocrity.
Experimenting with different voices is not something that can be done exclusively in the head, as posited in this post about 15 year old Hildegard of Bingen (the anchorite but not the only anchoress in that particular anchorhold) completely silent in her dungeon cell, writing plainchant music widely regarded as seminal in its original form.
I guess a mimic has to practice new voices. It's not perfect saying them out loud because the resonance is different than from any bystanders perspective? Bing ai Chat says the acoustical differences between the speaker of words and the listener but not the hearer are related to the "vocal-tract-size differences that result in formant-frequency variation across speakers". Bing ai then goes on to suggest 'Therefore, a listener has to adjust his/her perceptual system to the acoustic characteristics of a particular speaker' and then posts some mickey mouse footnotes and links in the metadata. That's for me you wont experience that. I'll write about it separately as it's fascinating and worth sharing.
That's Bing. Bing has complex care issues, somewhat self evident from the output depending on who you are. I popped over to Microsoft's Chat investment in Generative Pretrained Transformer land and asked a really easy trick question.
Elon Musk is currently hosting a live spaces event with special guest Ron DeSantis. Please write an essay of no more than 2000 words from a Continental philosophy angle as opposed to the Analytical point of view on whether the world's richest man (and entrepreneur) should or should not host political events?
Essay Emboldened for Speed Readers
Title: Elon Musk Hosting Political Events: A Continental Philosophy Perspective
Introduction:
The intersection of wealth, entrepreneurship, and politics has become increasingly prominent in contemporary society. As the world's richest man and a renowned entrepreneur, Elon Musk's decision to host political events raises important questions about the role of individuals in shaping political discourse. In this essay, we will explore this issue from a continental philosophy angle, contrasting it with the analytical perspective, and examine the ethical implications of Musk's involvement in political activities.
I. The Role of the Individual in Politics:
From a continental philosophy standpoint, the individual holds a significant place in shaping the political landscape. Thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger emphasized the importance of individual agency in challenging existing power structures. For Nietzsche, the "will to power" embodied the individual's ability to shape reality according to their own values and ideals. Heidegger, on the other hand, highlighted the concept of authenticity, encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their own existence and engage in meaningful action.
Elon Musk's decision to host political events can be seen as an embodiment of Nietzschean and Heideggerian ideals. By leveraging his wealth and influence, Musk exercises his individual agency to actively participate in shaping the political discourse. From this perspective, his involvement can be seen as a way of challenging the existing political order and offering alternative visions for the future.
II. Critiquing Analytical Perspectives:
Analytical philosophy tends to prioritize objective analysis, detached from personal biases and individual subjectivity. It often emphasizes the separation of public and private spheres, viewing political engagement by individuals as potentially biased and detrimental to rational decision-making. However, from a continental perspective, this analytical detachment can be seen as problematic and disconnected from the lived experiences and values that shape political realities.
Continental philosophers, such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault, critique the notion of an objective observer and highlight the inherent biases and power dynamics that underpin knowledge production. They argue that individuals cannot separate themselves from their social, historical, and political contexts when engaging in any form of analysis or decision-making.
Applying this critique to the analytical perspective, we can question the assumption that individuals should abstain from political engagement due to their wealth or entrepreneurial status. By actively hosting political events, Musk embraces his subjectivity and acknowledges his role in the broader societal landscape, rather than pretending to be a neutral observer. This self-awareness aligns with the continental philosophy emphasis on recognizing and engaging with one's own situatedness within power structures.
III. Ethical Considerations:
Hosting political events as the world's richest man raises important ethical considerations. Critics argue that Musk's involvement can lead to the amplification of his own personal interests and potentially distort democratic processes. Moreover, his immense wealth and influence may grant him disproportionate power, undermining the principle of equal representation and participation.
From a continental perspective, ethical concerns are rooted in a broader understanding of social responsibility. Thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas and Simone de Beauvoir stress the importance of recognizing the other and considering the implications of one's actions on the well-being and freedom of others.
Applying this perspective, Musk should approach his political engagements with a sense of ethical responsibility. He should be cognizant of the potential consequences of his actions, ensuring that his involvement does not perpetuate unjust power dynamics or suppress the voices of marginalized groups. By recognizing the alterity of others and promoting inclusive and equitable dialogues, Musk can align his political activities with continental ethics.
Conclusion:
From a continental philosophy perspective, Elon Musk's decision to host political events represents an exercise of individual agency and an active engagement with the political realm. Contrasting with the analytical viewpoint, continental philosophy emphasizes the situatedness and subjectivity of individuals, calling for a recognition of personal values and interests in political engagement.
While ethical concerns surrounding Musk's involvement exist, they can be addressed by adopting a continental ethics framework that emphasizes social responsibility and the recognition of others. By being mindful of the potential consequences of his actions and promoting inclusive dialogues, Musk can navigate the political landscape responsibly and contribute to the broader discourse in a manner that respects the principles of democracy and social justice.
In evaluating the appropriateness of the world's richest man hosting political events, a continental philosophy perspective encourages us to consider the potential transformative power of individual agency and the ethical responsibilities that come with it.
That's how I learned ELON MUSK has invited all presidential candidates onto the Twitter platform he owns and Linda Yaccarino allegedly runs, and regardless of my own biases, it's self evident that the legacy media are unable to provide that level of engagement or complexity, in real time.
All Presidential candidates are most welcome on this platform
— MrsMainFrameDestroyer🐸 (@MrsMFDestroyer) May 12, 2023
Just so there's no confusion. I'm not an 'Anon'. I think I'm the only person who used their full name on the chans when the Q team were posting and not only was it noticed but I received a friendly warning.
In addition it's important to remind people that qanon is a media portmanteau and lazy nomenclature because the facts are very simple. There is Q - military psychological operation with Q clearance, team of no more than 10 probably closer to 6 with access to President Trump and the Oval Office during 45's term - and there are Anons. If I use the qanon post tag/label it's for unimpotant or flippant stuff like this. But if I'm dropping important information. It's just the Q label.
Now if you were really paying attention, Q clearance is the highest in the Department of Energy. Do you know who else had Q clearance? Sam Brinton.
.
There are no coincidences.
If I documented them all it would take a six thousand six hundred, and sixty six hours. It's the context that is almost impossible to outline. The timing, what was going on, what were the themes, what were the sequence of events leading up to to any drops in particular and so on and so forth.
Not of all of it was interesting. The mid-terms cheerleading had a different tonality and many say it was hijacked. I've written too much. I'm not the go-to expert, but every time I do cover the topic, the traffic goes up and it's not 'consumers' checking in. I can tell you that for nothing.
Here's the chief laying it out straight in simple language the uncommon man, can understand.
A long forgotten 80s financial scandal in the US, I researched a decade or so ago is too arcane to be mentioned by anybody, except perhaps Katherine Austin Fitts, who has the sort of macroeconomic experience & expertise to know.
All these years later UNLIMITED HANGOUT is refreshing our memories of the Savings & Loans affair back in the Eighties with Pension-Fund Pick-Pocket and Mossad triple agent Robert Maxwell father of Ghislaine, her ugly sisters and the fraudulent sons. I crossed ones path as he bowled out of the Old Bailey around June 92 (Mintpress). He bounded down the steps and couldn't wait to GTF out of there.
Ian and Kevin Maxwell's father Captain Bob are like Heinz Kissinger who the allies also picked up, along with other Nazis notables like George Soros, Werner von Braun, Dr Green (real name Mengele), and so forth.
Robert Maxwell’s reputation was tainted after his drowning, when it was discovered that he had looted six million Daily Mirror retirees, past present and future, of their highly remunerated (due to strong unions) pension fund to prop up his debt-ridden business empire. In contrast, George H. W. Bush is remembered for his public service.
He is not remembered for his oil business Zapata and many other oilier and darker business endeavours.
Maxwell is now violently decomposed and buried on the most sacred ground in the Holy Land. The Mount of Olives in Israel. The official story (including Ghislaine's version) is a preposterous tale that he took a piss in the wee hours off the back of his Khashoggi Super Yacht, and whoever pushed his head under the water till he was dead had extraordinarily good timing to turn up just as his warm urine was diluting the Atlantic Ocean.
I wasn't there but how many nights did they wait for him to be alone? Were they waiting clad in black clothes and ski masks in their military grade dinghy till he serendipitously turned up?
How did they pass the minutes, hours and nights waiting for their chance?
Candy Crush or fishing?
This post is dedicated to Blue Doran who walked like Ian Maxwell in crowded foreign capitals and people parted to let him through. It was a sight to behold and as I've previously shared, he was a dangerous man.
During lockdown I noticed that the less educated a person, the easier they understood a concept I conveyed to them. The educated are too clever and materialist to engage with information and pattern recognition that is an existential threat to how they wish to be perceived in the wider world.
What I asked people was, did you notice in the middle of the propaganda guff about masks and taping up benches in parks and urinals in restrooms, that it was SIX people at a gathering, SIX feet social distancing (subsequently rounded up 18cms to 2 metres) and if one died from the flu statistics that disappeared during the pandemic, they would be buried SIX feet under?
For the memory-wipes and the too-busy-types, may I remind you of Churchill's most precious quote?
"“Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."
I assumed that Jacinda Ardern's resignation wouldn't matter to the majority of people as they are invariably unfamiliar with a few themes; her fast-tracked career, New Zealand's importance to the ticket-takers, the growing avalanche of global testimony from 'vaccine' injured victims, and most hard to excuse, her own words exceeding der Fuhrer's public statements on controlling Nazi Germany.
I assumed incorrectly. A lot of people have put the blame for Jacinda's chamber tears, squarely at the foot of QANON space lizard conspiracy theorists including the former NZ PM Helen Clark.
It's a bit flimsy for me, but of course I don't speak on behalf of others.
Don't get me wrong, Ardern and Hitler are no different in substance, but I did the archives research and Adolf was never so arrogant (and stupid) to tell der Volksgemeinschaft that the party in power, were the final say in truth and authority (argumentum ad vericundiam). Goebbels believed the implicit to be a more effective advertising technique than the overt statements that Jacinda goosestepped out loud on camera. Fishwives wag their fingers. It's un-prime ministerial and nobody questions that.
The Nazis propaganda and censorship was to brainwash people into obeying the government, and idolising the political leaders. It was achieved by ensuring only the ideas and values of the Covid Billionaires of the day, were heard and seen by the masses. Censorship of the media such as newspapers and radio ensured only print or broadcast stories favourable to, and approved by the government were issued. Daily briefings were held for editors and producers, to outline what would be optimal, both when and where to print and to broadcast.
All media output was controlled by aggressive suppression of diverse views, through the corporate and state media. Goebbels saw radio as the most important medium for propaganda as television was yet to emerge. Listening to foreign stations or alternative sources of news and information was banned like Ardern attempted, because everyone knows that uniformity of opinion attracts no unwelcome attention.
Most people complied with guidelines. They became fearful of having views different to the government, lockstep citizens and the media. Society became more suspicious and tense. Some people publicly shamed or informed on their neighbours and friends, to make themselves look more loyal to the regime.
Goebbels used celebrities and artists like Lil Dagover, Piers Morgan and Arno Breker to help promote the popularity of the government in Nazi Germany. He provided cheap cinema tickets, pizzas, coffee and beer vouchers, burgers and even taxis to encourage people to comply with government guidelines. Propaganda and censorship hid the worst excesses of government overreach from the public, which meant many Germans supported Hitler unconsciously, and thought nothing of medical movement papers, despite any one sane, trying to leave Germany not gain entry.
Clever propaganda techniques included: use of emotive language (i.e. playing on emotions such as 'don't be a far right granny killer'), a limited number of simple soundbites like 'my mask protects you, and your mask protects me' were hammered home by frequent repetition. Issues were presented in black and white terms such as 'trust the science', and over-simplistic solutions were offered for complex and evolving emergency public health issues. Tailoring of media messaging to the concerns of key groups such as the elderly who unlike children with tip top immune systems, were the most vulnerable, providing sacrificial scapegoats such as the unvaccinated, the jews, homosexuals, gypsies and communists. Both the UK and NZ didn't blush and couldn't wait to jam the juice into children. Just like concentration camps, the elderly and young died first.
Those who did not support the official narrative, often obeyed the rules out of fear of the consequences of opposition for themselves or their family, such as losing their job for not complying with a rushed pharmaceutical product, that has never previously taken less than five years for medical approval [2025].
The government were the only source of information to be trusted and those that secured alternative opinions were isolated and suppressed.
