Showing posts sorted by date for query ukraine. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ukraine. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday 11 February 2024

17 Seconds Into President Putins Interview





17 seconds into the CIA Tucker Carlson interview, and President Putin takes his watch off and puts it on the table next to his pen.

Who else drew our attention to the watch and pen symbolism inside the oval office during 45s presidency as proof? What sort of 7eventeen is involved?

Letter of the alphabet?






I didn't watch the interview live as big hype requires more not less distance, but I did see a lot of chatter after the interview and social media posts missed the most noticeable elements of the interview that Tucker spun off-topic too.

1. President Putin provided a masterclass on the inseparable destiny between Russia and the Ukraine. It was half an hour of grown up discourse never seen in the history of so called Western/International/Rules Based Order communications.

2. President Putin implied twice that Tucker is CIA

3. President Putin explained the process for peace.

4. President Putin signaled Q comms for those who are sentient on the matter.

5. Nothing can stop what is coming NCSWIC


Tucker is wearing a red string Qabala bracelet and is owned by Israel/CIA nexus.







I'll go back and watch it again as I was working on other things when I listened to it.

If you think Boris Johnson who scuppered the peace deal between The Ukraine and Russia and his follow up floozies Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak as well as the so called opposition and their mainstream media propagandists are telling the truth about Ukraine, you've failed a critical thinking test.

Time is running out for your chance to publicly reverse your statements and credibility as the house of cards falls.


Monday 27 November 2023

iilliaa - life gets hard





I've never lived in a war Zone but I have lived through a couple of military coups. Allow me to explain something to the pampered and progand'erd Western Lifestyle. It is not possible to tell the truth about what's really going on (in a conflict) as the truth is a national security threat. Good and bad because there's indifference on this dangerous subject.


DJ iilliaa's 'life gets hard' is an extraordinary track and one I love, as indeed, I enjoyed Kiev City Ballet's performance here in Southampton, but until Ukraine does the inevitable. It's not possible for DJ iilliaa to even imply anything other than he is a victim of Russian aggression. If you don't believe me, ask Julian Assange rotting away in a max security prison Belmarsh or ask the Chilean business entrepreneur Gonzalo Lire rotting away in a Kiev Regime prison after trying to make a break for the Hungarian border by the Ukraine SBU.


When I wrote up the Kiev Ballet performance, I inadvertantly quoted their website and repeated a lie so the creative director had to edit the website. That lie is repeated in The Guardian but I have ALL the receipts. I haven't published yet as it is not my intention to get anyone from all sides of the conflict in trouble, since the Kiev regime started bombing their own Ukraine citizens in the Donbas area of Ukraine in 2014. That was the year I started ringing the warning bell. Just click on the Ukraine tag or don't, if you don't care.




Thursday 28 September 2023

The Palimpsest

 

 

Monday 25 September 2023

Did Nazi That Coming









Pierre Trudeau with Zelenski invited Nazi veteran Varoslav Hunka of the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS, to the Canadian Parliament yesterday. They gave him a standing ovation for fighting with the Nazis against our ally during WWII, the Soviet Union. If you've supported Ukraine and wonder what you would have done in Nazi Germany. Well, now you know.






Monday 18 September 2023

Ukraine's War Declared in 2014 - Kinetic in 2022 - Termination Date TBC


Zelensky Hero



They always blame the victim

Wednesday 12 July 2023

Strategic Failure










The Pentagon has news for you about Ukraine. It's game over. Strategic failure as confirmed in Helsinki last month. If you notice the meeting at NATO with Zelensky at the top. He is isolated and will be dumped accordingly. If he is executed, you can be sure a lot of Ukrainians are going to tell you the side of the story they could not, due to the Nazi occupation we tried to informed you about.


We know through the Panama papers that Zelensky the comedian has a sprawling property empire round the world, but I guess the Miami residence would be his first pick.


They're going to need a news psyop to cover this affair and the current BBC attempt I don't think is going to cut it. Before Ukraine the news was 24/7 Covid and only a few nutters are masking up now.


I've included the female's testimony as so many of you fell for the Mariupol trauma porn. We will return to censored voices in due course. 


If you fell for Ukraine what else have you been suckered into?


Wait till you find out about the child trafficking and organs market.


Please notice our politicians at the NATO summit clutching each other like old friends. They just threw Zelensky under a bus and these people you trust and vote for would do the same for you and for me. That's the final lesson on the 'international community' the vapid think they belong to.


Update: The Times reports on the British Secretary of Defence and Ukraine fall out accusation.




Monday 22 May 2023

Conspiracy Realist





The Telegraph's Meredith Walker, wrote an article yestereday corroborating the key points I made in my previous post. They are that when .GOV has an inconvenient human rights obstacle to remove, it cannot manufacture easily ignored mandates such as the lockdown rules broken by Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, Dominic Cummings, Sir Keir Starmer, Neil Ferguson (subsequently rewarded with an OBE), SNP MP Margaret Ferrier and Sir Gavin Williamson (Knighted for his efforts) among other Members of Parliament.


“The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.” ― Henry Kissinger


Here's the article.

During my two decades in tech I’ve seen governments manufacture public outrage to serve their desire for control more times than I can count. There’s a predictable pattern that starts with a complex social problem receiving widespread attention. Everyone acknowledges the gravity of the issue. There is a rush to “do something”. 


But “something” too often involves magical thinking and specious “solutions”. Frequently, technology is painted as both cause and solution. Problems are presented as existing “online” and thus their solution is framed as technological. This almost always involves some combination of expanding surveillance and curbing the fundamental human right to privacy and free expression. 


The Online Safety Bill is a perfect example. Under the pretext of protecting children, its provisions could lead to the implementation of government-mandated mass surveillance applications on every UK smartphone. These would scan every message you send. 


The opaque databases and error-prone AI technology that would power this surveillance regime could lead to the mass deplatforming of millions of people based on unreliable algorithmic systems. Such a system would also introduce vulnerabilities and flaws that would inevitably be exploited by hostile states and hackers. 


While politicians have denied for months that the Bill will break encryption, the Home Office has been quite clear that it believes end-to-end encryption is enabling child abuse on the internet. 


The cynicism of this argument is made clear when we recognise that the Government has reduced support for measures protecting children that seem more likely to work. Early intervention services spending was slashed by 50 per cent from 2011 to 2021; referrals to children’s social care rose 9 per cent in 2021-22 alone. 


There’s no way to square this with the idea that protecting children is the first priority, rather than a pretext for government-mandated mass surveillance.


As written, experts agree the Bill would nullify end-to-end encryption, which Signal and other apps use to ensure that only you and the people you’re talking to read your messages. 


This encryption is what stands between citizens and the criminals, scammers and (sometimes) regimes that would dearly love to have access to their innermost thoughts.


This would make Britain a global role model for repressive regimes. If the UK declares that it’s fine to surveil all communications, it will set a precedent others will follow. 


It will have written the playbook by which authoritarians around the world could justify similar systems, where phones could automatically report citizens to the government if they write “Hong Kong Democracy”, “Ukraine Invasion”, “LGBTQ resources” or whatever else a government decides to ban. Being the first country to mandate such systems would be a stain on Britain’s legacy. 


Whatever happens, Signal is committed to ensuring people everywhere have the ability to communicate privately. When the Iranian government blocked Signal, we recognized that the activists, journalists and citizens in Iran who needed privacy were not represented by the authoritarian state. We worked to set up proxies and other means to help them access Signal. 


If the Online Safety Bill is passed, we promise that we will do everything in our power to ensure that the British people have access to safe and private communications. But we will not undermine or compromise the commitments we have made to you, no matter what the Government says.


However bleak the prospect, I remain optimistic that it will not come to this. The cynical and unworkable reality of the Bill is becoming clearer, and well informed politicians are moving to remedy its most troubling provisions. 


The Online Safety Bill is part of a pattern. But it’s a pattern we can stop here. There are real measures that the Government can take to protect children and I sincerely hope that Parliament will look to address them, rather than stripping away privacy and other fundamental rights.


Meredith Whittaker is president of the Signal Foundation

Monday 15 May 2023

Peace In Ukraine










There's no doubt in my mind that Russia can be provoked into declaring war on the UK and/or the US or just NATO as a whole. Each time we up the ante with more tanks, depleted uranium shells and longer range missiles the unthinkable gets closer and closer.


This is not an opinion I've had since the conflict started, this goes back to when I was studying Edgar Cayce's work. Back in the day I took an entheogen called Dimethyltryptamine, did the hyperspace thing, got shown a few things by; let's call them beings, though they were mostly human and certainly all humanoid.


After that it was like someone had released the kraken. My research and writing output went through the roof that year of 2011.



I was doing 18 hour days studying information that has long since been scrubbed from the internet by the very same incorporated forces who want to smash Russia and plunder her resources.



I know I have no influence or ability to persuade people who, despite knowing nothing about the Minsk agreements, the shelling of Donbass, the mini holocaust in Odessa or the biolabs or the provocations or the Kagan family and Straussian dogma on Russia and how much this has been on the cards since I first started writing about it in 2014.



However, if you're convinced Ukraine is the victim and not another NATO proxy war, watch the video clips above and see what you can do to work towards peace because that's the only destination we all need now. How that's done, I don't know but I'm not calling for any escalation, and like the British in Northern Ireland, I know how insoluble ethnic minority groups in different parts of a union can be the tinder for centuries of misery.



The Pope is an NWO Jesuit, I'm surprised he's pushing for peace but it is welcome. You do your bit, and I'll do mine. The peace and reconciliation process has been proven to work, though of course time is needed, then the healing and finally reflection all round.


Update - The Pope has continued to do the opposite of what a Luciferian Jesuit is supposed to do since the Ukraine peace attempt. Has he been swapped out or had a Damascene conversion? I don't know but it's 100% game-on and the waiting is over.


It's going to be Biblical - Great news from Stella Assange just now - Charles Edward Frith - 30/06/2023


Thursday 30 March 2023

Crime & Punishment






xxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXThe war in Ukraine started in June 2014 when Kiev forces commenced shelling of Ukrainian civilians in the Donbass region. Even in Israel these are not called clashes.


The CIA and State Department in cahoots with NATO gunning the show, toppled the freely and democratically elected Yanukovich government of The Ukraine through the Maidan square - Orange colour-revolution. British media were disgusted with the body count back then and accurately reported them as Far Right NAZIS. I'm a fan of a few Nazi designers. I like their Hugo Boss boots and Mercedes Star (but really a VW fan at heart). It's very telling the UK is invested in this conflict as much if not more than the Falklands or the Pentagon. No country's leadership has visited Kyiv more than the UK in this disgusting conflict.


Before we return to non-revisionist history, the Donbas lady underneath Rishi and Zed laughing their nuts off, while her legs were confiscated by the Kiev Nazi genociders that Zelensky and NATO are partnered with. She is the victim, and she is dead and she's the only one who isn't able to represent herself.

An elderly ex-US military guy called Russell Bentley in Texas was moved in more ways than one. No, you don't understand. He saw the same bleeding stumps eye witnessed instead of limbs, and literally moved to the Ukraine (Donbas Region) to defend civilians being bombed by their own government. It was 2014 so you probably don't care but it's 2023 now and forced Ukrainian conscription through kidnapping is necessary to keep the meat grinder happy.







Contrast this forced conscription with Twin sisters Katya and Anya filmed here in Khartsyzk, but hailing from Makiivka, who after their home was bombed, decided they could no longer sit by and watch the crisis in Ukraine unfold. So in 2015 the 20-year-olds joined rebel forces in the Donetsk People's Republic along with their mother and brother. 


They've been fighting for their loved ones, their homes and their lives since 2015 so anybody who wants to tell me that Russia started this war in 2022, let's do it together on camera so the entire world can see who knows their history and who lacks the backbone to challenge the fake media narrative. The subtitles I attempted to translate aren't great and I inadvertently destroyed my original clip, which is now scrubbed from Twitter, so any feedback is welcome as I've had the material checked by a Russian friend who abhors all sides in war.



In Odessa 2014, Pro-Regime Far-Right Nazi-mobs set a building of Ukrainian citizens on fire and (for those who jumped) they beat them to death with clubs. At least the WTC 9/11 jumpers were spared the baseball bats after they hit the pavement running.


Dying from flames and smoke inhalations is called a holocaust in Hebrew (from the Greek holokaustos) a religiously contrived animal-sacrifice that is completely consumed by fire as were the jumpers from the Trades Union Hall of Odessa and 9/11

See for yourself, as it were.


That was 2014
Was 2014
2014
That 2014
The year 2014

The Kyiv war didn't start in 2022. It started in 2014 and I and many others wrote about it extensively because the people who smiled during these times were not anonymous, the media reported their names; Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, Bernard-Henri, Nuland, Klitschko, Tyanehbok and their dark-lord philanthropist Igor Kolomoisky (rhymes with moistly).  The billionaire former Ukrainian producer of President Zelensky and sponsor of Nazi Azov battalion now integrated into the Ukrainian army.



Curious to know more, I checked what most people were entertained by in 2014 and I learned that many people were chilling out to a NETFLIX series called 'Orange Is the New Black' while IRL the US state department were orchestrating an 'Orange Colour Revolution' in Kiev. It's well documented online because the US assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs Victoria Nuland was recorded on her mobile saying 'Fuck the EU'. The very fucking institution the Maidan Square protestors (orchestrated by the CIA) were demanding to join - see how it works yet? Are you seeing any patterns? Do you need a  slap to wake up and smell the coffee?



It was massive news. Even attention-deprived folks were like WTF and (drum roll) The GuardianITN and the BBC published it. Stuff like that usually gets memory-holed pretty quick so it's a walking miracle we can establish its veracity for ourselves. She was also recorded at a hearing last year saying 'yeah, they're our biolabs close to the Russian border in Ukraine, and we're worried now that they're in Russian hands'. 



The 2014 Maidan square Orange Colour Revolution was executed by imported Georgian mercenary snipers. Both sides killed for the first time in false flag sniping history. More on that later.



Thursday 16 February 2023

NATO



NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a military alliance between North American and European countries that was established in 1949 to ensure Russia and Germany never fought on the same side. The alliance was formed spuriously in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies during the Cold War, even though all those years of posturing and propaganda were synthetic as the Hoover archives demonstrated once Tony Sutton D.Phil collated the evidence and published it. People realised the Germans lost WWII but the Nazis won it in part through Operation Paperclip and other less documented channels.


While NATO has been praised for promoting peace and stability in Europe, it has also faced criticism for its disastrous reputation for military interventions and aggressive posturing. Some argue that NATO has acted as a tool for Western imperialism indistinguishable from a New World Order military, intervening in the affairs of sovereign nations and destabilizing regions, with torture, depleted Uranium missiles and all in the name of its member countries furnishing ever present oligarchies and plutocrats.
Critics also point to the aggressive Eastward expansion of NATO as a threat to world peace. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has expanded its membership to include countries in Eastern Europe, which has caused tensions with Russia and fuelled divisions in the region though outlawed international behaviour such as training Nazi militias, providing equipment and lately unlimited funds requiring more austerity and belt tightening.


Additionally, NATO's commitment to collective defence has been criticized for leading to a lack of accountability. The alliance operates on the principle that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. This has led to military interventions without proper debate or consideration of the long-term consequences. The gravity of this is not missed despite no country ever declaring war on a NATO member. Trigger happy doesn't quite encapsulate the visceral inversion that only the memory wipes are incapable of recalling.



Furthermore, NATO's focus on military power as a means of achieving security has been singled out by historically prominent states people for neglecting diplomatic solutions, and addressing the 2014 root causes of conflict, for example, in The Ukraine. Some argue that NATO should prioritize diplomacy and conflict resolution, rather than relying on military force, fictitious claims of weapons of mass destruction and invading the wrong country for possible opportunism and then high tailing it, and leaving billions behind in military hardware as was the case in Afghanistan.



In conclusion, while NATO has been praised by the Lugenpresse for promoting peace and stability in Europe, it has also faced criticism for its interventions, aggressive posturing, expansion, lack of accountability, and focus on military power. A counternarrative to NATO would emphasize the need for diplomacy and conflict resolution, as well as the importance of respecting the sovereignty of longstanding nations and avoiding destabilizing interventions including training up Nazi militias and integrating them in the Ukraine military.


In this counterfactual scenario, NATO and the Azov Battalion did not cooperate in the last nine years. The Azov Battalion, which is a Ukrainian paramilitary organization, has been accused of promoting ultra-nationalist and far-right ideologies engaging in the most degenerate human rights abuses.


Ideally, NATO would have taken a strong stance against a plethora of Nazi idolizing Battalions and their actions, condemning any form of extremism, racism, and torture. NATO would have also provided support to the Ukrainian government in its efforts to address these issues and promote the rule of law and respect for human rights in the country. Instead of instigating a textbook CIA colour revolution and the bombing of their own people in Donbass by Kiev.


NATO would have worked closely with a democratically elected Ukrainian government and other international organizations to monitor the activities of the Swastika Battalions and other similar organizations, in order to support efforts to dismantle them and bring those responsible for crimes against humanity to pursue justice. NATO members would also have supported the Ukrainian government's efforts to promote national unity and reconciliation, and to address the root causes of extremism and conflict in the country.


Overall, in this counterfactual scenario, NATO and the Azov Battalions et al would have been opposed to each other, with NATO taking a strong stance against extremism and promoting the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and respect for human rights.


Revisionism, also known as historical revisionism, refers to the reinterpretation of historical events, facts, and narratives, often with the intention of promoting a specific political or ideological agenda. While it is not uncommon for historical perspectives to evolve over time as new information becomes available, revisionism can be dangerous when it is used to deliberately distort or manipulate the truth for political or ideological purposes including maintaining a stable income instead of telling the truth and getting fired.


The dangers of revisionism are numerous. It can undermine public trust in historical knowledge and institutions, such as museums, archives, and universities, which are responsible for preserving and disseminating accurate historical information. Revisionism can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and propaganda, leading to a lack of critical thinking and a distorted understanding of the past.


Revisionism can also have serious political and social consequences, as it can be used to justify or legitimize harmful policies and deadly punitive actions. For example, revisionist interpretations of history have been used to justify wars, human rights abuses, and discrimination, and to promote divisive and harmful ideologies.


It is important to resist revisionism and to promote responsible and accurate historical narratives. This requires a commitment to the principles of historical inquiry and to judicious use of reliable sources and methods. It also requires an ongoing effort to educate the public and promote critical thinking, so that people can recognize and reject revisionist interpretations of history and protect against the dangers they pose.


The use of quantitative inflation by the international community to conceal economic weakness and excruciating embarrassment through unwanted attention is a problematic and unethical practice that can have serious consequences vis a vis a natural instinct to protect the vulnerable. It's the catalyst for ultra far right Nationalism.


Inflating numbers erodes trust and can create a false sense of militaristic strength and stability, misleading policy makers, avaricious men, and an under informed public. This can result in a growing sense of kinetic prowess in critical areas, misdirected economic policies, and delayed interventions to address underlying weaknesses and challenges such as blanket censorship on the most pressing issues of the day.


In addition, the use of inflated numbers can undermine the credibility and legitimacy of government and financial institutions, eroding public trust and creating doubts about the validity of other economic indices like unemployment, excess mortality and declining birth rates. This can have a cascading effect, impacting confidence in monetary stability of markets and contributing to once in a lifetime, yet inevitable collapse.


The ubiquitous use of inflated numbers eventually destroys what is left of individual dignity and community resilience. It can lead to emergency fiscal policies and measures that perpetuate even greater inequality and harm those who are already vulnerable, such as low-income individuals and stagnant communities and an increasing sense of isolation in a multipolar world.


It goes without saying that a breach of ethical standards will eventually decimate the insincerely touted international community. It sends a message that accuracy and transparency are not valued, and that political and ideological considerations take precedence over the responsible and ethical use of accurate sources.

In conclusion, the use of quantitative inflation is necessary to conceal weakness and unwanted attention thereby promulgating reckless and unethical practices that can have serious consequences for any desire to return to business as a whole. It is important for the toxic legacy media, governments, NGO and financial institutions to prioritize transparency, accuracy, and ethics in their use of quantitative data to ensure that policy decisions are based on credible data if any desire to regain public trust remains in the memory of mankind.

NB: chatGPT AI client wrote this.