Lord McAlpine's Taste In Prepubescent Girl Art

Lord McAlpine has for decades been accused of paedophilia in print by Scallywag Magazine and Anti-Paedophile Campaigner and Activist, Mr David Icke. In all these years McAlpine has never sued anyone or publicly rejected their claims. 

In addition to his taste in art (sample above) a picture emerges of him that fits a character who is being protected by the establishment including media figures such as former Times Editor Andrew Neil (Annabells nightclub nutter) and Rupert Murdoch lackey "Dirty Dave" Aaronovitch.

I leave it to you to decide how you interpret the following evidence.

Here is the post that alerted me to McAlpine's taste in prepubescent girl art and photography. Here is a post on the topic by the Aangirfan Blog that is always essential reading and a Twitlonger kindly shared with me just now.

But most importantly are the words of Lord McAlpine himself on how to deceive the media.

Graham Ovenden the artist responsible for the prepubescent girls painted or photographed above has been charged with four cases of indecent assault to girls all under the age of 14, five counts of child neglect and four counts of false imprisonment.

Iranian Oscar Winner - A Separation

Very quickly the protagonists in this movie become quite annoying and I found myself siding with the judge and the daughter who is completely blameless and suffers the most. However this story's magic lies in it's ability to convey ambiguity and nuance. There isn't a single mistake that all parties don't make that I haven't made. That includes the couple above and the slightly over Islamic under educated couple who become embroiled in the lives of the more educated and upwardly mobile ones.

This is a movie about everybody losing unless key insights are learned from mistakes made and in that sense is as fine an introduction to Iranian metropolitan life as a person could wish for. 

It won an Oscar for best foreign film of 2012.

Are These Chemtrails?

The above video is an important contribution to the discussion. I got it from The Tap Blog earlier.

I deliberately avoid the chemtrail subject and focus on what I know best which is the venal actions of intelligence agencies (spooks, spies and paedophiles) hoodwinking their populations into war and systemic ignorance through the use of media propaganda, mind control and sexual abuse of children for blackmail on politicians who then make decisions the average punter can't figure out preferring to ignore suggestions from the likes of myself as wild conspiracy theories. The dangers of the coincidence theorists reliance on authority is staggering. They can't imagine another world that is fast emerging on the horizon with frantic attempts to obliterate it in the atmosphere. Go ahead take a drink.

I've seen the odd chemtrail over Bangkok and they are quantifiably different from contrails that disappear quickly unlike chemtrails that linger for hours and then diffuse to change cloud cover and sunlight dispersion and defraction in the atmosphere. Clearly the picture above demonstrates that at least hypothetically.

Do I know what they are for? No. Do I know why there seems to be international cooperation on the silence of the subject? No. Would I say I believe this link? 

Probably not. But it I do have separate corroborating sources.

I've got more immediate and pressing issues on my hands though the recent rebranding of chemtrails to geoengineering by the media is worth a snigger if only because it was a conspiracy theory before, but now it's just good old science. Post hoc ergo proptor hoc naturally.

More smoke than mirrors wouldn't you say?

I'm told the Youtube videos What in the world are they spraying? and Why in the world they are spraying? are both good introductory documentaries. Don't expect them on mainstream media who are too busy telling you news that is profitable to corporations and hamsterwheel lifestyles.

If I've missed anything out please leave a comment. Thanks. 

P.S. Did I mention MI5 and 6 are blackmailing VIP's with film of them raping children? 

It's not very 007 Bond is it?