Thursday, 12 July 2012

An Introduction To The Council On Foreign Relations - Warmongers Parading As Think Tanks




The Council on Foreign Relations set the establishment line. By reading their reports and articles a person can be ahead of the mainstream media and politics by a few days or weeks. They do allow the occasional dissenting voice but when they are behind their next invasion or preparing for war there's no ambiguity about the propaganda they are selling. Many mainstream journalists never question the Council On Foreign Relations even though their manipulation of political power, embedded corporatism and totally asymmetric representation of the Jewish Georgetown Professor in favour of bombing Iran stereotype is self evident. Their influential publication Foreign Affairs is far more militant than PRAVDA in its day and it's writers are indiscernible from psychopath savages found at lynchings if one removed their suits and visible signs of prosperity and vulgar over-education.


They Want You To Be A Docile Apathetic Consumer - Bill Hicks




Bill Hicks was appreciated more in the UK than in the US where telling the truth is increasingly an act of heresy in these interesting times. Bill was extraordinarily prescient about where we are today. He is great American hero and and extraordinarily funny. 


He was one of a kind and a huge gift to the United States when very little clarity is on offer in the mainstream corporatized media.

Increasingly Hysteric Hillary - Diary Of A Deranged Secretary of State




Once again the American and British peoples as well as the United Nations are impotent in the face of more war profiteering. Syria is a stepping stone to Iran and if Tehran falls there's no alternative to the ordered new world of globalization, global drone policing and RFID chipped privileges like eating and working. Sex too if they're any good at maintaining discipline.

My interpretation is that Hillary Clinton's latest threats of "Catastrophic assault" coupled with the long build up of US Navy ships in the area means an air assault on Damascus or a border war along Turkey or Lebanon. Probably both. My only hope is that China and Russia give NATO the bloodiest nose they've ever had the stupidity to be on the receiving end of. They will deserve every drop of claret on the desert sands they get.

I've been critical of the Assad regime since Bashar's Mayfair, London days but make no mistake, great evils have been perpetrated in Syria under the direction of NATO, Saudi, Qatar and Israel. They have been falsely portrayed in the Western propaganda as the fault of the Syrian government. 

As quietly as possible the BBC and even the respectable Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung have reported these are Western lies that are being perpetrated. But it's not enough to say we're lying once or twice. Every adman knows that repeating a lie is what sticks in the memory.

And the lie is Assad is the new boogeyman. Yet again the gullible Western publics falls for the oldest tricks in the book, unaware of our direct hand in Syrian atrocities to justify intervention - Ye olde false flag if you will.


 There will be more of those. There's always more when it comes to NATO.