Are The British Prurient, Two Faced , Gullible & Spineless?

I've been all those things at some time or other but when it comes to Princess Diana she was no concern of mine till the morning of her death. Every fibre in my body screamed something unforgivable had taken place. Correct me if I'm wrong but if you bought tabloids that chased her to death, then mourned her at the funeral, cheered at her brothers funeral eulogy at how she was victimised by the Royal family and then waved flags at the next royal pageant  celebration, yet never question why the latest film documenting the FACTS of the cover up AFTER her death cannot be shown in the United Kingdom, then I will take your silence as tacit understanding that the answer to my post title is yes.

There is a chance still yet to redeem yourselves and right a wrong. 


Avail yourselves of the evidence and try to do whatever it is that comes into your heart about it because the consequences of pursuing the truth are not trivial. My wish is to see the overturning of the house of Windsor and ejecting them from the privileged position they hold while say installing Prince Harry as the heir to the throne given his unblemished parentage and restore the house of Stuart.

Britain has an important part to play in the future for one reason and anothe. In the mean time the last few minutes of the video below are as good a place as any to examine your conscience and decide if you are going to find out for yourself, once and for all, why she was held alive in a tunnel in a car while all the CCTV was switched off and the Police radio network fell silent all over Paris before she finally died in the slowest ambulance in the history of emergencies. 


She held out a lot longer than was planned, and for once England; can you not just put your foot down and reciprocate the memory with honour. She was worth it.

How Sexy Are Lockheed Skunkworks?

Very few people know the full picture though there are hints that the U.S. Navy holds more cards than most. What is known however are Ben Rich of Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks' deathbed words. 


He said 'UFO visitors are real and the U.S. Military travel among stars'. Of course when he said "we" he didn't mean you or I or the collective group of people that paid for it (Disclosure: I have worked for the American Military in Europe, and for a while in Hollywood paying full taxes). He meant the groups that pull the government's strings.

So where is that technology the US taxpayers funded? The best answer is to do your own research because you need to trust your own instincts.


I do suggest you include 'breakaway civilisation by Richard Dolan and "Underground bases by Richard Sauder" but only because I find them more robust as evidence than the more flakier claims out there.


Just for fun my imaginative first thoughts are multiple timeline espionage, stargates, future viewing, individual human DNA signal monitoring, planetary artificial intelligence, conciousness-scanning, super luminal travel, conciousness harvesting and genetically engineered humans crossed with animal supersoldiers, but that's me just guessing and inventing on the spot. I'm sure you can do much better. Bear in mind that Ben Rich of Skunkworks said his thing in 1995 and the change might be logarithmic in some areas.


The great thing about capitalism is that there's an awesome incentive to concentrate technology and wealth beyond your wildest dreams in the hands of people with far more power than mere presidents or CEOs under the guise of protecting freedoms. It all works out quite neat if the media is owned too because hardly anyone questions what they're told. 


Ben Rich gave us a little taster of course, but there's lots of testimony out there spiked with disinformation by the acronym agencies who surf the net just like we all do. They are advanced at social media astroturf commenting software. Even more so than China or North Korea or Russia.


Welcome to the complex. It makes the Matrix look amateurish.

Look At It This Way

Roughly speaking the monkeys at CERN are wetting their knickers over the Higgs Boson as it will upend the standard model of physics. Which is curious because if that happens the existing reality gets changed and yet you try arguing about the existing reality with a particle theorist and they can't wait to talk about their credentials or some strait jacket Copenhagen agreement dialetic which is the scientific equivalent of don't ask don't tell for as long as the maths works out.

Nassim Haramein has already proved his worth to me and he seems to be making good progress on his space time theories incorporating vortex thinking (and a whole lot more deeply rooted in sacred geometry) that is the essence of the new emerging physics. The old materialist science robots are still sending people into space with the propulsion fuel like back in the sixties and yet they refuse to accept that the times they are a changing and that to be a part of change requires a different understanding of the universe and a rejection of the existing dogma. They hate Haramein and the closer he gets the more they despise him for being a thinker rather than an equation writer. You mark my words. Haramein is the future on so much science it cheers me no end to see him this happy. He's a nice bloke as well.