Freeman

Freeman is everybody's favourite conspiracy theorist. He's so lovable that I want to be a conspiracy theorist just like him too. However compared to his encyclopaedic knowledge of everything from ancient history, freemasonry and the illuminati, to space wars and Obama cloning I'd quickly run out of reasons why anybody would believe me but the thing about Freeman is that beside the extraordinary web of deceit and collusion he paints about the world that is hidden from view his trump card is his niceness. I'm not even all that nice really so instead give him a whirl instead and brace yourself for the rabbit hole because even if he's 20% right, he's an extraordinary individual....and nice with it. If you're head doesn't spin after this you're locked down too tight "dude".

Daniel Pinchbeck & Graham Hancock - Retelling the past/Reimagining the future

I can't ignore that I've been obsessed with John 1:1 for some time now as it is inseparable from who we are to the point that it fundamentally changes us from the moment that we have words in voice and then later in text.

In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God.

It's as fundamental as genetic mutation, punctuated equilibrium and all the other slow moving consumable evolution ideas except learning to speak and learning to write seem to have occurred a bit faster than evolution likes to admit. Which does suggest that maybe we had a little help.

Do we need a better story? You're damn right we do. We're on a headlong collision with an overpopulated auto-asphyxiation of octane fueled consumption mania and however you wish to interpret recent events fewer and fewer have the time and the heart to confront my assertion that the planet has for quite some time been saying enough is enough. What stories are you involved with?

I thought I'd share a video I first watched a few long or short months ago depending on how you view time right now. It's quite tame compared to the content I work through now so it shouldn't stretch anyone too much. It features Graham Hancock who used to write for the Economist and Daniel Pinchbeck who wrote for the New York Times and Wired so I think their credibility (and thus yours) is intact if you keep an open mind.

The ideas that they explore are even more urgent now than ever. There was a time when I would have thought twice about posting content that discusses South American Ayahuasca drinking but I've noticed that people are increasingly so overwhelmed with managing their rapidly diminishing time that nobody has the heart any more. 

In which case this video is a start to getting that heart back. You can watch it privately and yet it's here publicly so it's only me that should attract any flack. It's meant to provoke better questions from you. I hope it does. 


That's all I do all day long. Day in and day out. Looking for better questions. Every time I get a better question the answers to old ones age instantly looking increasingly irrelevant. I hope you get time to watch this because it's about challenging assumptions to you as friends and in a friendly manner. It's lo fi video conversation between two thoughtful men who care about the way things are going. As indeed do I. I hope you do to.

Nassim Haramein

I was getting into Nassim Haramein a few months back. I exhausted all his online talks and so I moved on from his special brand of free thinking and for me exciting physics. He's sidelined by the traditional scientific community but has on at least three occasions provided theories of explanation that have subsequently been proved right, like his claim  linked below, that there's a black hole at the center of all galaxies. This is now backed up by traditionalists within the Milky Way, and is looking increasingly obvious universally not forgetting his theories on vortexes overlapping with Marko Rodin which are gaining validity


This latest podcast seems to have some updated information from the old lectures that I was watching a while back but which are still worth checking out as so much is still consistent with his ongoing research to explain the Universe on a cosmic to sub atomic scale. That's eight hours in two parts, I've linked to above but if time is limited full day is unrealistic. 


He's the kind of thinker that Einstein would have approved of. Creative, persistent and deeply curious in a way that time and again pops up in work from widely disparate fields that I hang out in, including Marko Rodin who I mentioned earlier and that I blogged about back here. Keep an eye out for the thoughts on Zero Point Energy because I think he's going to be proved right on that in the next couple of years and in fact Marko Rodin's field coil has only been sidelined as it's too dangerous to the entire model of capitalism propped up on fossil fuel oils. It's just a matter of time from where I'm at but then I've done a fair bit of homework and when it's time to rewrite the past to include those who persevered the most with the bare minimum, Nassim and Marko will be there along with a fresh analysis of the distorted narrative we've been spoon fed for centuries called history.