Showing posts sorted by relevance for query queen. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query queen. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, 31 July 2011

Queen

This is the best rock documentary since watching Dig! and The Filth & The Fury. Days of our lives made me realise the only reason I loved Queen but didn't rave about them as a youngster was because the press had it in for Queen and portrayed them as uncool. I wonder if their earliest hit "Killer Queen" had something to do with that. It must have struck a chord with Buckingham Palace? It's remarkably prescient with lyrics such as

"She's a killer Queen, dynamite with a laser beam"

"perfumes came naturally from Paris, for cars she couldn't care less"



Was Freddy Mercury channelling the lyricist spirit? Nobody knows, much like I didn't know Freddy Mercury was gay until the evening news on 24 November 1991 when I was about to hit the road again and leave the UK for the first time to work abroad. 

I can still remember the scene. I was in bed watching the TV and I know it's a cliché but I was both shocked and surprised. Come to think of it, Freddy Mercury, Princess Diana and Amy Winehouse are the three people I've been most affected by after they died aside from my Great Grandma Lucy Myers

The Bible she gave me as a present is within reaching distant as I type. I use it for reference. This is the second part.


Monday, 30 January 2012

The Electric Pyramids (The Overdue Death Of A Tomb Theory)



Those of us with a little spare time to invest in the Pyramids learn two things. The first very quickly but the second takes a lot longer to fully absorb. The Cheops Pyramids are not tombs for Pharaohs is not so hard to figure out but much less digestible is the fanatical policing of this historical narrative which is designed to keep you stupid. I know, it's not very nice but it is as it is and we've all been a little guilty of failing to challenge the arc of this particular story and many others.

The Pyramids have quite a few functions including metaphysical displays of embedded knowledge such as the speed of light and other data points we have had to relearn but which the ancients were familiar with. What is more important as we plough through this age of deceit, tilling the apocalyptic (unveiling) soil of revelations is that the revolution will not be televised. 

The old power structures that policed a highly agenda driven view of civilised history as no oloder than five thousand years old (a preposterous assertion) are not going to take a full page ad out in the New York Times to say they got it wrong. They are quietly withdrawing to the shadows hoping we wont notice that the story is slowly changing though make no mistake that for the worst offenders of stupidity crusaders (like The Smithsonian) we have made a mental note of them and they will be dealt with accordingly.

Below is Christopher Dunn's article on the matter from the authoritive Atlantis Rising publication. 

In January 2011, an important and historic exploration took place inside the Great Pyramid. However, the remarkable evidence that was discovered seemed to pass into history without fuss or fanfare. A small article in the New Scientist magazine, with the promise of a future scholarly report on the findings, seemed to be an extremely muted response to an event that has traditionally been promoted to attract millions of “pyramid watchers” across the world. Has the interest in pyramid discoveries waned, or was this exploration another casualty of the Arab Spring, which saw a revolution in Egypt that ousted President Hosni Mubarak and saw the staccato-like firing/hiring/firing of one of the world’s most prominent Egyptologists, Zahi Hawass? Perhaps the exploration in the Great Pyramid earlier this year came at a time when Hawass did not want any attention brought on himself, as he was receiving enough attention by the Egyptian protesters in Tahrir Square who criticized his handling of the affairs of the Supreme Counsel of Antiquities (SCA). With the recent changes in Egypt’s power structure, we are left to ask:

What are the implications behind the relative silence from the SCA regarding this exploration?

Will the Southern Shaft of the Queen’s Chamber and Gantenbrink’s “door” ever rise to prominence again?

Did the discoveries behind Gantenbrink’s “door” support or contradict the many theories about what would be found there?

Going back as far as the seventeenth century, there are accounts of numerous explorations into the Great Pyramid that have yielded significant new details of the structure. Before 1872, the Queen’s Chamber shafts were no mystery because as far as visitors to the chamber were concerned, they did not exist. All that changed, however, when British explorer, Waynman Dixon, detected a crack in the wall and was able to push a rod deep into the crack without meeting any resistance, prompting him to have the limestone chiseled away revealing a square opening measuring 20.32 cm (8 in) wide and 22.35 cm (8.8 in) high. A similar shaft was subsequently found in the north wall.

Because of the machine-like, technical appearance of the Great Pyramid and the precision with which it was built, I began, in 1977, developing a theory that the original function of the Great Pyramid was intended not to be a tomb but a power plant. Within the context of the power plant with all its attributes and anomalous features which other theories were unable to explain without resorting to symbolism, I found a practical answer. The Queen’s Chamber, I proposed, served as a reaction chamber; and the shafts leading to this chamber supplied two chemicals (I proposed a combination of dilute hydrochloric acid and hydrated zinc) that, when mixed together, created hydrogen.

In 1993, a German robotics engineer, Rudolph Gantenbrink, on contract to install ventilation fans in the King’s Chamber shafts, after cleaning the debris using a robot, proposed that he use his robot, named “Upuaut II” (meaning “opener of the ways”) to coax from the depths of the pyramid more of its secrets by exploring the Southern Shaft in the Queen’s Chamber. While the exits from the shafts from the King’s Chamber are found on the outside of the pyramid, no exit has ever been found for either of the Queen’s Chamber shafts. I was viewing the exploration by Gantenbrink; and when the robot came to the end of the shaft, what is now famously known as Gantenbrink’s “door” came into view with two metal pins attached. (The shaft due to its small size could only allow a small animal to pass—Gantenbrink does not call the block a “door,” as have various Egyptologists—but rather a USO, or Unidentified Stone Object, a nomenclature that I will adopt for purposes of this article.) A friend immediately claimed that they looked like electrodes, which made sense to me; for in order to maintain the head pressure, the shafts had to be kept full, and electrodes could serve as a switch to signal replenishment. In 1998, my book, The Giza Power Plant, incorporated this theory.

Then in 2002, to much fanfare and excitement, “Opening of the Lost Tomb”, which offered to show live a new exploration of the Queen’s Chamber Southern Shaft, was broadcast in Europe by National Geographic and in the U.S. by Fox Television. The documentary captured 30 million viewers in the U.S. alone, glued to their television sets to watch a new robot named “pyramid rover” drill through the limestone block which held the metal fittings and then insert a camera through the hole to see what lay beyond. Prior to this broadcast, I posted two articles on my website explaining the reasoning behind my analysis of these shafts and what would be revealed if we were able to look behind it. Based on what I wrote in The Giza Power Plant, the last article outlined a prediction of what would be found behind the “USO.” The prediction included a drawing of the continuation of the metal fittings, or wiring attached to them, and a chemical supply shaft for the delivery of the chemical. The information gathered by the robot was not conclusive, but parts of the theory were supported—particularly the USO’s thickness.

Following the 2002 exploration, an occasional report would appear that promised a new exploration in the near future. Then on May 25, 2011, an article appeared in New Scientist online magazine describing the latest exploration of a new robot, named Djedi, which provided new images taken behind the USO. These images show that my design concept, while being a workable solution, was not quite correct. But far from being dismayed, I was impressed that the ancient Egyptians’ design was much better and delighted to note that greater evidence had been revealed than I had hoped!

I was astonished that information regarding this long awaited exploration had been released without fanfare. Zahi Hawass, the minister of antiquities in Egypt, and director of this recent expedition, described these internal features as the “last great mystery of the Great Pyramid.” With the last exploration broadcast on Fox television in the U.S. garnering 30 million viewers, why was National Geographic or Fox television not involved?

Reading the article and looking at the grainy images of the back of the stone block with the metal fittings, it became clear that the author and expedition team members were aware of the power plant theory. Rowan Hooper writes, “Metal is not part of any other known structure in the pyramid, and the discovery ignited speculation that the pins were door handles, keys or even parts of a power supply constructed by aliens.” As the first person to publish a work that described the pins as electrical devices, I must set the record straight that I have never credited the construction of the Great Pyramid to aliens, or any other people, except the indigenous people living in that area at the time. Moreover, the discovery of the pins in 1993 was not the trigger that gave birth to the idea that the Great Pyramid was a power plant; they simply enhanced the proposed use that I had formulated in 1977 for the Queen’s Chamber and the shafts. Shaun Whitehead, the camera designer from the company Scoutek in Melton Mowbray, UK, said, “Our new pictures from behind the pins show that they end in small, beautifully made loops, indicating that they were more likely ornamental rather than electrical connections.”

Kate Spence, an Egyptologist at Cambridge University, UK, indicated that the USO would have served a symbolic purpose, a door with door handles. This notion has been proposed before. German Egyptologist, Rainer Stadelmann, speculated in the 2002 documentary that the pins were symbolic door handles for the King to use to symbolically raise the door so that his soul can fly off to the stars to which the pyramid shafts are allegedly aligned.

The continuation of the pins on the backside of Gantenbrink’s USO was not the only discovery captured by the new robot. The images also revealed some mysterious symbols drawn on the floor in red paint. Peter Der Manuelian, an Egyptologist at Harvard University and director of the Giza Archives at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, said “Red-painted numbers and graffiti are very common around Giza. They are often mason’s or work-gang’s marks, denoting numbers, dates, or even the names of the gangs.

There was no immediate explanation for what these red symbols mean, but they are a significant discovery and have the potential to open up an entirely new area of research in gaining an understanding of ancient Egyptian symbolism. When considered along with the metal pins the symbols provide key evidence necessary to support the theory of an electrical use of the pins and also give us a roadmap for exploration into the future. Not only did the ancient Egyptians leave us with the physical evidence that proves this to be so, they also provided us with an electrical schematic that showed how the pins were wired!

The first most important discovery is the design of the two pins. Judging by their relationship to the size of the space, the pins are approximately .8 cm (5/16 inch) in diameter. Figure 1 shows the metal loop, with what appears to be a gap where the loop on the right pin seems to be inserted into another hole in the limestone block. The left pin shows signs of corrosion, similar to those in the main shaft, though not as severe. There also seems to be a white deposit around the left pin and its hole, while the right pin has what appears to be a black ring encircling the hole that penetrates through to the main shaft.

As these images did not match those that I had predicted, the expedition team evidently believed that the controversy had been settled and that that they served as more mundane objects and not electrical devices. This conclusion certainly would be more acceptable to those who hold the keys to the pyramid and control what information is given to the public. Also overlooked in the report was the somewhat faint evidence of a cable curling out of the top of the USO near the center and traveling along the ceiling. (See Figure 2)

The image of the floor behind the USO is especially intriguing (see Figure 3 & Figure 4). The patchwork of stitched together images reveals a wealth of information. The helical wraps of more flexible conduit can be seen lying on the floor near the bottom of the image just left of the red painted line—probably left there by the maintenance crew. The metallic appearance of this object and the helical turns of the metal have the same appearance as a length of flexible conduit that has been pulled apart while being disassembled would have. There are indications of more lengths of this material on the floor that are not as distinct as this one. Also just above and to the right of the red line is what appears to be an opening in the floor with anomalous objects nearby and one of them seeming to disappear into the opening.

While it appears that the maintenance crew did not clean up after performing repairs in the space behind the USO, the debris was not the only evidence they left there. They also left instructions on how to wire the pins! These instructions were painted as symbols onto the floor and represent a simple wiring diagram. The uppermost symbol – depicted as a number 5 with the lower loop almost closed, represents the left connector through which the pin is pushed until the end of the loop meets the limestone. The pin was probably tapered at the end which allowed it to enter the loop and gradually push it open while the connector loop held onto the pin as it tried to achieve its original shape. The vertical leg of this connector is not to scale (as very few wiring diagrams are), but the actual connector probably had a longer vertical leg up to the point when it is bent at right angles towards the center of the USO where the cable is located.

The center symbol that shows a round circle with a forked line below it could represent the cable through which electricity flowed. It is positioned between the upper and lower connector symbols on the floor as the flexible conduit is positioned between the right and left pins in the USO. The lower connector symbol is roughly similar to the upper with the exception of the top bend, which could go right or left as when installed it wouldn’t matter which way the loop was turned. All the symbols, including the line (which would logically represent the main cable coming from the USO) were more than likely positioned on the side that would identify the positive electrode.

All that has been revealed by the Djedi robot describes an electrical device which was accessible to workers for maintenance. Considering the erosion on the pins in the main shaft (the negative electrode having broken off in antiquity) and considering the extreme tapering that was more than likely caused by the rise and fall of a corrosive liquid, another significant conclusion that can be made is that these electrodes must have been replaced periodically. At the same time, the electrical cables were probably replaced and some of the shielding was left in the space. The entire design supports this view! The pins were made so that they could be removed easily and another one put in its place. Also, seating the lower loop into a blind hole would prevent the electrode from turning in the hole. After it was seated in position, the pin protruding into the main shaft would be bent 90 degrees and fixed securely in operating position.

Gantenbrink’s Upuaut II also revealed another important feature of the electrodes. After they were positioned in the hole, a sealant was applied and this can be seen clearly in Figure 8.

The implications of robot Djedi’s mission are stunning. They clearly indicate that there is access to the end of the Queen’s Chamber shafts and a passageway exists within the pyramid. This lends support for part of Pierre Houdin’s internal ramp theory and suggests that one must exist for access to the Queen’s Chamber shafts. Perhaps other parts of the structure, also!

Besides prompting further exploration in the Great Pyramid, to find ancient symbols and to be able to clearly connect them with a knowledge and use of electricity in prehistory is extremely exciting. It opens up a whole new area of study using knowledge and tools that have been previously excluded from ancient Egyptian studies. The question now is who will replace Hawass in broadcasting remarkable discoveries to the press? Will his successor take up the media mantle and be as effective in bringing attention to Egyptian antiquities? Say what you want about Hawass, the Egyptian antiquities scene has gone relatively quiet since he was replaced.

Friday, 11 January 2013

Why Did Queen Elizabeth's Private Secretary Lie About His Location When Diana Was Murdered?



Tony Blair's Director of Communications Alistair Campbell kindly reminded me that the Queen's principal private secretary at the time of Diana's death was at work in Buckingham Palace. My question to Sir Robert Fellowes (mysteriously awarded a peerage after executing his duties for the Royal Family) is why did he lie that he was on vacation during the period of and just after Diana's murder

It's a simple question and will require more lies to answer which suits me just fine. His name is now Baron Robert Fellowes and I want to know what he has to hide.

Update, the 2006 drama The Queen makes a glaring mistake about Robin Janvrin's role during this episode drawing attention to his actions in a none to subtle way.

Tuesday, 25 November 2014

A Legendary Post On British Power Paedophiles - Can You Guess Who Wrote It?



I've had this post in drafts since 2013 but now that the dust has settled and the dirt has risen I think it's time for people to read this excellently informed article on VIP paedophiles in the UK and have a guess who wrote it? Answers in the comments please.

*****

The evidence for a massive paedophile ring infesting the royal palaces, Downing Street and the Westminster Parliament is overwhelming and mounting by the week. The implications of the full truth being revealed can hardly be overstated - the devastating discrediting of the major political parties and the end of the monarchy.

It would bring about a total public re-evaluation of everything they have believed about the country they live in and the forces that dictate its laws, direction and methods of operation. The knock-on effect would be the same for much of the rest of the world because what I am about to describe is happening in every country to a larger or lesser extent - not least in the United States.

The revelations about record-breaking paedophile and child procurer Jimmy Savile have exposed the former BBC 'star entertainer' as a purveyor of sheer evil on a scale that would challenge any imagination. Here are the cold and shocking numbers according to the police - and these are not nearly the whole story:

450 people of both sexes have made complaints about Savile involving 28 police areas throughout the country and among them are 34 alleged rapes. They spanned a period of 54 years between 1955 and 2009 when Savile was 82. The abuses happened to 23 children and young people on BBC premises and at 14 hospitals and at least one hospice. More than 70 per cent of his victims were under 18 and one as young as eight. 


Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler said that Savile's crimes were 'vast, predatory and opportunistic' and he had effectively 'groomed the nation.' Sounds good, but personally, I would not trust the Met's investigation Operation Yewtree to pursue the full truth about Savile any more than I would have trusted him to produce the school nativity. 

Spindler added - ludicrously - that Savile used his celebrity to 'hide in plain sight'. Oh, no, no, no, mate. That will not do. Savile got away with it for 54 years because he was protected by the highest levels of the paedophile-Satanist-controlled British Establishment for whom he was procuring children. 

Lest we forget: Disc jockey Jimmy Savile was a close friend of the royal family including Lord Louis Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from the 1960s until he died aged 84 in 2011. Savile was also a close friend of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who ran one of the most paedophile-infiltrated administrations of modern times - yes and with all the competition, too.




Now a new front is emerging to expose the ring's sickening activities - the notorious Elm Guest House in Rocks Lane, Barnes, south-west London. I have been on the trail of Elite paedophilia and Satanism on both sides of the Atlantic for two decades but I still shake my head at the same recurring names year after year in location after location. 

Names emerging from sources seeking to expose what happened at Rocks Lane have included a Thatcher cabinet minister who has come up so often it is extraordinary testimony to the Establishment's ability to cover up that he is still at large and considered worthy of political influence.

Another 'Elm name' familiar to me is Anthony Blunt who is alleged to have used the name 'Anthony Goldstein' when visiting Rocks Lane. Blunt was one of the infamous 'Cambridge Five' British Intelligence insiders who spied for the Soviet Union. Four of them were Blunt, Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean and Kim Philby and the fifth, never named, was Lord Victor Rothschild, although there were actually more than five.

And Blunt leads us once again to the British royal family ...



Anthony Blunt (1907-1983) was born the third cousin of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon who became the wife of King George VI and is best known as the late Queen Mother - the woman that Princess Diana described as evil. This was a good description given that the lady they called 'The Nation's Grandmother' was one of highest satanic witches in Europe (see The Biggest Secret).

Blunt's mother was the second cousin of the black witch's father Claude Bowes-Lyon, the 14th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne. Blunt and his brothers would go for afternoon tea with the Bowes-Lyons at their London home in Mayfair and he was in the royal, political and Intelligence loop almost from the start.

There is another highly significant aspect of the Blunt story according to the London Daily Mail. The paper reported that he told colleagues that he was actually the secret son of King George V, the brother of Bowes-Lyon's spouse, George VI. This would put what was to happen later in a much clearer context.




Blunt was educated at the elite Marlborough College where he was a member of the Honourable Fraternity of the Amici. This is a rarely-mentioned secret society based at Marlborough but also operating at other elite colleges including Eton, Radley and Wellington. 


Its rituals appear to be based on Freemasonry with a system of degrees and prominence for the symbol of the all-seeing eye. Amici initiates use their covert manipulation to secure major positions of influence among the students and this continues when they enter the worlds of business and politics. It is the usual worldwide story, in other words, as with the Skull and Bones Society at Yale, the Quill and Dagger at Cornell and the Sphinx Society at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.


Blunt also spent part of his childhood in Paris when his official father, the Reverend Stanley Vaughan Blunt, ran the chapel at the British embassy. So Blunt had many royal and Establishment connections throughout his formative years and things began to move quickly when he won a scholarship to Trinity College at Cambridge University.




It was at Cambridge that he became a member of a Russian spy ring which was passing British secrets to Moscow during World War II. Four members have since been officially named as Blunt, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Kim Philby (who married Jewish Soviet spy Litzi Friedman). But others got away with it including their leader, Lord Victor Rothschild. 

Highly significant to the ring was a university secret society called the Cambridge Apostles. Blunt was a member and so was Guy Burgess and other spies and alleged spies, John Cairncross, Guy Liddell and the most important of all, Victor Rothschild. Blunt acted as a talent spotter and recruiter for the ring and his value as a potential Soviet source increased when he was recruited by MI5. 

Maclean and Burgess fled to the Soviet Union in 1951to avoid prosecution and Philby followed in 1963 after more than a decade of denial which saw him continuing to work for newspapers and part-time for MI6. Blunt secretly admitted his involvement to MI5 in 1963 on condition that he had immunity from persecution and this was not made public until 1979 when Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was forced by the weight of evidence by then in the public domain to make a statement to this effect. 

The ring master behind all of this was Lord Victor Rothschild who at one time shared his London flat with the homosexual Burgess and Blunt. Homosexuality was a criminal offence at the time and a perfect vehicle for blackmail even without the paedophilia that also went on.




Official biographies say that Rothschild was recruited by MI5 during the war in the same way as Blunt, but in fact Rothschild ran British Intelligence and wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill, another reported paedophile. 'National hero' Winston Churchill was a despicable character who worked covertly for the global enemies of freedom and peace - the Rothschilds. They were a secret source of income. 

There is a very good chance that Churchill was a Rothschild bloodline and the Windsors have been since their origins in Germany from where the Rothschild global empire of finance and secret society manipulation emerged. 

Prince William is a Rothschild at least through his grandmother - Princess Diana's mother, Frances Shand Kydd who was born Frances Ruth Roche, a Rothschild offshoot. Royals often tend to have official parents that are, one or the other, not blood parents. It must be a heck of a job keeping up with it.

Victor Rothschild was known within British Intelligence as the 'Black Bag Man' because he controlled the secret 'stash' that covertly funded off-the-record projects that the official government had refused to sanction. He knew where the bodies were buried throughout the Establishment and who was doing what to whom among royalty, politicians, media and academia. This allowed him to manipulate and dictate through threat of exposure.

These are the techniques that continue to be used today by the Rothschild networks and this is another reason why they love to see paedophiles in positions of power making the decisions that change society in the desired Orwellian fashion. The same happens in North America - in fact everywhere the Rothschilds and their lackeys are at work which is, well, pretty much everywhere.




No, it should be the other way round, mate.

Victor Rothschild was Winston Churchill's minder and the director of his policy before and during World War II - a war in which the Rothschild Cabal controlled all the major players through their placemen Roosevelt (United States); Churchill (Britain), Stalin (Soviet Union) and Hitler (Germany). 

This is the point that historians and researchers of the Cambridge spy ring don't understand. Victor Rothschild was not a Soviet spy - he was the Rothschilds' man directing British war policy as others were directing that of North America, the Soviet Union and Germany. 

The spying was largely done for the Rothschilds, not the Soviet Union, but there is also the fact that if you want to stop something happening that doesn't suit your agenda, or take most advantage of something happening when it does, then tell another 'side' (another of your sides) what is going to happen well before it does. 

This is what the Cambridge spy ring was really all about, but only Rothschild among them would have known that. The rest were convenient stooges and who was the one that never got caught? Rothschild. Six retired KGB colonels confirmed after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1993 that Rothschild was involved in the Cambridge spy ring, but they wouldn't have known the wider background either. Compartmentalisation is the key.




King George VI with his missus Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, third from the left, and in the centre is the king's mother, Mary of Teck, a descendent of infamous Satanist and blood drinker Vlad Dracul of Transylvania who inspired the Dracula stories. 

Anthony Blunt was so trusted by the royal family and his cousin Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (after all, he claimed to be one of them) that he was sent on a mission to Germany at the end of the war to retrieve British royal correspondence to their German royal relatives showing support for the Nazis which is what the royals are. Prince Philip's Nazi background is well documented, for example, but he's not alone.




Prince Philip at a Nazi funeral and his own family were closely connected to Nazis never mind the Windsors into which he was married.

The House of Windsor were officially the German House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (Herzogtum Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) until they changed their name to Windsor during the First World War as an exercise purely in public relations with Britain at war with Kaiser Wilhelm and their other relatives in Germany. 

Wilhelm was the cousin of King George V, whom Blunt apparently said was his father, and George was also a cousin of Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, but don't worry an elite doesn't run the world. 

The British wing of the Battenberg family anglicised their name to Mountbatten at the same time and later it was Lord Louis Mountbatten who maintained communications between the Windsors and their relatives in Nazi Germany even though he was Britain's Chief of Combined Operations and later Supreme Allied Commander in South-East Asia. 'Sides' don't matter to these people - the outcome is what counts. 

It was the paedophile Lord Mountbatten, the mentor to both Prince Philip and Prince Charles, who introduced his friend Jimmy Savile to the royal family in the 1960s.




Charles, Mountbatten and Philip.

Anthony Blunt's reward for services rendered in hiding the Nazi truth about the Windsor-Mountbattens was to be appointed Surveyor of the King's Pictures when he retired from MI5 after the war - even though he was still a member of the Rothschild spy ring and was seen with Burgess and Maclean just before they defected in 1951. 

Blunt continued in his royal role when George VI died in 1953 and his daughter Elizabeth became Queen although her mother Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon - Blunt's cousin - and her arranged-marriage husband Philip were the real power behind the throne. 

The Royals well knew about Blunt's treasonous background. Army officer Philip Hay went for an interview at Buckingham Palace in 1948 for the post of Private Secretary to the Dowager Duchess of Kent and he said that after they passed Blunt in a corridor, Sir Alan Lascelles, King George VI's private secretary, said: 'That's our Russian spy'. 

The Queen had been briefed about Blunt's secret confession (not that she needed to be) but he continued to work in all the royal palaces as the official advisor on her art collection and Victor Rothschild turned up to at least one dinner party with his friend Blunt years after his admission of spying. 

Meanwhile, other British spies such as John Vassall, a clerk at the British embassy in Moscow whose homosexuality was used to blackmail him, was jailed for 18 years when he was not in the same league of treachery as Blunt. 

What a joke it all it.




The Windsors would have also known that Blunt was a paedophile and it is no surprise to me whatsoever after hearing him named many times that he has turned up on the alleged lists of visitors to the Elm Guest House. The stories have long circulated about his procurement of young boys, mostly from 'care' homes, and his paedophile parties.

These include how Blunt would murder children through asphyxiation while they were being raped because of the apparent sexual 'high' these sickest of people get from this. One rapist would be a masked man said to be a royal or a Rothschild (same thing) who always wore socks even when otherwise naked. He became known as the 'Soxon Rothschild'. 

Blunt also ran a paedophile ring and was a friend of Stephen Ward who was at the centre of the Profumo Affair in early 1960s when the British Secretary of State for War John Profumo was exposed for having an affair with the model and dancer Christine Keeler , who was also having a relationship with Eugene Ivanov, a Russian military attaché.




Key events in the story happened at Cliveden, the Buckinghamshire mansion owned by the Astor family, and the usual suspects were involved, although of course not named, including Lord Mountbatten and Prince Philip. Stephen Ward was the fall-guy in the story and he 'committed suicide' to keep himself quiet. You know how it goes.

Blunt and his boyfriend, the former Irish Guards bandsman John Gaskin, lived in a flat at the Courtauld Institute of Art off London's Oxford Street where Blunt was director, and Gaskin would go out trawling public toilets for young men drunk or drugged enough to bring back for Blunt's pleasure.

When Gaskin began to blab about Blunt's activities, he 'fell' out of a window and landed on railings some distance below. Miraculously he survived, but later he is said to have thrown himself in front of a train five years after Blunt had died in 1983.

The royal family of course knew all about his paedophilia and child murder just as they knew about their close friend for decades, Jimmy Savile. Blunt once went for tea with his cousin the Queen Mother and took with him a 12 year old boy, according to a footman who said that he overheard her tell Blunt: 'You will keep my secrets and I will keep yours.'

And my god, they both had some.




The Queen Mother, a high Satanist, got away with it all her life thanks to a simple technique: smile when they're watching. Her daughter has yet to grasp that one. 

I understand why so many people find it impossible to comprehend that members of the royal family, political leaders and feted academics, entertainers and big banking and corporate names would be involved in paedophilia, murder and human sacrifice, but they are. 

I have been exposing the paedophile and child killing British Prime Minister Ted Heath since my book The Biggest Secret was first published in 1998 and this was backed up this week by barrister Michael Shrimpton, a former immigration judge and now an Intelligence and national security consultant. Shrimpton has an extensive intelligence background both sides of the Atlantic and he has written a book called Spyhunter which he hopes to publish this year.



Shrimpton said in an interview on community radio that Heath was a paedophile who murdered his young boy victims, or had others do it, often by throwing them into the sea after he had abused them on his series of yachts called Morning Cloud - one in particular that won the Sydney to Hobart race and then sank off Jersey in 1974 after Heath had sold it to a Jersey resident. 

Shrimpton said, as I have, that the record-breaking paedophile and BBC 'star' Jimmy Savile supplied boys for Heath - many of them from the Jersey children's home, Haut de la Garenne, with the support of those who ran the home.




Savile and Heath.

Shrimpton goes on:

There are people who are still alive who are involved in the paedophile scandal and obviously I am not going to name them on a radio programme but the most prominent paedophile associated with the Savile ring was a man called Edward Heath who you may recall was Prime Minister.

Heath was recruited by the Germans in 1937, I have said this in Spyhunter. Heath was into little boys and Savile was supplying them. A number of these boys were taken out the Haut de la Garenne in Jersey. Savile was taking children from a children's home with support of German assets in Jersey.

My own view is that the 'German' networks that Shrimpton talks about were controlled in the background, just like Britain, Russia, and the United States etc., by the Rothschilds and their lackeys. The same is true of the Nazi scientists, engineers, geneticists and mind controllers sent to the United States after the war under the code-named Operation Paperclip to set up NASA, the mind-control programme MKUltra, and much else. 

Germany has been a Rothschild fiefdom since the infamous occult family called Bauer changed their name to Rothschild in the 18th century and it is also used as a conduit for their activities by the Vatican wing of the conspiracy, the Jesuits, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar and Opus Dei. The Vatican was heavily involved in the 'rat runs' that transported those Nazis to the United States under Operation Paperclip.




Lenny Harper was the deputy head of Jersey police who had his career destroyed for the crime of genuinely investigating what happened to children at Haut de la Garenne. He searched for graves, but none were found because Michael Shrimpton said there weren't any: 

The boys were in fact being taken to a boat, it happened to be Edward Heath's boat or yacht and they were murdered and thrown overboard so there is no point sadly in looking for their grave ... they don't have any grave except the sea. 

That's why the BBC and the Cabinet Office have been so keen to protect Savile; that is why the cabinet office in the 1980s were willing to back Savile to the point of giving him a position of authority at Broadmoor [a high-security psychiatric hospital] ... you don't put a paedophile in charge of Broadmoor. It's like putting a lunatic in charge of the asylum or a drunk in charge of a brewery or David Cameron in charge of a government ...

Shrimpton rightly said that Lenny Harper was a very competent and very courageous police officer who 'was up against a Cabinet Office-backed paedophile ring and the investigation that he was conducting was at some professional risk ... 

... Indeed I suspect his life was also at risk at one point because he was getting close to some very uncomfortable truths about people in the Cabinet Office, GO2 [British Intelligence] in London and certain people in Jersey in the German network.

Shrimpton says that Heath's paedophilia and murder of children was covered up by his Cabinet Secretary John Hunt, Baron Hunt of Tanworth, who Shrimpton says was also a paedophile. There are interesting parallels between Hunt and Savile. 

Hunt was appointed by the Queen to be a Companion, Knight Commander and Knight Grand Cross of the British Order of chivalry known as The Most Honourable Order of the Bath of which the Queen is the head and Prince Charles the Grand Master. Hunt was also given a Papal Knighthood by Pope John Paul II - so was Jimmy Savile who was also knighted by the Queen.




Savile and Hunt were both given a Papal knighthood by the biggest child-abuse network on Planet Earth - the Roman Catholic Church (Church of Babylon relocated).

Michael Shrimpton highlights a fact that I have come across constantly over the years - that children abused by famous people, especially in the worlds of politics and royalty, are then killed to protect the identity of their abuser. He said: 

If the children are and I am afraid with paedophilia we sometimes have babies being abused but if you are not talking babies, you are talking toddlers who are able to recognise the people that are abusing them ... since you are talking about people who are on television, people who are high profile, you have to murder the children in order to protect your asset. 

So for the Germans [I would say Rothschilds] it was essential that the boys ... were being taken onto the yacht [for] a death ride. When Jimmy Savile was taking let's say a fourteen year old boy down to Morning Cloud, handing him over to Edward Heath or a member of the crew on the yacht, it was a death ride, that was that boy's last journey on earth because there was no way in the world with him recognising Edward Heath that he could be allowed back on shore and Savile must have known this ...

I named Edward Heath as a serial paedophile and child killer in my book, The Biggest Secret, first published in 1998 - seven years before he died. I also named him and his Chancellor of the Exchequer Anthony Barber as practicing Satanists, as I did the leading members of the royal family.




Anthony Barber.

Heath was read what I said by an excuse for a 'journalist' days after publication and he did nothing because to do so would have had the truth exposed in court - as it would be now if anyone from the Thatcher cesspit wants a go. Michael Shrimpton mentions Barber in his interview as being in league with Heath and Cabinet Secretary Hunt.

You can hear the whole interview with Michael Shrimpton at the end of this article and he also talks about what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what Shrimpton says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. 

Now let us assess what this tells us about the royal family and the Conservative Party administrations of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher between 1979 and 1990. Thatcher replaced Heath as party leader in 1975 and went on to be the next Conservative Prime Minister.


The implications for both the royal family and Thatcher are as follows:

Jimmy Savile was a close friend of Lord Mountbatten, Prince Philip and Prince Charles from the 1960s and this continued for decades AFTER the cover up of Heath's paedophilia and child murder in association with Savile. You mean they didn't KNOW? Is someone having a laugh? British Intelligence didn't know? Ditto. 

British Intelligence didn't know that a record-breaking paedophile had been interviewed by police but not charged on a number of occasions for sexual abuse against minors and didn't know about his legendary sexual abuses over 54 years? Of course they knew, but some at MI5 and MI6 would have been among his clients. 

A British newspaper quoted a 'Buckingham Palace insider' as saying that Prince Charles 'was furious that he was never informed about suspicions that Savile was a pervert who preyed on children.' The 'insider' said 'the Palace have been on to the security services to see why they were not informed' and the source continued:

The Queen, Philip, Charles and others want to know why no-one picked up a phone to tell them a child abuser was being allowed in royal homes and meeting with senior royals and their families ...

What a load of baloney. I'll tell you why they didn't pick up the phone -they were already well aware that the royals knew and had done so since paedophile Mountbatten brought Savile into the fold as a child procurer in the 1960s. 

This is the same royal family that employed at close range another infamous paedophile and child murderer, Anthony Blunt, and like so many paedophiles and killers they gave him a knighthood - as they did Savile. British Intelligence didn't know what Blunt was doing? He worked for them as well as moonlighting for the Rothschilds and the KGB.




Sir Maurice Oldfield

British Intelligence, while employing I am sure many genuine people, has been infested by Satanists and paedophiles including the former head of the Secret Intelligence Service, or MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield. He was a friend and associate of Victor Rothschild and one of his haunts was the Kincora Boys' Home in Belfast, Northern Ireland, along with Establishment paedophiles like Mountbatten and Heath. 

The Kincora abuse scandal broke in the 1980s but naturally the small fry were netted while the big fish swam away in the cesspool they inhabit. Oldfield was another paedophile given a knighthood by the royals and he was also made a member of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, another royal 'chivalry' order in their web of elite groupings and secret societies. 

So now to Margaret Thatcher: She and her husband Denis became such close friends with Jimmy Savile that he was invited to join them for New Year's Eve every year for more than a decade - and this was AFTER the Conservative Party cover up of Edward Heath's paedophile and child murders committed in concert with Savile.



Thatcher's government and circle of associates and aides was alive with paedophiles including Chester MP Peter Morrison, a close aide to Thatcher from 1975 to 1990. He was an open-secret paedophile, well known to colleagues, the media and the Chester police, and yet Thatcher and her Cabinet and inner circle did NOTHING while he was abusing boys in North Wales children's homes and elsewhere. Anyone in that Thatcher circle MUST have known. Thatcher minister Edwina Currie wrote in her published diaries:

One appointment in the recent reshuffle has attracted a lot of gossip and could be very dangerous: Peter Morrison has become the PM's PPS[Parliamentary Private Secretary]. Now he's what they call a 'noted pederast', with a liking for young boys; he admitted as much to [Conservative Party chairman] Norman Tebbit when he became deputy chairman of the party but added' 'However, I'm very discreet' - and he must be! She [Thatcher] either knows and is taking a chance, or doesn't; either way, it's a really dumb move[by then Morrison had been a close aide for 15 years - what does Currie mean Thatcher may not know?].

[Conservative MP] Teresa Gorman told me this evening (in a taxi coming back from a drinks party at the BBC) that she inherited Morrison's (woman) agent, who claimed to have been offered money to keep quiet about his activities. It scares me as all the press know, and as we get closer to the election someone is going to make trouble, very close to her indeed.

Note that Currie doesn't explain why she didn't go to the police or the media to demand that something be done about Morrison - it is only a case of how his activities could affect her party and the demand therefore that he better be discreet. 

It was Currie, as a health minister with responsibility for high security hospitals under Health Secretary Kenneth Clarke, who appointed Savile to run a taskforce at Broadmoor in the 1980s which he exploited to abuse patients.




Morrison and Thatcher. 'Hague' is William Hague, the current Foreign Secretary who was Welsh Secretary when the North Wales 'care' home scandal broke in which Morrison was involved.

The wider implications of paedophile politicians and royalty are far greater than even the sickening abuse of children. It means that paedophiles in power can be blackmailed to change society through legislation in ways that the blackmailers demand or else. 

The Rothschilds operating out of Britain, Germany, France and Rome have been the force behind the creation of what is now the European Union on their way to a global fascist dictatorship based on a world government, army, bank and currency,

Edward Heath was completely controlled by the Rothschilds (in my view, what Michael Shrimpton calls the Germans) because of his paedophilia and child murder. Rothschild asset Heath was the most constant and vocal advocate over decades of Britain's entry into the then European Economic Community (EEC) and it was Heath as prime minister who signed Britain's entry on January 1st 1973.

Heath's policies during his premiership between 1970 and 74 were largely dictated by a Think Tank called the Central Policy Review Staff which was headed by ... Lord Victor Rothschild. One of the policies was the industrialisation and chemicalisation of farming methods which Rothschild had championed as chairman of the Agricultural Research Council from 1948 to 1958. 

Rothschild was a frequent guest of Heath at the prime minister's country residence at Chequers, west of London, from where Heath and his Chancellor Anthony Barber would attend satanic rituals at Burnham Beeches, an area of woodland owned by 'The City' (London's financial centre) and so in truth owned by the secret societies that control The City (see The Biggest Secret).




Harold Wilson.

Victor Rothschild was also close to Heath's political opponent, the Labour Party Prime Minister and another paedophile, Harold Wilson. Either Wilson or Heath was in Downing Street from 1964 to 1975 and both were attached to strings held by Rothschild. 

It was during a Wilson premiership that Rothschild arranged for the covert export of plutonium to Israel to establish their now massive nuclear weapons programme (see ... And The Truth Shall Set You Free). 

Victor Rothschild was the force behind the expansion of nuclear power and worked in support of this by manipulating the miners' strikes of the Heath years which at one time led to Britain moving to a three-day working week to conserve energy. Several anti-nuclear protestors met unexplained or suspicious deaths.




Rothschild became senior security advisor to Margaret Thatcher at the same time that his Rothschild Zionist associate and royal knight Sir Colin Figures was head of MI6. Rothschild was also the instigator behind the sacking of BBC Director General Alasdair Milne in 1987 after Thatcher had appointed his friend Marmaduke Hussey as head of the BBC governors.

I was at the BBC at the time and met Milne. He was the last genuine defender of the BBC's independence and it's all been downhill ever since - exactly as planned. 

These are the wheels within wheels turning all the time under the cover of official versions of events which are repeated without question by the mainstream media. The cement that holds it all together is Satanism, paedophilia and secret societies. 

Police chiefs have announced this week that their initial inquiry into political paedophilia in Britain, known as Operation Fairbank, is going to be joined by a full-blown investigation into the historical abuse at the Elm Guest House called Operation Fernbridge while Fairbank will continue to follow up other leads.




Fairbank was established after Labour MP Tom Watson asked Prime Minister David Cameron in a parliamentary question about evidence he had of a widespread paedophile ring operating out of 10 Downing Street under a previous prime minister. 

Several politicians, including an ever-recurring Thatcher cabinet minister, a Thatcher promoter and a very famous singer are on a list of people said to have visited the Elm Guest House along with Anthony Blunt in the 1980s - the Thatcher years. 

Also on the list are a number of members of the Monday Club, a far-right faction within the Conservative Party which supported the apartheid regime in South Africa. 

Thatcher aide Derek Laud was the first black member of the Monday Club as he was the first black master of foxhounds in the country - both environments normally far from welcoming and conducive to black people. He was given the nickname 'Golly'.



This is the same Derek Laud, a long-time friend of Prime Minister David Cameron and his wife, Samantha, and a guest at their wedding, who was accused of paedophile activity by the now defunct Scallywag magazine in the 1990s along with Thatcher Treasurer Lord McAlpine who was in the news recently protesting his innocent after similar allegations surfaced. Neither chose to sue Scallywag all those years ago. 

The evidence for an enormous paedophile ring operating within the royal palaces, Downing Street and the Westminster Parliament is overwhelming and if the police do not make arrests of big political and royal names so they can be questioned under caution then police investigations will be shown to be a cover up given the evidence that is mounting all the time. 

The British Establishment with its worldwide reach and influence is indeed looking over the abyss.

Barrister and Intelligence Insider Michael Shrimpton talking about Jimmy Savile and Ted Heath


Michael Shrimpton also describes what he says happened to the abducted little girl Madeleine McCann, the assassination of Princess Diana, the murder of weapons expert Dr David Kelly who could have trashed the lies used to justify the Blair invasion of Iraq, and what he says was the murder of former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook.

I can't confirm what he says about Madeleine or Cook but for sure I can with everything else with regard to Heath, Savile and the Conservative Party and government. Nor do I agree with all of his assumptions about who was behind it all, and certainly not that British Intelligence are the 'good guys'. But it is very interesting information very much worth hearing.