Cassini & The Sun King

The Cassini spacecraft takes one of its last good looks at Iapetus, a Saturnian moon that I've been researching here along with Saturnalian worship by elites for a while.

This view looks toward the south pole of Iapetus (1,471 kilometers, or 914 miles across), and lit terrain seen here is in the southern latitudes of the trailing hemisphere. There is only one other planned viewing opportunity of Iapetus left in Cassini's Solstice Mission, in March 2015.

See PIA11690 to learn more about the color anomaly on Iapetus. See PIA08404 to learn more about that moon's equatorial ridge that is hard to accept as natural.

The image below the painting was taken in visible light with the Cassini spacecraft narrow-angle camera on June 7, 2011. The view was obtained at a distance of approximately 863,000 kilometers (536,000 miles) from Iapetus and at a Sun-Iapetus-spacecraft, or phase, angle of 98 degrees. Image scale is 5 kilometers (3 miles) per pixel.

I'm over Saturnalia now but it was a trip finding out it's more than just a pretty face. It's worthwhile digging into the JPL (Jack Parsons/Jet Propulsion) Laboratories' founder and his Aleister Crowley connections.

It's unfortunate that the bad boys get all the attention. I'd like to have had the time to give Venus and Jupiter more attention.

In 1669 Giovanni Cassini moved to France and through a grant from Louis XIV of France helped to set up the Paris Observatory, which opened in 1671; Cassini would remain the director of the observatory for the rest of his career until his death in 1712. In 1673 he became a French citizen. For the remaining forty-one years of his life Cassini served as astronomer/astrologer to Louis XIV ("The Sun King"); serving the expected dual role yet focusing the overwhelming majority of his time on astronomy rather than the astrology he had studied so much in his youth.

During this time, Cassini's method of determining longitude was used to measure the size of France accurately for the first time. The country turned out to be considerably smaller than expected, and the king quipped that Cassini had taken more of his kingdom from him than he had won in all his wars. Cassini went blind in 1711.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. The Cassini orbiter and its two onboard cameras were designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The imaging operations center is based at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo.

For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission visit http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov. The Cassini imaging team homepage is at http://ciclops.org.

Ringmakers of Saturn

Dr. Norman Bergrun is an alumnus of Ames Research Laboratory, NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) predecessor of Ames Research Center, NASA where he worked twelve years as a research scientist. At Ames, he pioneered the setting of design criteria for airplane thermal ice-prevention and the developing of roll stability laws for airplanes, missiles and rockets.

He joined Lockheed Missiles and Space Company (now Lockheed Martin) where he was manager of the planning and analysis of flight tests for the Navy Polaris Underwater Launch Missile System. During his thirteen years at Lockheed, he also served as a senior scientist having responsible analysis cognizance of special space-satellite applications. After a short tour of duty with Nielsen Engineering and Research, in 1971 he founded Bergrun Engineering and Research, parent of Bergrun Research founded in 1999 especially for world wide web activities.

An Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauics (AIAA), he is active as a leader in Congressional Visits Day events on Capitol Hill. As Deputy Director-at-Large for the AIAA western region, he overlooks section activities in seven western states. Other memberships include The Planetary Society, The Association for the Advancement of Science, The Aviation Hall of Fame, the National Society of Professional Engineers, the Federation of American Scientists and the Scientific Faculty, International Biographical Centre, Cambridge, England.

Bergrun holds a BSME degree from Cornell University, an LLB from LaSalle University Extension, a DSc (Hon) from World University and a California Professional Engineer (PE) License. He also has engaged in graduate aerospace studies at Stanford University. He is a founder of the California Society of Professional Engineers Education Foundation, is author of two books Tomorrow's Technology Today and Ringmakers of Saturn and has published over 100 papers. Two recent manuscripts, Lunar Life Forms: Revelations of Apollo 14 and Mars Puts on a Good Face: The Masquerade, have been registered with the Library of Congress, Washington, D. C. He has lectured in the United States, Canada, England and Europe.

Credited with numerous awards and citations including the California Society of Professional Engineers Archimedes Engineering Achievement Award, and Special Service Citations for contributions to the AIAA National Public Policy and to the Regional Sections Activity Committees, he is listed in Marquis "Who's Who in the World", "Who's Who in America", "Who's Who in Science and Engineering", and other reference works.

Continuing interests include photography*, NASA student activities and music, having played as a concert musician at Carnegie Hall with the Cornell University Band and having been a founder of "Aurora Singers", a 64-voice choir.

Jay Weidner on Stanley Kubrik, Arthur C Clarke, The Moon Landings, NASA & Saturn

The tiny moon in the picture above is actually Mimas (of Star wars death star fame)  but because I was confused with Kubrick movie 2001 space odyssey and Arthur C Clarke's landing on Saturn (it's gaseous how would it do that?) I now know it was Iapetus that was originally in the book but was changed to a moon of Jupiter by Warner brothers. 

Why would anyone would care? Well Saturn is Saturnalia and the studios got nervous about how much Kubrick was revealing. I've posted part two of the interview because it's just so interesting and gets straight to the sizzling bacon though I'm sure you'll start at the beginning if it grabs your attention. It did mine.

Cassini Mission - Saturn

CERN and Saturn: Gyroscopes Affecting Space, Time & Gravity?

Harold Camp, The Rapture & Saturn

I'm annoyed with myself. On the same day I was parading my Matrix movie occult symbolism discoveries, Harold Camp was eating his words over his failed rapture predictions. Instead of ignoring it, I should have done a little investigating because his Familyradio.com website is full-on Saturnalia as you can see below. 

It would not surprise me to find he's manipulated in some way, but in the absence of any evidence apart from that assertion, the all important symbolism is below. I should point out that it feels a little premature for U.S. citizens to be triumphant in the middle of this remarkable tornado and earthquake action (with volcanos going off round the world). 

I'd have been thankful he wasn't right. He may be programmed to test public reaction to a Rapture message. It didn't roll out this time but is it wise to ignorant of these topics given his new revised date and the occult worshippers love of parading in public what they intend to do? Just a few words of caution. I don't live there.

Saturn & Metatron's Cube

I spent the afternoon on Saturn. Or rather on Jet Propulsion Laboratories(JPL) and NASA's website doing some research and struck oil on that whole NASA/JPL obsession with the occult thing that says to me, more is going on under our noses, than you're average premier-league fan's blood pressure could handle. Let me you hit you up with the basics if you've missed the earlier Saturnalia posts.

Y'all can see from the sacred geometry below, that there's a two dimensional Hexagon AND a three dimensional Cube right?

You might not have time to watch the videos so let me articulate this carefully. Not every shape within a shape can represent both 2D and 3D structure with the integrity of Metatron's cube above, which can do a whole lot more than Hexagon and Cubes (Hexadron) and is really the DNA of platonic solids, and thus a building block to reality. If you wish the creator of the universe had Metatron's cube in mind before commencing with 3D reality. It's a transcendental form and a blueprint of holographic reality.

Where this gets sexy, is that Saturn was discovered in the 70's to have a rotating Hexagon on its North and South poles. Nowhere else in the universe is this the case (to our knowledge) and so we might ask ourselves a pertinent question. Why did the ancient Hebrews (and others) worship the black cube (Teffilin) and Saturn right up until today?

Or rather, how did they know that Saturn has a representational Metatron's cube when we only found out a few decades ago? The link with the Islamic Kaabah is hard to ignore too if you can now see the 2 dimensional Hexagon and 3 dimensional Hexadron.

I throw in the Islamic link at the end as a hint of today's findings. Saturn's influence on our space and time are hard to ignore and I've now had a Damascene conversion to the inarguable influence of of Saturn on our planet as displayed by the ancient Hebrew's AND the cosmic elites at NASA and Jet Propulsion Laboratories. I was sure before but now I'm convinced. Oh and the good news is maybe we got outside help on our side. The evidence has been under our noses for some time, but buckle up for the ride because there are those with everything to lose and we have EVERYTHING to gain.

Time Lords, Saturn and Lord of the Rings

Sometimes ya gotta watch something twice before the penny drops. You can always go back and check if you're unsure what I mean.

Cubism Part III

Cubism Part II

Cubism

There's a good reason to become acquainted with the themes of Saturnalia worship.

Its followers never reveal any affiliation, feign ignorance if discussed and lie when confronted with evidence. But that's not the 'good reason' I just mentioned. Most suspicious is that Saturnalia followers proselytize cold rationality, materialist science and bullet proof empiricism as the only metrics for progress while at the same time attacking those who say otherwise with calumny and ridicule of the tin foil hat, woo woo and conspiracy type epithets.

So why the deception? Why the fanatical use of symbolism, the obsessesion with timing and the deep reverence for ritual? Saturn has a controlling influence on our planet that we're largely ignorant of. So why do those who know, go out of their way to keep the rest of us stupid through disinformation, subterfuge and deception?

A fine rant by Occultscience101 who is one of the most comprehensive Saturnalia deconstructionists on Youtube and an unsurpassed etymologist capable of connecting more dots than most brains (including mine) have bandwidth to deal with. Fortunately his colloquial style is quite accessible, though some of his less obvious throwaway points can themselves be teased out into long sub codified treatises of the topic taking on a recursively fractal pattern endlessly looping back into itself until someone calls time. Which is ironic because Saturn is among other designations Chronos. The God of time.

Lord of the Rings

Originally Stanley Kubrick wanted 2001 Space Odyssey to connect with Saturn but the studios said that was unacceptable so he had to change the story to a Jupiter landing. I have no idea how Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke knew about Saturn's secrets, but I do know they tried to tip us off, and for that reason it's worth digging around on Saturnalia worship, chronos as control mechanism and Saturn's moon Iapetus because it's artificial.

Is Saturn's Moon Iapetus Artificial?

There are lots of anomalies in the solar system but Iapetus is the most challenging to describe as natural.

2001 Space Odyssey

We were watching 2001: A Space Odyssey last night. I vaguely recall watching it when I was younger but this time round it was such a treat. A lot more fell into place on this viewing as I'm getting a sense for Kubrick as a director and as a person. I'm trying to think who else is as good as him and apart from Lynch there is nobody is there? Funny thing was we both turned to look at each other half way and said 'those look like iPads'.

Now you might think that's a coincidence but Steve Job's amazing streak of success over the last few years has definitely had me wondering if he has had access to those allegations of back engineered gizmos that the UFO crowd swear are largely withheld from us by a self serving elite who accumulate wealth by enslaving our time to a mortgage/debt treadmill before egging us on to ripping each others throats out over oil and destruction through soul draining organised religion and misery. Like that feeling of being disconnected from who you really are. Precariously attached to a marginally differentiated lifeline of drudgery and artifice.

Well of course I'm riffing a bit here because Stanley Kubrick was a very secretive man.  Then there are those allegations of filming the moon landings in case they went wrong and thus potentially losing the U.S. a crucially psychological information war.  Allegedly Stanley demanded a deal that in return for shooting the moon landings he could later do the films he wanted without Hollywood interference. Has anybody got any recommendations for which Kubrick film I should watch next as I'm obsessed with his work now. Also does anybody know the rumour about why he changed the destination planet in 2001 Space Odyssey? It was meant to be Saturn but that was too close to the mark so he changed it to Jupiter. Saturn has that distinctly odd looking moon Iapetus which I've mentioned before was the spark for my synchronicity post and which looks like the death star in Star Wars. Just saying folks. Draw your own conclusions folks. I'm only on the lookout for better questions.

It's the circular parts of Iapetus that merit comment and then on closer look the ridge around the equator is distinctly uniform.

But rather than get bogged down with the differences between man made and artificial. You can leave that to Benoit Mandelbrot. The question I have is why call the moon landing missions Saturn V. What is it about Saturn? Why not call them Neptune 5?