Anyone who thinks the media prints, publishes or broadcasts anything remotely like reality is struggling right now with righteous indignation as the internet pretty much crushes the things that are said, as well as raising the things that are left out.
Here's a classic piece of fake news for the memory wipes.
Regrettably most people are too ill informed to understand the very basics of the Skripal story, like did he or didn't he die, which was misreported because it's designed to be a package of lies.
No doubt the fake left who partied hard during the Obama years while he bombed 7 Muslim countries had a good time till Trump got it. They left it to independent researchers and bloggers to utilize this once in lifetime opportunity to inform people of what was really going on via the Internet, in Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and later on Yemen.
The sinking of the Lusitania was probably one of the earliest Fake News specials but we should also including the sinking of the Maine in 1898. The media has been instrumental in selling all of the conflicts that arose from these and so the question remains, who owns and who populates the media? The math is inarguable when it comes to diversity analysis.
Alas it takes courage to point out why 2% of the population are responsible for 90% of Fake News currently shaping the average hairless monkey's opinion.
Here's a slightly out of date visual possibly explaining the BBC's toxic bias towards Fake News.
And a couple of BBC Fake News peddlers.
BBC contributor Melanie Phillips is married to Joshua Rozenberg, former legal affairs editor for the BBC.
Russia's decision to stand by its long time ally Syria is key in the current sentiment towards the country. Maybe something to do with pipelines the NWO so wish to control across Syria and the energy reserves on Israeli occupied Syrian land that Genie Energy now control.
Interesting interview and discussion on the propensity of the Zionist neoliberal media (that's MSM to you and I) for peddling wars, siding with Neocons and hating on Trump.
The best thing about the United States is an individual can buy a semi automatic and keep the wolves in Government and media at bay.
In an ideal world we would ban guns and selling weapons abroad but to start at home is a sign of electronic entrainment and a limited understanding of what happened to China and Germany when guns were removed from society.
Gun control is peddled by the worst of the worst and the least informed swallow it spoon-fed and cheering for more.
Every day the media's reputation tanks a little more and memes have been the most powerful weapon in that fight. This is ironic given that memes are primarily an advertising trick of combing text with visuals.
The same people who demand open borders around the world and diversity in the work place are mathematically over represented in the media while also refusing to discuss Israeli open borders and diversity within Israel.
I could share the numbers at the New York Times and BBC et al, if anybody disputes the mathematical facts but this clip of Ann Coulter describing CNN's epic Jewish over representation is indisputable.
Here's another fact. The media is racist and it's Zionist.
If you haven't seen this information you will be blown away - I'm confident of that.
It's not so much that the McCanns are lying, it's the critical deconstruction and analysis of their language which proves once and for all that there is something dark at the heart of the McCann story and as usual (for those who have studied Richard D Hall's presentations), it involves British intelligence, British politics, British media and highly likely involvement of child sexual abuse.
I just can't help but write about Mika Brzezinski. Like the other other media puppet and CIA asset over at CNN (cretins news network) and Anderson Cooper, she's a talentless journalist, a shallow and privileged member of the media elite. Her father Zbigniew was the President Carter/Obama advisor who has spent his entire life trying to get people to hate Russia. He created the foundation terror groups of ISIS and Al Qaeda by sponsoring the Mujaheddinhttp://charlesfrith.blogspot.hk/2013/06/glenn-greenwald-shuts-up-zbigniew.html to attack Soviet forces in Afghanistan thus creating the Taliban.
The biggest Youtube star has been dropped by Disney for doing a satirical piece that mocked the internet's ability to hire Indians to do anything through a company called Fiverr. Naturally the fake media ignored the context and positioned it as anti Semitic, though they've shot themselves in the foot.
There are now 6 Million Youtube people subscribers to Pewdiepie who just got woke on who runs the media. I believe the number of subscribers has been interfered with but you get the picture.
I enjoyed watching Trump at his press conference. Of course he's a huge bullshitter who makes things up all the time but that doesn't mean many of his points are not totally legitimate. The media is toxic, the left want a war with Russia because it confirms their confirmation bias and hatred towards Donny Tiny Hands. All in all things look very bad but in fact it's just the BS falling away and the ugly concealed reality surfacing for the first time in Millennia.
However there is one deeply troubling point that the media and the fake left/right wont address. Both Trump and Hillary had deep Lolita Express ties to convicted paedosadist and child sex trafficker billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. The media wont attack him on that point because they are complicit and the media paedos have yet to be identified but I know a few who top the list.
Fake Intelligence Agencies, Fake News, Fake Media, Fake Stories and we're rapidly approaching that point where the CIA will actually drop a truth bomb to regain any credibility and nobody will believe them. Google "ISIS CIA Jordan" for shits and giggles.
Special Correspondents is worth a watch even for those uninterested in the synthetic news broadcast 24/7 in the corporate media. It's humourous, even hilarious once or twice and unveils in a simple manner how easy it is to construct news events like Sandy Hook, Boston, Paris, Brussels and whatever gay disco/runaway lorry was the nonsense for last month.
The movie is a good sequel to Wag The Dog which was one of the first to dramatise the use of fake news, staged events, false flags and crisis actors. As ever with Hollywood it portrays peaceful Ecuador as a war ravaged country for housing Julian Assange in their London Embassy and for calling out the US War Machine for what it is. A nation scared of its own shadow.
The illusion of local TV is that it isn't tightly scripted by one of the 6 corporations that own the media. This video clip should dissolve that illusion and prompt the thinking person to factor in how powerful TV programming is when it comes to creating monsters out of nothing and pimping wars that are unnecessary except to the military industrial complex and the 1% they are there to protect and create profits for.
A must watch video of Reza Aslan on CNN reminding us that lightening rod issues such as female genital mutilation are not Islamic practice but an African practice including some predominately Christian states like Eritrea and Ethiopia.
My week on twitter: 468 New Followers, 1.25K Mentions, 3.75M Mention Reach, 1.23K Replies, 15.2K Retweets. via http://t.co/Hw4ncJqzNH
— Charles Edward Frith (@charlesfrith) June 22, 2014
I've never run my Twitter account to be popular. In fact, I think about 50 people a day unfollow me. Fortunately more people are prepared to stick around than leave so I want to thank you all for the very important (for me and I hope for you) retweets. Usually the reach is around two million Twitter users a week but lately it's been getting up to 3 million and approaching 4. My tweets are not candy floss subjects so I appreciate you all for getting the word out on subjects the mainstream media can never touch, because of who owns them, and who advertises in them.
The exception to this rule is Russia Today who featured one of my Tweets on the fiasco that is NATO backing the same psychopaths they call freedom fighters in Syria and are now obliged to call terrorists in Iraq (even though they trained many in Jordan recently). It's a classic example of the Orwellian double speak world we live in that only the internet can call out this media nonsense that people are being spoon fed. Many corporate media consumers have no idea what is going on, or are silent over it for reasons I assume are to do with keeping their heads down below the parapet, or putting money before conscience.
— Favstar.fm 500★'s (@Favstar500Favs) July 5, 2014
Update 27 July 2014 - We smashed the 4 million barrier - Thank you
My week on twitter: 697 New Followers, 2.56K Mentions, 4.69M Mention Reach, 1.95K Replies, 30.8K Retweets. via http://t.co/Hw4ncJqzNH
— Charles Edward Frith (@charlesfrith) July 27, 2014
Update: We tore through the 15 million mention reach metric, so either something is very wrong or very right ;)
My month on twitter: 1.95K New Followers, 9.3K Mentions, 15.6M Mention Reach, 7.07K Replies, 93.9K Retweets. via http://t.co/Hw4ncJ8qzz
— Charles Edward Frith (@charlesfrith) September 1, 2014
One thing Obama does better than any other president in history is he understands the media more than most and/or has better advisers. I totally disagree on the use of false flag shootings for socially engineering the removal of guns and many more issues, but the comment that Bergdahl's Dad looks like Duck Dynasty is too sweet.
September Clues raises more questions than it answers, but makes a cogent case for the No Planer theory. I'm so cynical of corporate media, that after NSA collusion with manufacturers and digital service providers to spy on us, I see no reason why a mornings viewing of video editing wasn't part of the 9/11 psyops.
I've no problem in admitting mistakes because I don't have the military industrial complex or government handcuffs to sit Dick Cheney in a room and pull his pacemaker our with pliers till he speaks.
I have to rely on the best information I can get my hands on at the time.
I've no real interest in the World Trade Centre towers military grade demolition on 9/11, because it's the million or so Iraqis and Afghanis that are the victims, not the Israelis, British, French or Americans who actually orchestrated most of it. You know. The perpetrators.
However, I hope you were watching your freedoms get pick-pocketed by the war entertainment complex since then.
Here's Butler Shaffer's views on the matter. It's erudite thinking and you really must read it to appreciate a mind ahead of its time.
If I were to offer a seminar on the nature of war, I believe that the first class session would include a showing of the film Wag the Dog. Those who wish to justify the obliteration of hundreds of thousands of total strangers in the name of "good" versus "evil," or "national honour," will likely find the movie discomforting. As the governments of India and Pakistan self-righteously, and in the name of "God," threaten one another with a nuclear war that could instantly kill anywhere from ten to twenty million people, it is time for decent, intelligent people to put down their flags and begin to see war for what the late General Smedley Butler rightly termed it: "a racket." This film offers a quick reality fix.
Randolph Bourne's observation "war is the health of the state" is familiar to most critics of militarism, but few have delved into why this is so. Statism is dependent upon mass thinking which, in turn, is essential to the creation of a collective, herd-oriented society. Such pack-like behaviour is reflected in the intellectual and spiritual passivity of people whose mindsets are wrapped up more in images and appearances than in concrete reality.
Such a collapse of the mind produces a society dominated by entertainment — which places little burden on thinking — rather than critical inquiry, which helps to explain why there has long been a symbiotic relationship between the entertainment industry and political systems. Entertainment fosters a passive consciousness, a willingness to "suspend our disbelief." Its purpose is to generate amusement, a word that is synonymous with "diversion," meaning "to distract the attention of." The common reference to movies as a form of "escape" from reality, reflects this function. Government officials know what every magician knows, namely, that to carry out their illusions, they must divert the audience's attention from their hidden purposes.
Michel Foucault has shown how the state's efforts to regulate sexual behaviour — whether through repressive or "liberating" legislation — serves as such a distraction, making it easier for the state to extend its control over our lives. It is instructive that, in the months preceding the World Trade Centre attacks which, in turn, ushered in the greatest expansion of police powers in America since the Civil War, the news stories that dominated the media had to do with allegations of adulterous affairs by a sitting president and a congressman. It is not coincidence that both the entertainment industry and the government school systems have helped to foster preoccupations with sex.
The authority of the state is grounded in consensus-based definitions of reality, whose content the state insists on controlling. This is why so-called "public opinion polls," rather than factual analysis and reason, have become the modern epistemological standard, and why imagery — which the entertainment industry helps to foster — now takes priority over the substance of things.
Politics and entertainment each feed upon — and help to foster — public appetites for illusions and fantastic thinking. The success of such undertakings, in turn, depends upon unfocused and enervated minds, which helps to explain why motion picture and television performers, popular musicians, and athletes — whose efforts require little participation on the part of the viewer — have become the dominant voices in our politicized culture. It also helps to account for the attraction of so many entertainers throughout the world to visionary schemes such as state socialism, as well as the increasing significance of entertainment industry gossip and box-office revenues as major news stories.
The entertainment industry helps shape the content of our consciousness by generating institutionally desired moods, fears, and reactions, a role played throughout human history. Ancient Greek history is tied up in myths, fables, and other fictions, passed on by the entertainers of their day, the minstrels. We need to ask ourselves about the extent to which our understanding of American history and other human behaviour has been fashioned by motion pictures, novels, and television drama. Through carefully scripted fictions and fantasies, others direct our experiences, channel our emotions, and shape our views of reality. The fantasies depicted are more often of conflict, not cooperation; of violence, not peace; of death, not the importance of life.
Nowhere is the interdependency of the political and entertainment worlds better demonstrated than in the war system, which speaks of "theatres" of operation, "acts" of war with battle "scenes," "staging" areas, and "dress rehearsals" for invasions. The pomp and circumstance of war is reflected in military uniforms that mimic stage costumes, all to the accompaniment of martial music that rivals grand opera. A Broadway play can become either a "bomb" or a "hit;" troops are "billeted" (a word derived from the French meaning of a "ticket"); while the premier of a movie is often accompanied, like a World War II bombing raid, by searchlights that scan the skies. Even the Cold War was framed by an "iron curtain." Is it only coincidence, devoid of any symbolic meaning, that at the end of the American Civil War - one of the bloodiest wars in human history - its chief protagonist was shot while attending the theatre, and that his killer was an actor who, upon completing his deed, descended to the stage and exited?
Adolf Hitler understood, quite well, the interplay between political power and theatre, a truth that continues to reveal itself in entertainers involving themselves so heavily in political campaigns, some even managing to get themselves elected to Congress or the presidency! Nor was it surprising that one of the first acts of the Bush Administration, following the announced "War on Terrorism," was to send a group of presidential advisers to Hollywood to enlist the entertainment industry's efforts to portray the war as desired by Washington! As with earlier wars, the "military/entertainment complex" will continue to write the scripts and define the characters that are required to assure the support of passive minds in the conduct of war.
Furthermore, because entertainment is often conducted in crowded settings (e.g., theatres, stadiums, auditoriums) there is a dynamic conducive to the generation of mass-mindedness. One need only recall the powerful harangues of Adolf Hitler that coalesced tens of thousands of individuals into a controllable mob, to understand the symbiotic relationship between entertainment and politics.
Entertainment is a part of what we call "recreation," which means to "re-create," in this case to give interpretations to events that are most favorable to one's national identity and critical of an opponent. In this connection, entertainers help to manipulate the "dark side" of our being which, once mobilized, can help to generate the most destructive and inhumane consequences. World War II movies portrayed Japanese kamikaze pilots who crashed their planes into Navy ships as "crazed zealots," while American pilots who did the same thing to Japanese ships or trains were represented as "heroes" willing to die to save their comrades. German and Japanese soldiers were presented as sneering sadists who delighted in the torture of the innocents, while the American soldiers only wanted to get the war over with so they could get back home to mom and her apple pie! How many of us, today, think of 19th century U.S. cavalrymen — as portrayed by the likes of John Wayne and Randolph Scott — as brave soldiers, while Indian warriors were "savages" for having forcibly resisted their own annihilation?
All of this leads me to ask whether the entertainment industry is an extension of the war system, or whether war is simply an extension of our need for entertainment? What should be clear to us is that entertainment is one of the principal means by which our thinking can be taken over and directed by others once we have chosen to make our minds passive, which we do when we are asked — whether by actors or politicians — to suspend our judgement about the reality of events we are witnessing. When we are content to be amused (i.e. to have our attention diverted from reality to fantasy), and to have our emotions exploited by those skilled in triggering unconscious forces, we set ourselves up to be manipulated by those producing the show.
Politics differs from traditional theatre in one important respect, however: in the political arena, we do not call for the "author" at the end of a war! Most of us prefernotto know, for to discover the identities of those who have scripted such events might call into question our own gullibility
