Why Margaret Thatcher Promoted Paedophiles in Power

Heath, Thatcher and Wilson all shared head of MI6 and known paedophile Sir Maurice Oldfield who used the MI5 run Kincora boys home to molest children in Northern Ireland. I'm just trying to figure out what was the deal with a lot of accusations against all three but what I can say is that I'm fairly confident that from the above 3 hours research that Heath was a paedophile, even if his friends came up with absurd claims of asexual behaviour to explain his lack of interest in men and women.

Where it gets interesting is with Thatcher. She ran against Heath suddenly and we need a rational explanation of why she entertained Jimmy Savile at Checkers for 11 years in a row? The only stories that make sense are she was some sort of practising Satanist into ritual child sex abuse (possible but hard to imagine) and the other is that she promoted more paedophiles into senior positions than anyone because she liked to keep her enemies close to her and there is no greater enemy of the state than a blackmailed paedophile.

It's very hard to figure out what the real deal is but the more I watch and read the more absurdity I can reject. For example Aangirfan blog and Peter Wright of Spycatcher fame both claim Wilson might have been working for the Soviet's but that doesn't make sense here when we listen to his secretly recorded voice in the first documentary bemoan Sir Maurice Oldfield neglect to deliver on his promise to root out the rot in MI6. One doesn't ask one's enemies to solve problems and actually now I think about it I think Oldfield got rid of Wilson and edged in Heath followed by Thatcher. That is why there may have been so many paedophiles around Thatcher. Maybe MI6's Sir Maurice Oldfield was telling her who was good to hire when he had his own agenda instead.

Gregg Hallett - Game of Thrones

I've been getting into Gregg Hallett's work though this is the first video interview I've seen of him. It wouldn't' surprise me in the least if his information about the imposter Royals is spook created disinformation. 

I do however believe what I see in front of my eyes and nobody looks like Prince Charles in his family, especially Prince Harry.

That said just because the current Royals might be imposters doesn't mean I accept any new Royal family, authentic or not. They can all go to hell, and fuck themselves, as they are parasites on the people.

Jim Fetzer the interviewer has his microphone volume turned up too high, and is either asleep or not paying attention to large chunks of the information, except in that cursory shallow way some people are able to do. He's also a little too keen to laugh when he's interviewing Gordon Duff who needs tough questions not sycophancy.

This Royal stuff is interesting but for me it's not as good as Gregg Hallett's information on Lord Mountbatten (or Battenberg as his real family name is) and there's an excellent post on the paedophile Royal Family and Lord Mountbatten over at Chris Spivey

Only Powerful Countries Use False Flag Attacks for Social Engineering

The modus operandi of false flags is to run an "exercise" concurrently with the false flag. It adds to confusion of reports, adds slack to subsequent official manipulation and some other reasons I don't want to share here but it is the signature of 9/11, 7/7 and Sandy Hook false flag events.

The official story is falling apart and we now have the evidence that is usually wiped from history when the FBI seizes all the CCTV and locks it up for that old trope 'national security reasons'. May I remind you all that Aurora and Sandy Hook were false flag events to bring in gun control, and that the manipulation is beginning to disintegrate to those who are awake and aware.

We don't need your CCTV because we have Digital cameras and Youtube and the Internet which has no gatekeepers even though you keep trying.