Iranian Oscar Winner - A Separation

Very quickly the protagonists in this movie become quite annoying and I found myself siding with the judge and the daughter who is completely blameless and suffers the most. However this story's magic lies in it's ability to convey ambiguity and nuance. There isn't a single mistake that all parties don't make that I haven't made. That includes the couple above and the slightly over Islamic under educated couple who become embroiled in the lives of the more educated and upwardly mobile ones.

This is a movie about everybody losing unless key insights are learned from mistakes made and in that sense is as fine an introduction to Iranian metropolitan life as a person could wish for. 

It won an Oscar for best foreign film of 2012.

Are These Chemtrails?

The above video is an important contribution to the discussion. I got it from The Tap Blog earlier.

I deliberately avoid the chemtrail subject and focus on what I know best which is the venal actions of intelligence agencies (spooks, spies and paedophiles) hoodwinking their populations into war and systemic ignorance through the use of media propaganda, mind control and sexual abuse of children for blackmail on politicians who then make decisions the average punter can't figure out preferring to ignore suggestions from the likes of myself as wild conspiracy theories. The dangers of the coincidence theorists reliance on authority is staggering. They can't imagine another world that is fast emerging on the horizon with frantic attempts to obliterate it in the atmosphere. Go ahead take a drink.

I've seen the odd chemtrail over Bangkok and they are quantifiably different from contrails that disappear quickly unlike chemtrails that linger for hours and then diffuse to change cloud cover and sunlight dispersion and defraction in the atmosphere. Clearly the picture above demonstrates that at least hypothetically.

Do I know what they are for? No. Do I know why there seems to be international cooperation on the silence of the subject? No. Would I say I believe this link? 

Probably not. But it I do have separate corroborating sources.

I've got more immediate and pressing issues on my hands though the recent rebranding of chemtrails to geoengineering by the media is worth a snigger if only because it was a conspiracy theory before, but now it's just good old science. Post hoc ergo proptor hoc naturally.

More smoke than mirrors wouldn't you say?

I'm told the Youtube videos What in the world are they spraying? and Why in the world they are spraying? are both good introductory documentaries. Don't expect them on mainstream media who are too busy telling you news that is profitable to corporations and hamsterwheel lifestyles.

If I've missed anything out please leave a comment. Thanks. 

P.S. Did I mention MI5 and 6 are blackmailing VIP's with film of them raping children? 

It's not very 007 Bond is it?

@prostitutkamila

I follow a few Russians around and have to occasionally jam a tweet through Google Translate to see what they're up to. This led to a Twitter exchange where I mentioned that @prostitutkamila is just a great sounding Twitter handle.

It seems like the State Department agree with me: Here's the minutes from a daily press briefing in March this year.

QUESTION: One of his followers appears to be someone with the name the – at least the Twitter handle Prostitutkamila. Do you have any – (laughter) – whose avitar is crossed legs. Do you have any – I mean, he is going back and forth with Prostitutkamila about this situation yesterday. Do you have any concerns or problems with that? Is that appropriate for – I mean, God knows who this person actually is, but --

MR. TONER: Right. Exactly, Matt. You well know, as I do, even though we’re not of the – this generation that uses Twitter – well, maybe you do, maybe you are, I don’t mean to age you – but that avitars come in all shapes and forms.

QUESTION: Well, I know, but, I mean, here he’s having a discussion saying that he was accosted by Cossacks at this event where these journalists – there were not just journalists there, there were men in military uniform, and I just – do you think that ambassadors should be routinely engaged in Twitter conversations with people who identify themselves as prostitutes?

MR. TONER: Again, he’s engaged with his followers. I’m not going to get – regulate or talk about from this podium who within his followers he should be talking to. Twitter – his tweets go out to a broad audience.

QUESTION: Did your concerns with – over his security and safety predate his Twitter activities yesterday?

MR. TONER: Yeah. I mean, I would say that. There’s been a number of incidents. I’m not going to go into them in detail but – because they do pertain to his security, but we’ve raised this.

QUESTION: Okay. And did you raise the concerns with the Russians before or after that exchange yesterday?

MR. TONER: Before. And we’re going to raise the latest concerns as well.

QUESTION: The latest concern being about his security, maybe --

MR. TONER: Well, and about --

QUESTION: My understanding was previous – the ones previous were about the anti-American incidents that --

MR. TONER: That’s right.

QUESTION: And then – but the new concern comes from the fact that he seems to be being followed around and --

MR. TONER: That’s my understanding, yes.

QUESTION: -- thinks that his phone and --

MR. TONER: Yes.

QUESTION: Have the Russians said anything in response to this latest --

MR. TONER: No. I don’t have any details about what their response has been.

QUESTION: Have they responded to the previous concerns about his being followed?

MR. TONER: Not that I’m aware.

QUESTION: New subject?

MR. TONER: Sure.