Nikola Tesla - How General Electric, Edison and J.P. Morgan Screwed Him And Us Over

This is a good introductory documentary to Nikola Tesla who like other great scientific luminaries was tapping into the spirit world on the side. Tesla had voices and visions just like Francis Bacon and let's not forget that  Descartes had an angel talk to him about the way to understanding was through maths and measurement and that Crick discovered DNA's twin helix structure on acid. That's not a story materialist science likes to remember as there's nothing empirical about channelling the spirit of angels for good ideas... but it goes on all the time.

I take heart that Google celebrated Tesla's birthday a while back because it was the largest nod to date with respect to the suppressed technology that the big names have held back from us for reasons of cattle-herding wealth-extraction  and to keep us in perpetual conflict over a limited resource that is caveman technology compared to what has and can be invented. (I am coming over to the abiotic theory of oil though. Fossil fuel doesn't stand up to interrogation the more I think about it).

Google aren't big enough to take on Govcorp quite yet, though that day is fast approaching as free energy is pretty much a leitmotif of the universe. Look at the constant expansion, of the electromagnetic spectrum, zero point energy, vacuum energy and the light the light the light that is inexplicably in constant creation. The documentary is worth watching just to understand what a total weasel Thomas Edison was and how history has portrayed him as a hero as that's how capitalism works. It elevates the most profitable. Not the cleverest or the most innovative and certainly nothing that is free. Word.

Fritz Lang, Werner Von Braun & The Moon Landings

I think this is even more interesting than the first part of the documentary I posted earlier. There's less of a focus on the questionable moon landing photography and more on manipulation of populations through media and film entertainment. It starts off with questions of the Van Allen belts being to dangerous for man to travel through without being irradiated to death but does move on to the whole Soviet and United States manipulation and deceit of space travel. I had no idea of the Von Braun/Fritz Lang connection or that the Soviets too were faking so much stuff.

I'm genuinely confused in a good way trying to fit in both sides motives because intercontinental complicity seems to be a theme I pick up now and again, and I may have to explore much deeper. 

The lie is different at every level isn't it?

British Questions About NASA Moon Landings

The first time I heard about the hoax moon landings I thought don't be ridiculous. I've only given it a day's research now, and had to walk away from it because both sides put forward a pretty good case for fake pictures or explanations for photographic anomalies in an inhospitable environment. Also it get's complicated as some of it may be true and some of it may be illusion for political reasons as those who believe Kubrick was hired by NASA to film the moon landings after his 2001 space oddysey success. I'm going to walk away from this discussion but if it get's you questioning the processed cheese reality of mainstream media that's a good thing but good luck with coming to a conclusion.

The real dark side of the moon is that all the evidence suggests it was put in place and is therefore some sort of artificial satellite. It's size, orbit, position, gravity and density are just too weird for anybody too explain.