I urge you to watch it and get a feel for how sophisticated psychological manipulation is, if you haven't caught on that the corporate media are in bed with the security industrial complex and it's goal of controlling humans like sheep.
It's always satisfying to keep talking and posting about Sandy Hook and the other psyops/false flags peddled by the corporate media, because long after the Zombies can only remember something about gun control and kids, we will be reminding those who have a chance that it's a crock of shit.
Hat's off to Sofia Smallstorm for her excellent and measured analysis
The most devastating interview with a former State Trooper, Police Officer and School Safety trainer who has trained 3500 school safety officers, and is not getting answers to questions that would prove Sandy Hook is not a social engineering project, planned two years in advance.
The police are threatening him if he doesn't shut up.
I urge you to listen to this before it gets wiped off the net or he his taken out. It's that good.
The great thing about Sandy Hook, like 9/11 is that once the penny drops they are all perception management events, your life improves instantly as you stop grieving and worrying about things that didn't really happen.
The modus operandi of false flags is to run an "exercise" concurrently with the false flag. It adds to confusion of reports, adds slack to subsequent official manipulation and some other reasons I don't want to share here but it is the signature of 9/11, 7/7 and Sandy Hook false flag events.
The official story is falling apart and we now have the evidence that is usually wiped from history when the FBI seizes all the CCTV and locks it up for that old trope 'national security reasons'. May I remind you all that Aurora and Sandy Hook were false flag events to bring in gun control, and that the manipulation is beginning to disintegrate to those who are awake and aware. We don't need your CCTV because we have Digital cameras and Youtube and the Internet which has no gatekeepers even though you keep trying.
Whatever happened at Sandy Hook it isn't the story portrayed in the media. Thus it's important to not let it slide like all the easily distracted, story for the day junkies who have forgotten what they felt yesterday, or at least have forgotten enough to ensure they don't examine new information.
The Memory Hole is doing excellent work and asking the best intellectual questions on this troubling issue.
I don't know what the full story is but there's something not right about Sandy Hook and the coincidence theorists can scream and shout and throw tantrums in the mainstream media but the alternative media researchers are standing firm. If you don't have time to conduct an open minded investigation that's understandable but to quote Wittgenstein- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must pass over in silence".
Our lie is not talking about 9/11, WMD's, Syria, Sandy Hook and the list goes on and on and on. Lance was telling us the truth. He was telling us we're all liars.
Just for asking questions about the very incoherent Sandy Hook massacre (which did take place but not as we've been told) I stand accused of being a filthy truther. Seeking fidelity in narratives is now looked down on. What does that say about the rest of modern cultural foundations?
No greater upside down, topsy turvy indictment of 21st century mendacity living can be manifested then the calumny that is now attached to seeking the truth and being called a truther.
Listen to this extraordinary show by Robert Phoenix. It's brilliant.
Naomi Wolf is taking a great risk here as It's inconceivable to consumers that large scale events like Boston Bamboozle and Sandy Hoax are synthetic, with Government/State collaboration and considerable use of well remunerated crisis actors.
However for those with their critical thinking still intact try to find a Sandy Hook pupil photo from between Jan 1 to Dec 1 2012 (it was already shut down) and watch the Boston Bombing with someone who knows the difference between a smoke bomb and a real one (Hint the real one works like the second photo below unlike the crisis actor currently creaming it with lucrative Hollywood style books and celebrity appearances (only days after losing his legs) in the first picture here.
Unfortunately the original good sound quality Operation Gladio documentary I posted has been pulled from Youtube but lately since Sandy Hook, people all over the world are starting to talk about it once again and rightly so.
NATO with the CIA conspired to and actually killed innocent Europeans to destablize society against the proven non threat of Communism.
Democide is the malignant tumour in society we must rid ourselves of. Remove military industrial complex democide and the Sandy Hooks, Columbine and Aurora shootings will vanish.
Don't believe me? Watch the above and listen to James Corbett's latest podcast on Operation Gladio over here, and then do your own research. There is no substitute for finding out something new yourself.
By the time the kid comes out of Boston FBI he's going to be clockworked oranged. A complete daze. Standard patsy procedure folks.
— Charles Edward Frith (@charlesfrith) April 20, 2013
It's not because I'm a prophet or anything. I just know the FBI are corrupt. I know it's a false flag bombing to strip civil liberties and profit from an enlarged security state apparatus and a lucid patsy witness is the last thing you need. That's why Jack Ruby had to wipe out Lee Harvey Oswald. Did you know Jack had MKULTRA mind control links? The rabbit hole is so deep.
Adam Lanza of Sandy Hook and James Holmes of Aurora movie theatre shooting, were also patsies but that was all about fertilizing demand for gun control.
Why are these teens, whose parents were supposedly just killed by Hamas, unsuccessfully attempting to hold back laughter in these mainstream media "news" reports? pic.twitter.com/JGZTJk0vu9
A hybrid event will include real murders and real bereavement, but it will also include actors, pretending to be grieving or dead. It's been documented many times and the most famous example (among researchers) of Dupers Delight is Robbie Parker at Sandy Hook. They know in advance that they don't need an Oscar performance as most people aren't devious like they are, and will post rationalise any signs of synthetic grieving.
So they smile at how easy it is to con you. All of the supporting evidence videos for this topic have been scrubbed from the net. Probably the single most censored subject as people will lose their minds if they learned all their shock and sadness for the deaths of children was a Larp.
We learned from Robbie Parker at Sandy Hook in 2012, that it doesn't matter how hard a crisis actor laughs; hypnotised TV consumers will justify it as grief.
Piers plays part of the double-act here by pretending to take his emotions seriously when it's plain to see the Health Secretary Matt Hancock, is creased-up laughing at the notion of the second person to receive the Pfizer vaccine, William Shakespeare.
I've no problem in admitting mistakes because I don't have the military industrial complex or government handcuffs to sit Dick Cheney in a room and pull his pacemaker our with pliers till he speaks.
I have to rely on the best information I can get my hands on at the time.
I've no real interest in the World Trade Centre towers military grade demolition on 9/11, because it's the million or so Iraqis and Afghanis that are the victims, not the Israelis, British, French or Americans who actually orchestrated most of it. You know. The perpetrators.
However, I hope you were watching your freedoms get pick-pocketed by the war entertainment complex since then.
Here's Butler Shaffer's views on the matter. It's erudite thinking and you really must read it to appreciate a mind ahead of its time.
If I were to offer a seminar on the nature of war, I believe that the first class session would include a showing of the film Wag the Dog. Those who wish to justify the obliteration of hundreds of thousands of total strangers in the name of "good" versus "evil," or "national honour," will likely find the movie discomforting. As the governments of India and Pakistan self-righteously, and in the name of "God," threaten one another with a nuclear war that could instantly kill anywhere from ten to twenty million people, it is time for decent, intelligent people to put down their flags and begin to see war for what the late General Smedley Butler rightly termed it: "a racket." This film offers a quick reality fix.
Randolph Bourne's observation "war is the health of the state" is familiar to most critics of militarism, but few have delved into why this is so. Statism is dependent upon mass thinking which, in turn, is essential to the creation of a collective, herd-oriented society. Such pack-like behaviour is reflected in the intellectual and spiritual passivity of people whose mindsets are wrapped up more in images and appearances than in concrete reality.
Such a collapse of the mind produces a society dominated by entertainment — which places little burden on thinking — rather than critical inquiry, which helps to explain why there has long been a symbiotic relationship between the entertainment industry and political systems. Entertainment fosters a passive consciousness, a willingness to "suspend our disbelief." Its purpose is to generate amusement, a word that is synonymous with "diversion," meaning "to distract the attention of." The common reference to movies as a form of "escape" from reality, reflects this function. Government officials know what every magician knows, namely, that to carry out their illusions, they must divert the audience's attention from their hidden purposes.
Michel Foucault has shown how the state's efforts to regulate sexual behaviour — whether through repressive or "liberating" legislation — serves as such a distraction, making it easier for the state to extend its control over our lives. It is instructive that, in the months preceding the World Trade Centre attacks which, in turn, ushered in the greatest expansion of police powers in America since the Civil War, the news stories that dominated the media had to do with allegations of adulterous affairs by a sitting president and a congressman. It is not coincidence that both the entertainment industry and the government school systems have helped to foster preoccupations with sex.
The authority of the state is grounded in consensus-based definitions of reality, whose content the state insists on controlling. This is why so-called "public opinion polls," rather than factual analysis and reason, have become the modern epistemological standard, and why imagery — which the entertainment industry helps to foster — now takes priority over the substance of things.
Politics and entertainment each feed upon — and help to foster — public appetites for illusions and fantastic thinking. The success of such undertakings, in turn, depends upon unfocused and enervated minds, which helps to explain why motion picture and television performers, popular musicians, and athletes — whose efforts require little participation on the part of the viewer — have become the dominant voices in our politicized culture. It also helps to account for the attraction of so many entertainers throughout the world to visionary schemes such as state socialism, as well as the increasing significance of entertainment industry gossip and box-office revenues as major news stories.
The entertainment industry helps shape the content of our consciousness by generating institutionally desired moods, fears, and reactions, a role played throughout human history. Ancient Greek history is tied up in myths, fables, and other fictions, passed on by the entertainers of their day, the minstrels. We need to ask ourselves about the extent to which our understanding of American history and other human behaviour has been fashioned by motion pictures, novels, and television drama. Through carefully scripted fictions and fantasies, others direct our experiences, channel our emotions, and shape our views of reality. The fantasies depicted are more often of conflict, not cooperation; of violence, not peace; of death, not the importance of life.
Nowhere is the interdependency of the political and entertainment worlds better demonstrated than in the war system, which speaks of "theatres" of operation, "acts" of war with battle "scenes," "staging" areas, and "dress rehearsals" for invasions. The pomp and circumstance of war is reflected in military uniforms that mimic stage costumes, all to the accompaniment of martial music that rivals grand opera. A Broadway play can become either a "bomb" or a "hit;" troops are "billeted" (a word derived from the French meaning of a "ticket"); while the premier of a movie is often accompanied, like a World War II bombing raid, by searchlights that scan the skies. Even the Cold War was framed by an "iron curtain." Is it only coincidence, devoid of any symbolic meaning, that at the end of the American Civil War - one of the bloodiest wars in human history - its chief protagonist was shot while attending the theatre, and that his killer was an actor who, upon completing his deed, descended to the stage and exited?
Adolf Hitler understood, quite well, the interplay between political power and theatre, a truth that continues to reveal itself in entertainers involving themselves so heavily in political campaigns, some even managing to get themselves elected to Congress or the presidency! Nor was it surprising that one of the first acts of the Bush Administration, following the announced "War on Terrorism," was to send a group of presidential advisers to Hollywood to enlist the entertainment industry's efforts to portray the war as desired by Washington! As with earlier wars, the "military/entertainment complex" will continue to write the scripts and define the characters that are required to assure the support of passive minds in the conduct of war.
Furthermore, because entertainment is often conducted in crowded settings (e.g., theatres, stadiums, auditoriums) there is a dynamic conducive to the generation of mass-mindedness. One need only recall the powerful harangues of Adolf Hitler that coalesced tens of thousands of individuals into a controllable mob, to understand the symbiotic relationship between entertainment and politics.
Entertainment is a part of what we call "recreation," which means to "re-create," in this case to give interpretations to events that are most favorable to one's national identity and critical of an opponent. In this connection, entertainers help to manipulate the "dark side" of our being which, once mobilized, can help to generate the most destructive and inhumane consequences. World War II movies portrayed Japanese kamikaze pilots who crashed their planes into Navy ships as "crazed zealots," while American pilots who did the same thing to Japanese ships or trains were represented as "heroes" willing to die to save their comrades. German and Japanese soldiers were presented as sneering sadists who delighted in the torture of the innocents, while the American soldiers only wanted to get the war over with so they could get back home to mom and her apple pie! How many of us, today, think of 19th century U.S. cavalrymen — as portrayed by the likes of John Wayne and Randolph Scott — as brave soldiers, while Indian warriors were "savages" for having forcibly resisted their own annihilation?
All of this leads me to ask whether the entertainment industry is an extension of the war system, or whether war is simply an extension of our need for entertainment? What should be clear to us is that entertainment is one of the principal means by which our thinking can be taken over and directed by others once we have chosen to make our minds passive, which we do when we are asked — whether by actors or politicians — to suspend our judgement about the reality of events we are witnessing. When we are content to be amused (i.e. to have our attention diverted from reality to fantasy), and to have our emotions exploited by those skilled in triggering unconscious forces, we set ourselves up to be manipulated by those producing the show.
Politics differs from traditional theatre in one important respect, however: in the political arena, we do not call for the "author" at the end of a war! Most of us prefernotto know, for to discover the identities of those who have scripted such events might call into question our own gullibility
There's some discussion in deep state research circles about how blind to this information the consumer classes are. There was a time when we could have understood why people refused to question 9/11 or Sandy Hook. However, now it's in your face and impossible to explain.
There's now quite a lot of speculation as to what kind of programming is going on inside consumer's heads? Is it fear, endocrine disruptors, Tell Lie Vision Programming, GMO foods? Whatever it is, it's a freak show to observe.
There's no explanation for it. A willful inability to explore basic checkable facts such as Richard Guthyahr's close association with the Israeli deep state through his wife and his presence at the last two socially engineered 'terrorist' dramas.
I'm not saying people didn't die but I don't care any more. There's too many calling cards at each of these events. Call it what you will. There's an element of False Flag action and no mistake.
CNN who organised a town hall gun control meeting to exploit the tragedy are in full panic control and it is for this reason that CNN propagandist Jake Tapper who makes 40,000 US Dollars a day tears into Sherrif Israel.
This interview made me feel sick to my stomach.
We know what happened at Sandy Hook but this time the media are obliged to ask tough questions that Sheriff Israel can only dissemble, lie and obfuscate on.
Israel replied to the CNN host in this interview, “Jake, I can only take responsibility for what I knew about. I exercised my due diligence. I’ve given amazing leadership to this agency.” When asked by Tapper if he knew the reason why the armed guard stayed outside instead of trying to save children who were 'bleeding out', Israel replies "I didn't ask". Let that sink in.
