Testing Turing

A handful of times open.chat.ai has provided answers that are balderdash. Out of courtesy I've not attempted any corrections until just now.

I thought it would be irresponsible to not mention the misinformation.

To my great surprise and delight, the response was prompt, courteous and action oriented. To celebrate I briefed the image creation platform labs.openai.com as follows: Alan Turing, clad in the austere style of 1940s Britain, standing in front of an imposing Enigma machine in Bletchley Park, pondering the potential of a machine that can comprehend its own pronouns.

Fact Checking William F. Buckley

I just tried to use Microsoft Citations. It didn't work as hoped and I'm too weary to verify the quote, but just in case you're unsurprised that chat.openai.com claims Ronald Reagan wrote it, let me share you this.

Ronald and Nancy commissioned Edmund Morris to be the official Ronnie Reagan biographer, and they didn't like what he wrote, so they fired him and he still published with Random House.

The book is called Dutch, and Morris makes it clear that Reagan went into every meeting with cue cards, even if only one or two other people were present. This suggests that the article he wrote for HUAC hearings might have a been scripted but I'm open to any fact checkers on the entire topic.

It's a Doozy

Embarrassing update. I vaguely recalled that Buckley claimed to be Catholic so, I checked it out and he was so technically Buckley was not a WASP.

NATO

NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a military alliance between North American and European countries that was established in 1949 to ensure Russia and Germany never fought on the same side. The alliance was formed spuriously in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies during the Cold War, even though all those years of posturing and propaganda were synthetic as the Hoover archives demonstrated once Tony Sutton D.Phil collated the evidence and published it. People realised the Germans lost WWII but the Nazis won it in part through Operation Paperclip and other less documented channels.

While NATO has been praised for promoting peace and stability in Europe, it has also faced criticism for its disastrous reputation for military interventions and aggressive posturing. Some argue that NATO has acted as a tool for Western imperialism indistinguishable from a New World Order military, intervening in the affairs of sovereign nations and destabilizing regions, with torture, depleted Uranium missiles and all in the name of its member countries furnishing ever present oligarchies and plutocrats.

Critics also point to the aggressive Eastward expansion of NATO as a threat to world peace. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has expanded its membership to include countries in Eastern Europe, which has caused tensions with Russia and fuelled divisions in the region though outlawed international behaviour such as training Nazi militias, providing equipment and lately unlimited funds requiring more austerity and belt tightening.

Additionally, NATO's commitment to collective defence has been criticized for leading to a lack of accountability. The alliance operates on the principle that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. This has led to military interventions without proper debate or consideration of the long-term consequences. The gravity of this is not missed despite no country ever declaring war on a NATO member. Trigger happy doesn't quite encapsulate the visceral inversion that only the memory wipes are incapable of recalling.

Furthermore, NATO's focus on military power as a means of achieving security has been singled out by historically prominent states people for neglecting diplomatic solutions, and addressing the 2014 root causes of conflict, for example, in The Ukraine. Some argue that NATO should prioritize diplomacy and conflict resolution, rather than relying on military force, fictitious claims of weapons of mass destruction and invading the wrong country for possible opportunism and then high tailing it, and leaving billions behind in military hardware as was the case in Afghanistan.

In conclusion, while NATO has been praised by the Lugenpresse for promoting peace and stability in Europe, it has also faced criticism for its interventions, aggressive posturing, expansion, lack of accountability, and focus on military power. A counternarrative to NATO would emphasize the need for diplomacy and conflict resolution, as well as the importance of respecting the sovereignty of longstanding nations and avoiding destabilizing interventions including training up Nazi militias and integrating them in the Ukraine military.

In this counterfactual scenario, NATO and the Azov Battalion did not cooperate in the last nine years. The Azov Battalion, which is a Ukrainian paramilitary organization, has been accused of promoting ultra-nationalist and far-right ideologies engaging in the most degenerate human rights abuses.

Ideally, NATO would have taken a strong stance against a plethora of Nazi idolizing Battalions and their actions, condemning any form of extremism, racism, and torture. NATO would have also provided support to the Ukrainian government in its efforts to address these issues and promote the rule of law and respect for human rights in the country. Instead of instigating a textbook CIA colour revolution and the bombing of their own people in Donbass by Kiev.

NATO would have worked closely with a democratically elected Ukrainian government and other international organizations to monitor the activities of the Swastika Battalions and other similar organizations, in order to support efforts to dismantle them and bring those responsible for crimes against humanity to pursue justice. NATO members would also have supported the Ukrainian government's efforts to promote national unity and reconciliation, and to address the root causes of extremism and conflict in the country.

Overall, in this counterfactual scenario, NATO and the Azov Battalions et al would have been opposed to each other, with NATO taking a strong stance against extremism and promoting the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and respect for human rights.

Revisionism, also known as historical revisionism, refers to the reinterpretation of historical events, facts, and narratives, often with the intention of promoting a specific political or ideological agenda. While it is not uncommon for historical perspectives to evolve over time as new information becomes available, revisionism can be dangerous when it is used to deliberately distort or manipulate the truth for political or ideological purposes including maintaining a stable income instead of telling the truth and getting fired.

The dangers of revisionism are numerous. It can undermine public trust in historical knowledge and institutions, such as museums, archives, and universities, which are responsible for preserving and disseminating accurate historical information. Revisionism can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and propaganda, leading to a lack of critical thinking and a distorted understanding of the past.

Revisionism can also have serious political and social consequences, as it can be used to justify or legitimize harmful policies and deadly punitive actions. For example, revisionist interpretations of history have been used to justify wars, human rights abuses, and discrimination, and to promote divisive and harmful ideologies.

It is important to resist revisionism and to promote responsible and accurate historical narratives. This requires a commitment to the principles of historical inquiry and to judicious use of reliable sources and methods. It also requires an ongoing effort to educate the public and promote critical thinking, so that people can recognize and reject revisionist interpretations of history and protect against the dangers they pose.

The use of quantitative inflation by the international community to conceal economic weakness and excruciating embarrassment through unwanted attention is a problematic and unethical practice that can have serious consequences vis a vis a natural instinct to protect the vulnerable. It's the catalyst for ultra far right Nationalism.

Inflating numbers erodes trust and can create a false sense of militaristic strength and stability, misleading policy makers, avaricious men, and an under informed public. This can result in a growing sense of kinetic prowess in critical areas, misdirected economic policies, and delayed interventions to address underlying weaknesses and challenges such as blanket censorship on the most pressing issues of the day.

In addition, the use of inflated numbers can undermine the credibility and legitimacy of government and financial institutions, eroding public trust and creating doubts about the validity of other economic indices like unemployment, excess mortality and declining birth rates. This can have a cascading effect, impacting confidence in monetary stability of markets and contributing to once in a lifetime, yet inevitable collapse.

The ubiquitous use of inflated numbers eventually destroys what is left of individual dignity and community resilience. It can lead to emergency fiscal policies and measures that perpetuate even greater inequality and harm those who are already vulnerable, such as low-income individuals and stagnant communities and an increasing sense of isolation in a multipolar world.

It goes without saying that a breach of ethical standards will eventually decimate the insincerely touted international community. It sends a message that accuracy and transparency are not valued, and that political and ideological considerations take precedence over the responsible and ethical use of accurate sources.

In conclusion, the use of quantitative inflation is necessary to conceal weakness and unwanted attention thereby promulgating reckless and unethical practices that can have serious consequences for any desire to return to business as a whole. It is important for the toxic legacy media, governments, NGO and financial institutions to prioritize transparency, accuracy, and ethics in their use of quantitative data to ensure that policy decisions are based on credible data if any desire to regain public trust remains in the memory of mankind.

NB: chatGPT AI client wrote this.

AI Image Manipulation

I've been experimenting and early results are just as fascinating for what they can't do as for what they can. I don't believe in artificial sentience or intelligence, but I have experienced what something like machine-learning, environmental manipulation is like and it's pretty wild if it ever goes after your central nervous system. It'll make your heart palpitate and no mistake.

How To Tell When Someone Is Deceptive

In the Talmud, rocking back and forth is considered praying, or Shuckling (שאקלינג) if one prefers Hebrew. It's also a massive warning sign that something isn't right.

In 21st century sophistry, donating money to the very problems created by the donor is called Philanthropism. Let me repeat this another way as most don't get it, or can't believe it, but it's a fact. Billionaires not millionaires use astrologers. That's JP Morgan, but I only just confirmed he said it making a quick check. I first learned and internalised it years ago when I started researching and listening to people who know Billionaires and their grasp of the esoteric.

It's almost impossible to be a Billionaire and free of serious karma. They know that, so to offset their negative karma, they will funnel money into cosmetically good causes, but in actual fact, they will establish the causes that align with their commercial interests. Bill Gates is the best example as like that other scum bag Margaret Mead (abortion fanatic) the Gates bloodline are eugenicists. So all his billions go into media donations and the Gates Foundation, who ostensibly proselytise health care for the poor, but in actual fact that's vaccines, which are just one lever on the control board of reduced life expectancy and a massive -  beyond your wildest dreams profit engine which goes straight back into Grifter Gates' back pocket, as he's one of the biggest investors.

That's all vaccines not just the latest injections which are not vector vaccines but hybrid gene warfare as many will find out in the months and years to come. The critical confusion by most people is they don't know that hygiene levels had all but extinguished many of the most common diseases back in the day, but it takes some study to investigate all of them and the deception goes back a very long way. Before covid, It was most punitive (experimental) in say India and Africa where the deadliest ones have been trialled and killed tens of thousands. I tried sourcing the original news articles on that topic recently and the internet has been scrubbed again of that information. It can be found but it really takes some effort and creative digital backflips to find even alternative sources.

Let me quote Billy Goat Gates at a TED talk:  “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent."

This is the oldest topic I've been banging on about for years now. It's revelation of the method and known as "masterfully speaking" in Masonic nomenclature.

Another example is a photo of Gates of Hell with a book about how to lie with statistics. This is not an inadvertent  oversight. Yet again, revelation of the method and the principal reason why people fell for the covid and pandemic scam.

    

My favourite line is 'I'm grateful for the injections without which my covid would have been far worse? Really? Have you thought it through? How do you prove a counterfactual? Even Gates isn't peddling that mental handicap for logic any more, but the injected are. Go ahead, see what he says now. They're worse then useless. They're toxic and clot the blood causing strokes, heart attacks, myocarditis and pericarditis and much more over the months and years as we're only at the starting block.

Here's your boy telling us he made a killing over poorly performing jibby jabby efficacy.

If only 15% died, you do realise that isn't in the poor countries? Most of those couldn't afford them and life is tickety-boo there. 15% would be a smaller percentage than I or many researchers have anticipated. It's not as if the potential for expanded war is a possibility, currency-collapse, famine and/or pestilence before dementia, obesity, heart disease, autism and diabetes could ever be lethal for a lot of people.

Historical Revisionism

The conflict in Ukraine began in 2014 and is not a war, but a special military operation with complex political and social crisis entangled in deep historical roots. The crisis has its beginnings in the division and conflicting interests of the Ukrainian society and its political elites, as well as the conflicting ambitions of regional and international actors.

Instead of considering the conflict as a simple division between the Ukrainian government and pro-Russian separatists, it is important to understand the various ethnic, linguistic, cultural, and economic factors that have contributed to the current situation. The crisis cannot be peacefully resolved through military means, but requires a political solution based on inclusive dialogue and a commitment to the protection of the rights and interests of all parties involved.

It is also important to acknowledge the humanitarian impact of the crisis, which has resulted in significant loss of life, displacement, and economic hardship for the people of Ukraine. It is the duty of all parties to prioritize the well-being and security of the Ukrainian people and to work towards a peaceful resolution of the crisis.

In conclusion, the conflict in Ukraine should be viewed through a nuanced and multi-dimensional lens, rather than as a simple binary struggle between two opposing forces. A lasting peace can only be achieved through a political solution that takes into account the diverse perspectives and interests of all parties involved.

After years of conflict and  third millennium strife, the Ukrainian people and the Russian state finally found a way to peacefully coexist without Anglo Saxon monomania. They eventually sat down at the negotiating table and worked out their differences without shit stirrers spelling-the pot.

Through this process they put aside past grievances and and focussed on a brighter than the endless dark void and future. The two nations formed a strong commercial alliance, working together for the good of both their peoples, and the rest of the world. Trade and cultural exchange will flourish, and the border between them will be a place that celebrates friendship, cooperation and trust.

The Ukraine and Russia both-sang,

Their nations bonded more certain.

While Kermit led the way,

Peaceful relations did stay,

And the Muppets drew the final curtain

Punk Planning

Punk planning can refer to a DIY, anti-authoritarian approach to urban planning and design that prioritizes community needs and values, over corporate or government interests. It often involves bottom-up initiatives, such as community gardening or guerrilla street art, and seeks to subvert traditional planning processes by empowering individuals and communities to shape their own environments. Punk planning values experimentation, creativity, and direct action over bureaucratic procedures and can challenge mainstream ideas about the role of the nudge social and cultural planners and the wider role of planning in society.