The Finest Drugs & Arms Dealer Of The 20th Century [Part Two]

Pete Brewton's book ties the Bush dynasty into the Savings & Loans scandal. In short Bush knew the banks were lending easily and encouraged his crooked friends to borrow millions and walk away. It is my view that if we forget for a moment the misery and suffering of millions around the world who were on the end of CIA arms-for-drugs gun barrels it's evident to me that George Bush senior is the most qualified criminal I can think of. He pissed over them all. From the Medellin Cartel to Manuel Noriega. 

They weren't in his class for criminal big thinking. It literally takes weeks and months to piece together the scale of corruption.

The Finest Drugs & Arms Dealer of the 20th Century [Part One]

It's quite tedious trawling through the trash videos of Youtube researching the Bush families drug and arms dealing (while in office too) but this latest is exceptional and corroborates a lot of the information that Russ Baker has separately concluded in Family of Secrets. 

I'd never heard of Emile de Antonio before but he's a heavyweight and in this TV series which I've forgotten the name of. I must name check the interviewers at some point for their incredible contribution to exposing the unreported story of the United States. It's clear that Iran Contra was not about the hostages but simply a sideline business that was being conducted long before the Iranians (conveniently) took the hostages through operations such as the Bush run Black Eagles.

When the history of the 20th century is rearranged to look loosely like how it actually happened, George Bush senior will be recognised for what he is. One of the finest criminal minds and the greatest deceivers we have ever known. I was coming to this conclusion when I watched his video denial testimony of the Iran Contra scandal below. There's no question of George Bush seniors criminal calibre. See for yourself. No one comes close.

Kubrick's Odyssey - Secrets Hidden In The Films Of Stanley Kubrick

If there's one reason for watching Jay Weidner's documentary above it's for the explanation of front screen projection used in the Apollo missions staged photography. You can also see it clearly in the photo above along with a typical studio light stand from the period, being used on a set that it's very likely Stanley Kubrick directed. The basis for this claim is also explained in the documentary. 

To this day NASA refuse to take colour photographs of the moon or point a telescope at the Apollo landing positions and show us sceptics the evidence of the landings such as moon buggy and so forth. It's been over 40 years and nobody has ever gone back either. A good thing to do if you don't want people asking awkward questions.