Donnie Darko - The Manipulated Living Will Do Anything To Save Themselves From Oblivion

When Donnie Darko (The Directors Cut) was re-released, the slightly Arabic looking font was removed for the usual brainwashing and paranoid issues that the US command and control corporate media have when a piece of art about a plane part hitting a building jangles the post 9/11 nerves. 

At least in Soviet Russia and The Peoples Republic of China the educated knew they were being lied to but most Americans are still in the dark about how manipulated they are. That is changing though.

Donnie Darko is one of my top movies ever. There's so much synchromysticism in it that I found myself moved twice as much as the first time I watched the movie, and still there's much room for digging deeper into it. There's no need to go on at length about the eerie synchronicity I experienced last night as much of it is personal but it resonated heavily and struck a even deeper contextual chord for the times we are living in. 

One hard to ignore example though was the Patrick Swayze character of Jim Cunningham with his creepy influence in school education. Cunningham is subsequently exposed for being a child pornography user which I saw as an analog for the recent Jerry Sandusky football coach abusing students at Penn State University and which for me isn't a scandal but merely business as usual for powerful and influential people in society as I've written about here here and here.

Donnie Darko is the kind of film that triggers future memories and past futures. You can look at a couple of examples over here and here but I think you should bring your own experiences to the film and see what I'm trying to adumbrate. It's a personal experience. 

There's also an interesting and immersive website over here.

Have You Seen The Documentary Thrive?

I would say it's a game changer in much the same way that Loose Change or Zeitgeist were.  As Wittgenstein once said. "It's true enough".

Dr Judy Woods - Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions on 9/11

Last night I met an American TV producer for Discovery Channel filming here in Thailand. When I mentioned 9/11 was an inside job he more or less warned me off from pursuing the subject.

That's a man who makes his living by celebrating the value of human inquiry.

Such is the threat to reality imposed by the mind control of this event, he tried to censor my opinion when by rights I should have pistol whipped him for fraudulent misrepresentation. Undeterred I put him in his place by asking in an incredulous manner if  he believed the 9/11 commission report. "No" was the answer (they always do) and so I pressed on, diplomatically framing things, just in case a word or a fact might help him out of his mental sickness. Finally I asked him how many buildings crumbled away on 9/11 and he got the number wrong by three. That's three buildings he didn't have a clue about and yet his reality tried to stifle mine. Changing the subject I learned he likes the same radio show I do and it made me sad that he had been given every opportunity in life to be a guardian of truth. As I walked away I held up the number of fingers to describe how many buildings were turned to dust on 9/11. I wont repeat it here.

Halfway through this British interview about 9/11 posted above, an SMS is sent describing Dr. Judy Wood as bonkers. She responds that nobody attacks her evidence but instead rely on insults. 

Twenty minutes later the person responsible contacts the show to say he was wrong and that Dr. Judy Wood's explanation for the 'dustification' of the World Trade Centre is the strongest explanation yet. My favourite part is when she explains that the best evidence for electro-gravitic nuclear reaction science is the missing World Trade Centre.

Think about that.

Dr. Judy Wood is the only investigator to have had the arrogance to attend the scene of the crime to determine what happened. 

It is my belief that a number of methods may have taken place that day to create confusion. The least plausible method of destruction is aviation fuel melting a few miles of steel girders. That's just insane.

Update: It was brought to my attention that the link in the visual to architects and engineers for truth is run by Dr Richard Gage who is discredited as not giving Dr Judy Wood's explanation the attention it deserves. A much better link would be to Dr. Judy Wood's book over here.