I generally have to sit through around five depth interviews to secure one good testimony. The reasons I reject the others are quite harsh. The respondent might be ego-driven, incoherent, looking to make a name or a profit for themselves, or just attention seeking.
All of these characteristics are associated with deep state disinformation characters too so that makes it easier to spot those respondents who quietly and powerfully lay out their testimony in a compelling and robust manner much as if a top advertising agency were pitching for an premium butter account with a solid reasoning for believing them.
This testimony falls under that category.
This testimony falls under that category.
