Fear of dying is a long term Roman Catholic mind control technique that pervades the pseudo Christian world to turn us into materialist 'he who dies with the most toys' is the winner robots. This is retarded and so if facing and fearing death, the Dimethyltryptamine in magic mushrooms (Psilocybin) is the best therapy.
Also if suffering post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) commonly known as Ecstasy, is an empathogen–entactogen and that too is the best therapy.
Millions of Palestinians are suffering and being traumatized (right here, right now) in a holocaust by the cowardly and obnoxious Israelis if we bother to look at the Palestinian children shaking uncontrollably on social media videos despite the suppression by Musk and Zuckerberg et al. An empathogen–entactogen doesn't work till the trauma ends as it is a 'POST' traumatic therapy.
The 'Western' Allopathic medicine model is a scam well documented for those who bother to put 'Allopathic + Rockefeller' in a search engine. It's all there.
I mention this because I've requested two doctors at my surgery to spend ten minutes with the 2012 Bioethics Commission material before we have a candid and complex conversation about what to do with any health conditions I have, and both have refused to do so, because they are too frightened to know more about health. I can only conclude they know they're frauds and dishing out vaccines to children and infants with perfect immune systems for money money money. Disgusted with their reluctance to discuss child abuse through the Allopathic medicine model I've decided I'm going to write an affidavit and serve it to them. I did tell one of this intention over the phone. She was too busy refusing to know more about biology information to ask a single question of the multiple duty of care failures I was outlining to her.
These are just facts. Whether they suit us or otherwise.
Last year I listened to a story about the most decorated man in WWII, who went on to star in his own film about his life in the military.
By coincidence the topic emerged again, and then last week I popped in to unsocially-distance a friend, and the movie was just starting on the television of the person who had told me the story in the first place.
We watched it together, and although war is not a genre I particularly care for, or enjoy, I got to the end and by then I was marvelling how this little guy (5 foot 5) went from ceaseless war-front bravery to being good enough to act as himself on the big screen.
Well actually some people know that, but even then, most are completely incapable of processing and synthesising the information into other topics such as the Shoah religion or the genocide of a million plus Germans after the war in real prisoner death camps not the work camps (Arbeitslager) that came complete with swimming pools, brothels, theatres and orchestras, but no indoctrination as we can see in any Hollywood movie or Television production.
All sides of the war would never be able to recruit soldiers if the troops knew what we now know. That's why war on a large scale is a discredited rationale for most young people, and many older ones too.
For some years , despite being a huge critic of the Pentagonal Satanic forces, I know most men sacrificed their lives ignorant of the important information and thus are truly courageous even if their efforts were misdirected.
They couldn't get away with it today, but they certainly have pulled the wool over the sheep's eyes on a Scamdemic that could still get much nastier in the future.
This would discredit those who have all the documentation that it was planned in advance.
It does smell more akin to a bioweapon than just the flu right?
To immerse oneself in the world of targeted individuals and gang stalking is to live in what most people would think is science fiction . I'm here to share with you it's real, documented, vicious and far more nuanced and complex than any single victim can convey. It's happening right now too. For example I learned recently through research and first hand testimony there's a difference between voice to skull (V2S) and synthetic telepathy. I'm reluctant to explain that right now but happy to answer any questions through private messages. About 24-18 months ago in Thailand over a series of Skype calls I realised one of my oldest friends had become a targeted individual. At first I thought it was paranoia on her part, but eventually the tell tale signs and cold hard testimony could no longer be ignored. I couldn't believe an obscure topic I had researched, applied to one of my oldest friends, who was now a victim, and so I suspected that possibly my activism work might be a connection? When I subsequently returned to the UK Zillah told me she came too close to criminal underworld elements through a boyfriend, and so this confirms that the technology has leaked from the intelligence agencies, to corporations to criminal elements as has been documented elsewhere. I still believe she was targeted because of me, as I later learned, I couldn't be targetted in Thailand as I was unknowingly protected by Royalty. I know it's a dubious claim but I have more evidence that I cannot share here without endangering more lives.
Very few people believe in targeted individuals as we're trained to respond that a person is insane or schizophrenic if they start to share their experiences. However I urge you to listen to the Bioethics Commission testimony above that I first mentioned many years ago and now have to revisit because as is self evident, the chairwoman Amy Gutmann did fuck all to stick her neck out for thousands of victims across the USA and now it's spreading globally if it didn't originate in the U.S. You owe it to yourself to do the work above before making snap judgements. The program is so pernicious that when a TI gets on the list it's almost impossible to get off it. Otherwise the perpetrators have to admit their crimes, and the creeps at SIS and CIA (and now the private sector) don't do that. We now have to wait for the justice-technology to catch up with the abusers technology. In the mean time I've learned a lot about techniques to lend succour to those whose lives are a living fucking hell.
Clay Parker Jones brought my attention to this after an impoverished skim the first time it hit my life stream a couple of weeks ago. It made first draft and so I'm finishing it off before it starts to rot in my draft folder although I suspect the high resolution art directed shots like the one above contributed towards its renaissance.
So anyway, I was listening to another McKenna podcast a while back that conveyed some of his anomalous thinking on the big picture stuff that I find refreshing against what I'm labelling random theory; which is the prevailing explanation for anything prior to a low entropic state.
I'm also re-reading Taleb's Black Swan as part of a process of disposing of anything extraneous including books. I may have lost a lot of important stuff last year but I'm focused on not acquiring replacements and furthermore want to go completely minimal. Too much has been lost over the years, and in various countries to take possessions seriously any more, though I notice The KLEIN would be like having a few fingers amputated should that go missing or need to be jettisoned.
This rationalisation process means my wardrobe is a little less hip than when I was carrying the first division threads in a suitcase carrying way too many other important things, but I can't justify not being resourceful, when I have more 2nd Division T Shirts than I could get through in a lifetime. You realise this isn't just aesthetics, though that in itself is a radical departure from my life until now. It's also an alignment with how I want to live the remainder, which offhand can't be that much than four or five hundred months if I take an unhealthy interest in actuarial norms. Which I don't.
Back to McKenna. he was riffing on as he does so well, about nature being in principle a conservative and conserving force, and about how its frugality driven if that makes sense at all within the context of an abundance machine that we plunder without precedence.
There was also something said about nature's answers being fundamentally elegant solutions, and about that being a good indicator of how to think when trying to solve problems usually belonging within the remit of the natural sciences. Which brings me back to the topic of this post.
Skinput strikes me as a great use of existing human biological real estate. I just made that line up but bear with me because I really think Skinput is clever and resourceful. It's low on atoms and somehow for me begins to change the way we think about the stuff we're hell bent on possessing; principally that will be possessions, or am I over egging with alliterations now? Sorry if it's annoying.
Sure we're always going to be attached to social objects and badges of modernity, sentimentality, nostalgia and utility. However, as it becomes increasingly unnecessary (through possession convergence) to require a watch, a notebook, a phone, a portable music device or even spend time teasing apart the UX debate on the demise of QWERTY keyboards as Apple's iPad has instigated, I can see an evolutionary change in our relationship to stuff which changes quite a lot of what we assume our BIOS will be like in the future. I hope it's not the same. I can't see why it would remain the same if I look at other fundamentals that have shifted as culture does.
In any case, there's a video about Skinput that I have embedded here for a lot less atomic space than was possible before the emergence of digital delivery. It's a bit dry but worth a look (Though I'd like it if Youtube allowed users to review videos at a faster speed than is conventional. Double and quadruple. That sort of thing.
Anyway, my only niggle is that the line Skinput have used is:
Appropriating the body as an input surface.
It is that already isn't it?
It's also a genius output surface and a lot lot more.
I guess it's the implied subservience of nature to science that annoys me with their endline. Mainly because I feel that nature is often most fiercely legislated around when it comes to sports of all things. Even the EPA hasn't earned the same gravitas and respect for nature that sports do. Whole forests and canyon, whole elements still in the ground don't get the same reverence for nature that sports does when considering the notion of purity and artificial helpers.
Sad, but over the years, I've never met anyone who supported my view (apart from a sports ethics philosophy professor who I listened to on The Forum) that we should allow sports participants the choice of pharmaceutically enhancing themselves. I think the enhanced Olympics would be more special than the Special Olympics were that to be the case, well it would be ace and well worth watching.
I'm not quite making my point clear. I see glimpses of neurological rewiring from Skinput, in much the same way that Google's anschluss of my neo cortex coupled with stealth tech creep of real simple syndication (RSS) has changed the way I digest data. Not just the way I think but my self awareness (not to be confused with self consciousness as I learned last week)
I like what Google did, no question they raised my IQ if we're flexible about the definition of intelligence, but I had no idea it would or that there's a quid pro quo.
So now's a good time I guess to think Skinput through. Spontaneous prodding is OK on Facebook but I can't imagine I'd like my skin to be less than mine if say a Blackberry Skin were to come on the market.
