The Great Debate - Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson (TPUSA)

Andrew Wilson on behalf of TPUSA paid serious money to debate Candace Owens over whether Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk or was installed as a patsy. What we got was three-plus hours of two people talking past each other in structurally different languages.

Wilson ran the classic inductive package. Surveillance images, DNA/prints, texts, timeline, the whole stack. He treated each piece as mutually reinforcing. The photographs identify Robinson, the physical evidence links him to the rifle, the messages show motive or confession, and the accumulation becomes “overwhelming.” The problem is that he never seriously internalised the possibility that the *entire stack* could be fabricated or curated by a multi-player entity — call it the deep state, the apparatus, whatever label you prefer. Once you grant that possibility, the cumulative effect evaporates. A useless or misidentified photograph does not become stronger because it is placed next to a degraded print and a contested text. It just sits there looking like another planted prop. Wilson kept treating the evidence as if it existed in a clean epistemic vacuum rather than inside a system capable of manufacturing narratives. That is the blind spot he never closed.

Candace, for her part, was stymied by the classic burden of proving a negative. Showing that the state’s identification is shaky, that the timeline is absurd, or that key pieces are degraded is relatively straightforward. Turning those holes into *affirmative proof* that Robinson was deliberately framed as the shooter is a much heavier lift. You cannot simply exhaust every alternative and declare victory. Absence of clean evidence is not the same as evidence of a frame-up. She spent most of the night in the first mode while claiming the second, which left her open to the charge that she was arguing reasonable doubt while advertising “overwhelming evidence of patsy.” That structural gap is real.

And yet the debate was won on a different axis entirely.

Wilson kept calling the case against Robinson overwhelming. When pressed on probability he landed somewhere in the 75–85% range. That is not overwhelming. That is “pretty likely, but I wouldn’t bet the house.” Then Candace asked him to name the actual charges. He could not. The man defending the “overwhelming” state case against Tyler Robinson could not list the seven counts. She rattled them off from memory. Aggravated murder, felony discharge of a weapon, obstruction, witness tampering, violence in the presence of a minor — the full slate. He sat there unable to name one while simultaneously claiming the evidence package was decisive.

That moment was fatal. You cannot credibly police someone else’s theory of the case when you do not even know what the formal accusations are. The combination of inflated language (“overwhelming”), a non-overwhelming probability estimate, and basic ignorance of the charging document collapsed the posture. Candace did not need to prove the deep-state frame-up in that instant. She only needed to show that the man selling certainty had not done the homework.

The rest of the night was secondary. Wilson never absorbed that his inductive chain lives or dies on the assumption that the evidence was not manufactured. Candace never fully escaped the difficulty of proving a negative. But the optics, the preparation gap, and the direct hit on the charges decided it for her.

The Greatest Interview in Recorded History - Candace Owens with Sean Ryan

 

So much winning. The demonic zionists get torched in this extraordinary, nearly 5 hours interview that has ignited the internet (unless you're in a lefty echo chamber safe space). It's also a very personal interview where we learn about the life of the most important voice on the planet.

Dave Smith UNCOVERS the True Story Behind Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Tucker Asks Sam Altman Why He Murdered OpenAI Whistleblower, Suchir Balaji

It's not that Sam Altman is synthetic. It's more remarkable than that. Everything without exception that Samuel communicates is synthetic. Nothing he says is real.

This is the most powerful and unforgettable interviews I've ever listened to, by one of the greatest news professionals of all time. That's how good it is. It's also hilarious in a creepy kind of way but Samuel is directly and indirectly responsible for the murder of his subordinate and OpenAI Whistleblower he claimed to be friends with. Again everything he says is synthetic. Even Musk says Samuel Altman is an oily and dangerous snake and Elons got skills in that department.

Jenny Constantine Interviews Clif High

Clif advised us to get into bitcoin when it was under $20 and wasn't an existential threat to the Federal Reserve. I was running barefoot round Benjakiti Park in Bangkok in those days as I couldn't afford a pair of trainers and was living off vapours. I was happy fit and healthy though so no regrets. I also studied a lot, listening to anyone who was interesting online. I still do.

This interview is a good one. I'm familiar with most of Clif's schtick and I don't agree with everything he says but from time to time he just drops more knowledge demonstrating he really is a 3rd Millennium Renaissance man. Inventor, Thinker, Coder, Linguist and general polymath as well as martial arts.

If you're having trouble sleeping, Cliff developed an all natural sleep aid called Pure Sleep, because the body only puts on mass during sleep and he was about 60 Kilos after a stomach tumour was removed. Demand for Pure Sleep has sometimes outstripped supply with very positive reviews. There's no melatonin or hangover effect but the reason I know it's good is how he was transformed by his own product. The first image was about 2016 and the next is relatively recent. Give it a try if you're struggling. 

Melvyn Bragg Interviews Gore Vidal - Southbank Show - 2008

It's a wonderful conversation although for me, there are two exceptional moments in this 2008 Southbank production. Baron Bragg says he saw the US President was in Africa on TV that morning but Gore Vidal interrupts his story.

'How can they tell?'

Lord Melvyn Bragg tries not to laugh louder and it's worth paying attention.

I'll come back to the second moment a little later.

As a little Torquemada?

— LAsky (@LAsky66) September 6, 2023

Took ages to find out the word I couldn't understand. I find listening very difficult in any language and generally respond to body language more than words. That's why podcasts are the best way of learning for me. Nothing to distract my eyes. In any case Gore Vidal is referring to Torquemada. A name I've never heard before.

What's striking is the comparison with Bobby Kennedy and saying it on camera. This is why Gore Vidal was a Greek among Romans. He said what he thought even if it took its toll, as he did with the Salzburgers who own the New York Times, now even worse and inarguably a propaganda rag. GV was an insider and knew the Kennedys so it's an exceptional piece of intel as we're now presented with RFK Jr who has done an excellent job on the Covid scamdemic only to declare his unfailing support for Zionism despite Ben Gurion's role as the highest authority (he reported to the next level up) for initiating JFK's and by extension RFK's assassination. To understand all that do a search on JFK + PERMINDEX then look at the correspondence between JFK and Ben Gurion on Dimona. JFK was adamant that Israel would have no nukes and that decision cost him his life.

Don't get me wrong. JFK upset everyone you could imagine (CIA, DoD and the FED etc) but the one thing nobody discusses is that he was bloodline and he chose to make the speech that went too far at the Waldorf Astoria which is Astor bloodline. They had to take him. He was doing everything he could to expose them. 

Another gem that I picked up from Gore is that his blind Senator grandfather was 33 Degree Mason and that it's common in bloodline families for one child to be clued up and another to have no idea. They are 5th Dan black belts in secrecy and most people haven't a clue.

I'm going to use this space to share a little more of what this video confirmed for me but only those who bother to check back on this post will know. I have no intention of embarrassing anyone, but the above video confirms my hypothesis and that's a confirmation that is mostly for my indulgence. I hope the future looks upon In Our Time as a very classy effort at asking difficult questions to answer about their lies. 

The credit goes to the man in the arena.

Kanye West

Kanye name dropping Edward Bernays and a lot lot more.

Probably the most important artist since Ian Curtis IMO at this point in time.

I can't believe I typed that but inspiration, is seldom the real thing.

I listened for about the 4th time during the night and wondered if I'd find the talk about Jesus a bit uphill, but in fact, it's a very relaxing interview and many of the comments echo that.

Kanye, has the best laugh I've heard in ages. I didn't know the old Kanye, but I like the new one.

RABBLE ROUSING WITH CHARLES FRITH

Here's an interview I did for Truth frequency radio.

Robert Stanley Interviews Me

Billy Wilder Interview

Both the style of interview and the subject matter are captured in a manner that is rarely achieved these days. It's relaxing, informative and charming. 

Billy Wilder of course directed Double Indemnity.

Financial Vipers of Venice

Consumers don't have time to study the history that supports the evidence for a global financial conspiracy stretching back thousands of years. 

So please only share this with woke people.

Seriously though it's a cracker and George Ann Huges is much missed for her extraordinary interviews with Joseph P Farrell. Lot's of laughs and oodles of information.

Russell Brand at the Cambridge Union

How I imagine Oscar Wilde might have sounded.

FOX News Interviews Bashar Al Assad

ggaddhahdh

Dennis Kucinich interviews Bashar al-Assad for FOX News with some other dude who has been drinking the corporate media Kool Aid. 

It's a great interview and you should watch it to make your own mind up.

FOX is owned by Murdoch who is developing oil interests with the Rothschilds on the Syrian Golan heights during the conflict. We know the Rockefeller faction are cooling on the Zionists because Brzezinski and Scowcroft have been against going to war while Kissinger has been pulling the strings for it to be dragged out and bleeding Syria to death. This suggests to me that Kissinger baled out on the Rockefeller faction to the Rothschilds (quite some time ago) and Murdoch is playing the two off against each other and cutting a deal in between. 

If it means less dead civilians I can live with that. We can deal with theft later.

If anyone else has a different analysis I'm all ears. I am aware the two factions have a modest mutual partnership but that seems to be a precursor to a potential takeover and not proof of its existence today. 

These people think long term and I've not included others like the Warburgs in this analysis. Upate: Original video no longer exists but a better one allows us to find out what we think of Bashar al Assad.

Anarchism For Relief of 1% Constipation

I don't consider myself any particular ideology though I don't mind choosing good ideas. In principle the dynamics of anarchism are much more in harmony with human nature than neoliberal capitalism which has to fall one day. That doesn't mean I can't pick and choose ideas from communism or capitalism when they're appropriate and contextually relevant. 

David Graeber from Yale gives a good talk on the subject of anarchism here. Pick and mix people. Create your own reality and chuck out the ideologies. They're too fixed, easy to corrupt and anti human. 

John Judge - Coincidence Theorists & Conspiracy Deniers

A good sense of humour is a rare quality in this field of research and so if you couple that with John Judge's fine mind (and conversational manner) you can learn a lot and open up the brain to different neurons firing on all 8 cylinders. We do share some language points like Coincidence Theorists and Conspiracy Deniers which is fun for me as I can tell he's a kindred language framer from this kind of play with words.

Conversations With John Judge - Part One

Hindsight is a wonderful thing but it does allow me to assess the quality of a man's thinking. Last night I listened to a mid eighties John Judge talk on Iran Contra and time after time after time he was not only way ahead of the pack but bang on the money. 

John Judge's mother worked in the Pentagon for DoD at a very senior level and has a great understanding of how the owners run the United States. I only disagreed with him on two points. My information tells me the 47000 deaths in the Vietnam war was adjusted to fit the projections his mother made. I also think he's inexplicably erroneous on whatever hit the Pentagon on 9/11. It was not a human guided plane. 

Other than that he's a very clever and shrewd observer of how things work.

Like me John thinks political parties have wrecked the democratic process.

Emile Francisco de Antonio

Emile Francisco de Antonio (May 14, 1919 -- December 16, 1989) was an American director and producer of documentary films, usually detailing political or social events circa 1960s--1980s. He has been referred to by scholars and critics alike, and arguably remains, "...the most important political filmmaker in the United States during the Cold War."

Emile is quite buttoned down but at the end of the interview he wells up a bit and tells the interviewers he feels he's among friends. He died a couple of weeks later.

de Antonio was born in 1919 in in the coal-mining town of Scranton, Pennsylvania. His father, Emilio de Antonio, an Italian immigrant, fostered the lifelong interests of Antonio by passing on his own love for philosophy, classical literature, history and the arts. Although his intelligence allowed him the privilege of attended Harvard University alongside future-president John F. Kennedy, he was also familiar with the working class experience, making his living at various points in his life as a peddler, a book editor, and the captain of a river barge (among other duties).

After serving in the military during World War II as a bomber pilot, de Antonio returned to the United States where he frequented the art crowd, often associating with such Pop artists as Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, and Andy Warhol, in whose film Drink de Antonio appears. Warhol was famously quoted praising de Antonio with the words, "Everything I learned about painting, I learned from De."

The book Necessary Illusions (1989) by Noam Chomsky and the documentary Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media (1992) by Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick are dedicated to Emile de Antonio.

Filmography Point of Order (1964) McCarthy: Death of a Witch Hunter (1964) Rush to Judgment (1967) America Is Hard to See (1968) In the Year of the Pig (1968) Charge and Countercharge (1969) Millhouse: A White Comedy (1971) Painters Painting (1972) Underground (1976) In The King of Prussia (1982) Mr. Hoover and I (1989)

Al Frankovich's Heart Attack In George Bush Intercontinental Airport, Texas

Al Frankovich made the Gladio documentary for BBC 2 I posted the other day and I was rewatching this interview with him earlier on his CIA documentary 'On Company Business' when I did a quick search and noticed he died of a heart attack in George Bush Intercontinental Airport of Texas. The irony of this happening to a man whose opening scene in 'On Company Business' is the heart attack gun of the George Bush run CIA revealed at the Church commission is a little too much so I'm posting it while I piece together his body of work. 

The Wikipedia entry for Al has been desecrated if anyone would like to provide information for it please use the comments below and I will rebuild it if I can. He did good work.

Robert Phoenix & I

Robert Phoenix invited me to talk with him on Free Association Radio for half an hour on Monday. That's no reason to give me a wider berth than usual because the quality bit is Robert on his own in the beginning. That's not false modesty either. The guy is a natural at being interesting without trying too hard.

Disappointingly but not entirely unexpectedly I interrupt too much, talk too fast and don't listen very well. Robert compensates for this with a killer basso profondo John B Wells voice impersonation in the beginning. It's word and tonally perfect. He kills a man's entire career shtick in three or four minutes but with a serious comment to make about Coast To Coast integrity.

He also invokes the American female equivalent of "annoyed from Tunbridge Wells" on right wing radio batting for Team Santorum. It's not just funny it's uncomfortable how much sympathy seemingly innocuous people take in the most vicious people professing to be holy men of political calling. 

Political priests are double scum plus for rational humans but for big demographic chunks it's a platinum credit card at a Miami GOP fund raiser for new voting software. It's the plenary dispensation ponzi scheme of medieval Papal scams.

Politicians are with a few rare exceptions self selecting power groomers and fondlers. Choosing sides in politics is a mugs game when they're all so disconnected from ordinary concerns, but like Robert I see what Murdoch's first choice for the GOP is packing under the piety. I don't care who gets in but the humourless self assurance of Rick Santorum screams psychopathy. There are few things on our planet more vicious than doing the Lords work in a Stealth Bomber with a growth market for Drones.

Lisa Harrison Interviews Bill Brockbrader (Woods)

There were so many interruptions in the last interview by Project Camelot that I'm pleased to see a different style of interview take place on this occasion with Lisa Harrison who has never disappointed me yet. I've yet to listen to this interview but feel confident enough to post it based on Lisa's previous work including highly complex stories and individuals such as George Kavassilas.