Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Monday, 8 June 2026

Gabriele D'Annuzio - Poet of Slaughter - Lucy Hughes-Hallet

The Pike: Gabriele d'Annunzio, Poet, Seducer and Preacher of War — A Book That Sticks With You




Lucy Hughes-Hallett’s The Pike was a terrific read. It really immersed me into the complexity of post-WWI peace in a way that will fuel me for many years. The book’s award-winning, cut-up non-linear style worked for the subject. It mirrors d’Annunzio’s own flamboyant, self-mythologizing autobiography and throws you into his world of contradictions without a dull linear plod. Only a minor quibble later.

Italy After Unification: Hunger for Glory

What staggered me most was the lust for conflict among Italy’s elites and officer class in the lead-up to, during and after the Great War. Italy had only recently unified into a kingdom in the 1860s–70s. The drive to restore national honour through acquisition of Italian-speaking enclaves and “lost” historic lands ran deep. Only about 8,000 out of 5.5 million mobilized soldiers actually volunteered. The rest were conscripts. Yet the upper echelons — poets, politicians, aristocrats, and ambitious officers — were often rabid for intervention on the Allied side in 1915, chasing irredentist dreams against Austria-Hungary. The ordinary soldier paid the price: roughly 650,000 Italian dead and 950,000 wounded. Those numbers hit harder after reading this.

Step forward the extraordinary character who embodied and amplified that elite fever: Gabriele d’Annunzio.




The Making of Il Vate

Born in 1863 to a fairly affluent but money-losing family on the Adriatic coast, d’Annunzio was a precocious child. Pampered yet driven, he devoured everything from the Classics to Nietzsche. He wrote poetry young, showed a knack for self-promotion that bordered on genius, and possessed a voice that must have been hypnotic in person. Physically, he was a diminutive figure who lost his hair early and was not conventionally handsome. None of that slowed him down.

He became probably the biggest shagger of upper-class (and often masculine-looking) women to street prostitutes, that I’ve ever come across in biography. The combination of high art, fastidious clothing sense, smooth words, and relentless approaches did the work. There are darker episodes too, including the rape of a peasant girl. His overriding quest was for historic glory fuelled by art, with complete disregard for money. Guys like this are usually venal and superficial. D’Annunzio wasn’t — or at least not only that.

He showed inarguable qualities: real courage in the early adoption of air battle flying and brutal Alpine ground conflict. He was extraordinarily hard-working. And he was a fabulous “noticer” of everything. Hughes-Hallett captures his eye for detail beautifully — three types of grey (pigeon, sky, and sea), the religious cross-like shadow that early biplanes cast on the ground. These observations are staccato across his writing, words and life.

Lifestyle, Creativity, and Debt

Money was only a means to an end. He was always in debt yet purchased exotic things wildly and spent what he had on absurd luxuries, like up to three or four shirt changes in a day, repeated many times over. A super creative guy — from “sub aqua glass organ” lines to the memorable pet names he gave those who stayed in favour throughout his life. He made notes of everything and anything. That archival instinct must have helped Hughes-Hallett enormously, though it also contributes to the book’s density.



The Book’s Style and a Small Niggle

This is where my only quibble comes in. The book is excellently researched and was uniformly praised for its cut-up non-linear style, probably inspired by Gabriele’s own autobiography. But there was just too much information in places. Tiny repetitions creep in. We’re told d’Annunzio was teetotal, then in one scene he’s drunk on champagne, and later reminded he was abstemious except for champagne (and cocaine, laudanum, etc.). Which is it? The same with the line about one lover, Marchesa Luisa Casati, being “the only woman who could astonish me.” Or the bloated bellies and hooves in the air of dead horses on the battlefield. Or that due to his baldness he no longer needed a brush. Or that his final home, the Vittoriale, was purchased by the state during his life, relieving him of the bills. Or the propaganda leaflets dropped with tiny sandbags from planes. These recursive echoes feel like the author occasionally forgot what she had written earlier. It’s a tiny niggle in an otherwise outstanding work.

Finest Hour: The Fiume Adventure

D’Annunzio’s finest hour — or at least the most theatrical — came after the war. He took over the enclave of Fiume (now Rijeka in Croatia) against the Italian government’s wishes. He hypnotized the half-Italian population into demanding violent autonomy. He pledged never to leave, never to give up, and never to yield. For over a year he delivered speeches, staged rituals, and lived the dream of poetic politics. Then the first Italian Navy missile hit his property, and he was out of there. Gone never to return.

The Bullshitter and the Cost

In the end, d’Annunzio was a bullshitter for me. A spectacularly, gifted, courageous one, but still. His brand of aestheticized militarism and irredentist glory came at the expense of those 650,000 killed and 950,000 wounded. The ordinary stories are the ones I feel for much more, even if they are less interesting to write about than the extraordinary. Gabriele d’Annunzio is very much that — larger than life, contradictory, impossible to look away from.

The Pike does justice to the complexity. It doesn’t flatten him into hero or villain. It shows the man who preached war, noticed the shadows of biplanes like crosses, burned through firewood like a Zulu in the Arctic circle, and helped shape the volatile atmosphere from which fascism would later draw aesthetic fuel. If you have any interest in WWI’s aftermath, Italian history, or the strange intersection of art and politics, this one is worth your time. It’s the kind of book that stays with you.

One of his lines is my new motto - No day of drudgery was ever as fertile for me as a week of laziness.


Monday, 1 June 2026

The Jew of Linz - Kimberley Cornish



I first heard about this book in 1999 through Mark Piper who informed me that Wittgenstein went to the same school as Hitler for a period of time. Wittgenstein was always my favourite philosopher though not so much for his work but for his life which I came to learn about through the book Wittgenstein - The Duty of Genius that my drug dealer and friend of mine who studied Philosophy under Ray Monk (the author of the book) at Southampton University loaned me.


The Jew of Linz digs deep into the astonishing coincidence that Wittgenstein attended the same school as Hitler. The first question it answered for me was how could the son of one of Europe's most fabulously wealthy families attend a school of the middle-class Hitler? The answer is Ludwig's father sent him there and it's obvious to me that it was to toughen him up as he stammered and was homosexual, as were two other of his four brothers, three of whom committed suicide.


Kimberley Cornish's main assertion is that Wittgenstein and Hitler had an interaction that triggered Hitler's quote unquote antisemitism (most Palestinians are Semites, most Jews aren't) despite Hitler also having Jewish blood. Hitler made many references to this unidentified Jewish interaction throughout his life, and I think Cornish proves it. Furthermore, Cornish goes on to make an astonishingly robust claim that Wittgenstein was a Soviet spy recruiter involved with the Cambridge Five.


The book starts off great but then wanders off into a long investigation into the crossover between Hitlerian/Nazi metaphysics and Wittgenstein's Theory of Mind. This is the kind of meaningless philosophy that the controllers have misdirected great minds into and which can be most informed with the simple act of inhaling DMT and which holocaust huffers like Kimberley will never do, demonstrating they're pseudo philosophers who can't explain the dental clinics, maternity wards, theatre and orchestra groups at Auschwitz as well as ignorant of the unity consciousness experience provided by entheogens.


I'm fairly sure there's quite a bit more to the Hitler/Wittgenstein story we're unaware of, but Kimberley has made great strides into the topic. I'm reselling the book on ebay if you want it for a few pounds.


Monday, 13 April 2026

Neo-Catholicism Rising: Observations from a Theology Outsider









Over the past few years, I have watched a Christian revival start to take shape. It has hardened into something specific: Neo-Catholicism, or what I am also calling New Wave Christianity. It is antizionist. It is anti-Scofield Bible. And it is, on its own terms, the most uncompromising version of the faith that Jews and Muslims may not have run into lately.


The central claim is straightforward. Do not kill. Above all, do not kill for group justice or collective payback. Christians are the only Abrahamic tradition that holds every human being has an immortal soul. That single point rules out a lot of the exceptions the other faiths sometimes allow. They are right about the soul. I am not here to mislead anyone on that.


I am an amateur theology student. I have put in the hours on the Abrahamic faiths and a few others. Christianity is the one I know historically the best. Catholic upbringing, no re-conversion. I am not a Christian. I simply stand next to this group as we chime, and because they strike me as solid, committed people.


My own studies keep shifting. Roman Christianity. Origins of the biblical texts. Christological arguments and early heresies. The conversion of European peoples to the faith. Overlaps with the Nag Hammadi library. The Flavian theory on Gospel creation. Yeshua versus the later “Jesus” framing. Right now, I am wrestling with the Ethiopian Bible and what it says about Christian epistemology and knowledge integration. I mine a topic until I get what I came for, then move on.


The podcasters and commentators I pay attention to; Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Baron Coleman, Coach Colin, and maybe a Carrie Prejean Boller? Sit in the top five percent for theological robustness and lived conviction. They are hardcore. They are decent company. We do not waste four or five hours a day on heretic knife fights. That would be pointless. Instead, we talk transnational criminal research, pattern recognition, and the events legacy media ignores.


What stands out is their quiet internal fire. It feels more exploratory, more empathetic, and more righteous than the alternatives I have studied. Tucker calling out Trump for refusing to place his hand on the Bible during the oath. Baron Coleman pressing Andrew Kolvet hard on the timeline and Utah airport details around the Erika Kirk meeting. Candace Owens delivering daily. Carrie Prejean Boller, fresh Catholic convert, getting herself removed from Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission for refusing to treat Zionism as biblical prophecy. These are not poses. They cost something.


I have been anti-Catholic for years because of institutional corruption. What I missed is that Catholicism has always kept a clearer doctrinal line on the Holy Lands and Jerusalem than most Protestant strains—especially the Scofield-influenced evangelical ones. That fact has warmed my view of the Vatican a notch. I still speak to the same God everyone else does without needing the wrapper, but the intellectual consistency is there.


If I ever joined a congregation, it would probably start with a RC church, though I would not limit it. My background does not drive the observation. A Hindu watching the same revival would see the same thing: a current of belief that actually works in practice. I like to duck into a mosque or temple from time to time too.


Arguments for and against Christianity are endless—historical, textual, philosophical. Fine. The power of the lived conviction is harder to wave away. This revival is not nostalgia. It is present-tense, adaptive, and pulling in serious minds who have had enough of the diluted versions.


That is the record. No gloss. Just what I see.



Thursday, 26 March 2026

Midnight Multiplex Morgan Hislop





The destruction of the zionist project was sealed under the Trump presidency.


What a legend.


NCSWIC

Thursday, 13 February 2025

Napoleon - 2023




I don't trust any historical accounts these days. Our timelines have been tampered with and so it's impossible to tell what's been made up, exaggerated or most importantly left out.

I do enjoy some historical topics while I wait for the full truth to be discovered or revealed and so Napoleon is a subject I've researched to some extent. I don't believe the logistical explanation for supplying 6 to 7 hundred thousand troops (Grande Armée) a thousand miles into Russia. I also don't believe that Napoleon was exiled to the island of Elba and then the island of St Helena for the reasons provided by the British. Why would you win a war and then give the vanquished their own island, a navy ship and a staff?

It doesn't make sense that Napoleon 'escaped' back to the French mainland and marched all the way to Paris with a rag tag army and even the logistics involved in that exercise as he had no official authority or state mechanisms to leverage.

This latest movie falls short of conveying Napoleon's full life as it would require a 10-20 part TV miniseries to do it justice but as I have an interest I thought I'd watch this cinematic effort and it jumps about like all earlier attempts. 

The editors keep in a few small movie set accidents. Things falling over, that sort of thing. It doesn't work and it's compounded by factual errors like stating Napoleon was born in 1768 (it was 1769) and that he bombed the largest pyramid in Egypt with cannon fire.

We need a big name actor to put on Napoleon's clothes and Joaquin Phoenix does a good job  with arguably Vanessa Kirby's Josephine Bonaparte as the stand out acting. It's a reasonable movie but I'd forgotten I don't like war scenes in films so I fast forwarded through those but the special effects were novel.

Below is an explanation of the credulity of the wartime logistics. He makes the mistake of undermining the claims but then conflates this with the existence of Napoleon at all which is silly but it's still worth watching.



Wednesday, 12 February 2025

Birmingham Royal Ballet - Cinderellla





I went to see this at Southampton Mayflower Theatre last Saturday. It was exactly what I hoped for, anticipated and expected.


Over the years I've seen ballet productions by Matthew Bourne, English National Ballet, Birmingham Royal Ballet and Opéra de Paris in Beijing.


It was a better seat ticket than usual and the proximity exposed me to mistakes. Did I see those mistakes before? No. Was it still one of the best ballet productions I ever seen? Absolutely.


The opening scenery was sophisticated as I've come to expect yet subsequent scenes were absolutely minimal and cosmic themed at the end. The music for Cinderella is Prokofiev, it's the best score I've yet listened to. The dance ensembles were dazzling as were those very costumes. The lead female (Cinderella), Miki Mizutani is the essence of the role, in such a manner that I marvel how a Japanese girl can live on the other side of the world and play a very European part with such perfection - for me at least.

Special shout out to the pantomime ballet of the wicked stepsisters played by Eilis Small and Reina Fuchigami. Ms Small was very attractive from the get go despite playing a difficult lanky role of clumsy yet complimentary to the overall ensemble. I felt a connection with her that lasted longer than usual. Ms Reina Fuchigami played the plump sister and was in the top three dancers in the production. Again, clumsy but poetic is a difficult act to pull off yet both sisters do exactly that.


What have I missed. Serendipity. The seat to my left was occupied by the best conversationalist I've encountered in years. She was about 70 to 80ish and I would have spent the next 24 hours with her if not longer.




Monday, 16 December 2024

Candace Owens & Explosive Truths



Candace Owens has been dropping Napalm on Israel, Zionism and Jews who support Israel and Zionism all this year. It's been quite a phenomenon to observe as she takes her Catholicism seriously and researches her subjects well before giving them massively wider publicity than the secrecy and censorship they've long been protected by.


I was going to publish her findings about the Sabbatean Frankists (Jewish Satanists) a few months ago, but held off and I'm glad I did. Her recent expose of the Israeli attempt to sink the USS Liberty has garnered over 4 million views on Youtube and many more on X.


That information has long been published on this blog since 2013, but it's Candace who has cracked the silence on this disgusting and heart wrenching attack on innocent US sailors leading to 34 deaths and a 171 injured.


I'll drop some more Candace video clips below to provide a fuller picture of what she has been exposing this year like no other has done in history on this deeply protected subject.












The Jewish holocaust is the most historically riddled with embellishments, lies, inflation and maudling obnoxiously ridiculous narratives. That doesn't mean Jews didn't die in WWII but the cartoon served up as official narrative is in it's twilight months, and the truth is more complex, more manipulated and more leveraged than the reality which is disgusting enough as are any wars often driven by Zionism.


The people who sided up with Zionism and doctrinaire Israeli history are weak. They may appear powerful but those days are evaporating and a lot of weak sycophantic people including A list media personalities and Academia and so forth are going to be judged on their support for the most reprehensible synthetic history ever.

Wednesday, 11 December 2024

Brandon Martinez Perspectives








I wonder; I just wonder if Brandon Martinez is acquainted with the Q material and specifically the Eleven references in 4500 drops (or so) to Adolf Hitler? 


Specifically Q Drop 928 Mar 2018 - 4.35.34 PM EST




We adapt to new and credible information when and if it presents itself.



Lamentably Mr Martinez resorts to ad homs and thus logical fallacies including argumentum ad lapidem or appeal to the stone. He name checks the yeti-believers and flerfers.



I have a much more nuanced working-theory than flatted earth. I call it the infinite plane hypothesis. Infinite past, infinite future and infinite space. Thus infinite plane.




Any information that refutes it through contention will require a better theory, though a new hypothesis is just as, if not more useful.