It's inevitable that people who are beginning to learn the basics about controlled opposition, are still massively vulnerable to the Sons of Light vs Sons of Darkness dialectic. No it's not controlled opposition. It's infinitely more subtle and bloodlines get to play different sides of the role-playing through the generations.
Alex Jones and I, as well as Elon agree on far more than any normie is willing to say publicly. However both push the fossil fuel fakery and climate scam as well as technocracy. I listened yesterday to Alex proselytise how he's 'read all the science' on transhumanism and it's all good for humans.
Alex. STFU. You don't know what an isotope is and you're on Elon's dime now ya meathead. Also listen to the video embed above for a 180 degree turn and then below.
The people playing or acting out the role of the good guys so far are Elon, Tuckz, Alex Jones, Vivek Ramaswamy, Joe Rogan, Andrew Tate and Russell Brand who may be the first to play both roles - Ask him about climate change. I will add more as time goes on but the one way to identify them and others is they have to peddle the fossil fuel fakery and net zero climate scam as well as transhumanism (Neuralink)
Here is Jones saying the opposite of the above and spewing obnoxious lies and hate speech.. Israel did 911. Alex knows that and can now not say it which is lamentable at best.
You won't want to miss this one. You might wanna share it too if like me you can't stop cracking up when Russell slips into American accent mode. I tried to track it down and ended up on nasal plosion videos.
It's a thing and it's exploding all over the flat earth web. I can't stop sploding either hah 🤣
The official story that Theodor Herzl instigated the Zionist movement is demolished by this 1829 newspaper report. The question that stands out here is how did the Rothschild know that strategically, Israel's presence in the Middle East would be crucial to control the world's oil supplies? That wasn't known until 1908 at the very earliest, and suggests that once again we are manipulated by banking bloodlines that plan hundred(s) of years in advance and have access to information that leading scientists of the day did not know.
America and the UK invade or bomb countries that no longer want to take their printed money scam or, as with Syria use proxy forces to soften up the road to Tehran. This means London, Washington and Israel have to side with the Sunni Petro-monarchies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar who despite being brutal dictatorships quite like the idea of having regional hegemonic control of the middle East through the Muslim Brotherhood who will be the technocrat leaders of these 12th century beheaders. They will not let the Muslim Brotherhood inside their own countries of course.
Do not trust a single thing your corporate media with the their commercial breaks have to say. Not a single word is pure.
You might think your iPhone means you're a world away from all this but all this pays for your iPhone lifestyle. It is not real. Are you not real?
It's brilliant how the corporate media keep the Brits focused on Celebrity nipple and mandatory sports in every constructed news broadcast. Qatar had some redeeming qualities compared to our usual oil allies the beheading Sharia state of Saudi but they are all so pimped by the media so you need me to keep you posted on how Qatar controls the opinions of the dozy Brits.
I finally caught up with David Lean's Lawrence of Arabia recently and enjoyed it for reasons no critic could ever have prepared me for. Geopolitically it's one of the most candid movies I can think of.
It couldn't be made in these times as the Pentagon and CIA are gatekeepers of big budget movies. Put simply nothing goes out without approval. The last thing our owners want is a Hollywood Blockbuster about ordinary people gathering to protest against their government.
Instead we get fed our lines to keep saluting the military.
The film is the only one I can think of that is even-handed in presenting the venality of the British Empire handing over to the US Empire. Films or Books are usually biased to one or the other but to acknowledge both sides of the Atlantic are built on other peoples suffering and other countries' resources is highly unusual.
At one point an American newsman explains his OSS role in drumming up American public interest in the Saudi Peninsula so that oil and the necessary wars for them can be sold. It's so blunt it makes the Syriana movie script look like a CIA appeaser.
Hold on to that thought though because it's our CIA buddies who torture, execute, kidnap and run the backbone of global drug trafficking while dividing countries by any means available including terrorism or using paedophile network blackmail.
Not many people know that MI6 trained ex-OSS agents moving to the newly formed CIA in 1947 and even less people realise its significance.
Why would London do that given the US Government's geopolitical strategic loyalty is clear from the Suez Crisis?
Why would the grand masters of the British Empire dirty tricks department give the secret sauce recipe away when it took centuries to acquire?
This movie does nothing to dispel the simplest yet most heretical answer to that question. It serves up a slice of history in the most important spot on the planet while ostensibly an Empire was handed over.
An excellent explanation of the petrodollar, and I even finally grasped what Nixon did in 73 when limiting the convertibility of the dollar currency and getting off the gold standard.
Recently I've taken to using art as a tool for the manifestation of the collective unconscious in a Jungian sense, and so as Moby Dick has been prodding me for over a year now since Hong Kong, for reasons I couldn't quite fathom, I set up an RSS feed and curated a mood stream of every new piece of original art being shared with the world on the topic, and supplemented that with bits of data plumbing Jedi Knightery, to see if I can compile an emerging narrative.
The learning so far is unsettling and an anomaly in expressionistic terms when looking back at history. It seems one of the key themes is not just the death of Captain Ahab and crew, but the death of Whales. Spooky whales levitating above the sea as if drawn in a state of mourning; lamenting the transit to a marine afterlife.
And then I awoke up from a nap just now, and for the umpteenth time was reminded of the book by The Guardian who week in and week out out are echoing the questionably tinnitus driven peals, ringing in my head and then out of nowhere, I realised the part of Moby Dick I had been so eager to share when reading this unusually off-topic novel for me that I find hard to follow. I overcame the age and relative formality of its language through the time tested clamour of Bangkok Go-Go bars. I find the neon, noise and nubility more soothing than when left a difficult text, alone in the distracting silence of home.
In any case, I meant to write how extraordinary it was learning of the whaling business in its heyday with respect to being the precursor for the entire edifice of imminent planetary industrialisation. That is to say, built upon the global scale of a wind powered floating business, in singular pursuit of yet another of natures exclusive and historically irreplaceable organic yields. If asked it is for this reason I argue leaving the oil in the ground instead of fuelling jet engines in the air for an economy levitating on the hologram of endless financial growth. What if say quantum entangled oil is the spice melange of a future interstellar life? To me, the what-ifs are a full nelson on the what-the-fucks line of reason.
I'll leave you with Melville's passage that left a slow burning mark upon me with a lesson on gateway drugs of the monkeys (homo consumericus) obsession with whale oil that was only displaced when the black stuff leaking from the ground, looked like it had something going for it.
Why did the Dutch in De Witt's time have admirals of their whaling fleets? Why did Louis XVI of France, at his own personal expense, fit out whaling ships from Dunkirk, and politely invite to that town some score or two of families from our own island of Nantucket? Why did Britain between the years 1750 and 1788 pay to her whalemen in bounties upwards of L1,000,000? And lastly, how comes it that we whalemen of America now outnumber all the rest of the banded whalemen in the world; sail a navy of upwards of seven hundred vessels; manned by eighteen thousand men; yearly consuming 4,000,000 of dollars; the ships worth, at the time of sailing, $20,000,000! and every year importing into our harbors a well reaped harvest of $7,000,000. How comes all this, if there be not something puissant in whaling?
Go on. I dare you to look at it. RAF Marham should be closed down when these pilots answer charges of war crimes and genocide.
Update: I subsequently learned that the dog pilot propaganda imagery is a Dambusters nostalgia trigger using of all things a dog called nigger. This will excite the 'good job' demographic even more. All we need now is a Red Arrows flyby and the next military hardware bill will be rubber stamped for national security reasons and paid by the unwitting British people who think killing machines are normal. They're not and I see a world where we don't need to fawn over the ceremonial death of others. It's inhuman to do so.
Update: 24/08/22 - I told you the Red Arrows were toxic. It's like flag wanks. The people who love to sanitize war because they're cowards are the first to swoon over a flyby of genociders and, well read it for yourself.
For the naive the current fossil fuel-oil energy policy is a psychotic earth raping corporate gravy-train that free energy will break the back of. That's a security risk to backbone-infrastructure business of the U.S. perpetual war, central banking model. It's not called big oil for nothing and like Randy says. Big dogs are kept unusually well fed.
The NSA are saying Anonymous will bring down the power grid. Well if it does go down I say it's the NSA and their spook chums who have the most to benefit. How many pig-trough government salaries and pensions on your tab are you paying for on 9800 Savage Road, Fort Meade, Maryland, 20755? Here's the bit above ground that we can see.
Here's NSA chief lizard General Keith B. Alexander doing one of those scary smiles reptilians have trouble imitating us humans. We're naturals. They aint.
Events over the last several days reveal that the United States and Israel plan to conduct a false flag terror event to be blamed on Iran. The event will likely occur within the next six months and will result in an attack on Iran prior to the November election.
Obama’s intelligence chief, James Clapper (center), warned of Iranian terror attacks inside the United States.
Intelligence in U.S. and Israel Warn of Domestic Terror Attack
Officialdom in the United States and Israel have issued a warning about an Iranian “threat stream” against Israeli “soft targets” in America.
The warning arrives several days after Obama’s intelligence boss James Clapper said Iran may strike inside the United States,
“We predict that the threat on our sites around the world will increase… on both our guarded sites and ‘soft’ sites,” states a letter sent out by the head of security for the Israeli Consul General for the Mid-Atlantic States.
Guarded sites are Israeli government facilities like embassies while soft sites are Jewish synagogues, schools, and community centers.
Yoram Cohen, the head of Israel’s security service Shin Bet, said recently that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will attack Israeli and Jewish targets abroad in response to the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists.
In January it was reported Mossad was behind the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan.
“The thwarted assassination plot of a Saudi official in Washington, D.C., a couple of months ago was an important data point,” a nameless official told ABC News, “in that it showed at least parts of the Iranian establishment were aware of the intended event and were not concerned about inevitable collateral damage to U.S. citizens had they carried out an assassination plot on American soil.”
Cohen linked the alleged threat to the discredited plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in October.
A court document in the case revealed that the FBI and the DEA concocted the plot as a sting operation and used failed used car salesman and alcoholic Mansour Arbabsiar as a patsy. Arbabsiar, who is from Iran, thought he was participating in a drug deal.
Despite the fallacious nature of the plot, intelligence officials used it to hype the specter of Iranian terrorism that will likely result in a false flag operation used as a pretext to invade Iran.
“In the past few weeks, there has been an escalation in threats against Israeli and Jewish targets around the world,” an intelligence document cited by ABC News states. It warns that demonstrations against Israel “could potentially turn violent at local synagogues, restaurants, the Israeli Embassy and other Israeli sites.”
The Israeli bulletin also provides an excuse for the TSA to step-up intrusive pat-downs and demand travelers be subjected to dangerous naked body scanners at airports across the United States.
“According to our evaluation there is a possibility that the forged passports will be used in order to pass as Israeli citizens at the security checks in Israel and around the world.
Israeli security authorities may consider an Israeli citizenship as a [criterion] to proceed with a more lenient security check in secure sites such as airports, etc.,” the bulletin explains.
The latest warning arrives two weeks after the Turkish newspaper Zaman reported that a cell of the Quds Unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard planned to attack U.S. embassy in Ankara and other targets across Turkey.
Fast Moving Timeline for War
The latest development follows a number of events over the past few weeks that point toward a concerted attack by Israel and then the United States on Iran:
• DEBKAfile reported earlier in the week that the United States will have 100,000 troops in the region by March. “Pentagon has been quietly massing troops and armaments on two islands located just south of the Strait of Hormuz, and within easy striking distance of Iran,” Mac Slavo wrote on January 31.
• On Friday, the establishment media reported that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said “there is a strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June,” according to the Washington Post. The timeline is predicated on Iran entering an Israeli contrived “zone of immunity” in its unsubstantiated effort to build a nuclear bomb.
Iran has issued a number of threats in response to punitive oil and economic sanctions devised by the United States and Europe. On Friday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a nationally televised speech that his country will retaliate if Western nations impose crippling oil sanctions. In January, in response to European Union foreign ministers deciding to impose an oil embargo on the country, Iran vowed to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
• Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Martin Dempsey admitted on January 9 that Iran has the ability to close off the strategic shipping lane linking the Gulf of Oman with the Persian Gulf. He said doing so would constitute a “red line.”
• In December, in response to Sec. Def. Panetta’s not ruling out an attack, Iranannounced it would hold a military exercise in the Persian Gulf. The 10 day exercise, dubbed “Velayat-e 90,” demonstrated that Iran has the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. further exacerbated the situation by sending the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis through the Strait of Hormuz while Iran was conducting its war game.
• Russia and China have indicated that an attack on Iran would constitute an attack on their national security. “Iran is our close neighbor, just south of the Caucasus.Should anything happen to Iran, should Iran get drawn into any political or military hardships, this will be a direct threat to our national security,” said Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s deputy prime minister and former envoy to NATO, in mid-January.
War President: Re-electing Obama
In November, DEBKAfile said Obama will use war as a re-election tool. “President Barack Obama went on line to America’s senior allies, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Israel and Saudi Arabia, with notice of his plan to attack Iran no later than September-October 2012 – unless Tehran halted its nuclear weaponization programs,” the neocon-connected subscriber-only publication predicted.
“Obama’s announcement was not perceived as a general directive to US allies, but a guideline to blow the dust off the contingency plans for a strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities which stayed locked in bottom drawers for three years,” states the report, adding that “Obama’s announcement spurred Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Israel into girding their navies, air forces, ballistic units and anti-missile defense systems for the challenges ahead.”
Britain’s foreign secretary William Hague said in January his country has not ruled out military action against Iran. Britain had dispatched its “most formidable warship HMS Daring” to the Persian Gulf region prior to Hague’s remarks.
In 2010, as Obama’s job rating began its descent into the abyss, former Clintonite and Democrat operative Mark Penn said Obama needs a domestic terror attack to regain his popularity. In July of that year, another former Clintonite, Robert Shapiro, said the only thing can preserve the Obama presidency is war.
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, writing for the Financial Times. “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
The late Washington Post columnist David Broder was more succinct. “With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran’s ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs.
This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve,” he wrote in late 2010.
Tensions will undoubtedly rise if there is a terror attack inside the United States, either against an Israeli target or American one.
It would provide an airtight excuse to unleash the awesome power of the U.S. military against Iran and cast Obama in the adulatory light all “war presidents” receive as the masses fall in line and wave their flags and cheer on “our boys” as they decimate another country and engage in yet another bloody massacre of innocents.
Once again the spineless Pentagon (and cowardly Ministry of Defence) are unable to stand up for the difference between right and wrong. They are a charade of the public relations talk for military which is always blah blah honour blah courage blah blah troops when the reality is they stand for nothing. Small boy psychopaths in fetish uniforms with guns taking it out on innocents in countries they shouldn't be in for countries that want to steal oil and resources.
There are only a handful of true patriots in the British political system. A smattering of voices who stand up and are counted while the population drives to work in blood oil and consumes itself silly at the expense of other parts of the world. George Galloway was smeared by the press as he stood up to a U.S. Congressional Committee regarding the invasion of Iraq. Well we all know he was right now but mainstream media isn't obliged to apologise because it does what it is told. George is no longer a voice in politics but he is a political voice and you ignore the uncomfortable truth at your own peril. More later after I've listened to them and parsed the marmalade for you. So to speak.
I realise it should be a NATO's flag dripping in oil above but the Pentagon is the boss, and this video interview is still remarkable for its candid nature. There's no mention of the Libyan wish to be paid in cash instead of worthless dollars that led to the West attacking Libya but Gaddafi makes his point very well. Libya is a very sweet piece of cake he says, and so let's be just as candid. The West has a very sweet tooth, and as can be seen in this interview, we're prepared to work with Islamic extremists to avoid going cold turkey.
The Iran/Iraq war was ugly. It was like World War One multiplied twice but with kids involved as the Iranians sent 'martyr children' to trigger and blow up the land mines first so their army could follow after.
At this point the Pentagon cut one of their famous two-faced double-dealing sneaky-fuck top-secret snake-oil-salesman hush-hush deals called the Iran Contra affair where they supplied arms to Iran and used the undeclarable profits to fund another war in South America with the democratically elected Nicaraguan government. This is pretty much how the CIA runs its terrorist operation globally.
Then when the Iran/Iraq war was over the corporations connected to the Pentagon had made a shed load of money to cause more mayhem and invest in bigger and better arms research and development. The Pentagon was ecstatic, the U.S. loved Ronnie Reagan more than any other president, Bush the ex head of the CIA was waiting in the wings, and everybody was pleased. Really really happy. It was like a fairy tale.
Iraq however was broke and asked for time to pay back its loans. This was the chance Kuwait had been waiting for since Mesopotamia fell in 1932. It fucked over Iraq by lowering the price of oil worldwide making it impossible for Iraq to pay back its loans. Furthermore, in a hostile and provocative manner, Kuwait was sending out it's drill pipes diagonally into Iraq land and stealing Iraqi oil.
Iraq then invaded Kuwait and the U.S. came to Kuwait and said if we help, you need to pay us back with your oil.
Cut to today and it's Iranian oil that corporate America wants. Fortunately the biggest bully in the area is Israel which has 300 nuclear weapons to pick a fight it can't lose and not only that but they run U.S. politics with campaign contributions to AIPAC and four media conglomerates dominate the media landscape and can invent any reality they want to justify a war that pays back big dividends to everyone.
The largest media conglomerate though is Disney and as you've got the picture now about who creates the Mickey Mouse wars I'll just remind you of the Disney strap line.
As far as I can see people are behaving as if their Jewish neighbours are being rounded up to the concentration camps and only a few have got the bottle to say anything in case it interferes with their salaries or career plans.
Let's be candid, those careers don't exist if you keep quiet. Speak up. It's about the difference between right and wrong.
Update: Here is Chomsky saying exactly what I am. This is not a surprise as he taught me how much the corporate for profit media repeats the governments lies.
Excellent Christmas cheer video round up on the flashpoints that the corporate media are not reporting accurately by Global Research TV. I don't agree with all their assessments, all of the time, but the service they provide means I'm covered on what's important around the world without a corporation's vested interested in the military industrial complex's skewering the truth like a freshly skinned deer over an Appalachian mountain barbecue fire.
I'm not into war porn but the photo above is easy to overlook that there's a tank rolling out of the smaller helicopter if you take a closer look. The defence Archons have fleeced us in order to keep themselves in toys that ultimately don't mean anything when tactical nuclear warheads start to take out key strategic points. The Straits of Hormuz is the one that matters most to the West and frankly I'll be raising a glass if Iran sever that arterial corridor of the Western banking/war model for beggar thy neighbour.
Taking a metaphysical look at the satellite map the decline of the masculine archetype and the emergence of the feminine bodes well in terms of geographic gender symbolism. See for yourself. It's only a fifth of the world's oil supply that flows through the couple of kilometres below that is deep enough for an oil tanker to crawl through.
Couple of nuclear tipped suicide speedboats would take care of that.
Deek covers the Gadaffi lynching in a couple of darkly satirical minutes. Our glorious allies have put his body on display inside a freezer stationed in a Shopping Mall. Starbucks while you fill up your car love?
It's easy to dismiss the Nobel peace prize awarded to Tawakul Karman (and Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee) as unconnected to the X Factor and TV dinner lives of the West but this year is a great example of an activist in a part of the world, that along with Bahrain and Syria is buried under a daily dishing of brutality that exists in large part to pipe the oil into the West's vehicles.
Everything is connected. Listen to her. There's no daylight between her and say the words of John Lennon or any of the other greats that invariably the system seems to find a way to place a bullet in.
