The Zapruder Movie Hoax

Who Was Abraham Zapruder?

Abraham Zapruder was conveniently positioned to film the murder of JFK and was a CIA linked Zionist. The film he made wasn't shared with the public until 12 years later. Abraham Zapruder was connected to George De Mohrenschildt. He was also a 32nd Degree Mason too.

Where Was The Movie Stored?

The Zapruder movie was kept by Time LIFE magazine, a well known CIA propaganda front run by Henry Luce. Henry Luce was a CIA insider and Yale Skull & Bones member like George Bush, who was also in Dallas that day, although he cannot remember what he was doing. 

JFK also fired CIA Director Alan Dulles who was placed on the rigged Warren Commission that was set up to only examine evidence pointing towards the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald killing JFK.

How Was The Movie Tampered With?

Four sequences were removed. The film removes the scenes of JFK's car turning into Elm Street, The Limo turning wide, The car stopping for two seconds and Two shots while the limo is stationary. The film was also tampered with using a technique called aerial imaging photography.

Why Does It Matter?

The same people who made a public display of executing Kennedy to warn future presidents who is really in charge, are the same people (and their offspring, successors and bloodlines) in charge today. They also silenced the media over the Israeli bombing of the USS Liberty, sold the Korean and Vietnam wars, dragged us into the Iraq war, and now want to go to war with Iran and Syria.

What Were The Top Two Threats By Kennedy To The Power Elite?

1. Kennedy wanted to stop Israel developing nuclear weapons through stealing secrets and plutonium from the United States. The Middle East has been in conflict ever since.
2. Kennedy wanted to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, after he realised it was really a shadow government crime-syndicate that had lied to him over Cuba and the Bay of Pigs.

Anybody Else Upset With Kennedy?

Sure. 

JFK wanted the oil depletion allowance (tax breaks) for Dallas oil men to be removed and used to invest in the American people not rich thieves. Bobby Kennedy as Attorney General was cracking down on the Mafia and the Mob, The Vice President LBJ came from Texas, hated Kennedy and wanted to be President. His own mistress admitted he knew beforehand, The Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon were furious with Kennedy for not starting a nuclear war with the USSR, which was of no danger to the US. General Curtis LeMay chewed a cigar and enjoyed Kennedy's entire autopsy from the viewing room.

All of these parties assisted in the public execution of JFK. The media aren't allowed to discuss it. 

Fortunately the internet is getting smarter by the day.

Update: I did hear some testimony that Abraham Zapruder is just a cut out and that the real film was taken by some other CIA assets.

Sex Slaves, Body Parts & Human Sacrifice - The Life Cycle of CIA Child Trafficking

Ted Gunderson ran the FBI in Los Angeles. Even with his credentials he couldn't jail the ring leaders of ritual child sex abuse with links to the CIA and all the way up to the Oval Office in the Whitehouse.

Ted was hired by John Edgar Hoover and was loyal to him so I think we can believe his testimony that he interviewed LBJ"s mistress who told him that LBJ informed her JFK "wont be a problem tomorrow" the day before he was assassinated. This isn't new because we know LBJ is responsible for assisting President Kennedy's murder but is unlikely to be the mastermind. What is new is that LBJ's girlfriend told Ted Gunderson that J Edgar Hoover was present at that meeting.

We now know Lee Harvey Oswald was on the FBI's books and likely spying on the CIA for Hoover. When the CIA found this out they set him up to be the patsy for JFK's murder. This means Hoover was playing a very ambiguous game in the JFK murder where he hoped to finger Alan Dulles who was running the CIA, and gain even more powers.

At the end of the day we still don't know for certain who initiated killing JFK but what should be apparent to the researcher of corruption is that our elites are rotten to the core. 

Don't trust them.

LBJ's Mistress on Lyndon's Involvement in JFK's Assasination



After my earlier post about Jackie Kennedy's recording that LBJ was responsible for Kennedy's assassination I was tipped off about this interview with LBJ's mistress. It's an extraordinary portrait of venal power in Texas confirming that LBJ planned Kennedy's death from day one and extended the Vietnam War to keep his Texan friends at Brown & Root flowing in cash. Today they are known as Haliburton. I feel I live in a parallel universe that a major media player still doesn't set the record straight and that so few are disturbed by this. 

How can the planet move on if we don't address that the top layer of elite power and influence are rotten to the core?

Update: LBJ assisted in JFK's murder but was not the mastermind. There may well have been a consortium but somebody must have put the idea forward first.

Update Two - The video has been removed from the internet. I will try to seek another one out as it is so convincing and is important first hand evidence.

Update Three - I've found one for the time being. Watch it while it's still online.

LBJ Orchestrated Kennedy's Killing

Jackie Onassis made tape recordings that are about to be released. She believed LBJ was responsible for her husband's murder. This is the same conclusion I reached a while back. Working on a conspiracy 'theory' floating around the internet I researched the telephone conversations between LBJ and Hoover at the FBI and came across a surreal moment.

They're both playing to the crowd in this recording as they were prolific at bugging their friends and enemies. Noticeable is how obsequious Hoover is to LBJ but at some point in these two recordings LBJ is asked if he want's to have a bullet proof limousine from now on and he asks Hoover in Kabuki theatre fashion 'do you think I need one'. Hoover responds in the affirmative. 

It's just one contrived line too far for me.

I read LBJ's famous Caro Trilogy book 'The Path To Power' and concluded there was never a more venal President than LBJ. Even as a young boy he would use any means to secure a victory and, when all else failed, he broke down and pleaded victim to bullying despite being a bully himself. The death of Kennedy was a coup d'etat and it has always staggered me that supposedly intelligent people would read the Warren Report when like the 911 Commission it is a work of fiction and camouflage.

Already the word conspiracy is beginning to mean anything that the official power players disagree with and they have their tunnel-vision footsoldiers blindly following the media's direction, unable to think for themselves. I put it to you that we are living in the time of revelations, and that as the meaning of apocalypse is 'the unveiling' we are also living in apocalyptic times. It started with Wikileaks, is currently bringing down Murdoch and now further distorted history is in for a seismic rewiring unprecedented since the Spanish conquistadors following the Vatican's orders trashed every piece of Mayan information they could unless it was valuable enough and portable enough to be shipped back to Rome where it now lies under lock and key for a little while longer till the Papacy crumbles.

Above is the deeply inappropriate wink by Texan Senator Albert Thomas to LBJ as he is sworn in to office standing next to the tragic grieving widow Jackie Onassis. LBJ paid his debt to power by cranking up the Vietnam conflict with the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident and later mysteriously withdrew from re-election to the highest office when presumably his use to the string pulling elites who really run Washington D.C. was no longer necessary. 

It was LBJ, the oily Texan who requested Kennedy's campaigning presence in his state where JFK was assassinated. I don't believe he was the one who decided that the President of the United States needed to be killed. He was just an opportunist with sufficient influence to facilitate the matter.

Ernest Bevin

I'm reading Alan Bullocks' Ernest Bevin at the moment. It's certainly the most comprehensive biography on Ernie Bevin, but its in some ways a disappointing book. So far I've read one sentence on his marriage and one on his daughter after 300 pages, which is a poor show. We're all a product of the people around us, and I feel that his depth has been stripped by focusing on Bevin's ascent from Trades Union Leader to Minister of Labour, by Churchill's invitation in the coalition government during the second world war. No, its not a great political history book and frankly the British never do quite get it right when trying to paint a picture of our politicians. Its generally either overblown puff pieces or pedestrian led tours of duty-to-detail like the late Roy Jenkins biography on Churchill.

Our cousins in the United States however seem to excel in this department. Maybe its because they have a bigger stage like say in Caro's biographical trilogy of LBJ or for a real left field choice, Edmund Morris' biography on Reagan: 'Dutch'. But for the real master of writing history there probably is no greater insight into power corruption and lies, than by writing your own history, as Kissinger memorably did with his autobiographical trilogy, peaking in the craft of non fiction writing with his second book (for his doctoral dissertation) 'Years of Upheaval' which saw shuttle diplomacy invented, not to mention Vietnam, oil shocks and China to mention a few.

That isn't to say the Bevin biography doesn't shine in parts. In the passage below, we find that he is under pressure in the artificial (for him) habitat as a socialist minister in the house of commons, with criticism all round when the Conservative Churchill steps up and soaks up the punishment in his defence from his own 'side' so to speak.

"To abuse the minister of Labour. He is a working man, a trade union leader. He is taunted with being an unskilled labourer representing an unskilled union. I daresay he gives offence in some quarters; he has his own methods of speech and action. He has a frightful load to carry; he has a job to do which none would envy. He makes mistakes, like I do, though not so many or so serious - he has not got the same opportunities. At any rate he is producing, at this moment, though perhaps on rather expensive terms, a vast and steady volume of faithful effort, the like of which has not been seen before. And if you tell me that the results he produces do not compare with those of totalitarian systems of government and society, I reply by saying 'We shall know more about that when we get to the end of the story'

Time and again Bevin struggles to persuade people that the British worker is motivated most when free to choose their own destiny and less commited when compelled. Only Bevin understood this and fought tooth and nail to gain their permission for anything he subsequently requested from them. This is a logic that totalitarianism never grasps.