The Exploding Microphone: What Really Happened to Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk was assassinated by an exploding microphone attached to his t shirt. Slow-motion analysis of event footage shows the white T-shirt billowing outward from the chest area around the Lavalier mic first, followed by the upward blood spray and neck disruption, with no visible external bullet entry hole or inward impact on the fabric. The motion matches an internal pressure event from a small shaped charge rather than a high-velocity rifle round striking from outside.

One of the very few manufacturers capable of producing such a miniature specialist explosive — Accurate Energetic Systems (AES) in Tennessee — received the only order of its kind in 2025 for this device. On April 22, 2025, the Department of Defense (via NSWC Crane Division) awarded contract N0016425PJ538 valued at $440,494 for “MINIATURIZED-XS DEMOLITION CHARGES AND DEMOLITION CHARGES, ANTI PERSONNEL-XS TO SUPPORT SPM.” These were compact, plastic-bonded, precision anti-personnel charges designed for special-purpose munitions — small enough to fit concealed applications and manipulatable during assembly.

When the AES plant exploded on October 10, 2025 — killing 16 workers and destroying Building 602 — researchers dug into the company’s public order records and discovered this specific miniaturized anti-personnel contract. The timing (one month after Kirk’s death on September 10, 2025) and the plant’s role as a key supplier of exactly the type of device described in the theory strongly suggest a cover-up to eliminate traceable provenance of the explosive used in the assassination.

In a recent podcast episode, Baron Coleman compiled dozens of early witness reports showing that many people at the UVU event described the sound as a firework, pop, or cracker rather than a loud rifle gunshot. Witnesses near the stage reported it sounding like “a firecracker” or “not very loud,” with initial confusion instead of immediate recognition of a high-powered shot. Media coverage and statements from selected TPUSA members and affiliates quickly reframed the narrative around a “gunshot” from a rooftop sniper, overriding the raw on-the-ground consensus and steering attention away from any closer explosive source. Click on the image for Baron's extraordinary Youtube presentation.

Coroner and forensic reports now show that the fragment recovered at autopsy did not match the .30-06 Mauser rifle allegedly used by the accused suspect. ATF ballistics analysis returned inconclusive results on linking the fragment to the weapon, consistent with it not originating from that rifle at all and supporting the possibility of an explosive fragment rather than a conventional bullet.

The combination of video evidence, the unique military contract, the post-assassination factory destruction, the witness sound descriptions, and the ballistics mismatch paints a clear picture. Charlie Kirk’s death was not the result of a lone distant sniper, but a precisely engineered close-range device concealed in his microphone by his israeli security team and with the knowledge of senior TPUSA staff.

All of this is the work of others. I've just collated and made it succinct with AI. Normally an article like this would take a few hours for me but with AI it's an hour or so which is liberating and makes writing fun again.

Save Gonzalo Lira?

I'm not concerned by his silence. 

I'm worried. 

Make your own mind up.

Update: Gonzalo Lira was arrested by the Ukrainian SBU and all his electronics were confiscated and instructed to keep quiet about internal affairs so he had no way of reaching the outside world.

He did get some tweets out and they were imo quite ungrateful for the concern expressed for him.

Update: 10.05.22

It seems he can vlog again from Kharkov which suggests to me he's cooperating with the SBU? He hasn't got a choice but he seems to be enjoying his current role.

Update: September, 2023 - Lira was arrested and detained again while trying to make a break for the Hungarian border.

Playtime

dreadedgmom

A post on Ian Tait's - Crackunit about the quality of YouTube commenting and community led me to do a bit of exploring. I discovered the 'Community Channel' Vlog by Natalie. She is an Australian born Vietnamese Asian, who at first glance comes across unfairly, as yet another vacuous and self indulgent net teen exploiting her natural good looks with a veneer of digital literacy disguised as drama talent vlogging. You'd be mistaken. Her video clips are wildly popular in the main because she is such a babe, but underneath it all there's a charming tenacity on her part to make engaging YouTube clips that often have a role playing make-believe narrative.

Natalie's videos generate mini waves of video responses from people like Van Awesome below that I particularly like, but what is remarkable for those video responses is that while in the main they are pedestrian (they're not meant to be Hollywood) there are flashes of rather good knowing film nods and techniques not to mention great humour. They're not consistently brilliant nor are they meant to be, but this is the future of community video entertainment and I can see no reason why Tim Tams haven't gone out of their way to offer Natalie a sponsorship collaborative deal, or indeed why a youthful brand isn't fostering the right environment where people like Natalie and Van Awesome can do stuff that keeps us coming back more often. Regrettably, I can just imagine that if they did, a monolithic and data driven marketing department wouldn't know how to handle a personality that is all about experimentation, making mistakes and sometimes mediocre musings on life with occasional flashes of delightful brilliance. MTV is surely missing a trick and so are a bunch of others. Snack brands seem ideal to me for this kind of bite sized entertainment format and shouldn't be an excuse for as Nigel Hollis writes, new media making old mistakes.

I guess the question is not so much 'is it good?', but instead, is it better. It seems that compared to other forms of entertainment and for up to 400 000 people who have watched Natalie's most popular clip, the answer is most definitely yes. Here's a video response to her work which has plenty of links for Natalie's own work. She may not be brilliant yet but I'll put money on it that she will be in the future. This is just the testing ground.