The evidence for a false flag/inside job isn't suspicious. It's overwhelming. John Judge takes a different approach by asking the questions the 9/11 commission report couldn't because the investigators are separated from the report writers (a very effective component of a cover-up). He calls it the 9/11 Omission report. There's a lot of interesting analysis that I've never come across before and I feel the compassionate observer of the human condition is obliged to spend time with this kind of information if the government's story is the narrative you've chosen to believe.
John Judge also mentions that CIA/DIA conflict that comes up time and again for me when people choose to parrot the line that Assange and Wikileaks are disinformation. That simply isn't the case.
